簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 羅崇綱
Lo, Chung-Kang
論文名稱: Plan Change: How the Pandemic Affect the Fertility Decision of Household?
Plan Change: How the Pandemic Affect the Fertility Decision of Household?
指導教授: 伍弘歷
Ng, Wung-Lik
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 社會科學院 - 經濟學系
Department of Economics
論文出版年: 2023
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 52
中文關鍵詞: 生育COVID-19新生兒出生率封城政策
外文關鍵詞: Fertility, COVID-19, Birth Rate, Lockdown Policy
相關次數: 點閱:116下載:32
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探究疫情和封城政策對美國出生率的影響。在疫情期間,感染者可 能會暫時喪失工作能力,無法將子女送至照護機構。此外,政府實施的封城政策除 將根據不同行業是否能夠轉換成遠距工作的模式對美國民眾造成不同程度的影響。 這些因素都會影響美國國民的生育選擇。為了深入了解疫情、封城政策和新生兒出 生率之間的關係,我們建立了一個生育決策模型,並將疫情特徵融入其中,以觀察 不同狀態下的出生率變化。研究結果顯示,由於疫情期間感染風險的增加導致民眾 無法工作,導致部分民眾無法只用政府提供的救助金負擔養育子女的費用,因此在 進入疫情期間出生率持續下降,直到疫情結束後才開始回升。然而,我們的模型結 果還顯示,在封城期間新生兒出生率意外地上升。這一現象可能是由於在疫情期 間,由於遠距工作造成民眾的薪資下降反而使得在家照顧孩童的成本降低使得民眾 相對於疫情之前的生育誘因更加強烈。

    This study examines the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent lockdown policies on the birth rate in the United States. During the pandemic, infected individuals may lose the ability to work and be unable to send their children to childcare facilities. Additionally, the impact of government lockdown policy varies among individuals, depending on the extent to which their respective industries can effectively transition to remote work. These factors have significant implications for individual fertility decisions. To understand the relationship between the pandemic, lockdown policies, and the birth rate, we develop a simplified fertility decision model that represents the decision-making process. We incorporate the unique characteristics of the pandemic into this model, allowing us to analyze its effects on the birth rate. Our findings reveal a decrease in the birth rate due to the increased risk of wage loss if infected. However, contrary to expectations, there is a surge in the birth rate during the lockdown period. This can be attributed to the decrease in wages during the lockdown. In turn, this lowers the cost of home care relative to earning a wage, making the prospect of having a child more appealing.

    中文摘要 ....................................... i Abstract........................................ ii Acknowledgements .................................. iii Contents........................................ viii List of Tables..................................... x List of Figures .................................... xi 1 Introduction.................................... 1 2 Related Works................................... 4 2.1  COVID-19 in the United States ...................... 4 2.2  Labor Market Under the Pandemic, Work From Home and Gender Inequality ................................... 6 2.3  Childcare Industry ............................. 8 2.4  Childless................................... 9 3 Model ....................................... 11 3.1  Representative Agent............................ 11 3.2  Fertility Decision Model .......................... 12 3.2.1 No Child............................... 13 3.2.2 Pregnancy.............................. 13 3.2.3 With Child ............................. 14 3.3  Susceptible-Infectious-Recovered (SIR) Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 3.3.1 Susceptible ............................. 14 3.3.2 Infected ............................... 14 3.3.3 Recovered .............................. 15 3.4  Demographic Evolution........................... 15 3.5  Dynamic Program ............................. 15 3.5.1  Before the Pandemic ........................ 16 3.5.2  After the Pandemic without Lockdown. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 3.5.3  After the Pandemic with the Lockdown. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 4 Calibration .................................... 21 4.1  Parameters ................................. 21 4.1.1 Preference.............................. 21 4.1.2 Wage................................. 21 4.1.3 Raising the Child.......................... 22 4.1.4 Work From Home.......................... 22 4.2  Contagious Parameters........................... 23 4.3  Moment................................... 23 5 Simulation..................................... 25 5.1 Baseline Model ............................... 25 5.2 Scenario Analysis.............................. 29 6 Conclusion..................................... 32 References....................................... 35 Appendix A:Steps For Simulation ......................... 40 Appendix B:Table of Share Of Work Can Be Done At Home . . . . . . . . . . 42

    [1]  Daniel Aaronson, Luojia Hu, Aastha Rajan, et al. Did covid-19 disproportionately affect mothers’ labor market activity. Chicago Fed Letter, 450:1–5, 2021.
    [2]  Arnstein Aassve, Nicol`o Cavalli, Letizia Mencarini, Samuel Plach, and Massimo Livi Bacci. The covid-19 pandemic and human fertility. Science, 369(6502):370– 371, 2020.
    [3]  CARES Act. Cares act. 2020.
    [4]  Stefania Albanesi, Rania Gihleb, Jialin Huo, and Jiyeon Kim. Household insurance and the macroeconomic impact of the novel coronavirus. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Pittsburgh, 2020.
    [5]  Titan Alon, Sena Coskun, Matthias Doepke, David Koll, and Mich`ele Tertilt. From mancession to shecession: Women’s employment in regular and pandemic recessions. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 36(1):83–151, 2022.
    [6]  Titan Alon, Sena Coskun, Matthias Doepke, David Koll, and Mich`ele Tertilt. From mancession to shecession: Women’s employment in regular and pandemic recessions. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 36(1):83–151, 2022.
    [7]  Titan Alon, Matthias Doepke, Kristina Manysheva, and Mich`ele Tertilt. Gendered impacts of covid-19 in developing countries. IZA Discussion Paper, 2022.
    [8]  Titan Alon, Matthias Doepke, Jane Olmstead-Rumsey, and Mich`ele Tertilt. The impact of covid-19 on gender equality. Technical report, National Bureau of eco- nomic research, 2020.
    [9]  Joshua Angrist and William N Evans. Children and their parents’ labor supply: Evidence from exogenous variation in family size, 1996.
    [10]  Martha J Bailey, Janet Currie, and Hannes Schwandt. The covid-19 baby bump: the unexpected increase in us fertility rates in response to the pandemic. Technical report, National Bureau of economic research, 2022.
    [11]  Alexander Bick. The quantitative role of child care for female labor force participa- tion and fertility. Journal of the European Economic Association, 14(3):639–668, 2016.
    [12]  Alexander Bick. The Quantitative Role of Child Care for Female Labor Force Par- ticipation and Fertility. Journal of the European Economic Association, 14(3):639– 668, 06 2016.
    [13]  Thomas J Bollyky, Emma Castro, Aleksandr Y Aravkin, Kayleigh Bhangdia, Jeremy Dalos, Erin N Hulland, Samantha Kiernan, Amy Lastuka, Theresa A McHugh, Samuel M Ostroff, et al. Assessing covid-19 pandemic policies and be- haviours and their economic and educational trade-offs across us states from jan 1, 2020, to july 31, 2022: an observational analysis. The Lancet, 401(10385):1341– 1360, 2023.
    [14]  Jonathan I Dingel and Brent Neiman. How many jobs can be done at home? Journal of Public Economics, 189:104235, 2020.
    [15]  Martin S Eichenbaum, Sergio Rebelo, and Mathias” Trabandt. The macroeco- nomics of epidemics. (26882), March 2020.
    [16]  Jacobsen GD and Jacobsen KH. Statewide covid-19 stay-at-home orders and population mobility in the united states. World Med Health Policy, 12(4)(347- 356):594–607, 2020 Dec.
    [17]  Paula E Gobbi. A model of voluntary childlessness. Journal of Population Eco- nomics, 26:963–982, 2013.
    [18]  Jonathan Heathcote, Kjetil Storesletten, and Giovanni L Violante. The macroeco- nomic implications of rising wage inequality in the united states. Working Paper 14052, National Bureau of Economic Research, June 2008.
    [19]  Misty L Heggeness and Jason M Fields. Working moms bear brunt of home schooling while working during covid-19. United States Census Bureau, 2020.
    [20]  Susan Hillis, Joel-Pascal Ntwali N’konzi, William Msemburi, Lucie Cluver, Andr ́es Villaveces, Seth Flaxman, and H Juliette T Unwin. Orphanhood and caregiver loss among children based on new global excess covid-19 death estimates. JAMA pediatrics, 176(11):1145–1148, 2022.
    [21]  Fayette Klaassen, Melanie H Chitwood, Ted Cohen, Virginia E Pitzer, Marcus Russi, Nicole A Swartwood, Joshua A Salomon, and Nicolas A Menzies. Changes in population immunity against infection and severe disease from sars-cov-2 omicron variants in the united states between december 2021 and november 2022. medRxiv, pages 2022–11, 2022.
    [22]  Mark Lino, Kevin Kuczynski, Nestor Rodriguez, and TusaRebecca Schap. Expen- ditures on children by families, 2015. Technical report, 2017.
    [23]  Edouard Mathieu, Hannah Ritchie, Lucas Rod ́es-Guirao, Cameron Appel, Charlie Giattino, Joe Hasell, Bobbie Macdonald, Saloni Dattani, Diana Beltekian, Esteban Ortiz-Ospina, and Max Roser. Coronavirus pandemic (covid-19). Our World in Data, 2020. https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus.
    [24]  Alicia Sasser Modestino, A Lincoln, and J Ladge. The importance of childcare in reopening the economy, 2020.
    [25]  Wung Lik Ng. To lockdown? when to peak? will there be an end? a macroeco- nomic analysis on covid-19 epidemic in the united states. Journal of Macroeco- nomics, 65:103230, 2020.
    [26]  United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. Effects of the coronavirus covid-19 pandemic (cps). 2020-2022. https://www.bls.gov/cps/effects-of-the-coronavirus- covid-19-pandemic.htm.
    [27]  U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Current employment statistics—national.
    [28]  World Health Organization. WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19, 2020.
    [29]  Our World In Data. Cumulative confirmed COVID-19 cases by world region, 2023.
    [30]  Our World In Data. WHO COVID-19 Dashboard, 2023.
    [31]  George Tauchen. Finite state markov-chain approximations to univariate and vector autoregressions. Economics letters, 20(2):177–181, 1986.
    [32]  TNY Times. See how vaccinations are going in your county and state. The New York Times, 17, 2020.
    [33]  Simon Workman and Steven Jessen-Howard. The true cost of providing safe child care during the coronavirus pandemic. Center for American Progress, 2020
    [34]  JQ Xu, SL Murphy, KD Kochanek, and E Arias. Mortality in the united states, 2018. nchs data brief, no 355. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD, 2020.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE