臺灣政府宣示2019年為臺灣地方創生元年，為因應城鄉發展不均的問題，推動地方創生之策略以「設計翻轉，地方創生」為目標，希冀創造產業興起、增加地方就業機會、改變人口流向，以復甦地方活力，借鏡日本地方創生之作法與成功案例。然而臺灣在地方創生的發展上尚待經時間驗證成效，但臺灣地方上的發展推動已行之有年且可歸納整理出地方創生的精神概念。本研究將以「土溝農村」為本研究個案，透過「服務主導邏輯」、「資源拼湊」兩種理論觀點切入來探討發展地方創生的脈絡，去分析土溝農村從過去無人聽聞的貧脊村落，到發展地方爭相造訪觀摩的臺灣第一座農村美術館，過程中如何運用各式資源透過土溝農村平台的去拼湊、整合、交換、創造，來扭轉地方劣勢，共創價值也創造農村轉型。在理論上，提出服務主導與資源拼湊之特性，點出土溝農村發展推動者在不同時期發展的應變與策略，在實務上，一起探討臺灣發展地方創生的可發展模式，為未來政府規劃地方創生的具體步驟與策略上帶來新的思維。

The Taiwan government has declared that 2019 will be the first year of Regional Revitalization in Taiwan. In response to the problem of uneven urban and rural development, the strategy of promoting Regional Revitalization is aimed at "designing overturning, regional revitalization ", and hopes to create industries and increase local employment opportunities. Change the flow of people to revitalize the local vitality and take advantage of the practices and success stories of regional revitalization in Japan. However, Taiwan's development of regional revitalization has yet to be time-tested, but Taiwan's local development has been promoted for many years and can be summed up to sort out the spiritual concept of regional revitalization. This study will be based on the case study of Togo Rural. Through the two theoretical viewpoints of " Service-Dominant Logic" and " Resource Bricolage ", this paper will explore the development of regional revitalization creation and to analyze how the rural areas of Togo have gone from unseen poor ridge villages and developed into the first rural art museum in Taiwan where local organizations are competing to visit and observe. How does Togo use the Togo Rural platform to use the integration, exchange and creation of various resources to reverse local disadvantages, co-create value and create rural transformation. In theory, it puts forward the characteristics of Service-Dominant Logic and Resource Bricolage and points out the strategies and strategies for the development of rural development promoters in different periods. In practice, we will explore the development model of local development in Taiwan and bring new thinking to the specific steps and strategies for the future government to plan Regional Revitalization.

1.Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative science quarterly, 50(3), 329-366.
2.Choi, J.-W., & Lee, J.-H. (2016). An Impact Analysis of Idle Space Regeneration Types on Regional Revitalization. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 17(5), 478-489.
3.Chung, S. J., & Kim, K. H. (2017). Regional Revitalization of Sakaiminato-Shi in Japan: The Necessity of Sustainable Local Culture Development Policy. Advanced Science Letters, 23(3), 1603-1607.
4.Cunha, M. P., Cunha, J. V., & Kamoche, K. (1999). Organizational improvisation: What, when, how, and why. International journal of management reviews, 1(3), 299-341.
5.Frederiksen, D. L., & Brem, A. (2017). How do entrepreneurs think they create value? A scientific reflection of Eric Ries’ Lean Startup approach. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(1), 169-189.
6.Ghezzi, A. (2018). Digital startups and the adoption and implementation of Lean Startup Approaches: Effectuation, Bricolage and Opportunity Creation in practice. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
7.Lanzara, G. F. (1999). Between transient constructs and persistent structures: designing systems in action. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 8(4), 331-349.
8.Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2014). Service-dominant logic: Premises, perspectives, possibilities: Cambridge University Press.
9.Roos, A., Eggers, J., Mark-Herbert, C., & Lindhagen, A. (2018). Using von Thünen rings and service-dominant logic in balancing forest ecosystem services. Land use policy, 79, 622-632.
10.Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 36(1), 1-10.
11.Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 44(1), 5-23.
12.Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2017). Service-dominant logic 2025. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(1), 46-67.
13.Vargo Stephen, L., & Lusch Robert, F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of marketing, 68(1), 1-17.
14.Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods Applied Social Research Methods Series (Vol. 5): Sage Publications.
15.王翠菱. (2017). 地方創生：山里生活博物館. 花蓮縣：花蓮縣政府.
16.王榆琮. (譯)(2018). 地方創生2.0. 台北市：時報文化(神尾文彥、松林一裕著, 2016)
17.林育靚, & 吳連賞. (2018). 傳統活化的地方創生-以高雄特有節慶皮影戲視覺設計為例. 東方學報(39), 77-87.
18.徐重仁. (2018). 地方創生, 再造幸福社會. 國土及公共治理季刊, 6(2), 36-43.
19.國家發展委員會（民國108年3月7日）。國家發展委員會推動「設計翻轉、地方創生」示範計畫。取自：https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=4A000EF83D724A25。
20.池熙璿. (2016). 服務主導邏輯. 新北市：中國生產力中心.
21.胡代光. (譯)(2000). 經濟學解說. 中國北京市：經濟科學出版社.
22.黃政傑. (1996). 質的教育研究: 方法與實例. 台北: 漢文.
23.蕭瑞麟, 歐素華, & 陳蕙芬. (2014). 劣勢創新: 梵谷策展中的隨創行為. 中山管理評論, 22(2), 323-367.
24.藍紀堯. (2018). 日本高濱町地方創生之研究. 宜蘭大學應用經濟與管理學系應用經濟學碩士班學位論文, 1-122.