| 研究生: |
侯凱仁 Hou, Kai-Jen |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
利用時間及參與者與隱含因素擴展來改善旅遊地點推薦 Using Time, People Features and Hidden Factor Expansion to Enhance Travel Location Recommendation |
| 指導教授: |
盧文祥
Lu, Wen-Hsiang |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
電機資訊學院 - 資訊工程學系 Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2015 |
| 畢業學年度: | 103 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 84 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 地點搜尋 、問句時間 、問句參與者 、隱藏因素 、問句分析 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Location Search, Question Time, Question People, Hidden Factor, Question Analysis |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:128 下載:3 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
自然語言檢索是使用人類語言問句搜尋答案。其目的是要擷取適合使用者的答案。相較於一般的短語查詢,自然語言問句查詢則是更能直覺的呈現出使用者的問題。例如,問句「台南三天兩夜情侶浪漫旅遊?」。但現今的搜尋引擎在自然語言檢索方面的表現往往不佳,導致使用者必須花大部分的時間在瀏覽出現部分詞彙網頁答案。在本論文,自然語言問句搜尋被定義為使用者想獲得一系列同性質的地點,並與ROSE等人提出條列式資訊目的定義相符。
在仔細的分析自然語言問句後,問句結構可以被分為問句時間、問句稱謂、問句活動、問句情緒以及問句地點類別。並且我們發現到了問句結構之間有一些關係存在,提出了一個自動化的方式找出問句結構之間的關聯來擴充問句。我們基於使用者需求並分析問句中的時間及稱謂以及隱含的因素,進而推薦適合的地點。我們使用適合中文的問句分析演算法辨識以上問句結構特徵。至於答案結構可以被分成適合的地點與適合的地點類別。我們利用問句結構和答案結構的關係,結合實際上的網路的評價意見,建構出以時間及稱謂為基礎的地點排序模型(LSRM)來改善地點搜尋。
實驗結果顯示我們提出的模型LSRM可以幫助使用者找到他們想要的地點。也顯示出我們的系統著實能增進地點搜尋的效能
Natural language search is to use human language questions as query to search answers. The task of natural language search is to extract suitable answers for users. Compare with short query, Natural language query users can directly submit their query intents. For example, the question, “The three days and two nights romantic travel which suit for couple?” But conventional search engines can’t efficiently process natural language queries and users can’t get good search results. So users need to spend lots of time on browsing and filter the result pages, which may involve some noise information. In those natural language question search, user wants to obtain a list of homogeneous locations. According to Rose et al. proposed list-informational goal definition, natural language question search is properly matched list-informational goal.
After advanced analysis on natural language question structure, the question structure can be divided into six parts, they are question Time, question people, question activity, question sentiment, question location category and question area. We noted that there are some relations between our question structures. Then, we proposed an automated method to identify related question structures and use them to expand questions. We try to recommend suitable locations based on the intent of users by analyzing the Time, people and other hidden factor. We used the algorithm of question analysis to identify question features. As to the answer structure, it can be divided into answer location and answer location category to match the question structure. We combine the relationship between the question structure and the answer structure to construct Location-Search Ranking Model (LSRM) to improve location search.
Experiment result shows that our proposed method LSRM can help user to get location list which matched their intent. And it shows LSRM really can enhance performance in location search.
[1] Agichtein E., Castillo C., Donato D., Gionis A., and Mishne G. Finding high-quality content in social media. WSDM, 2008.
[2] Broder A., A taxonomy of web search. SIGIR Forum, 2002
[3] Bierner G., Alternative Phrases and Natural Language Information Retrieval, ACL, 2001
[4] Chu C. J., Prager J., Ravin Y. and Cesar C. A Hybrid Approach to Natural Language Web Search, EMNLP,2002
[5] Chan W., Yang W., Tang J., Du J., Zhou X., and Wang W. Community Question Topic Categorization via Hierarchical Kernelized Classification, CIKM’13
[6] Elkan C., Log-linear models and conditional random fields, CIKM, 2008
[7] Ferret O., Grau B., Hurault-Planet M., Illouz G., Monceaux L., Robba I. and Vilnat A., Finding an Answer based on the Recognition of the Question Focus, 2001
[8] Yu Zheng, Lizhu Zhang, Zhengxin Ma, Xing Xie, Wei-Ying Ma., Recommending friends and locations based on individual location history. In ACM Transaction on the Web (ACM TWEB),5(1), 2011.
[9] Huang J.Y, Using Opinion-based Entity Ranking Model to Improve List-Informational Search, Master’s thesis, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan, R.O.C., 2013.
[10] Hu M. and Liu B., Mining and summarizing customer reviews, KDD’04, 2004
[11] Hu M. and Liu B., Mining Opinion Features in Customer Reviews, AAAI, 2004
[12] Ku L.W. and Chen H., Mining Opinions from the Web: Beyond Relevance Retrieval. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, Special Issue on Mining Web Resources for Enhancing Information Retrieval, 2007
[13] Liu B., Hu M., and Cheng J., Opinion Observer: Analyzing and Comparing Opinions on the Web, WWW, 2005
[14] Liu B., Guang Q., Bu J. and Chen C., Expanding Domain Sentiment Lexicon through Double Propagation, IJCAI-09, 2009
[15] Liu, B., Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, 5(1), 1-167, 2012
[16]Lin C.Y., Cao Y., Duan H., Yu Y. and Hon H.W., Recommending Questions Using the MDL-based Tree Cut Model, WWW, 2008
[17] Lin C.Y., Duan H., Cao Y. and Yu Y., Searching Questions by Identifying Question Topic and Question Focus, In Proceedings of ACL-08, 2008
[18] Liu Q., Agichtein E., Dror G., Maarek Y., and Szpektor I. When web search fails, searchers become askers: Understanding the transition. SIGIR, 2012.
[19] Lin S.J. and Lu W.H., Learning Question Focus and Semantically Related Features from Web Search Results for Chinese Question Classification, In AIRS, 2006
[20] Popescu A.M. and Etzioni O., Extracting Product Features and Opinions from Reviews, EMNLP’05, 2005
[21] Pang B. and Lee L., A Sentimental Education Sentiment Analysis Using Subjectivity Summarization Based on Minimum Cuts, ACL, 2004
[22] Pang B. and Lee L., Seeing PTARs Exploiting class relationships for sentiment categorization with respect to rating scales ACL, 2005
[23] Richard C.W., Schlaefer N., William W. C., and Automatic E.N., Set Expansion for List Question Answering. EMNLP, 2008
[24] Rose D.E. and Levinson D., Understanding User Goals in Web Search, WWW, 2004
[25] Vincent Wenchen Zheng, Yu Zheng, Xing Xie, Qiang Yang., Collaborative Location and Activity Recommendations With GPS History Data., WWW,2010
[26] Turney P., Thumbs Up or Thumbs Down? Semantic Orientation Applied to Unsupervised Classification of Reviews, ACL’02, 2002
[27] Wang S.M., Using Natural Language Question Structure Features to Improve List-Information Search, Master’s thesis, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan, R.O.C., 2012.
[28] Leon Derczynski, Jun Wang, Robert Gaizauskas and Mark A. Greenwood., A Data Driven Approach to Query Expansion in Question Answering. Coling, 2008
[29] Huiji Gao, Jiliang Tang, Xia Hu, and Huan Liu., Exploring Time Effects for Location Recommendation on Location-Based Social Networks. ACM, 2013