簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李芩萍
Li, Chin-Pin
論文名稱: 國中生自律/能力焦點及精熟/表現目標導向的課業避助行為之研究
Research on Junior High School Students’ Autonomy/Competence Concerns And Mastery/Performance Goal Orientation Academic Help- Avoidance Behaviors
指導教授: 程炳林
Cherng, Biing-Lin
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 社會科學院 - 教育研究所
Institute of Education
論文出版年: 2003
畢業學年度: 91
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 156
中文關鍵詞: 尋助態度知覺的課室目標結構社會動機目標導向課業避助行為
外文關鍵詞: goal orientation, academic help-avoidance behaviors, social motivation, attitude toward seeking help, perceived classroom goal
相關次數: 點閱:139下載:10
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 國中生自律/能力焦點及精熟/表現目標導向的課業避助行為之研究
    中文摘要
    本研究的主要目的有八:
    (一)瞭解國內國中生在學習數學時,四種課業避助行為
    之差異情形。
    (二)考驗國中生的個人特徵與其課業避助行為之關係。(三)分析國中生的尋助態度與其課業避助行為之關係。(四)探討國中生個人特徵與其尋助態度之關係。
    (五)考驗國中生的尋助態度是否為個人特徵與課業避助
    行為的中介變項。
    (六)探究國中生知覺的課室目標結構與其尋助態度之關
    係。
    (七)暸解國中生知覺的課室目標結構與其課業避助行為
    之關係。
    (八)探討國中生的尋助態度是否為其知覺的課室目標結
    構與課業避助行為的中介變項。為了完成前述目
    的,本研究總計抽取台灣本島南部地區十二所國中
    二十六個班級共851人為研究樣本。
    研究工具包括課業避助行為量表、目標導向量表、社會動機量表、知覺的課室目標結構量表、尋助態度量表、能力知覺量表。本研究所蒐集的資料以單因子重複量數變異數分析(one-way repeated measures, ANOVA)、多元迴歸分析( multiple regression analysis )、階層迴歸分析( hierarchical regression analysis)來考驗各項假設。
    本研究的發現如下:
    (一)國中生在四種課業避助行為上有差異。其中,自律
    焦點/精熟目標導向課業避助行為最高,其次分別為
    能力焦點/精熟目標導向課業避助行為、自律焦點/
    表現目標導向課業避助行為、能力焦點/表現目標導
    向課業避助行為。
    (二)個人特徵能預測四種課業避助行為。其中,趨向精
    熟目標、趨向表現目標、逃避表現目標、地位目標
    及自我效能能正向預測自律焦點/精熟目標導向、自
    律焦點/表現目標導向課業避助行為。
    (三)尋助態度可以預測課業避助行為。結果顯示,學
    習者持知覺的尋助利益時,其仍然可能產生自律焦
    點或精熟導向的課業避助行為。
    (四)個人特徵變項可以預測三種尋助態度。其中,逃避
    表現、地位目標與知覺的教師威脅、知覺的同儕威
    脅有正相關。
    (五)個人特徵與四種課業避助行為受到尋助態度所中
    介。其中,逃避表現目標會透過知覺的同儕威脅而
    對四種課業避助行為有間接效果;關係目標對四種
    課業避助行為的關係則經常會受知覺的同儕威脅的
    中介。
    (六)知覺的課室目標結構能預測尋助態度。其中,知覺
    的課室表現目標與知覺的教師威脅、知覺的同儕威
    脅有正向關係。此外,知覺的課室精熟目標、知覺
    的課室表現目標能正向預測知覺的尋助利益。(七)知覺的課室目標結構可以預測四種課業避助行為。
    其中,知覺的課室精熟目標與自律焦點/精熟目標導
    向課業避助行為、能力焦點/精熟目標導向課業避助
    行為有正向關係。此外,知覺的課室表現目標能正
    向預測四種課業避助行為。
    (八)知覺的課室目標結構會透過尋助態度的中介,而對
    四種課業避助行為產生間接效果。其中,知覺的課
    室精熟目標、知覺的課室表現目標與四種課業避助
    行為受到知覺的尋助利益所中介。
    本研究根據研究結果提出建議,以提供國中教學與學習輔導,以及未來研究
    之參考。

    The purposes of this study were to:(a)investigate four academic help-avoidance behaviors of junior high school students toward mathematics learning ,(b)examine the relation between students'personal characteristics and academic help-avoidance behaviors,(c)analyze the relation between students’ attitudes toward seeking help and academic help-avoidance behaviors,(d)explore the relation between students’ personal characteristics and their attitudes toward seeking help,(e)examine if the attitude towards seeking help of junior high school students is a moderator-mediator between students'personal characteristics and academic help-avoidance behaviors or not,(f)examine the relation
    between students’ perceived classroom goal and attitude toward seeking help or not,(g)explore the relation between students’ perceived classroom goal and academic help-avoidance behaviors, and(h)verify the attitude toward seeking help of junior high school students is a moderator-mediator between students’ perceived classroom goal and academic help-avoidance behaviors. The participants were 851 students from 12 junior high schools and 26 classes in southern Taiwan. The instruments used in this study included Help-Avoidance Behaviors Scale, Goal Orientation Scale, Social Motivation Scale,Classroom Goal Scale, Attitude toward Seeking Help Scale, and Competence Perception Scale. The
    statistical methods used to analyze the data were one-way repeated measures ANOVA, multiple
    regression analysis, hierarchical regression analysis.
    The results of this study were summarized as follows:(a)Junior high school students had four
    types of academic help-avoidance behaviors: autonomy concern/mastery goal orientation academic
    help-avoidance behaviors, autonomy concern/ performance goal orientation academic help-avoidance behaviors, competence concern/mastery goal orientation academic help-avoidance behaviors,competence concern/performance goal orientation academic help-avoidance behaviors,(b)Personal
    characteristics predicted four types of academic help-avoidance behaviors. Moreover, approach
    mastery goal, approach performance, avoidance performance, status goal, and self-efficacy had the
    positive relation between autonomy concern/mastery goal orientation academic help-avoidance
    behaviors and autonomy concern/ performance goal orientation academic help-avoidance behaviors,
    (c)Attitude toward seeking help predicted four types of academic help-avoidance behaviors.
    Perceived seeking benefit furthermore predicted autonomy concern or mastery orientation academic
    help-avoidance behaviors,(d)Personal characteristics predicted three types of attitudes toward seeking help. Avoidance performance, and status goal had positive relation between perceived threat from teachers and perceived threat from peers,(e)The relation between personal characteristics and four types of academic help-avoidance behaviors was mediated through attitudes toward seeking help.
    Avoidance performance mediated the effects of perceived threat from peers on academic
    help-avoidance behaviors. Relation goal was mediated by perceived threat from peers on academic
    help-avoidance behaviors. ,(f)Perceived classroom goal predicted attitudes toward seeking help.
    Perceived classroom performance goal had positive relation between perceived threat from teachers
    and perceived threat from peers. Besides, perceived classroom mastery goal, and perceived classroom
    performance goal had positive relation with perceived helping-seeking benefit, (g)Perceived
    classroom goal predicted four types of academic help-avoidance behaviors. Perceived classroom
    mastery goal had positive relation with autonomy concern/mastery goal orientation academic
    help-avoidance behaviors, competence concern/mastery goal orientation academic help-avoidance behaviors. In addition, perceived classroom performance goal had positive relation with four types of academic help-avoidance behaviors ,and(h)Perceived classroom goal which was mediated through the attitude toward seeking help affected four types of academic help-avoidance behaviors. Through perceived help-seeking benefit, both perceived classroom mastery goal and perceived classroom performance goal had effects on four types of academic help-avoidance behaviors. Based on the findings in this research, suggestions for junior high school teaching, pedagogical guidance and further studies are offered.

    中文摘要……………………………………………………………………………. I 英文摘要……………………………………………………………………………. II 目次…………………………………………………………………………………..IV 表目次………………………………………………………………………………..VI 圖目次…………………………………………………………………………… VIII 第一章緒論………………………………………………………………….. 01 第一節研究動機與目的………………………………………………….. 01 第二節研究問題………………………………………………………….. 09 第三節名詞釋義………………………………………………………….. 11 第二章文獻探討……………………………………………………………… 20 第一節課業避助行為的理論基礎……………………………………….. 20 第二節學生的個人特徵和課業避助行為之關係………………………... 33 第三節課室情境和課業避助行為之關係………………………………... 42 第四節課業尋助態度與課業避助行為之關係…………………………... 47 第三章研究方法……………………………………………………………… 52 第一節研究假設………………………………………………………….. 52 第二節研究對象………………………………………………………….. 52 第三節研究架構………………………………………………………….. 53 第四節研究工具………………………………………………………….. 56 第五節實施程序………………………………………………………….. 68 第六節資料處理………………………………………………………….. 69 第四章研究結果……………………………………………………………… 70 第一節描述統計分析……………………………………………………… 70 第二節個人特徵、尋助態度與課業避助行為之關係…………………… 82 第三節課室目標結構、尋助態度與課業避助行為之關係……………… 100 第五章討論、結論與建議…………………………………………………… 113 第一節討論………………………………………………………………… 113 第二節結論………………………………………………………………… 124 第三節建議………………………………………………………………… 129 參考書目……………………………………………………………………… 133 中文部分…………………………………………………………………….. 133 英文部分…………………………………………………………………….. 134 附錄一課業避助行為量表…………………………………………………… 140 附錄二目標導向量表………………………………………………………… 143 附錄三社會動機量表………………………………………………………… 145 附錄四課室目標結構量表…………………………………………………… 146 附錄五尋助態度量表………………………………………………………… 147 附錄六能力知覺量表……………………………………………….…. 148 附錄七正式施測量表……………………………………………………... 149 表目次 表2-1-1 課業避助行為的理由……………………………………………… 31 表3-2-1 正式樣本學校與人數……………………………………………… 53 表3-4-1 課業避助行為量表之因素分析及信度考驗效果………………... 59 表3-4-2 社會動機量表之因素分析及信度考驗效果……………………… 62 表3-4-3 尋助態度量表之因素分析及信度考驗效果…………………….. 66 表3-4-4 認知能力與自我效能量表之因素分析及信度考驗效果……… 68 表4-1-1 受試者在目標導向上得分之描述統計分析摘要表………….….. 71 表4-1-2 受試者在課室目標結構上得分之描述統計分析摘要表………….. 72 表4-1-3 受試者在尋助態度上得分之描述統計分析摘要表……………….. 72 表4-1-4 受試者在課業避助行為上得分之描述統計分析摘要表………….. 73 表4-1-5 不同年級國中生在目標導向上之差異分析……………………… 74 表4-1-6 三個年級國中生在三種社會動機上之平均數與標準差……… .. 74 表4-1-7 三個年級國中生在兩種能力知覺上之平均數與標準差…………. 75 表4-1-8 不同年級國中生在課室目標結構上之差異分析…………………. 76 表4-1-9 不同年級國中生在尋助態度上之差異分析……………………… 76 表4-1-10 三個年級國中生在四種課業避助行為上之平均數與標準差… 77 表4-1-11 男女生在目標導向上之平均數差異考驗分析……………… 78 表4-1-12 男女生在社會動機上之平均數差異比較…………………… 78 表4-1-13 男女生在能力知覺上之平均數差異比較……………………… 79 表4-1-14 男女生在課室目標結構上之平均數差異比較…………………… 79 表4-1-15 男女生在尋助態度上之平均數差異比較………………………… 80 表4-1-16 男女生在能力知覺上之平均數差異比較………………………… 80 表4-1-17 國中生在四種課業避助行為上之單因子重複量數變異數分析摘要 表……………………………………………………………………………. 81 表4-1-18 國中生在四種課業避助行為之平均數表………………………… 82 表4-2-1 預測變項與效標變項之交互關係矩陣……………………………. 83 表4-2-2 個人特徵與尋助態度之標準化迴歸分析摘要表………………… 84 表4-2-3 預測變項與效標變項的交互相關陣……………………………… 85 表4-2-4 尋助態度與課業避助行為之標準化迴歸分析摘要表………… 87 表4-2-5 預測變項與效標變項的交互相關矩陣………………………… 87 表4-2-6 個人特徵、尋助態度與課業避助行為之階層迴歸分析摘要表 95 表4-3-1 預測變項與效標變項的交互相關陣……………………….…… 101 表4-3-2 課室目標結構與尋助態度之標準化迴歸分析摘要表………… 102 表4-3-3 預測變項與效標變項的交互相關矩陣………………………… 102 表4-3-4 課室目標結構、尋助態度與課業避助行為之階層迴歸分析摘表 107 圖目次 圖3-3-1 研究架構圖……………………………………………………… 54 圖3-3-2 中介效果圖………………………………………………………. 56 圖4-2-1 尋助態度在個人特徵與自律焦點/精熟目標導向課業避助行為之間的中 介效果圖……………………………………………………………. 90 圖4-2-2 尋助態度在個人特徵與自律焦點/表現目標導向課業避助行為之間的中 介效果圖……………………………………………………………… 93 圖4-2-3 尋助態度在個人特徵與能力焦點/精熟目標導向課業避助行為之間的中 介效果圖………………………………………………………………... 97 圖4-2-4 尋助態度在個人特徵與能力焦點/表現目標導向課業避助行為之間的中 介效果圖………………………………………………………………. 100 圖4-3-1 尋助態度在課室目標結構與自律焦點/精熟目標導向課業避助行為之間 的中介效果圖………………………………………………………… 105 圖4-3-2 尋助態度在課室目標結構與自律焦點/表現目標導向課業避助行為之間 的中介效果圖………………………………………………………… 107 圖4-3-3 尋助態度在課室目標結構與能力焦點/精熟目標導向課業避助行為之間 的中介效果圖………………………………………………………… 110 圖4-3-4 尋助態度在課室目標結構與能力焦點/表現目標導向課業避助行為之間 的中介效果圖………………………………………………………… 112

    一、中文部分
    林麗華(2002)。目標導向、社會比較、自我效能與課業壓力關係之研究。
    國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系碩士論文。
    吳靜吉、程炳林(1992)。激勵的學習策略量表之修訂。測驗年刊,39 輯,
    59-78。
    徐富珍(1997)。社會比較的效果:對個人情感、認知及行為之影響研究。
    國立政治大學心裡研究所博士論文。
    陳正昌、程炳林(2001)。SPSS 、SAS 、BMDP 統計軟體在多變量統計上的
    應用。台北市:五南圖書出版公司。
    程炳林(2002)。多重目標導向、動機問題與調整策略之交互作用。師大
    學報:教育類,47 卷,1 期,39-58。
    程炳林(2003)。四向度目標導向模式之研究。師大學報:教育類,48 卷,
    1 期,15-40。
    黃德祥(1994)。社會比較理論在諮商輔導上的應用。輔導季刊,30 卷,3
    期,28-34。
    張春興(1996)。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐。台北市:東華書
    局。
    楊岫穎(2003)。國中生自我設限的情境及歷程因素之研究。國立成功大
    學教育研究所碩士論文。
    趙柏原(2000)。國中生自我效能、求助態度與課業求助行為之相關研究。
    彰師大學報,第一輯,163-200。
    蕭素玲(2002)。高中生課業求助行為之相關研究。國立成功大學教育研
    究所碩士論文。
    謝岱陵(2003)。國中生四向度目標導向之前因與後果變項之研究。國立
    134
    成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    二、英文部分
    Alexitch, L. R. (2002). The role of help-seeking attitudes and tendencies in
    students’ preferences for academic advising. Journal of College Student
    Development, 4(1), 5-19.
    Ames, C. (1992). Classroom: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal
    of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
    Arbreton, A. (1998). Student goal orientation and help-seeking strategy use. In
    S. A. Karabenick (Ed.), Strategic help seeking: Implications for learning and
    teaching(pp.95-116). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A.(1986). The moderator-mediator variable
    distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and
    statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6),
    1173-1182.
    Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today.
    International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 445-457.
    Bunk, B. P., Collins, R. L., Taylor, S. E., Van Yperen, N. W., & Dakof,
    G.A.(1990). The affective consequences of social comparison: either
    direction has its ups and downs. Journal of Personality and Sociall
    Psychology, 59(6) 1238-1249.
    Butler, R., & Neuman, O. (1995). Effects of task and ego achievement goals
    on help-seeking behaviors and attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology,
    87(2), 261-271.
    Butler, R. (1998). Determinants of help seeking: Relations between perceived
    135
    reasons for classroom help-avoidance and help-seeking behaviors in an
    experimental context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 630-643.
    Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science. New
    York: Academic Press.
    Covington, M. V. (1992). Making the grade. Cambridge, England: Cambridge
    University Press.
    Dillon, J. T. (1988). Questioning and teaching: A manual of practice. New
    York: Teachers College Press.
    Dillon, J. T. (1990). The practice of questioning. New York: Routledge.
    Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to
    motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
    Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A.(1997). A hierarchical model of approach and
    avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social
    Psychology, 72, 218-232.
    Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A.(2001). A 2×2 achievement goal framework.
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519.
    Hicks, L. (1997). How do academic motivation and peer relationship mix in an
    adolescent’s world?Middle School Journal, 28(4), 18-22.
    Hicks, L., & Myrphy, A. M. (1995, April). Social and achievement goals and
    academic self-regulation in adolescents. Paper presented at the annual
    meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco,
    CA.
    Karabenick, S. A., & Knapp, J. R. (1991). Relationship of academic
    help-seeking to the use of learning strategies and other instrumental
    achievement behavior in college students. Journal of Educational
    Psychology, 83, 221-230.
    136
    Karabenick, S. A., & Sharma, R. (1994). Perceived teacher support of student
    questioning in the college: Its relation to student characteristics and role in
    the classroom questioning process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1),
    90-103.
    Nelson-Le Gall, S., & Jones, E.(1989). Cognitive-motivational influences on
    task-related behavior of black children. Child Development, 61, 581-589.
    Nelson-Le Gall, S., & Gumerman, R. A. (1984). Children’s perceptions of
    helpers and helper motivation. Journal of Appiled Development Psychology, 5,
    1-12.
    Newman, R. S. (1990). Children’s help-seeking in the classroom: The role of
    motivational factors and attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82,
    71-80.
    Newman, R. S.(1994). Adaptive help-seeking: A strategy of self-regulated
    learning. In D. Schunk & B. Zimmerman (Eds.), self-regulation of learning
    and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp.283-301).
    Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Newman, R. S. (1998). Adaptive help seeking: A role of social interaction in
    self-regulated learning. In S. A. Karabenick (Ed.), Strategic help seeking:
    Implications for learning and teaching(pp.61-94). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Newman, R. S., & Goldin, L. (1990). Children’s reluctance to seek help with
    schoolwork. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 92-100.
    Newman, R. S., & Schwager, M. T. (1992). Student perceptions and academic
    help-seeking. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece(Eds.). Students perceptions in
    the classroom: Causes and consequences(pp.123-146). Hillsdale, NJ:
    Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Newman, R. S., & Schwager, M. T. (1993). Students’ perceptions of the teacher
    137
    and classmates in relation to reported help in math class. Elementary School
    Journal, 94,3-17.
    Newman, R. S., & Schwager, M. T. (1995). Students’ help seeking during
    problem solving: Effects of grade, goal, and prior achievement. American
    Educational Research Journal, 32, 352-376.
    Nicholls, J. G. (1979). Quality and equality in intellectual development: The
    role of motivation in education. American Psychology, 34, 1071-1084.
    Paris, S. G., & Newman, R. S. (1990). Developmental aspects of self-regulated
    learning. Educational Psychologist, 25, 87-102.
    Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning, In
    M. Boekaerts & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation(pp.451-502).
    San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining
    self-regulated. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459-470.
    Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V.(1990). Motivational and self-regulated
    learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of
    Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
    Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory,
    research, and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill Prentice-Hall.
    Roeser, R. W., Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. C. (1996). Perceptions of the school
    psychological environment and early adolescents’ psychological and behavioral
    functioning in school:The mediating role of goals and belonging. Journal of
    Educational Psychology, 88(3), 408-422.
    Ryan, A. M., & Hicks, L. (1997). Social goals, academic goals, and avoiding
    seeking help in the classroom. Journal of Early Adolescence, 17, 452-171.
    Ryan, A. M., Hicks, L., & Midgley, C. (1997). Social goals, academic goals,
    138
    and avoiding seeking help in the classroom. Journal of Early Adolescence,
    17, 152-171.
    Ryan, A. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). “Should I ask for help?’’ The role of
    motivation and attitudes in adolescents’ help seeking in math class. Journal of
    Educational Psychology, 89(2), 329-341.
    Ryan, A. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (1998). Achievement and social motivational
    influences on help seeking in the classroom. In S. A. Karabenick(Ed.), Strategic
    help seeking: Implications for learning and teaching(pp.117-140). Mahwah, NJ:
    Erlbaum.
    Ryan, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., & Midgley, C. (2001). Avoiding seeking help in
    the classroom: who and why?Educational Psychology Review, 13(2).
    93-114.
    Ryan, A. M., Gheen, M., & Midgley, C. (1998). Why do some students avoid
    asking for help? An examination of the interplay among students’ academic
    efficacy, teacher’s social emotional role and classroom goal structure.
    Journal of Early Psychology, 90, 528-535.
    Schunk, D. H.,(1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational
    Psychologist, 26, 207-231.
    Taylor, S. E., Wayment, H. A., & Carrillo, M.(1996). Social comparison,
    self-regulation, and motivation. In R. M. Sorrention & E. T.
    Higgins(Eds.),Handbook of motivation and cognition(pp.3-27). New York:
    Guilford Press.
    Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2001). Academic self-handicapping: What we
    know, what more there is to learn. Educational Psychology Review, 13 (2 ),
    115-138.
    Van der Meij, H. (1994). Student questioning: A componential analysis.
    139
    Learning and individual differences, 82, 137-161.
    Van der Meij, H. (1988). Constraints on questioning-asking in classroom.
    Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 505-512.
    Wentzels, K. R. (1989). Adolescent classroom goals, standards for performance,
    and academic achievement: An interactionist perspective. Journal of
    Educational Psychology, 81, 131-142.
    Wolters, C. A. (1998). Self-regulated learning and college students’ regulation
    of motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 224-235.
    Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons M. (1986). Development of a structured
    interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies.
    American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614-628.
    Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons M (1990). Student differences in
    self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy
    and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51-59.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:2003-06-27公開
    QR CODE