簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 楊泄煌
Yang, Yih-hwang
論文名稱: 在數量折扣環境下供應商選擇模式之研究
A Model for Supplier Selection under Multi-Supplier Quantity Discounts
指導教授: 王泰裕
Wang, Tai-yue
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 工業與資訊管理學系
Department of Industrial and Information Management
論文出版年: 2009
畢業學年度: 97
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 73
中文關鍵詞: 供應商選擇多目標線性規劃層級分析法模糊妥協規劃
外文關鍵詞: Multi-Objective Linear Programming, Supplier selection, Analytical Hierarchy Process, Fuzzy Compromise Programming
相關次數: 點閱:91下載:1
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 在今日高度競爭的環境下,提供一個有效的供應商選擇程序,對於成功的採購經理而言,是極為重要的。因為正確選擇優良的供應商,不但可以大幅減少採購成本,並增進企業的競爭力。然而在傳統上對於供應商選擇的程序,大都同時考慮多項異質的準則,因此在作採購決策時,變成是一件冗長的工作。再則當同時考慮數量折扣時,供應商選擇的程序即變得更複雜。在這種形況下,大多數的研究將“數量折扣下的供應商選擇問題”視為多目標線性規劃(MOLP)的問題,並將其簡化成混合整數規劃(MIP)的問題,以方便處理多目標的屬性。然而這種的處理方式,常常忽略尺度及主觀權重兩項議題。本研究將提出兩組解題的程序,分別為層級分析法(AHP)與模糊妥協規劃及層級分析法與正規化權重,去克服上述的尺度及主觀權重兩項議題,並針對不同供應商所提出的數量折扣,得到一個更合理的妥協解,去分配各供應商的訂購量。同時,為了論證本研究的模式,並闡明兩種不同決策者的態度,我們將利用一個例子來說明。從例子的資訊中,可進一步提供供應商改進的參考,更可幫助廠商與供應商建立雙贏的策略。

    In today’s highly competitive environment, an effective supplier selection process is very important for a purchasing manger in achieving success of any manufactory organization. Mainly selecting the right suppliers significantly reduces the purchasing cost and improves corporate competitiveness. However, supplier selection process should consider numerous heterogeneous criteria simultaneously, thereby be a tedious task while making purchasing decisions. Furthermore, the supplier selection process becomes more complicated when considering quantity discounts at the same time. Under such circumstances, most studies often formulate such problem as a Multi-Objective Linear Programming (MOLP) problem, and then scale it down to a Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) problem in order to handle the inherited multi-objectives simultaneously. However, this approach often neglects scaling and subjective weighting issues. In order to ease the problem mentioned above and obtain a more reasonable compromise solution for allocating order quantities among suppliers with their quantity discount rate offered, the two sets of solution procedures including Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) & fuzzy compromise programming and AHP & normalized weights, are introduced in this study. An illustrated example is presented to demonstrate the proposed model and to illuminate two kinds of attitudes for decision makers. The information from the experiments can be utilized further to explain the suppliers’ possible improvement and to help create win-win policies.

    Table of Contents Abstract ………………………………………………………………………. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………….. iv Table of Contents ……………………………………………………............. vi List of Tables ……………………………………………………………….... viii List of Figures………………………………………………………… …….. x 1. INTRODUCTION ……………………………….………………............... 1 1.1 Research Motivation …………………………………………………. 1 1.2 Research Objectives………………………………………………...... 2 1.3 Research Scope ………………………………………………………. 3 1.4 Research Procedure…………………………………………………... 4 1.5 The Organization of the Dissertation……………..………………….. 5 2. LITERATURE REVIEW … …………………………………………….... 6 2.1 Supplier Selection Criteria………………………………………….... 6 2.2 Supplier Selection Problems……………………………………..….... 9 2.3 Process of Evaluating Supplier Selection…………………….............. 10 2.4 Supplier Selection Methodologies…………………………………… 11 2.5 Summary…………………………………………………………….... 14 3. RESEARCH FRAMEWORK AND RESEARCH METHODOLOGY...…. 15 3.1 Model Formulation………………………..………...…………..……. 17 3.2 Fuzzy Compromise Programming………………..………….…...…... 22 3.3 The Analytical Hierarchy Process………………...………………….. 25 3.4 The Normalized Weight…………………………………...….............. 26 3.5 Summary………………………………………………………….…... 27 vii 4. DEVELOPING THE SOLUTION PROCEDURES……………………..... 28 4.1 The Solution ProcedureⅠ……………….…..……………............….. 28 4.2 The Solution ProcedureⅡ……………………………………………. 33 4.3 Summary…………………………………………………………..….. 36 5. NUMERICAL EXAMPLE………………………………………………… 37 5.1 The Numerical Example and Source Data…………………….……… 37 5.2 The Results of the Numerical Example Using Solution ProcedureⅠ... 39 5.3 The Results of the Numerical Example Using Solution ProcedureⅡ... 44 5.4 Analysis of Sensitivity………………………………………………... 46 5.5 Measurement of Performance for Each Supplier……………………... 58 5.6 Summary…………………………………………………………….... 60 6. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE RESEARCH…..……….……….............. 61 References…………………………………………………………………….. 64 Appendix……………………………………………………………………… 73

    References
    Akarte, M. M., Surendra, N. V., Ravi, B., Rangaraj, N., Web based casting supplier
    evaluation using analytical hierarchy process, Journal of the Operational Research
    Society, 52 (5), 511-522, 2001.
    Amid, A., Ghodsypour, S. H., O’Brien, C., Fuzzy multiobjective linear model for
    supplier selection in a supply chain, International Journal of Production
    Economics, 104, 394-407, 2006.
    Barbarosoglu, G., Yazgac, T., An application of the analytic hierarchy process to the
    supplier selection problem, Production and Inventory Management Journal, 38 (1),
    14-21, 1997.
    Benayoun, R., de Montgolfier, J., Tergny, J., Laritchev, O., Linear programming with
    multiple objective functions: step method (STEM), Mathematical Programming, 1,
    366-375, 1971.
    Bhutta, K. S., Huq, F., Supplier selection problem: a comparison of the total cost of
    ownership and analytical hierarchy process approaches, Supply Chain
    Management: An International Journal, 7 (3), 126-135, 2002.
    Buffa, F. P., Jackson, W. M., A goal programming model for purchase planning, Journal
    of Purchasing and Materials Management, Fall, 27-34, 1983.
    Chan, F. T. S., Interactive selection model for supplier selection process: an analytical
    65
    hierarchy process approach, International journal of production Research, 41 (15),
    3549-3579, 2003.
    Chang, S. L., Wang, R. C., Wang S. Y., Applying fuzzy linguistic quantifier to select
    supply chain partners at different phases of product life cycle, International
    Journal of Production Economics, 100 (2), 348-359, 2006.
    Chaudhry, S. S., Forst, F. G., Zydiak, J. L., Vendor selection with price breaks, European
    Journal of Operational Research, 70 (1), 52-66, 1993.
    Chen, C. T., Lin, C. T., Huang, S. F., A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and
    selection in supply chain management, International Journal of Production
    Economics, 102 (2), 289-301, 2006.
    Choy, K. L., Lee, W. B., Lo, V., An intelligent supplier management tool for
    benchmarking suppliers in outsource manufacturing, Expert Systems with
    Applications, 22, 213–224, 2002.
    Choy, K. L., Lee, W. B., Lo, V., Design of an intelligent supplier relationship
    management system: a hybrid case based neural network approach, Expert
    Systems with Applications, 24, 225–237, 2003.
    Dahel, N-E., Vendor selection and order quantity allocation in volume discount
    environments, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 8 (4),
    335-342, 2003.
    66
    De Boer, L., Labro, E., Morlacchi, P., A review of methods supporting supplier
    selection, European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 7, 75-89,
    2001.
    Degraeve, Z., Labro, E., Roodhooft, F., Total cost of ownership purchasing of a service:
    The case of airline selection at Alcatel Bell, European Journal of Operational
    Research, 156, 23-40, 2004.
    Dickson, G. W., An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions, Journal of
    Purchasing, 2 (1), 5-17, 1966.
    Dulmin, R., Mininno, V., Supplier selection using a multi-criteria decision aided method,
    Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 9, 177-187, 2003.
    Ellram, L. M., The supplier selection decision in strategic partnerships, Journal of
    Purchasing and Materials Management, 26 (4), 8-14, 1990.
    Ellram, L. M., Total cost of ownership: An analysis approach for purchasing,
    International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 25 (8),
    4-23, 1995.
    Ghodsypour, S. H., O’Briem, O., A decision support system for supplier selection using
    an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming, International
    Journal of Production Economics, 56-57, 199-212, 1998.
    Grando, A., Sianesi, A., Supply management: a vendor rating assessment, CEMS
    67
    Business Review, 1, 199-212, 1996.
    Hong, G. H., Hark, S. C., Jang, D. S., Rho, H. M., An effective supplier selection
    method for constructing competitive supply-relationship, Expert Systems with
    Applications, 28, 629-639, 2005.
    Karpak, B., Kumcu, E., Kasuganti, R., An application of visual interactive goal
    programming: a case in vendor selection decisions, Journal of Multi-criteria
    Decision Analysis, 8, 93-105, 1999.
    Kasilingam, R. G., Lee, C. P., Selection of vendors-A mixed-integer programming
    approach, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 31 (1/2), 347-350, 1996.
    Kumar, M., Vrat, P., Shankar, R., A fuzzy goal programming approach for vendor
    selection problem in a supply chain, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 46 (1),
    69-85, 2004.
    Li, G. D., Yamaguchi, D., Nagai, M., A grey-based decision making approach to
    suppliers selection problem, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46 (3-4),
    573-581, 2007.
    Li, L., Lai, K. K., A fuzzy approach to the multiobjective transportation problem,
    Computers and Operations Research, 27, 43-57, 2000.
    Liu, F. F., Hai, H. L., The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting
    supplier, International Journal of Production Economics, 97 (3), 308-317, 2005.
    68
    Liu, J., Ding, F. Y., Lall, V., Using data envelopment analysis to compare suppliers for
    supplier selection and performance improvement, Supply Chain Management: An
    International Journal, 5 (3), 143-150, 2000.
    Liu, F. F., Hai, H. L., The voting data envelopment analysis method for selecting
    supplier, International Journal of Production Economics, 97, 308-317, 2005.
    Masella, C., Rangone, A., A contingent approach to the design of vendor selection
    systems for different types of co-operative customer/supplier relationships,
    International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 20, 70-84,
    2000.
    Meade, L. M., Presley, A., R&D project selection using the analytic network process,
    IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49 (1), 59-66, 2002.
    Mummalaneni, V., Dubas, K. M., Chao, C., Chinese purchasing managers’ preferences
    and trade-offs in supplier selection and performance evaluation, Industrial
    Marketing Management, 25, 115-124, 1996.
    Muralidharan, C., Anantharaman, N., Deshmukh, S. G., A multi-criteria group decision
    making model for supplier rating, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38 (4),
    22-33, 2002.
    Narasimhan, R., An analytical approach to supplier selection, Journal of Purchasing
    and Materials Management, 19 (1), 27-32, 1983.
    69
    Nydick, R. L., Hill, R. P., Using the analytical hierarchy process to structure the supplier
    selection procedure, International Journal of Purchasing & Materials
    Management, 28 (2), 31-36, 1992.
    Pan, A. C., Allocation of order quantity among supplier, Journal of Purchasing and
    Materials Management, 25 (3), 36-69, 1989.
    Patton, W. W., Use of human judgment models in industrial buyer’s vendor selection
    decisions, Industrial Marketing Management, 25, 135-149, 1996.
    Petroni, A., Braglia, M., Vendor selection using principal component analysis, Journal
    of Supply Chain Management, 36 (2), 63-39, 2000.
    Rosenthal, E. C., Zydiak, J. L., Chaudhry, S. S., Vendor selection with bundling,
    Decision Sciences, 26 (1), 35-48, 1995.
    Saaty, T. L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.
    Saaty, T. L., Alexander, J. M., Thinking with Models: Mathematical Models in the
    Physical, Biological and Social Sciences, Chapter 8. Pergamon Press, London,
    1981.
    Saen, R. F., Suppliers selection in the presence of both cardinal and ordinal data,
    European Journal of Operational Research, 183, 741-747, 2007.
    Shin, H., Collier, D. A., Wilson, D. D., Supply management orientation and
    supplier/buyer performance, Journal of Operations Management, 18, 317-333,
    70
    2000.
    Shyur, H. J., Shih, H. S., A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection,
    Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 44, 749-761, 2006.
    Siying, W., Jinlong, Z., Zhicheng, L., A supplier-selecting system using a neural
    network. in: 1997 IEEE international Conference on Intelligent Processing System,
    IEEE Press, New York, pp. 468-471, 1997.
    Swift, C. O., Preferences for single sourcing and supplier selection criteria, Journal of
    Business Research, 32, 105-111, 1995.
    Talluri, S., Narasimhan, R., A methodology for strategic sourcing, European Journal of
    Operational Research, 154, 236-250, 2004.
    Talluri, S., Narasimhan, R., Nair, A., Vendor performance with supply risk: A
    chance-constrained DEA approach, International Journal of Production
    Economics, 100 (2), 212-222, 2006.
    Tam, M. C. Y., Tummala, V. M. R., An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a
    telecommunications system, Omega, 29, 171-182, 2001.
    Thompson, K., Scaling evaluative criteria and supplier performance estimates in
    weighted pint prepurchase decision models, International Journal of Purchasing
    & Materials Management, 27 (1), 27-36, 1991.
    Timmerman, E., An approach to vendor performance evaluation, Journal of Purchasing
    71
    and Materials Management, Winter, 2-8, 1986.
    Turner, I., An independent system for the evaluation of contract tenders, Journal of the
    Operational Research Society, 39 (6), 551-561, 1988.
    Vokurka, R. J., Choobineh, J., Vadi, L., A prototype expert system for the evaluation and
    selection of potential supplier, International Journal of Operations and
    Production Management, 16 (12), 106-127, 1996.
    Wang, G., Huang, S. H., Dismukes, J. P., Product-driven supply chain selection using
    integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology, International Journal of
    Production Economics, 91, 1-15, 2004.
    Weber, C. A., A data envelopment analysis approach to measure vendor performance,
    Supply Chain Management, 1 (1), 28-39, 1996.
    Weber, C. A., Current, J. R., Benton, W. C., Vendor selection criteria and methods,
    European Journal of Operational Research, 50, 2-18, 1991.
    Weber, C. A., Current, J. R., A multi-objective approach to vendor selection, European
    Journal of Operational Research, 68, 173-184, 1993.
    Weber, C. A., Current, J. R., Desai, A., Non-cooperative negotiation strategies for
    vendor selection, European Journal of Operational Research, 108, 208-223, 1998.
    Weber, C. A., Desai, A., Determination of paths to vendor market efficiency using
    parallel coordinates representation: A negotiation tool for buyers, European
    72
    Journal of Operational Research, 90, 142-155, 1996.
    Wind, Y., Robinson, P. J., The determinants of vendor selection: The evaluation function
    approach, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, August, 29-41, 1968.
    Xia, W., Wu, Z., Supplier selection with multiple criteria in volume discount
    environments, Omega, 35, 494-504, 2007.
    Yang, C. C., Chen, B. S., Supplier selection using combined analytical hierarchy
    process and grey relational analysis, Journal of Manufacturing Technology
    Management, 17 (7), 926-941, 2006.
    Zimmermann, H. J., Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective
    functions, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, 45-55, 1978.
    Zimmermann, H. J., Fuzzy Set Theory and its Application, fourth ed. Kluwer Academic
    Publishers, Boston, 1993.

    下載圖示 校內:2010-06-19公開
    校外:2012-06-19公開
    QR CODE