導入都市經濟、社會、產業等機能以促進都市的復甦與發展，強調以地區為基礎的都市再發展策略已經成為當前全球都市更新的趨勢，臺灣目前進行都市更新往往未對區域進行整體發展的考量，僅以環境衰敗及更新效益為選擇標準，無法帶來新的發展契機，甚至使都市問題更為嚴重，因而需重新思考都市更新地區之選擇策略。
自1999年實施都市更新條例至今已有超過300件都市更新案件，但多為私部門由市場所主導的小規模重建更新，使都市更新的發展陷入重建更新之窘況；政府於2009年提出全台30處優先推動都市更新地區，以實質環境窳陋程度、容易推動之大面積公有土地、策略性再發展地區或歷史文化地區為標準，顯示目前推動都市更新並未以地區整體發展的角度來思考，太過於著重實質環境而忽略環境條件以外之其他都市問題及發展潛力。過去國外研究都市更新地區優先推動之選擇評估係以整合經濟、環境及社會的需求、地區發展的永續性等多面向進行，相較於臺灣現況僵固都市更新條例的規範，更能有效地針對都市更新地區的推動優先性給予排序。
本研究以模糊德爾菲法及模糊階層分析法進行兩階段專家問卷，建立包含實質環境空間、公共建設、經濟發展、社會文化及政策指導等不同面向之評估指標，嘗試評估現行劃設都市更新地區之推動優先性，回饋優先劃定都市更新地區法規與政策，使都市更新地區優先推動成果更具效率與效益，促進都市整體性再發展。

Urban regeneration projects have been considered as the major catalyst to revitalize deprived urban areas socially and economically. Proposing area-based comprehensive urban regeneration strategies are emphasized global wide. Many researches confirmed that urban renewal priority areas should be based on physical environment and the economic, social needs of local residents, the sustainability of regional development in order to ensure long-term benefits for the whole area. In Taiwan, although the idea of area-based regeneration projects has been advocated by many researchers, in practical, the main considerations for designating “priority areas” regulated by the current Urban Renewal Act 1999 are still dominating the decision making process. Blight areas bigger than one-block in size with worse deprived social and physical environment, or listed historical buildings are recommended for designation.
Since 1999, there has been over 300 urban renewal projects proposed in Taiwan, but most are small-scale private sector-led housing development projects. It has further resulted in issues such as gentrification, housing affordability and social conflicts between rich and poor. In 2009, the central government has announced 30 priority areas promote urban regeneration. However, the criteria for designation include large area of public lands, major facilities and historic heritages. Clearly, the government is still based on the current status and easiness of implementation to designate the priority areas without taking into account the future demands, social–economic trends, and possible benefits from the regional development perspectives.
Hence, this study intends to use fuzzy Delphi and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process to identify evaluating criteria in terms of the physical environment, social and economic development potential, the future investment returns and other factors for designating urban renewal priority areas. A series expert survey will be conducted to confirm designated principles and establish urban renewal area prioritizing weight indicators framework as an assessment tool. This study is expected to provide recommendations for future legal and policy amendments of urban regeneration in Taiwan.

壹、中文文獻
都市更新條例（民87年11月11日）。
行政院內政部營建署（民97）。愛台十二項建設總體計畫－都市更新推動計畫。臺北市。行政院內政部營建署。
行政院內政部營建署（民100）。政府為主都市更新推動手冊。臺北市。行政院內政部營建署。
行政院經濟建設委員會（民86）。都市更新方案。臺北市。行政院經濟建設委員會。
行政院經濟建設委員會（民94）。加速推動都市更新方案。臺北市。行政院經濟建設委員會。
何友峰、簡宇伶（民89）。都市更新地區選定評估模式之研究－以臺北市為例。朝陽設計學報，1，53-72。
吳韻吾（民94）。運用ＧＩＳ系統於都市更新地區街廓調查及優先更新評選模式之研究。中國技術學院學報。27。
李樑堅（民87）。應用模糊理論於中小企業擔保與無擔保放款授信評估表改善建立之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。臺北市。行政院國家科學委員會。
林佑璘（民92）。臺北市實施都市更新歷程及影響之研究（碩士論文）。中國文化大學。臺北市。
袁如瑩（民89）。都市更新地區選定與處理方式之研究－以台北縣三峽鎮為例（碩士論文）。中國文化大學。臺北市。
財團法人都市更新研究發展基金會（民91）都市更新魔法書－實現改造城市的想像。臺北市：財團法人都市更新研究發展基金會。
高筱慧（民90）。更新地區優先順序評估之研究（碩士論文）。國立政治大學。臺北市。
張立立（民89）。都市再發展評估指標建構之研究（博士論文）。國立政治大學。臺北市。
陳正忠（民95）。我國航管人員知識取得途徑及其內容之研究（碩士論文）。美和技術學院。屏東縣。
陳昭宏（民90）。亞太港埠競爭力與核心能力指標之研究。運輸學刊。13（1），1-25。
黃定國（民88）。都市更新有關更新地區劃設及更容積獎勵準則之研究。臺北市。內政部建築研究所。
黃湘苓（民90）。劃定都市更新地區評估指標之研究（碩士論文）。國立台北科技大學。臺北市。
廖慧萍（民92）。公有閒置空間再利用評估模式之研究（碩士論文）。朝陽科技大學。台中市。
鄭滄濱（民90）軟體組織提升人員能力之成熟度模糊評估模式（碩士論文）。國立台灣科技大學。臺北市。
賴光真（民87）。分析層級程序法（AHP）評比尺度縮減可行性之探討。教育與心理研究。21（1）。17-35。
貳、外文文獻
Arbaci, S., & Tapada-Berteli, T. (2012). Social inequality and urban regeneration in Barcelona city centre: reconsidering success. European Urban and Regional Studies, 19(3), 287-311. doi: 10.1177/0969776412441110
Chan, E. H. W., & Lee, G. K. L. (2007a). Contribution of urban design to economic sustainability of urban renewal projects in Hong Kong. Sustainable Development, 10(3), 122-130.
Chan, E. H. W., & Lee, G. K. L. (2007b). Design considerations for environmental sustainability in high density development: A case study of Hong Kong. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 11(2), 359-374. doi: 0.1007/s10668-007-9117-0
Cincinnati-USA-Regional-Chamber. (2011). Agenda 360-Community Update. United States of America: Cincinnati USA Regional Chamber Retrieved from http://www.agenda360.org/.
Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458-467.
DETR. (1999a). Towards an Urban Renaissance-Final Report of the Urban Task Force. London: DETR.
DETR. (1999b). A better quality of life-Strategy for sustainable development for the United Kingdom. London: HMSO
DETR. (2000). Our Towns and Cities: The Future Delivering an Urban Renaissance. London: HMSO.
Dobbs, L., & Moore, C. (2002). Engaging communities in area-based regeneration: the role of participatory evaluation. Policy Studies, 23(3), 157-171.
DOE. (1994). Sustainable Development: The UK Strategy. London: HMSO.
Donaldson, R., Plessis, D. d., Spocter, M., & Massey, R. (2013). The South African area-based urban renewal programme: experiences from Cape Town. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment.
Gabrielsen, G. V. (2008). Area-based strategies and urban regeneration: AHO The School Of Architecture And Design.
Hemphill, L., Berry, J., & McGreal, S. (2004a). An indicator-based approach to measuring sustainable urban regeneration performance: Part 1, conceptual foundations and methodological framework. Urban Studies, 41(4), 725-755. doi: 10.1080/0042098042000194089
Hemphill, L., McGreal, S., & Berry, J. (2004b). An indicator-based approach to measuring sustainable urban regeneration performance: Part 2, empirical evaluation and case-study analysis. Urban Studies, 41(4), 757-772. doi: 10.1080/0042098042000194098.
Housing Rights Service. Geographical targeting-Urban priority areas. Retrieved 15, Sep., 2012, from http://www.housingadviceni.org/grants/will-i-always-get-a-grant/geographical-targeting.html
Lawless, P. (2007). Is Urban Area-based Regeneration Possible? The New Deal for Communities Programme in England. The International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability, 6(1), pp.93-102.
Lawless, P., Foden, M., Wilson, I., & Beatty, C. (2009). Understanding Area-based Regeneration: The New Deal for Communities Programme in England. Urban Studies, 47(2), 257-275. . doi: 10.1177/0042098009348324
Lee, G. K. L., & Chan, E. H. W. (2009). Indicators for evaluating environmental performance of the Hong Kong urban renewal projects. Facilities, 27(13/14), 515-530. doi: 10.1108/02632770910996351
Lee, G. K. L., & Chan, E. H. W. (2010). Evaluation of the urban renewal projects in social dimensions. Property Management, 28(4), 257-269. doi: 10.1108/02637471011065683
Meyer, B. P. (1998). Accounting for differential neighborhood economic development impacts in site-specific or area-based approaches to urban brownfield regeneration. Working Paper. University of Louisville. Retrieved from http://cepm.louisville.edu
Muscat, R. (2010). Area Based Initiatives-do they deliver? United Kingdom: Centre for Local Economic Strategies.
Roberts, P., & Skyes, H. (2000). Current Challenges and Future Prospects. In P. Roberts & H. Skyes (Eds.), Urban Regeneration A Handbook (pp. 295-314). London: Sage Publications.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process-Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sag, N. S. (2010). An Area-Based Approach In Urban Regeneration Project-Konya Sample. Paper presented at the 14th International Planning History Society, Istanbul, Turkey.
Salman, A., & Quershi, S. (2009). Indicators of sustainable urban development: A review of urban regeneration projects in Karachi, Pakistan. from www.herodot.net/conference/Ayvalik/papers/geog-04.pdf
Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council. (2006). Sefton Unitary Development Plan.
Smith, G. R. (1999). Area-based initiatives: The rationale and options for area targeting. Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion: London School of Economics, London.
Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council. (2004). Wirral Unitary Development Plan.