簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 白愷菈
Keshia Bailey
論文名稱: The Geographic Influence Towards The CSR-Financial Performance Relationship: Transportation Industry
The Geographic Influence Towards The CSR-Financial Performance Relationship: Transportation Industry
指導教授: 楊曉瑩
Yang, Ann Shawing
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 國際經營管理研究所
Institute of International Management
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 102
外文關鍵詞: Geographic proximity, Corporate social responsibility, Firm performance, Transportation industry
相關次數: 點閱:187下載:11
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • ABSTRACT
    Keywords: Geographic proximity, Corporate social responsibility, Firm performance, Transportation industry.
    This study examines how different geographic proximities have an impact towards the relationship, CSR and firm performance. For numerous years, this relationship has been debatable amongst researchers. This paper explains how different geographic proximities, measured in kilometers, from various financial centers can enhance this relationship. As Stock exchanges are usually situated within a country’s CBD and as they have been moving towards CSR initiatives and encouraging these initiatives with their stakeholders, this paper uses them as our financial centers. It focuses on the Transportation Industry, as this industry plays a vital role within every economy, as it drives industrialization, urbanization and globalization. Even though it is an imperative industry, it is one of the largest industries to affect the environment negatively. This research uses panel data to analyze the CSR-FP relationship by comparing it with transportation companies that are closer to their financial centers, which is defined as their stock exchange, and transportation companies that are further away from their financial centers, that is their stock exchanges. The study is based on all Transportation firms that engage in CSR between the year 2008 and 2018. It finds that these companies that are closer to their financial centers have a stronger CSR-FP relation compared to those that are further away. The firms that are further away, have either no impact or a smaller impact than the firms that are closer to their financial centers. This relation is more pronounced when analyzing it separately between the Eastern and Western region.
    II
    Reason being different CSR initiatives impact firm performance differently within these two regions. That is, as Western and Eastern regions both view CSR differently, this effects the firm’s performance differently pertaining to CSR.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT I ACKNOWLEDGEMENT III TABLE OF CONTENTS IV LIST OF TABLES VII CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Research Background. 1 1.1.1 The Importance of Corporate Social Responsibility. 4 1.1.2 The Importance of the Transportation 4 1.2 Research Objective and Motivation. 6 1.3 Research Gaps and Contributions. 8 1.4 Research Structure. 9 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW. 11 2.1 The Institutional Theory and Legitimacy Theory. 11 2.2 Geography and Corporate Outcomes. 12 2.3 Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance in the Transportation Industry. 14 2.4 Geographic Proximity Impact with the Transportation Industry. 18 CHAPTER THREE RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 24 3.1 Research Design and Sample 24 3.2 Data Measurements. 30 3.2.1 Dependent Variable. 30 3.2.2 Independent Variables 31 3.2.3 Control Variables 32 3.3 Research Methodology and Regression Model. 35 CHAPTER FOUR RESEARCH RESULTS 39 4.1 Descriptive Statistics. 39 4.2 Correlation Analysis. 50 4.3 Multicollinearity Test. 58 4.4 Empirical Results. 58 4.4.1 Regression Results for a Firm’s CSR Scores towards the Firm’s Tobin’s q within The Transportation Industry. 59 4.4.2 Regression Results for a Firm’s CSR Scores towards the Firm’s ROA within The Transportation Industry. 63 4.4.3 Regression Results for Transportation Firm’s Different CSR Scores towards their Tobin’s q within Different Geographic Proximities. .66 4.4.4 Regression Results for Transportation Firm’s Different CSR Scores towards their ROA within Different Geographic Proximities. 72 4.4.5 Regression Results for Eastern Transportation Firm’s Different CSR Scores Impact Towards their Firm Performance, Across Different Geographic Proximities. 77 4.4.6 Regression Results for Western Transportation Firm’s Different CSR Scores Towards their Firm Performance Across Different Geographic Proximities. 84 CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS 91 5.1 Research Conclusions. 91 5.2 Research Limitations and Suggestions. 97 REFERENCES 99 LIST OF TABLES Table 3-1 List of Transportation Firms ....................................................................... 26 Table 3-2 List of Eastern and Western Firms ............................................................. 29 Table 3-3 Summary of Variable Sources ..................................................................... 34 Table 4-1 Descriptive Statistics – All Transportation Firms ...................................... 43 Table 4-2 Descriptive Statistics – Closer Transportation Firms ................................ 44 Table 4-3 Descriptive Statistics – Further Transportation Firms............................... 45 Table 4-5 Descriptive Statistics – Eastern Region Further Firms .............................. 47 Table 4-6 Descriptive Statistics – Western Region Closer Firms ............................... 48 Table 4-7 Descriptive Statistics – Western Region Further Firms ............................. 49 Table 4-8 Correlation Matrix – Tobin’s q and Overall CSR Score ............................ 52 Table 4-9 Correlation Coefficient Matrix - ROA and Overall CSR Score .................. 53 Table 4-10 Correlation Matrix – Tobin’s q and Environmental CSR Score ............... 54 Table 4-11 Correlation Matrix – ROA and Environmental CSR Score ...................... 55 Table 4-12 Correlation Matrix - Tobin’s q and Social CSR Score ............................. 56 Table 4-13 Correlation Matrix - ROA and Social CSR Score..................................... 57 Table 4-14 Variance Inflation Factor Test Results ..................................................... 58 Table 4-15 Panel Regression Results – CSR and Tobin’s q Relation Amongst all Transportation Firms .............................................................................. 62 Table 4-16 Panel Regression Results – CSR and ROA Relation Amongst All Transportation Firms .............................................................................. 65 VIII Table 4-17 Panel Regression Results – CSR and Tobin’s q Relation Amongst Closer Transportation Firms .............................................................................. 70 Table 4-18 Panel Regression Results – CSR and Tobin’s Q Relation Amongst Further Transportation Firms .............................................................................. 71 Table 4-19 Panel Regression Results – CSR and ROA Relation Amongst Closer Transportation Firms .............................................................................. 75 Table 4-20 Panel Regression Results – CSR and ROA Relation Amongst Further Transportation Firms .............................................................................. 76 Table 4-21 Panel Regression Results – CSR and Tobin’s Q Relation Amongst Closer Transportation Firms Within The Eastern Region .................................. 80 Table 4-22 Panel Regression Results – CSR and Tobin’s Q Relation Amongst Further Transportation Firms Within The Eastern Region .................................. 81 Table 4-23 Panel Regression Results – CSR and ROA Relation Amongst Closer Transportation Firms Within The Eastern Region .................................. 82 Table 4-24 Panel Regression Results – CSR and ROA Relation Amongst Further Transportation Firms Within The Eastern Region .................................. 83 Table 4-25 Panel Regression Results – CSR and Tobin’s Q Relation Amongst Closer Transportation Firms Within The Western Region ................................. 87 Table 4-26 Panel Regression Results – CSR and Tobin’s Q Relation Amongst Further Transportation Firms Within The Western Region ................................. 88 Table 4-27 Panel Regression Results – CSR and ROA Relation Amongst Closer Transportation Firms Within The Western Region ................................. 89 Table 4-28 Panel Regression Results – CSR and ROA Relation Amongst Further Transportation Firms Within The Western Region ................................. 90 Table 5-1 Hypothesis Concluding Results ................................................................... 95

    Acabado, D. R., Branca, A. S., Catalão‐Lopes, M., & Pina, J. P. (2020). Do distinct CSR categories have distinct determinants? The roles of market structure and firm size. European Management Review, 17(1), 5-17.
    Bocquet, R., Le Bas, C., Mothe, C., & Poussing, N. (2017). CSR, innovation, and firm performance in sluggish growth contexts: A firm-level empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(1), 241-254.
    Boeprasert, A. (2012). Does geographical proximity affect corporate social responsibility? Evidence from US market. International Business Research, 5(9), 138.
    Bondy, K., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Multinational corporation codes of conduct: Governance tools for corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(4), 294-311.
    Boubakri, N., Guedhami, O., & Saffar, W. (2016). Geographic location, foreign ownership, and cost of equity capital: Evidence from privatization. Journal of Corporate Finance, 38, 363-381.
    Breuer, W., Müller, T., Rosenbach, D., & Salzmann, A. (2018). Corporate social responsibility, investor protection, and cost of equity: A cross-country comparison. Journal of Banking & Finance, 96, 34-55.
    Buchanan, B., Cao, C. X., & Chen, C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility, firm value, and influential institutional ownership. Journal of Corporate Finance, 52, 73-95.
    Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of management Review, 32(3), 946-967.
    Chen, C. M., & Delmas, M. (2011). Measuring corporate social performance: An efficiency perspective. Production and operations management, 20(6), 789-804.
    Chintrakarn, P., Jiraporn, P., Jiraporn, N., & Davidson, T. (2017). Estimating the effect of corporate social responsibility on firm value using geographic identification. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 46(2), 276-304.
    Chintrakarn, P., Jiraporn, P., Tong, S., & Chatjuthamard, P. (2015). Estimating the effect of entrenched boards on firm value using geographic identification. Finance Research Letters, 12, 109-116.
    Choi, J.-S., Kwak, Y.-M., & Choe, C. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: Evidence from Korea. Australian journal of management, 35(3), 291-311.
    Dabic, M., Colovic, A., Lamotte, O., Painter-Morland, M., & Brozovic, S. (2016). Industry-specific CSR: Analysis of 20 years of research. European Business Review.
    Davis, J. C., & Henderson, J. V. (2008). The agglomeration of headquarters. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 38(5), 445-460.
    Degryse, H., de Goeij, P., & Kappert, P. (2012). The impact of firm and industry characteristics on small firms’ capital structure. Small Business Economics, 38(4), 431-447.
    Delen, D., Kuzey, C., & Uyar, A. (2013). Measuring firm performance using financial ratios: A decision tree approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(10), 3970-3983.
    Dimson, E., Karakaş, O., & Li, X. (2015). Active ownership. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(12), 3225-3268.
    Ding, D. K., Ferreira, C., & Wongchoti, U. (2016). Does it pay to be different? Relative CSR and its impact on firm value. International Review of Financial Analysis, 47, 86-98.
    Ding, D. K., Ferreira, C., & Wongchoti, U. (2019). The geography of CSR. International Review of Economics & Finance, 59, 265-288.
    Dorfleitner, G., Utz, S., & Wimmer, M. (2018). Patience pays off–corporate social responsibility and long-term stock returns. Journal of sustainable finance & investment, 8(2), 132-157.
    Du, X., Chang, Y., Zeng, Q., Du, Y., & Pei, H. (2016). Corporate environmental responsibility (CER) weakness, media coverage, and corporate philanthropy: Evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(2), 551-581.
    Dupire, M., & M’Zali, B. (2018). CSR strategies in response to competitive pressures. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(3), 603-623.
    El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., & Kim, Y. (2017). Country-level institutions, firm value, and the role of corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(3), 360-385.
    Endrikat, J., Guenther, E., & Hoppe, H. (2014). Making sense of conflicting empirical findings: A meta-analytic review of the relationship between corporate environmental and financial performance. European Management Journal, 32(5), 735-751.
    Evangelista, P. (2014). Environmental sustainability practices in the transport and logistics service industry: An exploratory case study investigation. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 12, 63-72.
    Fatemi, A., Fooladi, I., & Tehranian, H. (2015). Valuation effects of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Banking & Finance, 59, 182-192.
    Flammer, C. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management Science, 61(11), 2549-2568.
    Gao, W., Ng, L., & Wang, Q. (2011). Does corporate headquarters location matter for firm capital structure? Financial Management, 40(1), 113-138.
    Gao, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, H., Peng, T., & Hao, S. (2016). Study on the relationship between comprehensive transportation freight index and GDP in China. Procedia engineering, 137, 571-580.
    Gasparatos, A., El-Haram, M., & Horner, M. (2009). A longitudinal analysis of the UK transport sector, 1970–2010. Energy Policy, 37(2), 623-632.
    Grewal, R., Cote, J. A., & Baumgartner, H. (2004). Multicollinearity and measurement error in structural equation models: Implications for theory testing. Marketing science, 23(4), 519-529.
    Guenster, N., Bauer, R., Derwall, J., & Koedijk, K. (2011). The economic value of corporate eco‐efficiency. European Financial Management, 17(4), 679-704.
    Hernández, J. P. S.-I., Yañez-Araque, B., & Moreno-García, J. (2020). Moderating effect of firm size on the influence of corporate social responsibility in the economic performance of micro-, small-and medium-sized enterprises. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151, 119774.
    Ho, F. N., Wang, H.-M. D., & Vitell, S. J. (2012). A global analysis of corporate social performance: The effects of cultural and geographic environments. Journal of business ethics, 107(4), 423-433.
    Ho, S. S., Li, A. Y., Tam, K., & Tong, J. Y. (2016). Ethical image, corporate social responsibility, and R&D valuation. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 40, 335-348.
    Hou, M., Liu, H., Fan, P., & Wei, Z. (2016). Does CSR practice pay off in East Asian firms? A meta-analytic investigation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(1), 195-228.
    Husted, B. W., Jamali, D., & Saffar, W. (2016). Near and dear? The role of location in CSR engagement. Strategic Management Journal, 37(10), 2050-2070.
    Ishaq, M., Islam, Y., & Ghouse, G. (2021). Tobin’s Q as an Indicator of Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from Manufacturing Sector Firms of Pakistan. International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (1), 425-441.
    Jiraporn, P., Jiraporn, N., Boeprasert, A., & Chang, K. (2014). Does corporate social responsibility (CSR) improve credit ratings? Evidence from geographic identification. Financial Management, 43(3), 505-531.
    John, K., Knyazeva, A., & Knyazeva, D. (2008). Do shareholders care about geography. Journal of Financial Economics, 73(2), 271-288.
    John, K., Knyazeva, A., & Knyazeva, D. (2011). Does geography matter? Firm location and corporate payout policy. Journal of financial economics, 101(3), 533-551.
    Kim, Y., Li, H., & Li, S. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 43, 1-13.
    Krüger, P. (2015). Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth. Journal of financial economics, 115(2), 304-329.
    Kuzey, C., Uyar, A., Nizaeva, M., & Karaman, A. S. (2021). CSR performance and firm performance in the tourism, healthcare, and financial sectors: Do metrics and CSR committees matter? Journal of Cleaner Production, 128802.
    Lee, S., & Park, S.-Y. (2010). Financial impacts of socially responsible activities on airline companies. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 34(2), 185-203.
    Lim, S., & Lee, K. T. (2012). Implementation of biofuels in Malaysian transportation sector towards sustainable development: A case study of international cooperation between Malaysia and Japan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(4), 1790-1800.
    Lin, B., & Benjamin, N. I. (2017). Influencing factors on carbon emissions in China transport industry. A new evidence from quantile regression analysis. Journal of cleaner production, 150, 175-187.
    Lioui, A., & Sharma, Z. (2012). Environmental corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Disentangling direct and indirect effects. Ecological Economics, 78, 100-111.
    Loughran, T. (2008). The impact of firm location on equity issuance. Financial Management, 37(1), 1-21.
    Luo, X., Wang, H., Raithel, S., & Zheng, Q. (2015). Corporate social performance, analyst stock recommendations, and firm future returns. Strategic Management Journal, 36(1), 123-136.
    McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of management Journal, 31(4), 854-872.
    Molina-Morales, F. X., García-Villaverde, P. M., & Parra-Requena, G. (2014). Geographical and cognitive proximity effects on innovation performance in SMEs: a way through knowledge acquisition. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(2), 231-251.
    Nelling, E., & Webb, E. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: the “virtuous circle” revisited. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 32(2), 197-209.
    Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization studies, 24(3), 403-441.
    Perrow, C. B. (1970). Organizational analysis: A sociological view.
    Piecyk, M. I., & Björklund, M. (2015). Logistics service providers and corporate social responsibility: sustainability reporting in the logistics industry. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management.
    Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, clusters, and company strategy.
    Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Foundations for organizational science. London: A Sage Publication Series.
    Sheldon, P. J., & Park, S.-Y. (2011). An exploratory study of corporate social responsibility in the US travel industry. Journal of Travel Research, 50(4), 392-407.
    Stellner, C., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and Eurozone corporate bonds: The moderating role of country sustainability. Journal of Banking & Finance, 59, 538-549.
    Subramanian, N., & Gunasekaran, A. (2015). Cleaner supply-chain management practices for twenty-first-century organizational competitiveness: Practice-performance framework and research propositions. International Journal of Production Economics, 164, 216-233.
    Sun, L. (2012). Further evidence on the association between corporate social responsibility and financial performance. International journal of law and management.
    Wang, Q., & Pirinsky, C. A. (2010). Geographic location and corporate finance: a review. Handbook of Emerging Issues in Corporate Governance.
    Xie, J., Nozawa, W., Yagi, M., Fujii, H., & Managi, S. (2019). Do environmental, social, and governance activities improve corporate financial performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 286-300.
    Yang, A. S., & Baasandorj, S. (2017). Exploring CSR and financial performance of full-service and low-cost air carriers. Finance Research Letters, 23, 291-299.
    Zamir, F., & Saeed, A. (2018). Location matters: Impact of geographical proximity to financial centers on corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in emerging economies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1-33.

    下載圖示
    2026-07-13公開
    QR CODE