簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳冠綸
Chen, Kuan-Lun
論文名稱: 雙金屬二維BHT框架作為析氧反應電催化劑之第一原理設計與分析
First-Principles Design and Analysis of Bimetallic Two-Dimensional BHT Frameworks as Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysts
指導教授: 田弘康
Tian, Hong-Kang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 化學工程學系
Department of Chemical Engineering
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 122
中文關鍵詞: 密度泛函理論氧氣析出反應雙金屬金屬有機骨架自旋極化電子傳輸性質
外文關鍵詞: Density Functional Theory, Electrocatalysis, Oxygen Evolution Reaction, Bimetallic 2D π-d Conjugated Frameworks
相關次數: 點閱:6下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 雙金屬二維π–d共軛苯六硫醇 (Benzenehexathiol, BHT) 框架近年來被視為具潛力的氧氣析出反應 (Oxygen evolution reaction, OER) 電催化平台。然而,其多組合的組成空間使實驗篩選相當耗時,而基於計算氫電極 (Computational hydrogen electrode, CHE) 的自由能排序亦容易受到溶劑效應與外加電位影響,限制其預測可靠性。因此,本研究避免僅依賴單一反應自由能變化作為篩選依據,改以局部磁矩、*OH吸附行為、穩定性與導電性等多項特徵進行綜合評估。基於我們先前對NiFe-BHT的實驗與理論研究,本研究利用密度泛函理論Density functional theory, DFT) 系統性探討單金屬TM–BHT及錳基雙金屬MnTM–BHT (TM = Fe、Co、Ni、Cu) 的催化特性。結果顯示,MnFe5:1-BHT能在保留較高Mn局部磁矩 (2.757 μB) 的同時,將Mn位點的*OH吸附能 (Ead) 調控至較有利的負值區域 (−0.647 eV) 。計算氫電極 (CHE) 分析定性指出Fe與Mn之間存在協同作用,其中Fe對鄰近Mn位點具有電子調控效果。此外,透過熱力學穩定性與玻爾茲曼輸運計算分析,MnFe5:1-BHT具有與已合成單金屬BHT相近的亞穩定性及足夠的導電能力。綜合多項電子結構與材料性質分析,本研究提出MnFe5:1-BHT為具實驗潛力之OER催化候選材料。

    Bimetallic two-dimensional π–d conjugated benzenehexathiol (BHT) frameworks have attracted increasing attention as potential electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER). Nevertheless, the large number of possible metal combinations makes experimental exploration inefficient, and activity predictions based solely on computational hydrogen electrode (CHE) free-energy profiles may be influenced by solvation effects and applied potentials. To address these limitations, this study adopts a multi-property evaluation strategy rather than relying on a single reaction free-energy change. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed to examine monometallic TM–BHT frameworks and Mn-based bimetallic MnTM–BHT systems, where TM = Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu. The results show that Fe incorporation into Mn-BHT effectively modifies the adsorption behavior of the Mn site. In particular, MnFe5:1-BHT exhibits a favorable *OH adsorption energy (Ead) of −0.647 eV while maintaining a high local Mn magnetic moment of 2.757 μB. Qualitative CHE analysis further suggests that Fe and Mn may play cooperative roles, with Fe contributing to the reaction energetics and electronically influencing neighboring Mn sites. In addition, convex-hull analysis and Boltzmann transport calculations indicate that MnFe5:1-BHT possesses metastability comparable to experimentally reported monometallic BHT frameworks and sufficient charge transport capability. Overall, the combined analysis of adsorption behavior, magnetic properties, thermodynamic stability, and electronic transport supports MnFe5:1-BHT as a promising candidate for future OER electrocatalyst development.

    摘要 I EXTENDED ABSTRACT II 誌謝 X 目錄 XII 表目錄 XVI 圖目錄 XVII 第一章 緒論 1 第二章 文獻回顧 4 2-1 綠氫能源之發展與應用 4 2-2 電解水反應概述與氧氣析出反應 7 2-2-1 電催化產氫與產氧半反應機制 7 2-2-2 氧氣析出反應 (OER) 之動力學瓶頸與挑戰 9 2-3 電解水觸媒種類與材料特性 10 2-3-1 貴金屬電催化觸媒 10 2-3-2 過渡金屬電催化觸媒 11 2-3-3 金屬有機骨架觸媒 13 2-4 提升OER催化活性之設計與調控策略 14 2-4-1 催化劑晶體與表面結構調控 14 2-4-2 多金屬協同效應 17 2-4-3 自旋極化與磁性調控 18 2-5 二維導電苯六硫醇 (BHT) 基金屬有機骨架 21 2-5-1 傳統金屬有機骨架於電催化之限制 21 2-5-2 苯六硫醇導電型金屬有機骨架 22 2-5-3 雙金屬BHT MOF於電催化之潛力 24 2-6 理論計算於電催化之應用 26 2-6-1 第一原理計算與材料設計 26 2-6-2 傳統計算評估催化劑方法及其侷限性 28 2-6-3 吸附能與磁矩效應預測催化活性 29 2-6-4 熱力學穩定性評估 30 2-6-5 導電性與電荷傳輸能力 33 2-7 理論計算於雙金屬電催化材料篩選之優勢與研究設計 34 第三章 理論計算背景與方法 36 3-1 薛丁格方程式 36 3-2 密度泛函理論 37 3-3 Hohenberg-Kohn定理 37 3-3-1 Kohn-Sham方程式 38 3-4 交換相關泛函 40 3-4-1 局部密度近似 40 3-4-2 廣義梯度近似 41 3-5 計算軟體與工具 42 3-5-1 Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP) 42 3-5-2 Python Materials Genomics (Pymatgen) 43 3-5-3 BoltzTraP2 44 3-6 分析方法 45 3-6-1 吸附能 45 3-6-2 磁矩 46 3-6-3 Computational Hydrogen Electrode (CHE) 46 3-6-4 形成能 48 3-6-5 相圖 48 3-6-6 Energy above the convex hull (Ehull) 49 第四章 結果與討論 51 4-1 金屬BHT框架之原子結構設計與建立 52 4-2 單金屬BHT系統之局部磁性與配位環境效應 56 4-3 單金屬框架之電催化活性篩選與主體框架確立 59 4-4 第二金屬引入對Mn-BHT框架電子結構與吸附能之調變 62 4-5 理論預測趨勢與實驗文獻之對比驗證 66 4-6 篩選結果之CHE定性機制驗證 68 4-7 熱力學穩定性分析與實驗可行性評估 70 4-8 導電特性與電子傳輸行為分析 74 第五章 結論 81 參考資料 82 附錄 100

    [1] D. J. Soeder, ‘Energy Futures The Story of Fossil Fuel, Greenhouse Gas, and Climate Change Second Edition’.
    [2] S. O. Akpasi, I. M. Smarte Anekwe, E. K. Tetteh, U. O. Amune, S. I. Mustapha, and S. L. Kiambi, ‘Hydrogen as a clean energy carrier: advancements, challenges, and its role in a sustainable energy future’, Clean Energy, vol. 9, no. 1. pp. 52–88, Feb. 01, 2025. doi: 10.1093/ce/zkae112.
    [3] A. Dauletbay, ‘Transportation of Hydrogen: Hydrogen Usage’, in Hydrogen Technologies - Advances, Insights, and Applications, IntechOpen, 2024. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.1005066.
    [4] I. Rolo, V. A. F. Costa, and F. P. Brito, ‘Hydrogen-Based Energy Systems: Current Technology Development Status, Opportunities and Challenges’, Energies, vol. 17, no. 1., Jan. 01, 2024. doi: 10.3390/en17010180.
    [5] A. K. Worku, D. W. Ayele, D. B. Deepak, A. Y. Gebreyohannes, S. D. Agegnehu, and M. L. Kolhe, ‘Recent Advances and Challenges of Hydrogen Production Technologies via Renewable Energy Sources’, Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research, vol. 5, no. 5. May 01, 2024. doi: 10.1002/aesr.202300273.
    [6] B. Sun, M. Zhang, Q. Sun, J. Zhong, and G. Shao, ‘Review on natural hydrogen wells safety’, Nature Communications, vol. 16, no. 1. Dec. 01, 2025. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-55773-y.
    [7] R. Boddula and A. M. Asiri, Methods for electrocatalysis: advanced materials and allied applications. Springer, 2020.
    [8] H. Sun, X. Xu, H. Kim, W. C. Jung, W. Zhou, and Z. Shao, ‘Electrochemical Water Splitting: Bridging the Gaps Between Fundamental Research and Industrial Applications’, Energy and Environmental Materials, vol. 6, no. 5. Sep. 01, 2023. doi: 10.1002/eem2.12441.
    [9] K. A. Stoerzinger, O. Diaz-Morales, M. Kolb, R. R. Rao, R. Frydendal, L. Qiao, X. R. Wang, N. B. Halck, J. Rossmeisl, H. A. Hansen, T. Vegge, I. E. L. Stephens, M. T. M. Koper, and Y. Shao-Horn, ‘Orientation-Dependent Oxygen Evolution on RuO2 without Lattice Exchange’, ACS Energy Letters, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 876–881, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00135.
    [10] X. Han, M. Jin, T. Chen, T. Chou, J. Chen, S. Wang, Y. Yang, J. Wang, and H. Jin, ‘Defect Engineering of RuO2 Aerogel for Efficient Acidic Water Oxidation’, ACS Materials Letters, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 748–755, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.3c01414.
    [11] W. Zheng, Y. Zhao, K. Jiang, F. Xie, L. Meng, S. Gao, J. Li, J. Lan, M. Luo, L. Liu, and Y. Tan, ‘Heteroatom dopants overcome the activity-stability trade-off in RuO2 for acidic oxygen evolution’, Nature Communications, vol. 16, no. 1, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-62036-x.
    [12] I. A. Khan, P. Morgen, S. Gyergyek, R. Sharma, and S. M. Andersen, ‘Microwaves assisted synthesis of IrRu alloy nanoparticles for acidic oxygen evolution reaction: A balance between activity and stability’, Applied Surface Science, vol. 703, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2025.163405.
    [13] M. Ledendecker, S. Geiger, K. Hengge, J. Lim, S. Cherevko, A. M. Mingers, D. Göhl, G. V. Fortunato, D. Jalalpoor, F. Schüth, C. Scheu, and K. J. J. Mayrhofer, ‘Towards maximized utilization of iridium for the acidic oxygen evolution reaction’, Nano Research, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 2275–2280, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s12274-019-2383-y.
    [14] C. Roy, R. R. Rao, K. A. Stoerzinger, J. Hwang, J. Rossmeisl, I. Chorkendorff, Y. Shao-Horn, and I. E. L. Stephens, ‘Trends in Activity and Dissolution on RuO2 under Oxygen Evolution Conditions: Particles versus Well-Defined Extended Surfaces’, ACS Energy Letters, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 2045–2051, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b01178.
    [15] Y. Xue, J. Zhao, L. Huang, Y. R. Lu, A. Malek, G. Gao, Z. Zhuang, D. Wang, C. T. Yavuz, and X. Lu, ‘Stabilizing ruthenium dioxide with cation-anchored sulfate for durable oxygen evolution in proton-exchange membrane water electrolyzers’, Nature Communications, vol. 14, no. 1, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43977-7.
    [16] K. A. Jannath and H. A. Saputra, ‘Transition metal-based electrocatalysts for alkaline oxygen evolution reaction: Developments, challenges, and perspectives’, Next Materials, vol. 9. Oct. 01, 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.nxmate.2025.101164.
    [17] M. Gong, Y. Li, H. Wang, Y. Liang, J. Z. Wu, J. Zhou, J. Wang, T. Regier, F. Wei, and H. Dai, ‘An advanced Ni-Fe layered double hydroxide electrocatalyst for water oxidation’, Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 135, no. 23, pp. 8452–8455, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.1021/ja4027715.
    [18] B. B. Gicha, L. T. Tufa, S. Kang, M. Goddati, E. T. Bekele, and J. Lee, ‘Transition metal-based 2d layered double hydroxide nanosheets: Design strategies and applications in oxygen evolution reaction’, Nanomaterials, vol. 11, no. 6, 2021, doi: 10.3390/nano11061388.
    [19] G. Sheng, S. Zhao, U. Naeem, F. N. A. Saad, R. Lyu, X. Jiang, S. Hu, S. Kheawhom, R. Yin, H. Song, A. Alshoaibi, W. Shao, and A. A. Mohamad, ‘Rational design of transition metal-based heterostructure electrocatalysts for high-performance oxygen evolution reaction’, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 127. pp. 717–736, May 13, 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.04.058.
    [20] H. Li, M. Eddaoudi, M. O’Keeffe, and O. M. Yaghi, ‘Design and synthesis of an exceptionally stable and highly porous metal-organic framework’, Nature, vol. 402, no. 6759, pp. 276–279, 1999, doi: 10.1038/46248.
    [21] B. Dai, X. Wei, L. Chen, X. Bao, Q. Zhong, and H. Qu, ‘Introducing different long-chain flexible ligands to regulate the transformation behavior of NiFe-MOF and as bifunctional catalysts for the HER/OER’, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 682, pp. 80–93, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2024.11.114.
    [22] M. A. Abdelwahab, G. G. Mohamed, and A. S. Eliwa, ‘Facile Synthesis of Co-MOF Nanoflakes as an Efficient and Durable Electrocatalyst for HER and OER Applications in Alkaline Medium’, Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 5981–5996, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10904-025-03635-5.
    [23] Y. Wen, J. Zhang, Q. Xu, X. T. Wu, and Q. L. Zhu, ‘Pore surface engineering of metal–organic frameworks for heterogeneous catalysis’, Coordination Chemistry Reviews, vol. 376. pp. 248–276, Dec. 01, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2018.08.012.
    [24] ‘Introduction to Metal–Organic Frameworks’, Chemical Reviews, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 673–674, Feb. 2012, doi: 10.1021/cr300014x.
    [25] J. Duan, S. Chen, and C. Zhao, ‘Ultrathin metal-organic framework array for efficient electrocatalytic water splitting’, Nature Communications, vol. 8, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1038/ncomms15341.
    [26] W. Wang, D. Chen, F. Li, X. Xiao, and Q. Xu, ‘Metal-organic-framework-based materials as platforms for energy applications’, Chem, vol. 10, no. 1. pp. 86–133, Jan. 11, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2023.09.009.
    [27] L. Liu, Z. Jiang, L. Fang, H. Xu, H. Zhang, X. Gu, and Y. Wang, ‘Probing the crystal plane effect of Co3O4 for enhanced electrocatalytic performance toward efficient overall water splitting’, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 9, no. 33, pp. 27736–27744, 2017.
    [28] X. Hou, J. Li, J. Zheng, L. Li, and W. Chu, ‘Introducing oxygen vacancies to NiFe LDH through electrochemical reduction to promote the oxygen evolution reaction’, Dalton Transactions, vol. 51, no. 36, pp. 13970–13977, 2022.
    [29] B. Lin, F. Xu, and S. Mu, ‘NiFe LDH/CuO nanosheet: a sheet-on-sheet strategy to boost the active site density towards oxygen evolution reaction’, RSC advances, vol. 10, no. 46, pp. 27424–27427, 2020.
    [30] Y. Hao, L. Wang, S. Cheng, H. Cheng, Q. He, and L. Yi, ‘Co–Mn bimetallic metal–organic frameworks nanosheets for efficient oxygen evolution electrocatalysis’, Energy Technology, vol. 12, no. 11, p. 2401049, 2024.
    [31] Y. Zang, D.-Q. Lu, K. Wang, B. Li, P. Peng, Y.-Q. Lan, and S.-Q. Zang, ‘A pyrolysis-free Ni/Fe bimetallic electrocatalyst for overall water splitting’, Nature Communications, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 1792, 2023.
    [32] T. Lim, J. W. H. Niemantsverdriet, and J. Gracia, ‘Layered Antiferromagnetic Ordering in the Most Active Perovskite Catalysts for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction’, ChemCatChem, vol. 8, no. 18, pp. 2968–2974, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1002/cctc.201600611.
    [33] Y. Wu, L. Cheng, Y. Tang, H. Sun, and Q. Xiang, ‘Unified Perspectives on Spin Polarization in Heterogeneous Photo/Electrocatalysis’, Advanced Functional Materials. Jan. 19, 2025. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202516617.
    [34] L. Lin, Y. Xu, Y. Han, R. Xu, T. Wang, Z. Sun, and Z. Yan, ‘Spin-Magnetic Effect of d-π Conjugation Polymer Enhanced O-H Cleavage in Water Oxidation’, Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 146, no. 11, pp. 7363–7372, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c11907.
    [35] C.-Y. Huang, H.-A. Chen, W.-X. Lin, K.-H. Chen, Y.-C. Lin, T.-S. Wu, C.-C. Chang, C.-W. Pao, W.-T. Chuang, J.-C. Jan, Y.-C. Shao, N. Hiraoka, J.-W. Chiou, P.-C. Kuo, J. Shiue, D. Vishnu S. K, R. Sankar, Z.-W. Cyue, W.-F. Pong, and C.-W. Chen, ‘In Situ Identification of Spin Magnetic Effect on Oxygen Evolution Reaction Unveiled by X-ray Emission Spectroscopy’, Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 147, no. 16, pp. 13286–13295, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c18149.
    [36] H. Furukawa, K. E. Cordova, M. O’Keeffe, and O. M. Yaghi, ‘The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks’, Science, vol. 341, no. 6149, p. 1230444, 2013.
    [37] R. Saha, K. Gupta, and C. J. Gomez Garcia, ‘Strategies to improve electrical conductivity in metal–organic frameworks: a comparative study’, Crystal Growth & Design, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 2235–2265, 2024.
    [38] L. S. Xie, G. Skorupskii, and M. Dinca, ‘Electrically conductive metal–organic frameworks’, Chemical Reviews, vol. 120, no. 16, pp. 8536–8580, 2020.
    [39] X. Huang and W. Xu, ‘Benzenehexathiol-Based Conjugated Coordination Polymers: A Decade of Breakthroughs in High Conductivity and Quantum Phenomena’, Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 543–556, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.5c00694.
    [40] R. Toyoda, N. Fukui, D. H. L. Tjhe, E. Selezneva, H. Maeda, C. Bourgès, C. M. Tan, K. Takada, Y. Sun, I. Jacobs, K. Kamiya, H. Masunaga, T. Mori, S. Sasaki, H. Sirringhaus, and H. Nishihara, ‘Heterometallic Benzenehexathiolato Coordination Nanosheets: Periodic Structure Improves Crystallinity and Electrical Conductivity’, Advanced Materials, vol. 34, no. 13, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1002/adma.202106204.
    [41] T. Doughty, A. Zingl, M. Wünschek, C. M. Pichler, M. B. Watkins, and S. Roy, ‘Structural reconstruction of a cobalt-and ferrocene-based metal–organic framework during the electrochemical oxygen evolution reaction’, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 16, no. 31, pp. 40814–40824, 2024.
    [42] Z. Huang, Z. Wang, H. Rabl, S. Naghdi, Q. Zhou, S. Schwarz, D. H. Apaydin, Y. Yu, and D. Eder, ‘Ligand engineering enhances (photo) electrocatalytic activity and stability of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks via in-situ surface reconstruction’, Nature Communications, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 9393, 2024.
    [43] X. Wang, H. Niu, X. Wan, Z. Zhang, F. R. Wang, and Y. Guo, ‘Strain-promoted conductive metal-benzenhexathiolate frameworks for overall water splitting’, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 624, pp. 160–167, 2022.
    [44] M. Li, Z. Wu, M. Zheng, H. Chen, T. Gould, and S. Zhang, ‘First-Principles Exploration of 2D Benzenehexathiolate Coordination Nanosheets for Broadband Electrochromic Devices’, Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 32, no. 41, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1002/adfm.202202763.
    [45] C. A. Downes, A. J. Clough, K. Chen, J. W. Yoo, and S. C. Marinescu, ‘Evaluation of the H2 evolving activity of benzenehexathiolate coordination frameworks and the effect of film thickness on H2 production’, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1719–1727, 2018.
    [46] X. Fan, S. Tan, J. Yang, Y. Liu, W. Bian, F. Liao, H. Lin, and Y. Li, ‘From Theory to Experiment: Cascading of Thermocatalysis and Electrolysis in Oxygen Evolution Reactions’, ACS Energy Letters, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 343–348, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c02380.
    [47] J. Li, W. Huang, M. Wang, S. Xi, J. Meng, K. Zhao, J. Jin, W. Xu, Z. Wang, and X. Liu, ‘Low-crystalline bimetallic metal–organic framework electrocatalysts with rich active sites for oxygen evolution’, ACS Energy Letters, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 285–292, 2018.
    [48] G. Liu, F. Xie, X. Cai, and J. Ye, ‘Spin crossover and exchange effects on oxygen evolution reaction catalyzed by bimetallic metal organic frameworks’, ACS Catalysis, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 8652–8665, 2024.
    [49] E. Batsaikhan, M. Hayashi, and B. Sainbileg, ‘Spin: an essential factor in advancing the oxygen evolution reaction on 2D Fe-MOF’, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 27, no. 22, pp. 11700–11707, 2025.
    [50] W. S. Lee, H. Maeda, Y. T. Kuo, K. Muraoka, N. Fukui, K. Takada, S. Sasaki, H. Masunaga, A. Nakayama, H. K. Tian, H. Nishihara, and K. Sakaushi, ‘Spontaneous-Spin-Polarized 2D π-d Conjugated Frameworks Towards Enhanced Oxygen Evolution Kinetics’, Small, vol. 20, no. 40, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1002/smll.202401987.
    [51] J. Xu, C. Lund, P. Patel, Y. L. Kim, and C. Liu, ‘Recent Advances on Computational Modeling of Supported Single-Atom and Cluster Catalysts: Characterization, Catalyst–Support Interaction, and Active Site Heterogeneity’, Catalysts, vol. 14, no. 4. Apr. 01, 2024. doi: 10.3390/catal14040224.
    [52] Y. Zang, Q. Wu, S. Wang, B. Huang, Y. Dai, and Y. Ma, ‘High-throughput screening of efficient biatom catalysts based on monolayer carbon nitride for the nitric oxide reduction reaction’, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 527–535, 2022.
    [53] X. Lv, W. Wei, B. Huang, Y. Dai, and T. Frauenheim, ‘High-throughput screening of synergistic transition metal dual-atom catalysts for efficient nitrogen fixation’, Nano Letters, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1871–1878, 2021.
    [54] Z.-Y. Xiong, W. Hong, Y. Q. Zhao, W. J. Yin, and Y. Xu, ‘High-throughput screening and research of nitrogen reduction on 2D metal–organic framework: First-principles study’, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 126, no. 3, 2025.
    [55] B. C. Yeo, H. Nam, H. Nam, M.-C. Kim, H. W. Lee, S.-C. Kim, S. O. Won, D. Kim, K.-Y. Lee, and S. Y. Lee, ‘High-throughput computational-experimental screening protocol for the discovery of bimetallic catalysts’, npj Computational Materials, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 137, 2021.
    [56] J. K. Nørskov, J. Rossmeisl, A. Logadottir, L. Lindqvist, J. R. Kitchin, T. Bligaard, and H. Jónsson, ‘Origin of the Overpotential for Oxygen Reduction at a Fuel-Cell Cathode’, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 108, no. 46, pp. 17886–17892, Nov. 2004, doi: 10.1021/jp047349j.
    [57] H. Oberhofer, ‘Electrocatalysis Beyond the Computational Hydrogen Electrode’, in Handbook of Materials Modeling: Applications: Current and Emerging Materials, W. Andreoni and S. Yip, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 1505–1537. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-44680-6_9.
    [58] S. Ringe, N. G. Hörmann, H. Oberhofer, and K. Reuter, ‘Implicit Solvation Methods for Catalysis at Electrified Interfaces’, Chemical Reviews, vol. 122, no. 12, pp. 10777–10820, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00675.
    [59] F. Calle-Vallejo, ‘Mainstream and Sidestream Modeling in Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysis’, Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 58, no. 17, pp. 2749–2759, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.5c00439.
    [60] J. A. Gauthier, S. Ringe, C. F. Dickens, A. J. Garza, A. T. Bell, M. Head-Gordon, J. K. Nørskov, and K. Chan, ‘Challenges in Modeling Electrochemical Reaction Energetics with Polarizable Continuum Models’, ACS Catalysis, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 920–931, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b02793.
    [61] K. S. Exner, ‘Four Generations of Volcano Plots for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction: Beyond Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer Steps?’, Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 1336–1345, May 2024, doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.4c00048.
    [62] K. Chan and J. K. Nørskov, ‘Potential Dependence of Electrochemical Barriers from ab Initio Calculations’, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 1686–1690, May 2016, doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00382.
    [63] A. M. Dudzinski, E. Diesen, H. H. Heenen, V. J. Bukas, and K. Reuter, ‘First Step of the Oxygen Reduction Reaction on Au(111): A Computational Study of O2 Adsorption at the Electrified Metal/Water Interface’, ACS Catalysis, vol. 13, no. 18, pp. 12074–12081, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1021/acscatal.3c02129.
    [64] J. Bae, B. Kreitz, A. A. Peterson, and C. F. Goldsmith, ‘Influence of Coverage Dependence on the Thermophysical Properties of Adsorbates and Its Impact on Microkinetic Models’, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 3461–3476, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.4c02167.
    [65] R. Jena, V. Kashyap, R. Jana, T. Mandal, T. N. Das, F. A. Rahimi, S. Barman, D. Maity, R. Kumar, D. Bhattacharyya, A. Datta, and T. K. Maji, ‘In Situ Tracking of Ni-MOF Reconstruction into Active Ni(OH)2 OER Catalysts’, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 64, no. 38, p. e202510741, Sep. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202510741.
    [66] N. Govindarajan, G. Kastlunger, J. A. Gauthier, J. Cheng, I. Filot, A. Hagopian, H. A. Hansen, J. Huang, P. M. Kowalski, J. Liu, J. M. Lombardi, M. Maraschin, A. Peterson, H. S. Pillai, H. Prats, C. J. Price, R. van Roij, J. Rossmeisl, R. R. Seemakurthi, S.-J. Shin, A. Smith, J.-X. Zhu, and K. Doblhoff-Dier, ‘The Intricacies of Computational Electrochemistry’, ACS Energy Letters, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 4277–4288, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.5c00748.
    [67] J. Li, ‘Oxygen evolution reaction in energy conversion and storage: design strategies under and beyond the energy scaling relationship’, Nano-Micro Letters, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 112, 2022.
    [68] D. Deng and L.-M. Yang, ‘Magnetic moment is an effective descriptor for electrocatalytic nitrogen reduction reaction on two-dimensional organometallic nanosheets’, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 15, no. 18, pp. 22012–22024, 2023.
    [69] K. Zhang, S. Wang, X. Li, H. Li, and Y. Ni, ‘Phase segregation in Cu0.5Ni0.5 alloy boosting urea‐assisted hydrogen production in alkaline media’, Small, vol. 19, no. 28, p. 2300959, 2023.
    [70] F. Xie, T. Lu, Z. Yu, Y. Wang, Z. Wang, S. Meng, and M. Liu, ‘Lu–H–N phase diagram from first-principles calculations’, Chinese Physics Letters, vol. 40, no. 5, p. 057401, 2023.
    [71] C.-M. Wang, C.-H. Hsu, J.-S. Yang, and P.-C. Tsai, ‘Ab initio study on lithium anode interface instability and stabilization of superionic Li3InCl6 and Li6PS5Cl solid electrolytes’, Journal of Power Sources, vol. 640, p. 236719, 2025.
    [72] N. Kawashima, T. Rölle, T. Rauch, M. Seifert, and S. Botti, ‘Computational exploration of energy materials: the Zn–As–P ternary phase diagram’, Journal of Physics: Materials, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 015011, 2026.
    [73] T. Y. Ahmed, S. B. Aziz, and E. M. A. Dannoun, ‘New photocatalytic materials based on alumina with reduced band gap: A DFT approach to study the band structure and optical properties’, Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 5, 2024.
    [74] S. T. Baidak and A. V Lukoyanov, ‘Semimetallic, half-metallic, Semiconducting, and metallic states in Gd-Sb compounds’, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 24, no. 10, p. 8778, 2023.
    [75] W. Li, ‘Electrical transport limited by electron-phonon coupling from Boltzmann transport equation: An ab initio study of Si, Al, and MoS2’, Physical Review B, vol. 92, no. 7, p. 075405, 2015.
    [76] G. K. H. Madsen, J. Carrete, and M. J. Verstraete, ‘BoltzTraP2, a program for interpolating band structures and calculating semi-classical transport coefficients’, Computer Physics Communications, vol. 231, pp. 140–145, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2018.05.010.
    [77] J. Jiang, X. Zhou, H. Lv, H. Yu, and Y. Yu, ‘Bimetallic‐based electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction’, Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 33, no. 10, p. 2212160, 2023.
    [78] E. Schrödinger, ‘An Undulatory Theory of the Mechanics of Atoms and Molecules’, Physical Review, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1049–1070, Dec. 1926, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.28.1049.
    [79] A. K. Rajagopal and J. Callaway, ‘Inhomogeneous Electron Gas’, Physical Review B, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 1912–1919, Mar. 1973, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.7.1912.
    [80] W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, ‘Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects’, Physical Review, vol. 140, no. 4A, pp. A1133–A1138, Nov. 1965, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133.
    [81] E. O. Kane, ‘Thomas-Fermi Approach to Impure Semiconductor Band Structure’, Physical Review, vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 79–88, Jul. 1963, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.131.79.
    [82] J. P. Perdew and W. Yue, ‘Accurate and simple density functional for the electronic exchange energy: Generalized gradient approximation’, Physical Review B, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 8800–8802, Jun. 1986, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.33.8800.
    [83] G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, ‘Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set’, Physical Review B, vol. 54, no. 16, pp. 11169–11186, Oct. 1996, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169.
    [84] G. Kresse and D. Joubert, ‘From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method’, Physical Review B, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 1758–1775, Jan. 1999, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758.
    [85] M. Cococcioni and S. de Gironcoli, ‘Linear response approach to the calculation of the effective interaction parameters in the $mathrm{LDA}+mathrm{U}$ method’, Physical Review B, vol. 71, no. 3, p. 35105, Jan. 2005, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.035105.
    [86] G. Xing, S. Liu, and J. Liu, ‘Computational evaluation of 2D metal-organic frameworks with TMX4-centers (X= O, S and Se) for CO2 electroreduction’, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 3486–3494, 2023.
    [87] S. P. Ong, W. D. Richards, A. Jain, G. Hautier, M. Kocher, S. Cholia, D. Gunter, V. L. Chevrier, K. A. Persson, and G. Ceder, ‘Python Materials Genomics (pymatgen): A robust, open-source python library for materials analysis’, Computational Materials Science, vol. 68, pp. 314–319, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.028.
    [88] I. C. Man, H. Y. Su, F. Calle-Vallejo, H. A. Hansen, J. I. Martínez, N. G. Inoglu, J. Kitchin, T. F. Jaramillo, J. K. Nørskov, and J. Rossmeisl, ‘Universality in Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysis on Oxide Surfaces’, ChemCatChem, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 1159–1165, Jul. 2011, doi: 10.1002/cctc.201000397.
    [89] H. Xu, D. J. Zheng, S. Wang, E. Y. Zheng, Y. Zhang, T. Liu, J. Liu, D. Menga, J. Kim, J.-H. Fang, X. Wang, Z. Zhang, L. Schröck, J. Wang, S. Lee, S. Yu, H. Iriawan, G. Zhu, Y. Román-Leshkov, J. Li, and Y. Shao-Horn, ‘Stable Metal–Organic Electrocatalysts for Anion-Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzers by Defect Engineering’, Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 147, no. 33, pp. 29838–29851, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c06156.
    [90] K. Y. Liu, J. Liu, and J. M. Herbert, ‘Accuracy of finite-difference harmonic frequencies in density functional theory’, Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 38, no. 19, pp. 1678–1684, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1002/jcc.24811.
    [91] J. Liu, G. Xing, and L. Chen, ‘2D Conjugated metal–organic frameworks: defined synthesis and tailor-made functions’, Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 1032–1045, 2024.
    [92] H. Baba and M. Nakano, ‘Magnetic and spectroscopic characterizations of high-spin cobalt (II) complex with soft-scorpionate ligand’, Inorganic Chemistry Communications, vol. 17, pp. 177–179, 2012.
    [93] B. C. Sheath, S. Savvin, and S. J. Clarke, ‘Contrasting magnetic structures in the quaternary sulfides Ba2FeMS5 (M= Sb, Bi)’, Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 63, no. 49, pp. 23267–23275, 2024.
    [94] Y. Zhou, R.-Z. Yao, X. Cai, Z. Wang, P. Cen, Y. Yang, A. Yuan, Y. Tang, X. Chen, and S. Zhang, ‘Field-induced Co (II) single-ion magnet in octahedral [S6] coordination environment’, Journal of Molecular Structure, vol. 1294, p. 136391, 2023.
    [95] H. Singh, D. Prendergast, and M. Nath, ‘Modulation of electrocatalytic activity by tuning anion electronegativity: case study with copper chalcogenides’, Journal of Physics: Energy, vol. 5, no. 4, p. 045016, 2023.
    [96] S. Dutta, P. Banerjee, and S. K. Pati, ‘Computational Insight into TM–Nx Embedded Graphene Bifunctional Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Evolution and Reduction Reactions’, ACS Physical Chemistry Au, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 305–315, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1021/acsphyschemau.2c00003.
    [97] S. Bhattacharjee, U. V Waghmare, and S.-C. Lee, ‘An improved d-band model of the catalytic activity of magnetic transition metal surfaces’, Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 35916, 2016, doi: 10.1038/srep35916.
    [98] J. Wu, E. Kan, and C. Zhan, ‘A theoretical investigation on the OER and ORR activity of graphene-based TM–N3 and TM–N2X (X= B, C, O, P) single atom catalysts by density functional theory calculations’, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 26, no. 45, pp. 28449–28458, 2024.
    [99] Z.-K. Han, D. Sarker, R. Ouyang, A. Mazheika, Y. Gao, and S. V Levchenko, ‘Single-atom alloy catalysts designed by first-principles calculations and artificial intelligence’, Nature Communications, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 1833, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22048-9.
    [100] S. N. Shreyanka, J. Theerthagiri, S. J. Lee, Y. Yu, and M. Y. Choi, ‘Multiscale design of 3D metal–organic frameworks (M− BTC, M: Cu, Co, Ni) via PLAL enabling bifunctional electrocatalysts for robust overall water splitting’, Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 446, p. 137045, 2022.
    [101] N. Iqbal, R. Ahmad, T. Noor, N. Shahzad, and M. I. Shahzad, ‘Manganese doped Ni-MOF derived porous carbon-based bifunctional oxygen electrode catalyst for metal air batteries’, Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 334, p. 130448, 2025.
    [102] C. Wu, X. Zhang, H. Li, Z. Xia, S. Yu, S. Wang, and G. Sun, ‘Iron-based binary metal-organic framework nanorods as an efficient catalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction’, Chinese Journal of Catalysis, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 637–647, 2021.
    [103] X. Huang, H. Yao, Y. Cui, W. Hao, J. Zhu, W. Xu, and D. Zhu, ‘Conductive copper benzenehexathiol coordination polymer as a hydrogen evolution catalyst’, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 9, no. 46, pp. 40752–40759, 2017.
    [104] D. Xing, H. Wang, Z. Cui, L. Lin, Y. Liu, Y. Dai, and B. Huang, ‘A conductive two-dimensional trimetallic FeCoNi-benzenehexathiol π–d conjugated metal–organic framework for highly efficient oxygen evolution reaction’, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 656, pp. 309–319, 2024.
    [105] S. Namvar, A. Namaeighasemi, S. I. G. P. Mohamed, U. Nwosu, M. A. Khan, N. Gupta, A. M. Sarkar, T. Raja, A. Jaradat, I. Papailias, K. Glusac, S. Siahrostami, S. Nejati, and A. Salehi-Khojin, ‘2D Multivariate-Metal-Organic Frameworks (2D-M2OF) for High Yield Ammonia Synthesis from Nitrate’, Advanced Energy Materials, vol. 15, no. 35, p. 2405031, Sep. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202405031.
    [106] R. A. Murphy, L. E. Darago, M. E. Ziebel, E. A. Peterson, E. W. Zaia, M. W. Mara, D. Lussier, E. O. Velasquez, D. K. Shuh, and J. J. Urban, ‘Exchange bias in a layered metal–organic topological spin glass’, ACS central science, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 1317–1326, 2021.
    [107] S. A. Khandy, I. Islam, D. C. Gupta, and A. Laref, ‘Predicting the electronic structure, magnetism, and transport properties of new Co‐based Heusler alloys’, International Journal of Energy Research, vol. 42, no. 13, pp. 4221–4228, 2018.

    QR CODE