| 研究生: |
潘思錡 Pan, Ssu-Chi |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
以知識動態概念檢視區域創新系統演化之研究—以我國的新竹科學園區及南部科學園區暨周邊地區為例 Examining the Evolution of Regional Innovation Systems through a Knowledge Dynamics Perspective: Evidence from the Hsinchu and Southern Taiwan Science Parks and Their Surrounding Areas |
| 指導教授: |
胡太山
Hu, Tai-Shan |
| 學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
| 系所名稱: |
規劃與設計學院 - 都市計劃學系 Department of Urban Planning |
| 論文出版年: | 2026 |
| 畢業學年度: | 114 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 168 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 區域創新系統 、空間知識動態 、新竹科學園區 、南部科學園區 、演化 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | global production networks, territorial knowledge dynamics, regional innovation systems, science parks, knowledge functions |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:11 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究從空間知識動態的角度,建構一套能描繪區域創新系統 (Regional Innovation System, RIS) 長期演化的分析模式。既有 RIS 相關研究多著重於主體結構、制度安排或網絡連結,較少探究系統內知識在不同時期如何被應用、吸收與轉化,也難以解釋不同RIS之間的差異。因此,本研究立基於既有理論,將知識動態操作化為四項功能:知識應用、知識探勘、知識生成與知識擴散,作為建立演化模式的基礎。
經由理論梳理,本研究以模糊德爾菲與模糊層級分析法進行兩階段專家問卷,以確認四項知識功能中的具體指標及其相對重要性,並搭配敘述統計與深度訪談,從產業結構、主體組成、制度條件與知識連結等面向,分析新竹科學園區與南部科學園區及其周邊地區的演化歷程。
研究結果指出,RIS確實具有演化特性,且四項知識功能會隨產業生命週期、制度安排與外部知識來源而調整。竹科自早期便因明確的技術需求而同時展現探勘與應用活動,並在累積中逐步強化知識生成能力,形成以積體電路產業為核心、具高度外溢效果的創新環境。相較之下,南科在初期受政策導向較強,產業以生產導入與在地擴散為主,知識生成能量相對有限;直到近年先進製程投資逐步到位後,其生成活動才明顯提升。兩者在背景條件、制度與產業結構的差異,使其呈現截然不同的知識動態與演化路徑。
本研究提出的演化模式,可補足 RIS 研究在長期描繪上的不足,並說明不同區域在不同政策與產業脈絡下,如何形成差異化的知識動態結構。面對全球生產網絡重組與供應鏈外移的新趨勢,研究也指出,相較於僅聚焦產線移動或成本因素,更重要的是強化海外與我國間的知識回流,包括跨區域研發合作、人才流動、海外在地知識的蒐集與轉譯,以及提升園區的吸收能力,使海外布局反而能成為深化國內RIS的重要契機。
整體而言,本研究建構一套具知識動態概念的 RIS 演化模式,不僅能解析竹科與南科的異質性發展,也可作為後續比較研究與政策規劃的分析基礎。
This dissertation examines the evolution of regional innovation systems through the concept of territorial knowledge dynamics, using Hsinchu Science Park and Southern Taiwan Science Park as comparative cases. By integrating global production networks, territorial knowledge dynamics, and regional innovation systems, this study constructs an analytical framework based on four knowledge functions: knowledge application, knowledge exploitation (with (with explorative extension), knowledge generation, and knowledge diffusion. The findings show that the two science parks have followed different evolutionary paths due to differences in institutional conditions, industrial structures, historical trajectories, and knowledge bases. Hsinchu Science Park demonstrates stronger knowledge generation and diffusion capacities, while Southern Taiwan Science Park has developed through knowledge application, production expansion, and later-stage functional upgrading. This study argues that successful regional innovation systems cannot be simply replicated; rather, they must be understood through their specific knowledge functions, territorial contexts, and evolutionary processes.
Alhusen, H., Bennat, T., Bizer, K., Cantner, U., Horstmann, E., Kalthaus, M., . . . Töpfer, S. (2021). A new measurement conception for the ‘doing–using–interacting’ mode of innovation. Research Policy, 50(4), 104214.
Apanasovich, N. (2016). Modes of innovation: a grounded meta-analysis. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7(3), 720-737.
Apanasovich, N., Alcalde-Heras, H., & Parrilli, M. D. (2017). A new approach to business innovation modes: the ‘Research, Technology and Human Resource Management (RTH) model’in the ICT sector in Belarus. European Planning Studies, 25(11), 1976-2000.
Asheim, B. T. (2019). Smart specialisation, innovation policy and regional innovation systems: What about new path development in less innovative regions? Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32(1), 8–25.
Asheim, B. T., & Coenen, L. (2006). The role of regional innovation systems in a globalising economy: Comparing knowledge bases and institutional frameworks of Nordic clusters. In G. Vertova (Ed.), The changing economic geography of globalization (pp. 148–165). Routledge.
Asheim, B. T., & Gertler, M. S. (2006). The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 291–317). Oxford University Press.
Asheim, B. T., Grillitsch, M., & Trippl, M. (2016). Regional innovation systems: Past–present–future. In R. Shearmur, C. Carrincazeaux, & D. Doloreux (Eds.), Handbook on the geographies of innovation (pp. 45–62). Edward Elgar.
Asheim, B. T., & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems: The integration of local ‘sticky’ and global ‘ubiquitous’ knowledge. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 77–86.
Asheim, B. T., Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2019). Advanced introduction to regional innovation systems. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Asheim, B. T., Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2020). The role of the regional innovation system approach in contemporary regional policy: Is it still relevant in a globalised world? In B. T. Asheim, A. Isaksen, & M. Trippl (Eds.), Regions and Innovation Policies in Europe (pp. 12–29). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Autio, E. (1998). Evaluation of RTD in regional systems of innovation. European Planning Studies, 6(2), 131–140.
Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31–56.
Bergek, A., Hekkert, M., Jacobsson, S., Markard, J., Sandén, B., & Truffer, B. (2015). Technological innovation systems in contexts: Conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 16, 51–64.
Böhn, T., & Thomi, W. (2003). Knowledge Intensive Business Services in Regional Systems of Innovation-Initial Results from the Case of Southeast-Finland. Hallesche Diskussionsbeiträge zur Wirtschafts- und Sozialgeographie, No. 5, 1–22.
Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61-74.
Boschma, R. (2015). Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience. Regional Studies, 49(5), 733–751.
Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2011). The emerging empirics of evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 11(2), 295–307.
Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17(3), 233–247.
Capello, R., & Lenzi, C. (2019). Structural dynamics of regional innovation patterns in Europe: the role of inventors’ mobility. Regional Studies, 53(1), 30-42.
Chen, L. C. (2009). Learning through informal local and global linkages: The case of Taiwan's machine tool industry. Research Policy, 38(3), 527-535.
Coe, N. M., Dicken, P., & Hess, M. (2008). Global production networks: realizing the potential. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(3), 271–295.
Coe, N. M., Hess, M., Yeung, H. W.-C., Dicken, P., & Henderson, J. (2004). Globalizing Regional Development: A Global Production Networks Perspective. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(4), 468–484.
Cooke, P. (2001). Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the Knowledge Economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 945–974.
Cooke, P. (2002). Regional innovation systems: General findings and some new evidence from biotechnology clusters. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 133–145.
Cooke, P. (2004a). Introduction: Regional innovation systems – an evolutionary approach. In P. Cooke, M. Heidenreich, & H.-J. Braczyk (Eds.), Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governance in a Globalized World (2nd ed., pp. 1–18). Routledge.
Cooke, P. (2004b). The role of research in regional innovation systems: New models meeting knowledge economy demands. International Journal of Technology Management, 28(3–6), 507–533.
Cooke, P. (2012). Complex adaptive innovation systems. Routledge.
Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, 26(4–5), 475–491.
Corrocher, N., & Cusmano, L. (2014). The ‘KIBS engine’of regional innovation systems: Empirical evidence from European regions. Regional Studies, 48(7), 1212-1226.
Crevoisier, O., & Jeannerat, H. (2009). Territorial knowledge dynamics: From the proximity paradigm to multi-location milieus. European Planning Studies, 17(8), 1223-1241.
De Bruijn, P., & Lagendijk, A. (2005). Regional innovation systems in the Lisbon strategy. European Planning Studies, 13(8), 1153–1172.
Doloreux, D. (2002). What we should know about regional systems of innovation. Technology in Society, 24(3), 243–263.
Doloreux, D., & Parto, S. (2005). Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues. Technology in Society, 27(2), 133-153.
Doloreux, D., & Porto Gomez, I. (2017). A review of (almost) 20 years of regional innovation systems research. European Planning Studies, 25(3), 371–387.
Fritsch, M., Kudic, M., & Pyka, A. (2019). Evolution and co-evolution of regional innovation processes. Regional Studies, 53(9), 1235–1239.
Gertler, M. S. (2010). Rules of the game: The place of institutions in regional economic change. Regional Studies, 44(1), 1-15.
Gong, H., & Hassink, R. (2019). Co-evolution in contemporary economic geography: Towards a theoretical framework. Regional Studies, 53(9), 1344-1355.
Hanusch, H., & Pyka, A. (2007). Principles of neo-Schumpeterian economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31(2), 275–289.
Hertog, P. D. (2000). Knowledge-intensive business services as co-producers of innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 4(4), 491–528.
Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (1998). Policy subsystem configurations and policy change: Operationalizing the postpositivist analysis of the politics of the policy process. Policy Studies Journal, 26(3), 466–481.
Hsieh, H.-N., Chen, C.-M., Wang, J.-Y., & Hu, T.-S. (2015). Knowledge-intensive business services as knowledge intermediaries in industrial regions: A comparison of the Hsinchu and Tainan metropolitan areas. European Planning Studies, 23(11), 2253–2274.
Hu, T.-S. (2017). Developments in interactive relationships and knowledge between KIBS firms and their clients in Taiwan. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15(2), 257–271.
Hu, T.-S., Lin, C.-Y., & Chang, S.-L. (2013). Knowledge intensive business services and client innovation. The Service Industries Journal, 33(15–16), 1435–1455.
Huggins, R., Johnston, A., & Thompson, P. (2012). Network capital, social capital and knowledge flow: how the nature of inter-organizational networks impacts on innovation. Industry and Innovation, 19(3), 203–232.
Isaksen, A., Jakobsen, S. E., Njøs, R., & Normann, R. (2019). Regional industrial restructuring resulting from individual and system agency. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32(1), 48-65.
Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2016). Path development in different regional innovation systems: A conceptual analysis. In Innovation drivers and regional innovation strategies (pp. 66-84). Routledge.
Ishikawa, A., Amagasa, M., Shiga, T., Tomizawa, G., Tatsuta, R., & Mieno, H. (1993). The max-min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 55(3), 241-253.
Jensen, M. B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B.-Å. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 36(5), 680–693.
James, L., Vissers, G., Larsson, A., & Dahlström, M. (2016). Territorial knowledge dynamics and knowledge anchoring through localized networks: The automotive sector in Västra Götaland. Regional Studies, 50(2), 233–244.
Jeannerat, H., & Crevoisier, O. (2016). Editorial: From “territorial innovation models” to “territorial knowledge dynamics”: On the learning value of a new concept in regional studies. Regional Studies, 50(2), 185–188.
Koch, A., & Stahlecker, T. (2006). Regional innovation systems and the foundation of knowledge intensive business services. A comparative study in Bremen, Munich, and Stuttgart, Germany. European Planning Studies, 14(2), 123-146.
Lagendijk, A. (2006). Learning from conceptual flow in regional studies: Framing present debates, unbracketing past debates. Regional Studies, 40(4), 385-399.
Lee, P. C., & Su, H. N. (2010). Investigating the structure of regional innovation system research through keyword co-occurrence and social network analysis. Innovation, 12(1), 26-40.
Madsen, T. L., Mosakowski, E., & Zaheer, S. (2002). The dynamics of knowledge flows: human capital mobility, knowledge retention and change. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(2), 164-176.
Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2015). On the notion of regional economic resilience: conceptualization and explanation. Journal of Economic Geography, 15(1), 1-42.
Martin, R., Aslesen, H. W., Grillitsch, M., & Herstad, S. J. (2018). Regional innovation systems and global flows of knowledge. In New avenues for regional innovation systems-theoretical advances, empirical cases and policy lessons (pp. 127-147). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Miörner, J., & Trippl, M. (2017). Paving the way for new regional industrial paths: Actors and modes of change in Scania’s games industry. European Planning Studies, 25(3), 481–497.
Moodysson, J., Trippl, M., & Zukauskaite, E. (2017). Policy learning and smart specialization: balancing policy change and continuity for new regional industrial paths. Science and Public Policy, 44(3), 382-391.
Muller, E., & Zenker, A. (2001). Business services as actors of knowledge transformation: the role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems. Research Policy, 30(9), 1501-1516.
Njøs, R., & Fosse, J. K. (2019). Linking the bottom-up and top-down evolution of regional innovation systems to policy: organizations, support structures and learning processes. Industry and Innovation, 26(4), 419-438.
Peters, B., Roberts, M. J., Vuong, V. A., & Fryges, H. (2017). Estimating dynamic R&D choice: an analysis of costs and long‐run benefits. The RAND Journal of Economics, 48(2), 409-437.
Rypestøl, J. O., Isaksen, A., Eriksen, E. L., Iakovleva, T., Sjøtun, S. G., & Njøs, R. (2021). Cluster development and regional industrial restructuring: Agency and asset modification. European Planning Studies, 29(12), 2320-2339.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill.
Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 47(9), 1554-1567.
Simmie, J. (2003). Innovation and urban regions as national and international nodes for the transfer and sharing of knowledge. Regional Studies, 37(6-7), 607-620.
Simmie, J., & Martin, R. (2010). The economic resilience of regions: towards an evolutionary approach. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3(1), 27–43.
Simmie, J., & Strambach, S. (2006). The contribution of KIBS to innovation in cities: an evolutionary and institutional perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(5), 26-40.
Stuck, J., Broekel, T., & Revilla Diez, J. (2016). Network Structures in Regional Innovation Systems. European Planning Studies, 24(3), 423–442.
Tödtling, F., Asheim, B., & Boschma, R. (2013). Knowledge sourcing, innovation and constructing advantage in regions of Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(2), 161-169.
Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2013). Transformation of regional innovation systems: From old legacies to new development paths. In Re-framing regional development (pp. 297-317). Routledge.
Uyarra, E. (2011). Regional innovation systems revisited: networks, institutions, policy and complexity (No. 1113). Public policies and local development.
Yeung, H. W. C., & Coe, N. M. (2015). Toward a dynamic theory of global production networks. Economic Geography, 91(1), 29-58.
Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M., Voigt, P., Gutierrez-Gracia, A., & Jimenez-Saez, F. (2007). Regional innovation systems: how to assess performance. Regional Studies, 41(5), 661-672.
中科志編輯委員會(2008)。中科志(二○○八年版)。臺中市:國家科學委員會中部科學園區管理局。
白仁德(2007)。新竹工業區全球生產網絡之調查分析。建築與規劃學報,8(3),171–186。
沈明展、蔡佩純、邊泰明(2006)。創新系統下的產業網絡行為:以數位遊戲產業為例。科技管理學刊,11(3),119–147。
周素卿(1998)。科學園區的另一種發展版本:台南科學園區。台灣社會研究季刊,(32),125–163。
林韻芬(2013)。以模糊德爾菲法應用於劃定都市更新地區評估指標之研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東商業技術學院不動產經營系。
林楨家、馮正民(2008)。《都市及區域分析方法》(第二版)。臺北:建都文化。
邱英浩、鄭奕孟、謝宗育(2012)。應用模糊德爾菲與分析網絡程序法於文化創意產業園區發展評選之研究。建築學報,(80),85–109。
柳雯馨(2020)。以區域創新系統觀點探討科學園區再發展之研究-以竹科與南科為例(碩士論文)。國立成功大學都市計劃學系。
柳雯馨、胡太山、潘思錡(2021)。迎向創新時代:科學園區的蛻變。臺灣土地研究,24(2),139–169。
胡太山、林建元、錢學陶(2005)。產業創新群聚浮現與科技社群互動對創新活動影響之探討-以新竹科學園區及周邊為例。建築與規劃學報,6(1),43–61。
胡太山、解鴻年、王俊堯(2002)。新竹科學園區周邊地區社經發展變遷之調查研究。都市與計劃,29(1),37–65。
胡太山、張素莉(2001)。技術基礎設施、產業聚群與地方創新網絡建構之初探:以新竹科學園區暨周邊地區為例。建築與規劃學報,2(1),27–42。
張素莉、胡太山、林建元(2004)。高科技產業與生產者服務業互動關係之探討:以新竹科學園區及周邊地區為例。科技管理學刊,9(3),33–61。
陳秉立、閻永祺、孔憲法(2016)。南部科學園區創新平台形成之政策網絡分析。建築與規劃學報,17(1),25–52。
孔憲法、蕭勝雄、閻永祺、陳秉立(2019 年 06 月)。科學園區發展經驗創新轉化與基礎設施智慧化之研究。中國工程師學會會刊,92(2),65–83。
葉晉嘉、翁興利、吳濟華(2007)。德菲法與模糊德菲法之比較研究。調查研究,(21),31–58。
潘思錡、胡太山、賈秉靜(2019)。以創新投入與人才演化之觀點解析台灣工具機產業創新氛圍的形塑。建築與規劃學報,20(2),115–137。
劉佩真(2025 年 2 月 4 日)。政策 x 台積電效應 南部漸成半導體生產重鎮。工商時報。https://www.ctee.com.tw/news/20250204700109-439901
新竹科學園區管理局(2010)。新竹科學園區三十週年專刊。取自 https://www.sipa.gov.tw/home.jsp?serno=201001210117&mserno=201001210113&menudata=ChineseMenu&contlink=include/menu03.jsp(2025 年 11 月 20 日取用):https://www.sipa.gov.tw/file/20101216143851.pdf
新竹科學園區管理局(2000)。新竹科學園區二十週年專刊。取自 https://www.sipa.gov.tw/home.jsp?serno=201001210117&mserno=201001210113&menudata=ChineseMenu&contlink=include/menu03.jsp(2025 年 11 月 20 日取用):https://www.sipa.gov.tw/home.jsp?mserno=201001210118&serno=201001210118&menudata=ChineseMenu&contlink=include/menu04.jsp
新竹科學園區管理局(2020)。新竹科學園區四十周年專刊。取自 https://www.sipa.gov.tw/home.jsp?serno=201001210117&mserno=201001210113&menudata=ChineseMenu&contlink=include/menu03.jsp(2025 年 11 月 20 日取用):https://pavo.sipa.gov.tw/sipaCa/AReport/109AReport_ch.pdf
南部科學園區管理局(2003)。南部科學園區 2003 年年報。取自 https://www.stsp.gov.tw/web/WEB/Jsp/Page/cindex.jsp?frontTarget=DEFAULT&pageID=100&thisRootID=88(2025 年 11 月 30 日取用)。
南部科學園區管理局(2017)。南部科學園區 2017 年年報。取自 https://www.stsp.gov.tw/STSIPA_UPLOAD/Publish/1524033726584.pdf(2025 年 11 月 30 日取用)。
台灣積體電路製造股份有限公司(2011)。99 年度公司年報。取自 https://investor.tsmc.com/chinese/annual-reports(2025 年 12 月 15 日取用):https://investor.tsmc.com/sites/ir/annual-report/2010/c_all_4.pdf
聯華電子股份有限公司(2011)。99 年度公司年報。取自 https://www.umc.com/zh-TW/Download/annual_reports(2025 年 12 月 15 日取用):https://www.umc.com/upload/media/08_Investors/Annual_Reports/annual_report_chinese_pdf/2010/2010AR_CHI_all.pdf