本研究探討太陽能生態系統中，作為主導者的中心企業如何面對制度邏輯衝突並達成一致，以實現生態系統的永續發展。隨著太陽能產業在台灣的快速發展，不同參與者之間的邏輯衝突日益凸顯，如何協調這些衝突成為生態系統健康發展的關鍵。然而，現有研究較少關注生態系統中的制度邏輯衝突，尤其是中小企業視角的探討更為缺乏，研究旨在填補這一研究空白，為學術界和實務界提供新的洞見。
本研究以茂鴻電力公司為個案，採用質性研究方法中的單一個案研究進行深入分析。通過對公司高層管理者的訪談、地方里長的訪談、蒐集次級資料的等方式，探索該公司如何在其太陽能生態系統中處理各種制度邏輯衝突。研究發現，生態系統中確實存在多元邏輯，如政府的政策邏輯、供應商的市場邏輯等，這些邏輯間的衝突影響著生態系統的運作。
研究結果顯示，作為生態系統的主導者，茂鴻電力公司採用了靈活多樣的策略來調和這些衝突。具體來說，個案公司根據衝突的程度採取對應合作、妥協或是競爭策略，策略的運用需要信賴、契約和關鍵資源，彼此可交錯使用。當邏輯和行動的相容性高，且彼此的邏輯對生態系統的運作皆具有主導性時，衝突程度較小時，使用合作策略；中等程度的衝突則會使用妥協和競爭策略；衝突程度較為密集的情況亦採用妥協策略。
本研究的理論貢獻主要體現在兩個方面：首先，通過實證案例將制度邏輯理論與生態系統理論相結合，擴展了兩個領域的研究範疇。其次，研究發現生態系統中特有的制度邏輯衝突應對策略。在實務方面，本研究強調採用生態系統觀點來促進太陽光電產業發展的重要性，並為企業如何在生態系統中處理合作困境提供策略引導。

This study explores how focal firms, as ecosystem leaders, address institutional logic conflicts to foster sustainable development in Taiwan’s solar energy sector. With the industry’s rapid growth, conflicts among diverse participants have become prominent, necessitating effective conflict resolution. Existing research has overlooked these conflicts, especially from SMEs’ perspectives. This study fills this gap, offering insights for academia and practitioners.
Using a qualitative single-case study of Maohong Power Company, data were gathered from interviews with senior management and local community leaders, along with secondary sources. The findings reveal multiple logics within the ecosystem, such as government policy and supplier market logics, with conflicts impacting operations.
As a dominant player, Maohong Power employs flexible strategies to reconcile conflicts, using cooperative, compromise, or competitive approaches based on conflict intensity. Trust, contracts, and key resources are crucial for these strategies. Cooperative strategies are used for lower conflict levels, compromise and competitive strategies for moderate conflicts, and compromise strategies for intense conflicts.
This study contributes to theory by integrating institutional logic and ecosystem theories through empirical analysis and identifying ecosystem-specific strategies for conflict resolution. Practically, it highlights the importance of an ecosystem perspective for advancing the solar photovoltaic industry and offers strategic guidance for managing collaboration challenges.

Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard business review, 84(4), 98.
Adner, R. (2012). The wide lens: A new strategy for innovation. Penguin Uk.
Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of management, 43(1), 39-58.
Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic management journal, 31(3), 306-333.
Ågerfalk, P. J., & Fitzgerald, B. (2008). Outsourcing to an unknown workforce: Exploring opensurcing as a global sourcing strategy. MIS quarterly, 385-409.
Alford, R. R., & Friedland, R. (1985). Powers of theory: Capitalism, the state, and democracy. Cambridge University Press.
Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is Qualitative in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7
Auerswald, P. E., & Dani, L. (2017). The adaptive life cycle of entrepreneurial ecosystems: the biotechnology cluster. Small Business Economics, 49, 97-117.
Basole, R. C. (2008). Visualization of interfirm relations in a converging mobile ecosystem. 2008 7th International Conference on Mobile Business,
Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature.
Battilana, J., Besharov, M., & Mitzinneck, B. (2017). On hybrids and hybrid organizing: A review and roadmap for future research. The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, 2, 128-162.
Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419-1440.
Beck, R., Gregory, R. W., & Marschollek, O. (2015). The Interplay of Institutional Logics in it Public-Private Partnerships. SIGMIS Database, 46(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/2747544.2747547
Benítez-Ávila, C., Hartmann, A., & Dewulf, G. (2019). Contractual and relational governance as positioned-practices in ongoing public–private partnership projects. Project management journal, 50(6), 716-733.
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. In Social theory re-wired (pp. 110-122). Routledge.
Berghäll, S., Mattila, O., Kuusisto, J., Häyrinen, L., & Toppinen, A. (2014). Are the Social Layers of Ecosystem Services Understandable Through the Service Dominant Logic: The Business Potential of Forest as an Experience. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS,
Besharov, M. L., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Multiple Institutional Logics in Organizations: Explaining Their Varied Nature and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 364-381. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0431
Bhappu, A. D. (2000). The Japanese family: An institutional logic for Japanese corporate networks and Japanese management. Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 409-415.
Binder, A. (2007). For love and money: Organizations’ creative responses to multiple environmental logics. Theory and society, 36, 547-571.
Bluhm, D. J., Harman, W., Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (2011). Qualitative Research in Management: A Decade of Progress. Journal of management studies, 48(8), 1866-1891. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00972.x
Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (1991). De la justification: les économies de la grandeur.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Stanford University Press.
Brantnell, A., & Baraldi, E. (2020). Following unique logics despite institutional complexity: An inductive study of academic inventors and institutional logics [Article]. European Management Journal, 38(5), 684-697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.02.005
Brem, A., & Radziwon, A. (2017). Efficient Triple Helix collaboration fostering local niche innovation projects–A case from Denmark. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 130-141.
Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future.
Bryman, A. (1984). The Debate about Quantitative and Qualitative Research: A Question of Method or Epistemology? The British Journal of Sociology, 35(1), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.2307/590553
Bryman, A. (2004). Qualitative research on leadership: A critical but appreciative review. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 729-769. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.007
Cappellaro, G., Tracey, P., & Greenwood, R. (2020). From Logic Acceptance to Logic Rejection: The Process of Destabilization in Hybrid Organizations. Organization Science, 31(2), 415-438. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1306
Ceccagnoli, M., Forman, C., Huang, P., & Wu, D. (2012). Cocreation of value in a platform ecosystem! The case of enterprise software. MIS quarterly, 263-290.
Cennamo, C., & Santalo, J. (2013). Platform competition: Strategic trade‐offs in platform markets. Strategic management journal, 34(11), 1331-1350.
Chung, C.-N., & Luo, X. (2008). Institutional Logics or Agency Costs: The Influence of Corporate Governance Models on Business Group Restructuring in Emerging Economies. Organization Science, 19(5), 766-784. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0342
Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. (2014). Business research methods. Mcgraw-hill.
CPP, I. (2008). Thomas-kilmann conflict mode.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
Cusumano, M. A. (2002). The elements of platform leadership. MIT Sloan management review.
Cusumano, M. A. (2008). How companies become platform leaders. MIT Sloan management review.
Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 491-512.
DATA EXPLORER. (2024). Net Zero Tracker. Retrieved 6/17 from https://zerotracker.net/
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. sage.
Dessers, E., & Mohr, B. J. (2020). An ecosystem perspective on care coordination: Lessons from the field. International Journal of Care Coordination, 23(1), 5-8.
DiMaggio, P. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23(1), 263-287.
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. 1, 38.
DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. Institutional patterns and organizations, 3-21.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review, 48(2), 147-160.
Dobbin, F. (1994). Forging industrial policy: The United States, Britain, and France in the railway age. Cambridge university press.
Dobbin, F., & Sutton, J. R. (1998). The strength of a weak state: The rights revolution and the rise of human resources management divisions. American Journal of Sociology, 104(2), 441-476.
Eisenahardt, K. (1989). Building theory from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32.
Fankhauser, S., Smith, S. M., Allen, M., Axelsson, K., Hale, T., Hepburn, C., Kendall, J. M., Khosla, R., Lezaun, J., Mitchell-Larson, E., Obersteiner, M., Rajamani, L., Rickaby, R., Seddon, N., & Wetzer, T. (2022). The meaning of net zero and how to get it right. Nature Climate Change, 12(1), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01245-w
Flick, U., Von Kardoff, E., & Steinke, I. (2004). A companion to qualitative research. Sage.
Fligstein, N. (1990). The Transformation of Corporate Control Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. In: Press.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2011). Case study. The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 4, 301-316.
Fossey, E., Harvey, C., McDermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Australian & New Zealand journal of psychiatry, 36(6), 717-732.
Friedland, R., & Alford, R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, 232-263.
George, A. L. (2019). Case studies and theory development: The method of structured, focused comparison. Springer.
Gerlak, A. K., & Heikkila, T. (2006). Comparing collaborative mechanisms in large-scale ecosystem governance. Natural Resources Journal, 657-707.
Glaser, V. L., Fast, N. J., Harmon, D. J., & Green, S. E. (2016). Institutional Frame Switching: How Institutional Logics Shape Individual Action. In How Institutions Matter! (Vol. 48A, pp. 35-69). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X201600048A001
Gould, S. J. (1977). Ontogeny and phylogeny (Vol. 9). Belknap Press of Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA.
Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317-371. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2011.590299
Guyader, H., Nansubuga, B., & Skill, K. (2021). Institutional Logics at Play in a Mobility-as-a-Service Ecosystem. Sustainability, 13(15), 8285. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8285
Haines-Young, R., & Potschin, M. (2010). The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. Ecosystem Ecology: a new synthesis, 1, 110-139.
Halinen, A., Medlin, C. J., & Törnroos, J.-Å. (2012). Time and process in business network research. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(2), 215-223.
Hannah, D. P., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2018). How firms navigate cooperation and competition in nascent ecosystems. Strategic management journal, 39(12), 3163-3192.
Haveman, H. A., & Rao, H. (1997). Structuring a theory of moral sentiments: Institutional and organizational coevolution in the early thrift industry. American Journal of Sociology, 102(6), 1606-1651.
Hedberg, L. M., & Lounsbury, M. (2021). Not just small potatoes: Cultural entrepreneurship in the moralizing of markets. Organization Science, 32(2), 433-454.
Heide, J. B. (1994). Interorganizational governance in marketing channels. Journal of marketing, 58(1), 71-85.
Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Keystones and dominators: Framing operating and technology strategy in a business ecosystem. Harvard Business School, Boston, 3, 1-82.
IEA. (2018). World Energy Outlook 2018. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2018
IEA. (2024a). Renewables. https://www.iea.org/energy-system/renewables
IEA. (2024b). Trends in electric cars. Retrieved 6/13 from https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2024/trends-in-electric-cars
Ingstrup, M. B., Aarikka-Stenroos, L., & Adlin, N. (2021). When institutional logics meet: Alignment and misalignment in collaboration between academia and practitioners. Industrial Marketing Management, 92, 267-276.
IPCC. (2018). Global Warming of 1.5°C.An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. C. U. Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157940
Isenberg, D. J. (2010). How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard business review, 88(6), 40-50.
Ismail, S., Heeks, R., Nicholson, B., & Aman, A. (2017). Analyzing conflict and its management within ICT4D partnerships: an institutional logics perspective. Information Technology for Development, 24, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1320962
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic management journal, 39(8), 2255-2276.
Järvi, K., Almpanopoulou, A., & Ritala, P. (2018). Organization of knowledge ecosystems: Prefigurative and partial forms. Research policy, 47(8), 1523-1537.
Jarzabkowski, P., Bednarek, R., & Lê, J. K. (2014). Producing persuasive findings: Demystifying ethnographic textwork in strategy and organization research. Strategic organization, 12(4), 274-287.
Jay, J. (2013). Navigating Paradox as a Mechanism of Change and Innovation in Hybrid Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137-159. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0772
Jehn, K. A. (1995). A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict. Administrative science quarterly, 40(2), 256-282. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393638
Jehn, K. A. (1997). A Qualitative Analysis of Conflict Types and Dimensions in Organizational Groups. Administrative science quarterly, 42(3), 530-557. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393737
Jehn, K. A., Greer, L., Levine, S., & Szulanski, G. (2008). The Effects of Conflict Types, Dimensions, and Emergent States on Group Outcomes. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17(6), 465-495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-008-9107-0
John, W., Creswell, P., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. sage.
Jones, C., Maoret, M., Massa, F. G., & Svejenova, S. (2012). Rebels with a cause: Formation, contestation, and expansion of the de novo category “modern architecture,” 1870–1975. Organization Science, 23(6), 1523-1545.
Kapoor, R. (2018). Ecosystems: broadening the locus of value creation. Journal of Organization Design, 7(1), 1-16.
Kapoor, R., & Lee, J. M. (2013). Coordinating and competing in ecosystems: How organizational forms shape new technology investments. Strategic management journal, 34(3), 274-296.
Kotz, M., Levermann, A., & Wenz, L. (2024). The economic commitment of climate change. Nature, 628(8008), 551-557. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07219-0
Kraatz, M. S., & Block, E. S. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, 840, 243-275.
Krausmann, F., Gingrich, S., Eisenmenger, N., Erb, K.-H., Haberl, H., & Fischer-Kowalski, M. (2009). Growth in global materials use, GDP and population during the 20th century. Ecological Economics, 68, 2696-2705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.007
Lizardo, O., & Strand, M. (2010). Skills, toolkits, contexts and institutions: Clarifying the relationship between different approaches to cognition in cultural sociology. Poetics, 38(2), 205-228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2009.11.003
Lohmer, J., Bugert, N., & Lasch, R. (2020). Analysis of resilience strategies and ripple effect in blockchain-coordinated supply chains: An agent-based simulation study. International Journal of Production Economics, 228, 107882.
Lounsbury, M. (2002). Institutional transformation and status mobility: The professionalization of the field of finance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 255-266.
Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. (2019). Cultural entrepreneurship: A new agenda for the study of entrepreneurial processes and possibilities. Cambridge University Press.
Lounsbury, M., Steele, C. W. J., Wang, M. S., & Toubiana, M. (2021). New Directions in the Study of Institutional Logics: From Tools to Phenomena. Annual Review of Sociology, 47(Volume 47, 2021), 261-280. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-090320-111734
Lounsbury, M., & Wang, M. S. (2020). Into the Clearing: Back to the future of constitutive institutional analysis. Organization Theory, 1(1), 2631787719891173. https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787719891173
Lui, S. S., Wong, Y.-y., & Liu, W. (2009). Asset specificity roles in interfirm cooperation: Reducing opportunistic behavior or increasing cooperative behavior? Journal of Business research, 62(11), 1214-1219.
Lusch, R. F. (2011). Reframing supply chain management: a service‐dominant logic perspective. Journal of supply chain management, 47(1), 14-18.
Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2014). Service-dominant logic: Premises, perspectives, possibilities. Cambridge University Press.
Macneil, I. R. (1980). Power, contract, and the economic model. Journal of Economic Issues, 14(4), 909-923.
Matthies, B. D., D'Amato, D., Berghäll, S., Ekholm, T., Hoen, H. F., Holopainen, J., Korhonen, J. E., Lähtinen, K., Mattila, O., Toppinen, A., Valsta, L., Wang, L., & Yousefpour, R. (2016). An ecosystem service-dominant logic? – integrating the ecosystem service approach and the service-dominant logic. Journal of Cleaner Production, 124, 51-64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.109
McPherson, C. M., & Sauder, M. (2013). Logics in action: Managing institutional complexity in a drug court. Administrative science quarterly, 58(2), 165-196.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
Meyer, A. D. (1982). Adapting to Environmental Jolts. Administrative science quarterly, 27(4), 515-537. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392528
Meyer, J. W., & Jepperson, R. L. (2000). The “actors” of modern society: The cultural construction of social agency. Sociological theory, 18(1), 100-120.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
Miller, D., Le Breton‐Miller, I., & Lester, R. H. (2011). Family and lone founder ownership and strategic behaviour: Social context, identity, and institutional logics. Journal of management studies, 48(1), 1-25.
Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard business review, 71(3), 75-86.
Murphy, A. (2014). The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure and Process [Book Review]. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 35(6), 584-584. https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-06-2014-0102
Myers, M. D. (2019). Qualitative research in business and management.
Natili, M., & Ronchi, S. (2023). The Politics of the European Minimum Wage: Overcoming Ideological, Territorial and Institutional Conflicts in the EU Multi‐level Arena. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies.
NationalGrids. (2022). What is nuclear energy (and why is it considered a clean energy)? https://www.nationalgrid.com/stories/energy-explained/what-nuclear-energy-and-why-it-considered-clean-energy#:~:text=Nuclear%20energy%20is%20sometimes%20referred,burning%20fossil%20fuels%20for%20energy.
Neuman, D. (1997). Chapter 5: Phenomenography: Exploring the roots of numeracy. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph, 63-177.
Nigam, A., & Ocasio, W. (2010). Event attention, environmental sensemaking, and change in institutional logics: An inductive analysis of the effects of public attention to Clinton's health care reform initiative. Organization Science, 21(4), 823-841.
Öberg, C., & Shih, T. T.-Y. (2014). Divergent and convergent logic of firms: Barriers and enablers for development and commercialization of innovations. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(3), 419-428. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.12.010
Ochieng, P. A. (2009). An analysis of the strengths and limitation of qualitative and quantitative research paradigms. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 13, 13.
Oh, C. H., Shin, J., & Ho, S. S. H. (2023). Conflicts between mining companies and communities: Institutional environments and conflict resolution approaches. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 32(2), 638-656.
Osmonbekov, T., Gregory, B., Chelariu, C., & Johnston, W. J. (2016). The impact of social and contractual enforcement on reseller performance: the mediating role of coordination and inequity during adoption of a new technology. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 31(6), 808-818.
Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455-476.
Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2013). Embedded in Hybrid Contexts: How Individuals in Organizations Respond to Competing Institutional Logics. In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional Logics in Action, Part B (Vol. 39 Part B, pp. 3-35). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X(2013)0039AB014
Parrondo, A. C. (2019). The European Green Deal sets out how to make Europe the first climate-neutral continent by 2050, boosting the economy, improving people's health and quality of life, caring for nature, and leaving no one behind https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_19_6691
Pomegbe, W. W. K., Li, W., Dogbe, C. S. K., & Otoo, C. O. A. (2021). Closeness or opportunistic behavior? Mediating the business ecosystem governance mechanisms and coordination relationship. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 28(3), 530-552. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-01-2020-0013
Pondy, L. R. (1967). Organizational Conflict: Concepts and Models. Administrative science quarterly, 12(2), 296-320. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391553
Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic management journal, 23(8), 707-725.
Radziwon, A., & Bogers, M. (2018). Managing SMEs’ collaboration across organizational boundaries within a regional business ecosystem. In Researching open innovation in SMEs (pp. 213-248). World Scientific.
RE100. (2024). RE100 annual disclosure report 2023. https://www.there100.org/our-work/publications/re100-2023-annual-disclosure-report
RE100Taiwan. (2024). 實現全球 100% 綠電革命. https://www.re100.org.tw/
Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30(6), 629-652.
Roundy, P. T. (2017). Hybrid organizations and the logics of entrepreneurial ecosystems. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(4), 1221-1237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0452-9
Rukanova, B., Wigand, R. T., van Stijn, E., & Tan, Y.-H. (2015). Understanding transnational information systems with supranational governance: A multi-level conflict management perspective. Government Information Quarterly, 32(2), 182-197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.12.003
Saz-Carranza, A., & Longo, F. (2012). Managing Competing Institutional Logics in Public–Private Joint Ventures. Public Management Review, 14(3), 331-357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2011.637407
Scaringella, L., & Radziwon, A. (2018). Innovation, entrepreneurial, knowledge, and business ecosystems: Old wine in new bottles? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 59-87.
Schmidt, S. M., & Kochan, T. A. (1972). Conflict: Toward Conceptual Clarity. Administrative science quarterly, 17(3), 359-370. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392149
Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Sage publications.
Shipilov, A., & Gawer, A. (2020). Integrating research on interorganizational networks and ecosystems. Academy of management annals, 14(1), 92-121.
Smets, M., Jarzabkowski, P., Burke, G. T., & Spee, P. (2015). Reinsurance Trading in Lloyd’s of London: Balancing Conflicting-yet-Complementary Logics in Practice. Academy of Management Journal, 58(3), 932-970. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0638
Spigel, B., & Harrison, R. (2018). Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic entrepreneurship journal, 12(1), 151-168.
Stake, R. E. (2013). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford press.
Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: a sympathetic critique. European planning studies, 23(9), 1759-1769.
Strang, D., & Soule, S. A. (1998). Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 265-290.
Suominen, A., Seppänen, M., & Dedehayir, O. (2019). A bibliometric review on innovation systems and ecosystems: a research agenda. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(2), 335-360.
Suri, H. (2011). Purposeful Sampling in Qualitative Research Synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal, 11(2), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ1102063
Tangpong, C., Hung, K.-T., & Ro, Y. K. (2010). The interaction effect of relational norms and agent cooperativeness on opportunism in buyer–supplier relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 28(5), 398-414.
Tansley, A. G. (1935). The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology, 16(3), 284-307.
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic management journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
Thelen, K. (2004). How institutions evolve: The political economy of skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge University Press.
Thomas, K., & Kilmann, R. (1974). Thomas-kilmann conflict mode. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/t02326-000
Thomas, K. W. (1976). Conflict and conflict management. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psycholog (pp. 889-935). Rand McNally.
Thomas, K. W. (1992). Conflict and Conflict Management: Reflections and Update. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(3), 265-274. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2488472
Thornton, P. H. (2002). The rise of the corporation in a craft industry: Conflict and conformity in institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 81-101.
Thornton, P. H. (2004). Markets from culture: Institutional logics and organizational decisions in higher education publishing. Stanford University Press.
Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958-1990 [Article]. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801-843. https://doi.org/10.1086/210361
Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, 840(2008), 99-128.
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process. OUP Oxford.
Tracey, P., Phillips, N., & Jarvis, O. (2011). Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model. Organization Science, 22(1), 60-80.
Um, K.-H., & Kim, S.-M. (2019). The effects of supply chain collaboration on performance and transaction cost advantage: The moderation and nonlinear effects of governance mechanisms. International Journal of Production Economics, 217, 97-111.
PARIS AGREEMENT, (2015). https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf
UN. (2023a). For a livable climate: Net-zero commitments must be backed by credible action. https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/net-zero-coalition
UN. (2023b). Renewable energy – powering a safer future. https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/raising-ambition/renewable-energy
UNFCCC. (2023a). First global stocktake. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/cma2023_L17_adv.pdf
UNFCCC. (2023b). Why the Global Stocktake is Important for Climate Action this Decade. https://unfccc.int/topics/global-stocktake/about-the-global-stocktake/why-the-global-stocktake-is-important-for-climate-action-this-decade
Van der Borgh, M., Cloodt, M., & Romme, A. G. L. (2012). Value creation by knowledge‐based ecosystems: evidence from a field study. R&D Management, 42(2), 150-169.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Why “service”? Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 36, 25-38.
Wacker, J. G., Yang, C., & Sheu, C. (2016). A transaction cost economics model for estimating performance effectiveness of relational and contractual governance: Theory and statistical results. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(11), 1551-1575.
Wareham, J., Fox, P. B., & Cano Giner, J. L. (2014). Technology ecosystem governance. Organization Science, 25(4), 1195-1215.
Weinberg, D. (2014). Contemporary social constructionism: Key themes. Temple University Press.
WhiteHouse. (2021). The Long-Term Strategy of the United States: Pathways to Net-Zero Greenhouse Gas Emissions by 2050. t. U. S. D. o. S. a. t. U. S. E. O. o. t. President. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/US-Long-Term-Strategy.pdf
Wibisono, Y. Y., Govindaraju, R., Irianto, D., & Sudirman, I. (2019). Managing differences, interaction, and partnership quality in global inter-firm relationships: An empirical analysis on offshore IT outsourcing. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 12(3), 730-754.
Williamson, O. E., & Ouchi, W. G. (1981). The markets and hierarchies and visible hand perspectives. Perspectives on organization design and behavior, 347-370.
Wittmayer, J. M., Avelino, F., Pel, B., & Campos, I. (2021). Contributing to sustainable and just energy systems? The mainstreaming of renewable energy prosumerism within and across institutional logics. Energy Policy, 149, 112053. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112053
Womack, D. F. (1988). Assessing the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Survey. Management Communication Quarterly, 1(3), 321-349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318988001003004
Yan, S., Ferraro, F., & Almandoz, J. (2019). The Rise of Socially Responsible Investment Funds: The Paradoxical Role of the Financial Logic. Administrative science quarterly, 64(2), 466-501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839218773324
Yilmaz, K. (2013). Comparison of quantitative and qualitative research traditions: Epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences. European journal of education, 48(2), 311-325.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). Sage Thousand Oaks, CA.
York, J. G., Vedula, S., & Lenox, M. J. (2018). It’s Not Easy Building Green: The Impact of Public Policy, Private Actors, and Regional Logics on Voluntary Standards Adoption. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1492-1523. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0769
王涵. (2023, 2023/02/13). 2050實現碳中和可能嗎？日本碳中和實現路徑圖. Retrieved 06/13 from https://ubrand.udn.com/ubrand/story/123647/6962838
台灣電力公司. (2023). 長期電源開發規劃. https://www.taipower.com.tw/tc/page.aspx?mid=212&cid=122&cchk=260a432c-fc0e-47e0-a90e-2bc0cc52cb61
交通部. (2024). 極端氣候災防預警暨汛期防汛準備辦理情形專題報告. https://ppg.ly.gov.tw/ppg/SittingAttachment/download/2024032787/12022491130009460002.pdf
行政院. (2019). 《電業法》修法—發展綠能，啟動國家能源轉型. https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/2ae8bfb8-6014-49d1-b04e-75374fbd6096
徐嬋, & 楊光宇. (2024). 尺素金聲丨14.5億千瓦！全球可再生能源“最大增長”為何來自中國？. 人民網. http://finance.people.com.cn/BIG5/n1/2024/0127/c1004-40167805.html
國家發展委員會. (2022). 臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明. Retrieved 06/10 from https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=DEE68AAD8B38BD76
寇江澤, & 丁怡婷. (2023). 積極穩妥推進碳達峰碳中和. 中國共產黨新聞網. Retrieved 6/12 from http://cpc.people.com.cn/BIG5/n1/2023/0406/c64387-32658416.html
經濟部. (2018). 推動能源轉型「展綠、增氣、減煤、非核」. https://www.moea.gov.tw/MNS/populace/Policy/Policy.aspx?menu_id=32800&policy_id=9
經濟部能源署. (2024a). 2023年光電併網量2.5GW 年度達成量史上最高 持續掌握案源追趕進度. https://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/populace/news/News.aspx?kind=1&menu_id=40&news_id=113485
經濟部能源署. (2024b). 再生能源發電量111-112年度. https://www.esist.org.tw/database/search/electric-generation/r?q=H4sIAAAAAAAAA02MwQqEMAxE_2XOXip76q9Ike4a3MK21TYisuy_mxoWPCS8mUzmi4VKyBMsDnSgNI0HrDG98iqsFGEfHSr7wpowf6UZ5XjxlgJLYdzfUlnpQy8OORnYAZzhbl7fvLpFyRWSdX34ub01JfMMuV13XxnudwIPWFifrwAAAA==
經濟部能源署. (2024c). 電力統計. https://www.esist.org.tw/database/search/electric-generation/r?q=H4sIAAAAAAAAA02MywqDQAxF_.Wu3Yy4ml8pIqIpHXAezkRESv.9iaHQRU5OLpe8UaiGvMLjQgdK63TBO9eb7.JmEX7o0HiubA33u6xjHm8_UmB5GM.XvGy00cIhJwf_AGeMf1mvWTui9M4ieIZKuhZFViSBjuTj5wvRySBXrgAAAA==
葉卉軒. (2023). 沃旭能源：大彰化西南第一階段離岸風場 全數併網. 經濟日報. https://money.udn.com/money/story/5612/7442859?from=edn_search_tag_result
鄒敏惠. (2023). 台灣第三座商轉離岸風場 苗栗海能風電47支風機啟用. https://e-info.org.tw/node/236765
潘淑滿. (2022). 質性研究：理論與應用 (Vol. 2). 心理.
藍之青. (2015, 2015/11/23). 巴黎氣候會議：後《京都議定書》的時代轉捩點. 轉角國際 Udn Global. https://global.udn.com/global_vision/story/8663/1332141#sup_2