| 研究生: |
劉銘聖 Liu, Ming-Sheng |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
新藥解盲失敗對生技股股價的影響 The Impact of Unblind Failure of New Drug on Stock Performances of Biotechnology Pharmacy Industry |
| 指導教授: |
莊雙喜
Chuang, Shuang-Shii |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 企業管理學系碩士在職專班 Department of Business Administration (on the job class) |
| 論文出版年: | 2017 |
| 畢業學年度: | 105 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 67 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 事件研究法 、新藥解盲 、異常報酬率 、連動性 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Event Study, New Drugs’ Unblind, Motility, Abnormal Return Rate |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:152 下載:14 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
新藥研發過程最後必須經過臨床試驗第三期的解盲測試,但是新藥解盲結果往往會令大眾投資人失望。新藥解盲失敗不但對本身主體公司股價造成嚴重的挑戰,對整體生技股股價波動也會造成很大的衝擊。本研究以近年來主要新藥解盲失敗事件對生技醫療產業股價產生的異常報酬率來進行討論。以股價的異常績效來分析新藥解盲失敗所造成的影響,這是較為客觀性,並且具有整體性的衡量指標。用市場模式 (Market Model) 進行估計,來衡量在新藥解盲失敗宣告前後期間對整體生技醫療產業有無股價異常報酬的產生。
本研究以事件研究法 (Event Study),以Thompson (1993) 與Grace,Rose and Karafiath (1995) 所採用的市場模式探討發生2014年7月27日之基亞 (Medigen Biotechnology Corp) 新藥解盲失敗以及2016年2月21日浩鼎 (OBI Pharma) 新藥解盲失敗對台灣整體生技股股票異常報酬的影響。
實證結果發現:
1.整體上市櫃生技股股票的確會因為新藥解盲失敗後,與事件主角股價產生連動性為負的異常報酬率。以直線迴歸分析,也具有顯著影響。
2.新藥解盲失敗後對製藥類生技股股價會產生很大影響的平均累積異常報酬率。
3.兩次新藥解盲失敗對大盤加權指數與生技醫療類指數的波動,分別有不同的影響。
The new drug R&D process must pass through unblind test of clinical tests in phase III, but unblind results of new drugs often make public investors disappointed. New drugs’ unblind failure not only causes a great challenge to companies’ stocks, but also greatly impacts stock price fluctuation of overall biotechnology. The study will discuss abnormal return rate of new drugs’ unblind failure on medical industry of biotechnology and analyze influences of new drugs’ unblind test from the perspective of abnormal performance of stock price. This is relatively objective and has the integrality. The market model is used to evaluate and measure generation of abnormal returns in the overall medical industry of biotechnology before and after new drugs’ unblind failure statement.
Based on the Event Study, the market model of Thompson(1993), Grace, Rose and Karafiath(1995) is used to discuss influences of the new drugs’ unblind failure of Medigen Biotechnology Corp on July 27th 2014 and new drugs’ unblind failure of OBI Pharma on February 21st 2016 on abnormal returns of overall biotechnology stocks in Taiwan.
Empirical results find that
1. Overall biotechnology stocks indeed generate abnormal returns with negative motility of the subject stock price after the new drugs’ unblind failure. It also has the significant effect with the linear regression analysis.
2. After the new drugs’ unblind failure, it will generate average abnormal returns on stock price of pharmaceutical biotechnology.
3. After twice new drugs’ unblind failure, it will cause a different influence on weighted index number and fluctuation of biotechnology indexes.
1.中文部分
王慧菱, 譚醒朝,& 張曉芬.2005. SARS疾病災難事件對臺灣生技醫療產業股價影響之研究. 健康管理學刊, 3(2): 99-119.
王慧菱, 譚醒朝,& 張曉芬.2007. 禽流感事件對臺灣生技醫療產業股價影響之研究. 健康管理學刊, 5(2): 107-116.
沈中華 & 李建然.2000. 事件研究法-財務與會計實證研究必備. 臺北:華泰出版有限公司.
吳奉遠.2002. 巨災事件對產險業股價影響之研究. 國立中正大學.
周賓凰 & 蔡坤芳.1997. 臺灣股市日資料特性與事件研究法. 證券市場發展季刊, 9(2): 1-26.
周柔汶.2004. 第二次波灣戰爭事件對股票市場異常報酬之研究. 國立高雄第一科技大學.
林泉源.1988. 證券投資顧問事業績效及投資者行為特性之研究.中華民國證券市場發展基金會出版. 16~22.
林子貞.1989. 台灣股市明牌對股價波動影響之實證研究. 國立政治大學.
林奇文.2014. 一顆新藥600億炒股大騙局. 財訊周刊, 457.
林怡廷.2016. 浩鼎事件後台灣該領悟三件事. 天下雜誌, 592.
凌明智.2004. 重大災難事件對股票市場之影響—以SARS疾病災難事件對台灣金融業為例. 國立高雄第一科技大學.
張素莉.2000. 公司重大事故與股價反應之研究:以華航空難事件為例.中華大學工業.
張揖平 & 賴博志.2001. 廣義自我迴歸條件異質變異數模式之參數估計介紹. 貨幣觀測與信用評等. 166-174.
張孟軒.2010. 自然災害事件對股票市場異常報酬率影響的研究.國立成功大學.
鄧哲明.2013. 新藥的研發流程概論. 科學月刊, 44(2).
蔡佳燕.2003. 重大災難事件對股票市場之影響-以臺灣九二一集集大地震對電子業、銀行業、營建業為例. 國立高雄第一科技大學.
2.英文部分
Barrett, W. B., Heuson, A. J., Kolb, R.W. 1986. The Effect of Three Mile
Island on Utility Bond Risk Premia. Journal of Finance, 41(1): 255-261.
Beaver, H. W. 1968. The Information Content of Annual Earnings
Announcement. Journal of Accounting Research, 64: 393-416.
Beaver, W. H. 1982. Discussion of Market-Based Empirical Research in
Accounting. Journal of Accounting Research, Supplement, 20: 323-331.
Bjerring, J. H., J. Lakonishok & T. Vermaelen. 1983. Stock Price and Financial
Analysts’ Recommendations. Journal of Finance, 38: 187-204.
Bollerslev, T. 1986. Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity.
Journal of Econometrics, 31: 307-327.
Bowman, R. G. 1983. Understanding and Conducting Event Studies. Journal of
Business Finance of Accounting, 10: 561-84.
Brown, S. J. & J. B. Warner, 1980. Measuring Security Price Performance.
Journal of Financial Economics, 8: 205-258.
Bruning, E. R. & A. T. Kuzma, 1989. Airline Accidents and Stock Return
Performance Logistics and Transportation. Harvard Business Review, 25(2): 157.
Davies, P. L. & M. Canes, 1978. Stock Prices and the Publication of Second-
hand Information . Journal of Business, 51: 43-55.
Dimson, Elory & Paul Marsh, 1984. An Analysis of Brokers and Analyst's
Unpublished Forecasts of UK Stock Returns. Journal of Finance, 39: 1257-1291.
Dolley, J.C. 1933. Characteristics and Procedure of Common Stock Split-ups.
Harvard Business Review, 11: 316-26.
Engle, R. F. 1982. Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of U.K. Inflation. Econometrics, 50: 987-1008.
Fama, E. F. 1970. Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical
Work. Journal of Finance, 25: 383-417.
Fama, E. F., L. Fisher, M. C. Jensen, & R. Roll. 1969. The Adjustment of Stock
Prices to New Information. International Economic Review, 10: 1-21
Fama, E. F. 1976. Foundation of Finance. New York, Basic Books.
Fama, Eugene. F. 1991. Efficient Capital Markets:Ⅱ. Journal of Finance, 5(46):
1575-1611.
Grace, E. V., L. C. Rose, & I. Karafiath. 1995. Using Stock Return Data to
Measure the Wealth Effects of Regulation: Additional Evidence from California’s Proposition 103. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 62: 271-285.
Peterson, David R. & Pamela, P. Peterson. 1995. Abnormal Returns and Analysts
Earnings Forecast Revisions Associated with the Publication of Stock Highlights’ by Value Line Investment Survey. Journal of Financial Research, 18: 465-477.
Thompson, Aileen, J. 1993. The Anticipated Sectorial Adjustment to the Canada
-United State Free Trade Agreement: A Event Study Analysis. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 26: 253- 272.
Williams, J. B. 1956. The Theory of Investment Value Amsterdam: North-
Holland Woolridge J. R. & C. C. Snow. 1990. Stock Market Reaction to Strategic Investment Decisions. Strategic Management Journal, 353-363.