簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 葉舒婷
Yeh, Shu-Ting
論文名稱: 農村復興:以行動者網絡理論觀點探討宜蘭深溝村新農群聚
Rural Renaissance: A Perspective from Actor Network Theory to Explore the New Farmers’ Cluster in Shen-Gou Village, Yilan
指導教授: 林蕙玟
Lin, Hui-Wen
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 規劃與設計學院 - 創意產業設計研究所
Institute of Creative Industries Design
論文出版年: 2017
畢業學年度: 105
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 181
中文關鍵詞: 農村發展農藝復興創意生活圈行動者網絡建構倆佰甲
外文關鍵詞: Rural Development, Agricultural Renaissance, Creative Milieu, Actor Network Theory, 200 Akker
相關次數: 點閱:109下載:14
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 近年來,農業的價值在不同的面相上,例如社會關係、社會正義、教育、環境保護等透過形形色色的農業行動被重新揭示。越來越多提倡人、食物、土地的關係重建的多元化農業行動在台灣各地蓬勃發展,而透過報導與網絡媒體等可以看見社會大眾對於農意識的提升。這樣的現象闡述了現今是一個農藝復興的時代。而多元化農業行動來自各方行動者組成網絡的共同努力,透過網絡的形成,各方行動者得以在網絡中彼此學習,共同創新,集結眾人之力貢獻於農業行動。
    本研究透過宜蘭縣深溝村新農群聚現象探討在農藝復興的脈絡之下,各方行動者組成網絡的動態歷程以及當地創意氛圍吸引群聚的過程。深度訪談與參與式觀察法為主要資料收集方法,並以Nvivo 10作為輔助工具分析訪談結果。本研究歸納出目標案例的行動者網絡結構變遷,並進一步發現主導行動者所強調的社群開放性是導致當地行動網絡得以擴大發展的主要關鍵。

    Recently, the agriculture reveals its value in different aspects such as social connection, justice, education, environmental protection, etc. through various agricultural action. More and more various operations of agriculture which aiming for reconnecting food, people and land is booming everywhere in Taiwan. Through the media, we could observe that the agricultural awareness of the society has risen. The phenomenon demonstrates that now is the era of Agricultural Renaissance. And the various agriculture actions are from the different actors to form the network and learn together to contribute to the agriculture.
    This study clarified the actor network process and defined the creative milieu for attracting actors by exploring the phenomenon of new farmers’ cluster in Shen-Gou Village in the context of Agricultural Renaissance. The in-depth interview and participant observation are the methods for data collection and analyze the data by coding in Nvivo 10. This research generalized the evolution of the actor network in Shen-Gou and found that the openness emphasized by major players is the key point for the scale up of the new farmers’ cluster in Shen-Gou.

    摘要 i Abstract ii 誌謝 iii Contents iv Table Contents vi Figure Contents 1 Chapter 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Research Motivation 3 1.2 Research Background 4 1.3 Pilot Study 6 1.3.1 The practice of Agricultural Renaissance in Taiwan 6 1.3.2 The reshaping of Agricultural Renaissance in Yilan 8 1.3.3 Preliminary conclusion 10 1.3.4 Discussion for further research 11 1.4 Research Objectives and Questions 13 Chapter 2 Literature Review 14 2.1 Rural Renaissance: Rural Development toward Sustainability 14 2.1.1 Transformation of rural development 14 2.1.2 Agricultural Renaissance toward sustainable development 15 2.1.3 New paradigm of rural development 20 2.1.4 Summary 22 2.2 Creative Rural: Creative Milieu with Resilience Ability 23 2.2.1 Creative milieu for regional innovation 23 2.2.2 Creative talents as talented X land ethics in rural area 26 2.2.3 Summary 28 2.3 Actor Network Theory: Third Road for Rural Development 29 Chapter 3 Research Design and Methods 31 3.1 Research Framework 31 3.1.1 Research concept 32 3.1.2 Research procedure 33 3.2 Research Methods 35 3.2.1 Grounded theory 35 3.2.2 Case study 35 3.3 Data Collection Methods 37 3.3.1 Participant observation 38 3.3.2 Purposive sampling 46 3.3.3 In-depth Interview 46 3.4 Data Analysis Methods with Nvivo 10 47 Chapter 4 Findings and Analysis 50 4.1 Settlement Formed by the New Farmers’ Cluster in Shen-Gou 50 4.1.1 New rural landscape in Agricultural Renaissance 51 4.1.2 Evolution stage 57 4.2 Translation Process for New Farmers’ Cluster in Shen-Gou 65 4.2.1 Problematization 65 4.2.2 Intéressement 67 4.2.3 Enrollment 71 4.2.4 Mobilization 73 4.2.5 Dissidence 76 4.3 Creative Milieu in Shen-Gou for New Farmers’ Cluster 79 4.3.1 Creative talents in the cluster 80 4.3.2 Space for the interaction 84 Chapter 5 Discussion and Conclusion 87 5.1 Research Discussion 88 5.1.1 Rural Meaning Revolution 88 5.1.2 Sustainable Development of Rural Creative Milieu 89 5.1.3 Rural for Happiness 91 5.2 Suggestion for Rural Development Policy in Taiwan 94 5.3 Research Limitation and Suggestion for Future Study 95 Reference 97 Appendix 104 1. Interview protocol (March 30) 104 2. Interview protocol (April 6) 105 3. Interview Transcript 106 4. Coding Data 181

    English:
    Barbara B. Kawulich. (2005). Participant Observation as a Data Collection Method. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(2). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/466/996
    Borgatti, S. (n.d.). Introduction to Grounded Theory. Retrieved June30, 2017, from http://www.analytictech.com/mb870/introtogt.htm
    Bosworth, G., Annibal, I., Carroll, T., Price, L., Sellick, J., &Shepherd, J. (2016). Empowering Local Action through Neo-Endogenous Development; The Case of LEADER in England. European Society for Rural Sociology. Sociologia Ruralis, 56(3), 427–449.
    Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In Power, action and belief: a new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196–223). London: Routledge.
    Cassel-Piccot, M., &Bory, S. (2014). Green Growth: From Theory to Action, From Practice to Power. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    Cooke, P., &Morgan, K. (1994). The creative milieu: a regional perspective on innovation. In The handbook of industrial innovation (pp. 25–32).
    Cooke, P. (1996). The New Wave of Regional Innovation Networks: Analysis, Characteristics and Strategy. Small Business Economics, 8, 159–171.
    Cresswell, K. M., Worth, A., &Sheikh, A. (2010). Actor-Network Theory and its role in understanding the implementation of information technology developments in healthcare. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 10(1), 67.
    Cundill, G., &Rodela, R. (2012). A review of assertions about the processes and outcomes of social learning in natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 113, 7–14.
    Czarniawska, B., &Hernes, T. (2005). Actor-network theory and organizing. Copenhagen Business School Press.
    Ditze, A., Schmidt, P., Wuhrmann, J.-C., &Müller-Kirschbaum, T. (2004). The Human Side of Innovation. Journal of Business Chemistry, 1(2), 48–53. Retrieved from http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&an=14962316
    Dudovskiy, J. (2012). Purposive sampling. Retrieved June30, 2017, from http://research-methodology.net/sampling-in-primary-data-collection/purposive-sampling/#_ftn1
    Elbanna, A. (2009). Actor Network Theory and IS Research. In Ivan Tchalakov (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Contemporary Theoretical Models in Information Systems (p. 17). UK: Quarterly.
    Escalona-Orcao, A. I., Escolano-Utrilla, S., Saez-Perez, L. A., &García, B. S.-V. (2016). The location of creative clusters in non-metropolitan areas : A methodological proposition. Journal of Rural Studies, 45, 112–122.
    Gallin, B. (1966). Hsin Hsing, Taiwan: Chinese Village in Change. Univ. California P; Ex-library edition.
    Gibson-Graham., J. K. (2006). A postcapitalist politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    Guinjoan, E., Badia, A., &Tulla, A. F. (2016). THE NEW PARADIGM OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT. THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND RECONCEPTUALIZATION USING THE “RURAL WEB.” Boletín de La Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles, 71, 495–500.
    Hackler, D., &Tech, V. (2008). DIVERSITY, ENTREPRENEURSHIP, AND THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT. JOURNAL OF URBAN AFFAIRS, 30(3), 273–307.
    Harvey, D. C., Hawkins, H., &Thomas, N. J. (2012). Thinking creative clusters beyond the city : People , places and networks. Geoforum, 43(3), 529–539.
    Holmes, A. (2013). Direct Observation. In F. R.Volkmar (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders (pp. 980–981). New York, NY: Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1698-3_1758
    Huylenbroeck, G.Van, Vandermeulen, V., Mettepenningen, E., &Verspecht, A. (2007). Multifunctionality of Agriculture: A Review of Definitions, Evidence and Instruments. Living Reviews in Landscape Research, 1, 1–38.
    Jr, H. D., &Cobb, J. (1989). For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy Toward Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future. Boston: Beacon Press.
    Keiner, M. (Ed.). (2006). The future of sustainability. The Future of Sustainability. Springer Netherlands.
    Kroma, M. M. (2008). Organic Farmer Networks: Facilitating Learning and Innovation for Sustainable Agriculture. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 28(4), 5–28.
    Landry, C. (2008). The Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Innovators. Routledge.
    Latour, B. (1988). Mixing humans and non-humans together: The Sociology of a Door-Closer. Social Problems, 35(3), 298–310.
    Law, J. (1999). After ANT: Complexity, Naming, and Topology. The Sociological Review, 47(1), 1–14.
    Leeuwis, C. (2000). Reconceptualizing Participation for Sustainable Rural Development : Towards a Negotiation Approach. Development and Change, 31, 931–959.
    Lyson, T. A. (2004). Civic agriculture : reconnecting farm, food, and community. Lebanon, NH: Tufts University Press.
    McCallin, A. (2015). What is Grounded Theory? Retrieved from http://www.groundedtheoryonline.com/what-is-grounded-theory/
    Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. (2010). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Biodiversity Synthesis. Ecosystems, 285. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625600
    Mills, A. J., Durepos, G., &Wiebe, E. (2010). Encyclopedia of Case Study Research. SAGE.
    Murdoch, J. (2000). Networks - A new paradigm of rural development? Journal of Rural Studies, 16(4), 407–419.
    Nahapiet, J., &Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social Capital , Intellectual Capital , and the Organizational Advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266. https://doi.org/10.2307/259373
    Neumeier, S. (2016). Social innovation in rural development: identifying the key factors of success. The Geographical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12180
    Ploeg, J. D.van der, Renting, H., Brunori, G., Knickel, K., Mannion, J., Marsden, T., …Ventura, F. (2000). Rural Development: From Practices and Policies towards Theory. Journal of the European Society for Rural Sociology, 40(4), 391–408.
    Pollan, M. (2012). The Omnivore’s Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals. Taipei: 遠足文化.
    Prändl-Zika, V. (2008). From subsistence farming towards a multifunctional agriculture: Sustainability in the Chinese rural reality. Journal of Environmental Management, 87(2), 236–248.
    Ravbar, M., Bole, D., &Nared, J. (2005). A creative milieu and the role of geography in studying the competitiveness of cities: the case of Ljubljana. Acta Geographica Slovenica, 45(2), 7–34. https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS45201
    Renting, H., Rossing, W. A. H., Groot, J. C. J., Van derPloeg, J. D., Laurent, C., Perraud, D., …VanIttersum, M. K. (2009). Exploring multifunctional agriculture. A review of conceptual approaches and prospects for an integrative transitional framework. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(SUPPL. 2), 112–123.
    SACHS, J. D. (2015). The Age of Sustainable Development. Columbia University Press.
    Salvia, R., &Quaranta, G. (2017). Place-Based Rural Development and Resilience : A Lesson from a Small Community. Sustainability, 9(889), 15.
    Sarkissian, W., &Perlgut, D. (2005). The community participation handbook : resources for public involvement in the planning process / edited by Wendy Sarkissian, Donald Perlgut with Elaine Ballard and Kevin Walsh. (2nd ed. (r). Murdoch: Murdoch, W.A. : Institute for Sustainablity & Technology Policy, Murdoch University.
    Smith, G., Nandwani, D., &Kankarla, V. (2016). Facilitating resilient rural-to-urban sustainable agriculture and rural communities. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 4509(October), 1–17.
    Sol, J., Beers, P. J., &Wals, A. E. J. (2013). Social learning in regional innovation networks: Trust, commitment and reframing as emergent properties of interaction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 49, 35–43.
    Soy, S. K. (1997). The Case Study as a Research Method Uses and Users of Information. Retrieved December10, 2016, from https://www.ischool.utexas.edu/~ssoy/usesusers/l391d1b.htm
    Taylor-powell, E., &Steele, S. (1996). Collecting Evaluation Data : Direct Observation. Cooperative Extension Publications, 8.
    Tisenkopfs, T., Kunda, I., Šūmane, S., Brunori, G., Klerkx, L., &Moschitz, H. (2015). Learning and Innovation in Agriculture and Rural Development: The Use of the Concepts of Boundary Work and Boundary Objects. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 21(1), 13–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2014.991115
    Tscharntke, T., Clough, Y., Wanger, T. C., Jackson, L., Motzke, I., Perfecto, I., …Whitbread, A. (2012). Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biological Conservation, 151, 5359.
    Walsh, I., Holton, J. A., Bailyn, L., Fernandez, W., Levina, N., &Glase, B. (2015). What Grounded Theory Is…A Critically Reflective Conversation Among Scholars. Organizational Research Methods, 18(4), 581–599.
    Walsham, G., &Sahay, S. (1999). GIS for district-level administration in India. MIS Quarterly, 23, 39–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/249409
    Walsham, G. (1997). Actor-Network Theory and IS Research: Current Status and Future Prospects. In A. S.Lee, J.Liebenau, &J. I.DeGross (Eds.), Information Systems and Qualitative Research: Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 WG 8.2 International Conference on Information Systems and Qualitative Research, 31st May--3rd June 1997, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA (pp. 466–480). Boston, MA: Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35309-8_23
    Wilson, G. A. (2001). From productivism to post-productivism... and back again? Exploring the (un)changed natural and mental landscapes of European agriculture. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26(1), 77–102.
    Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research. Design and Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, 4, 240.

    中文:
    社區夥伴 (民101)。落地生根-社區支持農業之甦動。香港。
    Chen, C., &Tai, S.-H. (2007). 陳家聲、戴士嫻 (民94)。創業家社會網絡行為之質性研究。創業管理研究,1–24。
    Chang, Y. L. (2006). Constructing Environmental Hope : A Narrative of An Environmentalist。台灣大學。
    Chang, T. C. (2000). 張子超 (民89)。立意取樣 Purposive Sampling。取自 http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1304283/
    Chen, Fen Yu, Tsai, Pei Hui, Lee, Wei Huan, Zhou, Ji Chan, Zhou, Fu Yi, Zheng, Ya Yun, Xiao, Hui Han, Lian, Wei Zu (2014). 陳芬瑜, 蔡培慧, 李威寰, 周季嬋, 周馥儀, 鄭雅云, 蕭褘涵, 連偉志/攝影 (民103)。小農復耕:好食材、好生態、好市集、好旅行。台灣:果力文化。
    Chen, J. (2016). 陳瑞樺 (民105)。以農之名:臺灣戰後農運的歷史考察。文化研究,22,75–122
    Chen, Y. R. (2015). 陪伴務農的力量. 鄉間小路. Retrieved from http://twoakker.blogspot.tw/2015/09/blog-post.html
    Chou, H. H., &Tsai, C. H. (2013). 周信輝、蔡志豪 (民102)。網絡組織間關係治理的搭架:行動者網絡理論的動態觀點. 臺大管理論叢,23(SUPPL.1),135–164。
    Chuang, S. (2001). 莊淑姿 (民90)。台灣鄉村發展類型之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。
    Hong, S. F. (2011). 洪士峰 (民100)。半農半X的生活:順從自然,實踐天賦書摘。庶民文化研究,3,110–114。
    Hsieh, C. (2008). A Preliminary Study on the Impact of Industry on the Settlement Development - a case of the Sishu in Tainan. National Cheng Kung University.
    Hu, T.-L. (1978). The Evolving Agricultural Communities: Development and Types of Agro - industry in a Suburban Community. Publications of the Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica, 46, 79–111.
    Hung, J.-C., &Tsai, C.-H. (2011). 洪榮志 (民100)。從行動者網絡理論看文創商品的展演:以安平劍獅的在地轉譯為例。創業管理研究,6(4),105–122。
    Kang, J. H. (2013). 康靜華 (民102)。臺灣農村再生機制之研究-以農村發展模式為核心(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。
    Kun-Sun Shiao. (1999). 蕭崑杉 (民89)。鄉村再結構化之概念分析。農業推廣文彙,44,191–203。
    Lee, C.-J. (2005). 李承嘉 (民94)。行動者網絡理論應用於鄉村發展之研究:以九份聚落1895-1945年發展為例。地理學報,39,1–30。
    Lee, C.-J. (2012). 李承嘉 (民101)。農地與農村發展政策:新農業體制下的轉向。台北:五南。
    Lee, H.-Y. (2014). 李欣芸 (民103)。花蓮移民軌跡中產業的創意空間實踐(碩士論文)。成功大學。
    Lee, L. F. (1996). 李祿豐 (民85)。宜蘭地區稻田一年一作栽培良質稻種概況。 花蓮區農業專訊,18(5),7。
    Lee, Y. S. (2011). 李郁璇 (民100)。農業多功能論下農村永續社區之研究-以苗栗縣後龍鎮灣寶社區為例(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。
    Lee, Z. C. (2013). 李展其 (民102)。台灣農業典範變遷之研究 (碩士論文)。國立政治大學。
    Lii, D. (2016). 李丁讚 (民105)。導論:農業人文的誕生。文化研究。22,10–22。
    Lin, C. J., Ru, Y. N., &Wang, C. R. (2014). 林子傑、呂宥甯 (民103)。宜蘭農舍吵什麼|專題報導。Retrieved May30, 2017, from https://ilanland.info/
    Lin, C. M. (2016). 林瓊美 (民105)。《我愛深溝05》農村精神領袖之陳阿公與三官宮_0702。Retrieved May30, 2017, from http://rice-music.blogspot.tw/2016/06/5.html
    Lin, H. J. (2013). 穀東十年,賴青松掀起農業新浪潮. Retrieved May29, 2017, from https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/44317/
    Lin, H. P. (2010). A Study on the Experiential Process of the New Farmers Engaging in New Agriculture. National Chi Nan University College of Education Graduate Institute of Adult & Continuing Education.
    Lin, P. L. (2010). 林柏伶 (民99)。台灣農村發展與治理制度變遷之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。
    Lin, X. C. (2015). 林欣琦 (民104)。一點點的土。Retrieved May30, 2017, from http://agriculturedesignworkshop.blogspot.tw/search?updated-max=2015-04-06T05:47:00-07:00&max-results=7&start=28&by-date=false
    Lin, Y. T., Chou, Y. Z., &Smileland. (2015). 果力文化/主編, 微笑土地/協力, 林怡亭/採訪, 周穎宗/採訪 (民104)。一日宜蘭人:親水樂農、依山傍海、舊城慢遊的理想生活。台北。果力文化。
    Peng, M. H. (2011). 彭明輝 (民100)。糧食危機關鍵報告 : 台灣觀察。台北。商周。
    Strauss, A., &Corbin, J. (2001). 吳芝儀、廖梅花譯 (民80)。紮根理論研究方法(一版)。嘉義。濤石文化事業有限公司。
    Tsai, H. C. (2003). 蔡宏進 (民82)。台灣新鄉村社會學。台灣。全華圖書。
    Tsai, Y. (2014). 蔡晏霖 (民103)。農作為方法:「以農為本」的抵抗政治。文化研究,18,217–226。
    Tsai, Y. (2016). 蔡晏霖 (民105)。農藝復興:臺灣農業新浪潮。文化研究, 22,23–74。
    Tsai, P. H., Taiwan Rural Front, Development, Partnerships for Community. (2015). 蔡培慧、台灣農村陣線、香港社區夥伴 (民104)。巷仔口的農藝復興:社區協力農業,開創以農為本的美好生活。台灣:果力文化。
    Tzu, S. N., Chen, H. F., Yu, M. R., &Wu, C. J. (2017). 朱思年、陳蕙芬、游銘仁、吳靜吉 (民106)。師徒關係與社會創新的在地實踐:賴青松和黃聲遠。台灣:遠流。
    Tzu, T. T. (2012). 曾資婷 (民101)。宜蘭縣員山鄉尚德村與深溝村農地休耕之研究(碩士論文)。國立宜蘭大學。
    Wong, Y. M., &Lin, Y. F. (2015). 翁鈺旻、林郁芩 (民104)。【農田不見了】農地政策 草根論壇。Retrieved May30, 2017, from https://hackpad.com/ep/pad/static/qyBKdYtXSi5
    Wu, J. L. (2013). 吳佳玲 (民106)。陳阿公與宜蘭小田田的相遇. Retrieved May30, 2017, from https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/30003/
    Wu, J. L. (2016). 吳佳玲 (民106)。有田有米的夥伴──陳榮昌阿公. Retrieved May30, 2017, from http://sweetrice9220412.blogspot.tw/2016/06/blog-post.html
    Wu, J. L. (2017). 吳佳玲 (民106)。沒有農地,就沒有農業,沒有農業,就不是一個國家。Retrieved May30, 2017, from http://sweetrice9220412.blogspot.tw/
    Wu, Y. N. (2007). 吳音寧 (民96)。江湖在哪裡?台灣農業觀察。台北:INK印刻出版公司。
    Wu, M. (Ed.). (1997). 漢聲雜誌社 (民85)。日本 MOA 的自然農法。台北。英文漢聲。
    Yang, W. C. (2017). 連結、開放與共享 深溝小農群聚經驗分享. Retrieved May29, 2017, from https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/91178/
    Yao, S. yi, Chen, Y. han, Chang, C. yuan, Chao, P. W., Yang, H. S., Liu, T. X., …Lu, J. jane. (2015). 姚淑儀, 陳泳翰, 曹沛雯, 劉致昕, 潘雅君, 蔡明原, 賴黛玉, 游婉琪, 盧家珍 (民104)。農村好學。南投:行政院農業委員會水土保持局。
    Youngsun, A. (n.d.). 宜蘭小百科-社區日曆. Retrieved May29, 2017, from http://blog.ilc.edu.tw/blog/blog/9536/catid=30336/page/83

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:2018-08-29公開
    QR CODE