簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 蔡至勛
Tsai, chih-shung
論文名稱: 水平策略聯盟之宣告對其上下游產業 之財富效果的影響
Horizontal strategic alliance: Analysis of wealth effects on suppliers and corporate customers
指導教授: 張紹基
Chang, Shao-Chi
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 國際企業研究所
Institute of International Business
論文出版年: 2006
畢業學年度: 94
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 43
中文關鍵詞: 水平策略聯盟上下游產業策略聯盟種類
外文關鍵詞: customers and suppliers, horizontal strategic alliance, alliance type
相關次數: 點閱:170下載:3
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 摘要
    過去有許多文獻已經證實策略聯盟平均而言會為合作公司創造價值。但是並沒有任何一篇的研究將主題進一步延伸,討策略聯盟對其上游供應商以及下游顧客產業的財富效果。因此,本研究將探討當水平策略聯盟宣告時,對其上下游產業的財富效果會帶來何種影響。
    首先,我們檢測水平策略聯盟所帶來的兩種力量:生產綜效以及市場力量,何者會對策略聯盟的上下游產業造成較大的影響。另外,我們將探討不同目的的策略聯盟是否會對聯盟的上下游產業造成不同的影響。
    本研究自SDC資料庫中,篩選了1553家曾經於1989年至1999年宣告策略聯盟的合作公司,並依據Shahrur (2005)的方法,利用美國經濟分析局所編制的「Use table」來區別出聯盟公司的上下游。最後從實證結果中,我們發現生產綜效以及市場力量可能會同時存在,且上下游產業會因為策略聯盟產業的集中度和上下游產業與聯盟的依存關係,而受到不同力量的影響。最後,我們還發現科技技術性目的的策略聯盟比非科技性目的的聯盟更容易為其上下游產業帶來正面的財富效果。

    Abstract
    Strategic alliances on average do create value to partner firms have been proven in many previous studies. However, no previous studies have further extended the topics to discuss about the wealth effects that strategic alliances would bring on their suppliers and customers. Therefore, in this research, we are going to examine the wealth effects of horizontal alliance partner firms’ corporate customers and suppliers.
    At first, we investigate two powers that horizontal alliance would bring— productive synergy and market power, which one may dominate and affect the customers and suppliers. In addition, we discuss whether the diverse types of alliance purposes would have different effects on their suppliers and customers.
    We have collected 1553 horizontal partner firms during 1989 to 1999 from SDC database. Then, we follow Shahrur’s (2005) method and employ “Use table” from the Bureau of Economic Analysis at the U.S. Department of Commerce to help us identify partner firms’ suppliers and customers.
    Our results suggest that productive synergy and market power may work simultaneously. Under the high degree of concentration of partner firms’ industries, the relation of interdependence of customers (suppliers) and partner firms would affect the results. Moreover, our findings suggest that the customers or suppliers of technological alliances experience more positive wealth effects than those of non-technological alliances.

    Content 1. Introduction 1 2. Hypotheses Development 4 2.1 Productive synergy hypothesis 5 2.2 Market power hypothesis 6 2.3 Alliance activities hypotheses 7 3. Data sources and Methodology 13 3.1 Strategic alliances sample 13 3.2 Identifying Suppliers and Customers 15 3.3 Measuring abnormal returns 17 3.4 Variables 18 3.5 Regression Model 23 4. Empirical results 26 4.1 Abnormal returns to the partner firms and their customers, and suppliers 26 4.2 Cross-sectional analysis 28 4.2.1 Regression of CARs to productive synergy hypothesis 28 4.2.2 Regression of CARs to both productive synergy and market power hypothesis 30 4.3 Alliance type analysis 34 5. Conclusion 39 Reference 41

    Reference
    Anand, B.N., Khanna, T., 2000. Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances. Strategic Management Journal 21, 295-315.
    Berger, P., Ofek, E., 1995. Diversification’s effect on firm value. Journal of Financial Economics 37, 39-66.
    Bhagat, S., Shleifer, A., Vishny,R., 1990. Hostile takeovers in 1980s: The return to corporate specialization. Brookings Paper on Economic Activity. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution , 1-72.
    Blair, R., Harrison, J., 1993. Monopsony: Antitrust Law and Economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ..
    Chan, S.H., Kensinger, J.W., Keown, .J., Martin, J.D., 1997. Do strategic alliances create value? Journal of Financial Economics 46, 199-221.
    Chen, S.S., Ho, K.W., 1997. Market response to product-strategy and capital expenditure announcements in Singapore: Investment opportunities and free cash flow. Financial Management 26, 82-88.
    Das, S., Sen, P.K., Sengupta, S., 1998. Impact of strategic alliances on firm valuation.
    Academy of Management Journal 41, 1, 27-41.
    Das, S., Sen, P.K., Sengupta, S., 2003. Strategic alliances: a valuable way to manage intellectual capital? Journal of Intellectual Capital 4, 1.
    Dodd, P., Warner, J., 1983. On corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics 11, 401-438.
    Doukas, J., 1995. Overinvestment, Tobin’s q and gains from foreign acquisitions. Journal of Banking and Finance 19, 1285-1303.
    Dussauge, P., Garrette, B., Mitchell, W., 2000. Learning from competing partners: Outcomes and durations of scale and link alliances in Europe, North America and Asia. Strategic Management Journal 21, 99-126.
    Eckbo, E.B., 1983. Horizontal mergers, collusion, and stockholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics 11, 241-273.
    Fan, J.P.H., Lang, L.H.P., 2000. The measurement of relatedness: an application to corporate diversification. Journal of Business 73, 629-660.
    Fee, C.E., Thomas, S., 2004. Sources of gains in horizontal takeovers: Evidence from customer, supplier, and rival firms. Journal of Financial Economics 74, 423-460.
    Galbraith, J.K., 1952. American Capitalism: The concept of countervailing power. Houghton-Mufflin, Boston.
    Hagedoorn, J., 1993. Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal 14, 371-385.
    Jensen, M., Meckling, B., 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305-360.
    Johnson, S.A., Houston, M.B., 2000. A reexamination of the motives and gains in joint ventures. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 35 (1).
    Kaplan, S., Weisbach, M., 1992. The success of acquisitions: Evidence from divestitures. Journal of Finance 47, 107-138.
    Kogut, B., 1988. Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management Journal 9, 319-332.
    Mikkelson, W.H., Partch, M.M., 1988. Withdrawn security offerings. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 23, 119-133.
    Parise, S., Sasson, L., 2002. Leveraging knowledge management across strategic alliances. Ivey Business Journal 67(2), 42.
    Pisano, G.. P., 1989. Using equity participation to support exchange: Evidence from the biotechnology industry. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 5(1), 109-126
    Ravenscraft, D., Scherer, F., 1987. Mergers, sell-offs and economic efficiency. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
    Robinson, W.T., 1988. Sources of market pioneer advantages: The case of industrial goods industries. Journal of Marketing Research 25, 87-94.
    Robinson, W.T., Fornell, C., 1985. Sources of market pioneer advantages in consumer goods industries. Journal of Marketing Research 22, 305-317.
    Schakenraad, J., Hagedoorn, J., 1994. The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. Strategic Management Journal 15, 291-309.
    Shahrur, H., 2005. Industry structure and horizontal takeovers: Analysis of wealth effects on rivals, suppliers, and corporate customers. Journal of Financial Economics 76, 61-98.
    Silverman, B.S., Baum, J.A., 2000. Alliance-based competitive dynamics. Academy of Management Journal 45 (4), 791.
    Smith, R.K., Proffitt,D.,& Stephens, A.A., 1992. Investments. St.Paul, MN: West Publishing.
    Snyder, C.M., 1996. A dynamic theory of countervailing power. Rand Journal of Economics 27, 747-769.
    Song, M.H., Walking, R.A., 2000. Abnirmal returns to rivals of acquisition targets: a test of the “acquisition probability hypothesis”. Journal of Financial Economics 55, 143-171.
    Tellis, G.J., 1989. The impact of corporate size and strategy on competitive pricing. Strategic Management Journal 10, 569-585.

    下載圖示 校內:2007-06-30公開
    校外:2007-06-30公開
    QR CODE