有鑑於近幾年重大污染事件頻傳，突顯環境污染問題的嚴重性。本研究將以棕地（即已知或可能有污染的廢棄工業土地）理念為核心，並將研究範圍集中於探討受污染場址，擬以國外棕地再發展經驗，透過探討美國及歐洲其他國家棕地發展歷程與其再發展流程及策略，並與國內相關之土壤及地下水污染整治相對照，比較與美國組織結構的差異。
　　在探討國內受污染場址的同時，不可忽略的是早期工業區的開發為台灣經濟成長的重要基石，許多老舊工業區亦同時面臨產業衰頹與環境污染的危機，也因此不可忽略國內工業區的發展；本研究選取國內最早成立的六堵工業區作為實證案例，探討其區內發展現況課題與潛在污染分佈，並就文獻探討國外棕地再發展經驗提供六堵工業區未來發展方向，並提出國內受污染場址整治改善策略。

　　In recent years, more and more great contamination events occured increasingly in Taiwan, has revealed the serious problem of contamination in environment pollution. The study based on the Brownfield theory as the core of study(it mean the derelict land which were known or suspected contaminated), and focusing the scope on the contaminated land, try to compare difference of Brownfields Redevelopment process and strategy between the foreign and Taiwan.
　　However, when we discuss the contaminate site in Taiwan, it can not be ignore the industrial park have been the economic foundation of Taiwan in early stage. So many old industrial parks also faces the crisis of environmental pollution and industry decay. Taking the Liu-Du Industrial Park as the empirical case, we propose the future direction of development in Liu-Du Industrial Park, and the redevelopment strategy of contaminate site by discussing the foreign Brownfields redevelopment experience.

1.Alker S., et al., 2000., The Definition of Brownfield., Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43(1): 49-69.
2.Borak D., 2002., Brownfields and Utility Sites—A Primer for Local Governments, International City/County Management Association.
3.Campbell C. S., and M. H. Ogden, 1999. Constructed Wetlands in the Sustainable Landscape., John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4.Dramstad W. E., and J. D. Olson, and R. T. T. Forman, 1996., Landscape ecology principles in landscape architecture and land-use planning., Harvard University Graduate School of Design,Washington.
5.Deason J. P., and G. W. Sherk, and G. A. Carroll, 1998., Public Policies and Private Decisions Affecting the Redevelopment of Brownfields: An Analysis of Critical Factors, Relative Weights and Areal Differentials., Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, U.S. Environmant Protection Agency.
6.Dennison M. S., 1998., Brownfields redevelopment :/programs and strategies for rehabilitating contaminated real estate., Rockville, Md. :/Government Institutes.
7.De Sousa C. A., 2003.,Turning brownfields into green space in the City of Toronto., Landscape and Urban Planning 62 :181-198.
8.European Commission, 2003. United Kingdom Support for Land Remediation., European Commission, Belgium.
9.English Partnerships, 2003., Towards a National Brownfield Strategy-Research Findings for The Deputy Prime Minister., English Partnerships.
10.Forman R. T. T., and M. Godron, 1986.Landscape ecology., New York :Wiley.
11.Farina A., 1998., Principles and methods in landscape ecology., London ; New York : Chapman & Hall.
12.Grimski D., and U. Ferber, 2001., Urban Brownfields in Europe., Umweltbundesamt, Federal Environment Agency.
13.Hough M., 1995.,Cities and natural process., London ;Routledge,New York.
14.Hill C. M., 2003., New Life for Brownfields., Public Roads, July/ August: 36-39.
15.Lyle J. T., 1994.,Regenerative design for sustainable development, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
16.Murray K. S., and Rogers D. T., 1999.,Groundwater Vulnerability, Brownfield Redevelopment and Land Use Planning., Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 42(6): 801-810.
17.Meyer P. B., 2000., Approaches to Brownfield Regeneration: The Relative Value of Financial Incentives, Relaxed Mitigation Standards and Regulatory Certainty., Urban Development and Management Association of European Schools of Planning Congree.
18.McCarthy L., 2002., The brownfield dual land-use policy challenge: reducing barriers to private redevelopment while connecting reuse to broader community goals., Land Use Policy, 19: 287-296.
19.Morrison D., and Hanks K., 2003., Local Government and Community Engagement in Brownfields Redevelopment., International City/County Management Association.
20.NLUD-Previously Developed Land (PDL), 2003., Statistical Release— Previously- Developed Land that may be available for development (Brownfield Sites) in 2002, National Land Use Database (NLUD)
21.Rocky Mountain Institute: Wilson A.,et al., 1998., Green development : integrating ecology and real estate., New York : John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
22.Russ T. H., et al., 2000., Redeveloping brownfields :/landscape architects, planners, developers., New York :/McGraw-Hill.
23.Simons R. A., 1998., Turning brownfields into greenbacks :/developing and financing environmentally contaminated urban real estate., Washington, D.C. :/Urban Land Institute.
24.Singer M., et al., 2000., Brownfields Redevelopment: A guidebook for Local Governments and Communities-Second Edition., International City/County Management Association.
25.Shinn R. C., Jr., 2001., New Jersey Brownfields Redevelopment Update 2001., New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.
26.Thomas M. R., 2002., A GIS-based decision support system for brownfield redevelopment., Landscape and Urban Planning, 58: 7-23.
27.U. S. EPA, 1999., A Sustainable Brownfields Model Framework., US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Respones, Outreach and Special Projects Staff, Washington, D.C.
28.Uwe FERBER, Detlef GRIMSKI, 2002., Brownfields and Redevelopment of Urban Areas—A report from the Contaminated Land Rehabilitation Network for Environmental Technologies., Contaminated Land Rehabilitation Network for Environmental Technologies.
29.U. S. EPA, 2002., The New Brownfields Law., US Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C.
30.Whitman C. T., 2002., The Brownfields Program: Setting Change in Motion., U. S. EPA.
31.Wagner D. M., R. Dhesi, 2002. ,Growing Greener: Revitalizing Brownfields into Greenspace., International City/County Management Association.
32.Wilson H. D., 2002. Brownfield Redevelopment: An Urban Revitalization Tool for Reducing Urban Sprawl., URBANA Independent Study Professor Pierre Frechette University of Laval, Quebec.
33.Forman R. T. T., and Godron M.,1986, (張啟德 等譯, 1994), Landscape Ecology.,(景觀生態學), 台北：田園城市文化。
34.Hough M.,1995, (洪得捐、顏家芝、李麗雪 譯, 1998), Cities and Natural Process., (都市和自然作用), 台北：田園城市文化.。
35.Beer A. R., and C. Higgins., 2000,(陳淑珍 譯, 2002), Environmental Planning for site development, 2nd ed.,(環境規劃與基地開發：地方性永續規劃設計手冊), 台北市：六合出版。
36.Dramstad W. E., and J. D. Olson, R. T. T. Forman.,1996, (張俊彥, 洪佳君, 曾心嫻編譯, 2001), Landscape Ecology Principles in Landscape Architecture and Land-Use Planning.,(景觀建築及土地使用計畫之景觀生態原則), 臺北：地景企業公司。
37.Simonds J. O., 1998, (張效通 譯, 2001), Landscape Architecture: a Manual of Site Planning and design 3edit.,(環境規劃設計導論—景觀建築：基地規劃設計手冊), 台北市：麥格羅希爾國際股份公司、六合出版。
38.Makhzoumi J., and Pungetti G., 1999 (陳淑珍 譯, 2003), Ecological landscape design and planning: the Mediterranean context., (生態景觀設計與規劃—地中海地區), 台北：六合出版社。
39.基隆巿文獻委員會，1954-1957，基隆市志，基隆巿文獻委員會。
40.基隆巿文獻委員會，1957、1970、1973，基隆市年鑑，編基隆市政府。
41.臺北市銀行經濟研究室，1977，臺灣區工業區開發調查報告./臺北市銀行經濟研究室。
42.林建元，1992，工業區開發整體規劃之研究，經濟部工業局。
43.肖篤寧, 1993,“景觀生態學 :/理論、方法及應用 = Landscape ecology : theory, methods and applications.”, 臺北：地景企業股份有限公司。
44.丘昌泰，1993，美國環境保護政策：環境年代發展經驗的評估，臺北市：臺灣產業服務基金會。
45.第一商業銀行徵信室編，1994~2003，主要產業之動向：產業調查資料，臺北：第一商業銀行徵信室。
46.大武崙工業區管理站，1994，六堵工業區廠商名冊，大武崙工業區管理站。
47.蕭峰雄，1994，我國產業政策與產業發展，臺北市：遠東經濟。
48.林建元，1995，工業區開發環境災害防範作業手冊，經濟部工業局。
49.陳世一，1997，尋找河流的生命力：基隆河中游暖暖、七堵段歷史與地景巡禮，基隆市：基隆市立文化中心。
50.中華民國管理科學學會，1997-2003，工業區開發管理年報，臺北市，經濟部工業局。
51.俞孔堅，1998，景觀：文化, 生態與感知，臺北市：田園城市文化。
52.張正豪，1998，政府編定工業區更新策略之研究—以土城工業區為例，國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。
53.楊致行，2000，清潔生產概論：邁向產業永續發展之路，臺北市：經濟部工業局。
54.國立台灣大學地理環境資源學系暨研究所，2000，基隆市綜合發展計畫，基隆市：基隆市政府。
55.基隆巿環境保護局，2001，基隆巿環境保護計畫，基隆市政府。
56.牛慧恩，2001，美国对”棕地”的更新改造与再开发，国外城市规划第2期。
57.許育誠，2002，棕地再發展之研究—都市計畫工業區更新之新方向，國立台北大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文。
58.林建元，2002，工業區更新與現代化。
59.財團法人都市更新研究發展基金會，2002，都市更新法規經緯，台北市：都市更新研發會。
60.財團法人都市更新研究發展基金會，2002，都市更新魔法書，台北市：都市更新研發會。
61.許育誠，2002，棕地再發展之研究—都市計畫內工業區更新之新方向，國立台北大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文。
62.罗思东，2002，美国城市的棕色地块及其治理，城市问题第6期：外國城市64-67。
63.鍾國輝，2002，生態工業園區概念在竹科之應用研究—以積體電路產業為例，國立成功大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文。
64.基隆市政府，2003，六堵工業區引進商業設施宣導資料，基隆市政府。
65.李進勇，2003，基隆市志，基隆市：基隆市政府。
66.鄔建國, 2003, ”景觀生態學 :/格局、過程、尺度與等級= Landscape ecology : pattern, process, scale and hierarchy”, 台北：五南。
67.徐作聖，2003，”高科技產業策略與競爭”，台北市：全華出版。
68.美國環境保護署網站”棕地清理與再開發”網頁 http://www.epa.gov/brownfields/
69.美國紐澳良大學棕地倡議中心http://www.brownfields.com/
70.美國市長會議網站”棕地行動議程”：http://www.usmayors.org/uscm/brownfields/agenda.htm
71.英國威爾斯土壤更新網站http://www.grc.cf.ac.uk/lrn/about/index.php
72.都市更新研究發展基金會網站http://www.ur.org.tw/
73.土壤及地下水污染整治網http://ww2.epa.gov.tw/SoilGW/index.asp
74.行政院環境保護署網站http://www.epa.gov.tw/