前人已證明將多項式變曲率隔震系統架設於振動台上，藉由直接量測隔震系統層間總剪力回授至主結構系統之數學模型，計算主結構樓板絕對位移反應並以此為命令發送至振動台，藉由此即時互制作用之混合實驗確實可模擬出隔震系統於真實震波作用下，主結構樓板上隔震系統之反應，並將真實振動台實驗簡化並取代。本文進一步將混合實驗推廣至被動控制摩擦質量阻尼系統上，首先以振動台實驗測試摩擦調諧質量阻尼器(FTMD)於高阻尼與低阻尼控制下相較於主結構系統無控制下之減振效果，證實FTMD系統被動控制確實可降低主結構系統受震波作用之反應。其次，將主結構系統簡化為數學模型，直接量測FTMD系統層間總剪力回授計算下一步主結構系統反應，並發送命令至振動台，使振動台可模擬出主結構系統於震波作用下絕對位移的反應，以此混合實驗重現FTMD系統於高阻尼與低阻尼控制下振動台實驗之反應。由本文混合實驗結果與振動台實驗數據比較結果證實，無論FTMD系統高阻尼與低阻尼控制下皆可以混合實驗重現振動台實驗時，FTMD系統裝設於主結構系統上之反應。由此可證明本混合實驗之架構不僅可重現隔震系統於振動台實驗下的反應，透過混合實驗模擬實驗元件與主結構系統間之互制反應，更可將混合實驗推展至被動控制摩擦質量阻尼系統上。因此可證明本混合實驗架構於結構實驗之發展性，取代傳統之振動台實驗，並可簡化複雜之數值模擬推導，為未來具相當發展性之結構實驗方式。

The friction-type tuned mass damper system (FTMD) is adopted in this thesis as the target for implementing the hybrid testing technique. Firstly, the shaking table tests of the FTMD controlled by high/low friction setups are conducted. The vibration suppression of the main structure equipped with the FTMD subjected to earthquake loading can be investigated and ensured. Secondly, the main structure is replaced by its numerical model and is embedded inside the hybrid testing configuration. The total shear force estimated from the inertial force calculated from the measured acceleration is fed back into the simulation part to find the absolute displacement command of the main structure. The shaking table is then adopted as the test bed of the hybrid testing to behave like the main structure and to interact with the equipped FTMD system. The test results of both hybrid tests and their corresponding shaking table tests illustrate similar control performance of the FTMD. Therefore, the hybrid testing technique can be extended to the friction-type control devices

[1] Almazan, J. L., Llera, J. C., Inaudi, J. A., Lopez-Garcia, D., Izquierdo, L. E., A bidirectional and homogeneous tuned mass damper: A new device for passive control of vibrations, Engineering Structures, 29(7):1548-1560 (2007)
[2] Chung, W. J., Yun, C. B., Kim, N. S. and Seo, J. W. “Shaking table and pseudodynamic tests for the evaluation of the seismic performance of base-isolated structures” Engineering Structures, 365-379 (1999)
[3] Frahm, H., “Device for Damping Vibration of Bodies”, US Patent, No. 989958, (1909).
[4] Hakuno, M., Shidawara, M. and Hara, T., “Dynamic destructive test of a cantileverbeam controlled by an analog-computer” Transactions Japa Society of Engineers, 1-9 (1969).
[5] Horiuchi, T., M. Inoue, T. Konno and W. Yamagishi. Development of a real-time hybrid experimental system using a shaking table - (Proposal of experiment concept and feasibility study with rigid secondary system). Jsme International Journal Series C-Mechanical Systems Machine Elements and Manufacturing 42: 255-264. (1999)
[6] Lee, S.K., E.C. Park, K.W. Min and J.H. Park. Real-time substructuring technique for the shaking table test of upper substructures. Engineering Structures 29: 2219-2232. (2007)
[7] Lu, L. Y., L. L. Chung, L. Y. Wu, G. L. Lin, “Dynamic analysis of structures with friction devices using discrete-time state-space formulation” Computers and Structures, Vol171-p1-9 (1969).
[8] Ozcelik, R., B. Binici and O. Kurç. Pseudo Dynamic Testing of an RC Frame Retrofitted with Chevron Braces. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 16: 515-539, (2012)
[9] Reinhorn, A.M., M. Bruneau, S.Y. Chu, X. Shao and M.C. Pitman. Large scale real time dynamic hybrid testing technique -shake tables substructure testing. 2003 ASCE/SEI Structures Congress and Exposition: Engineering Smarter, May 29, 2003 - May 31, 2003. Seattle, WA, United states: American Society of Civil Engineers, 67-72. (2003)
[10] Ricciardelli, F., Vickery, B. J., Tuned vibration absorbers with dry friction damping, Earthquake Engineering and Structure Dynamics, 28:707-723 (1999)
[11] Stefano, S., Gloria, T., Georges, M, and Francisco, J. M., “Experimental investigation on a base isolation system incorporating steel-Teflon sliders and pressurized fluid viscous spring dampers” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 37, 225-242 (2008)
[12] Takanashi, K. et al., “Nonlinear earthquake response analysis of structures by a computer actuator online system” Transactions Architectural Instruction Japan, 229,77-83 (1975).
[13] Wang, Y. P., Lee, C. L., Yo, T. H., “Modified state space procedures for pseudodynamic testing” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 30, 59-80 (2001).
[14] Warburton G.B., “Optimum Absorber Parameters for Various Combinations of Response and Excitation Parameters”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp.381-401, (1982).
[15] Yang, T.Y., B. Stojadinovic and J. Moehle. Hybrid simulation of a zipper-braced steel frame under earthquake excitation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 38: 95-113. (2009)
[16] 王建，「變曲率滑動隔震防治近斷層震波之實驗與分析」，國立高雄第一科技大學營建工程研究所，碩士論文，(2006)。
[17] 朱凱業，「多項式變曲率滑動支承之混合實驗」，國立成功大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文，(2013)。
[18] 何玉泊，’’半主動摩擦調諧質量阻尼器之振動台試驗與減振分析’’，國立中興大學土木研究所，碩士論文，(2010)
[19] 吳依寰，”摩擦型阻尼器之擬動態實驗與震動台驗證”，國立成功大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文，(2011)。
[20] 李明鴻，「應用快速擬動態試驗技術於非線性含斜撐框架動態反應之模擬與試驗」，國立成功大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文，(2006)。
[21] 林憲良，「降伏型非線性構件之慢速擬動態實驗與數值模擬」，國立成功大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文，(2007)。
[22] 張家瑋，「不同加載速率對擬動態實驗誤差的影響」，國立成功大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文，(2008)。
[23] 張順益、蔡克銓、陳冠州，「對時間積分之運動方程式在擬動態試驗上之應用」，中國土木水利工程學刊，第617-625頁，(1997)。
[24] 許敬昀，「FTMD摩擦型調諧質量阻尼器第一階段混合實驗實驗報告書」，國立成功大學土木工程研究所，實驗報告書，(2014)。
[25] 許敬昀，「FTMD摩擦型調諧質量阻尼器第二階段混合實驗實驗報告書」，國立成功大學土木工程研究所，實驗報告書，(2014)。
[26] 盧煉元、林沛暘、林子剛、葉士瑋、莊翔圩、何銘川(2011) 先進減震高架地板於設備防震之應用研究，99年度國科會專題研究計畫成果報告書，計畫編號 NSC 99-2625-M-327-002。
[27] 鍾立來、吳賴雲、陳宣宏、黃旭輝、張忠信、林廷翰 (2007)，摩擦鐘擺行調諧質塊阻尼器之最佳化設計研究，國家地震工程研究中心報告。
[28] 簡旭甫，”不同加載速率下摩擦單擺支承之消能行為測試，國立成功大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文，(2012)。
[29] 顏呈璁，”多重取樣量測對擬動態實驗誤差之影響”，國立成功大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文，(2009)。
[30] 羅仕杰，「記憶體共享光纖網路設備於即時擬動態實驗之初步研究」，國立暨南國際大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文，(2005)。