簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳彥孜
Chen, Yen-Tzu
論文名稱: 晚期非小細胞肺癌使用免疫檢查點抑制劑之真實世界證據:台灣多中心觀察性研究
Real world evidence of immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter observational study in Taiwan
指導教授: 徐之昇
Hsu, Chih-Sheng
楊思雋
Yang, Szu-Chun
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 醫學院 - 臨床藥學與藥物科技研究所
Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical sciences
論文出版年: 2019
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 95
中文關鍵詞: 非小細胞肺癌免疫檢查點抑制劑Programmed death 1真實世界研究比較效果分析
外文關鍵詞: Non-small cell lung cancer, Immune checkpoint inhibitor, Programmed death 1, Real-world, Comparative effectiveness and safety
相關次數: 點閱:88下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 研究背景
    非小細胞肺癌是106年台灣癌症死因死亡率排名第一的癌症,過去治療藥物只有化學治療或標靶治療,近年來免疫檢查點抑制劑則是一項新興的治療選擇。免疫檢查點抑制劑可藉由PD1、PD-L1負向調節T細胞的功能,活化人體免疫對腫瘤細胞的攻擊達到治療效果。許多隨機對照試驗已證實第一線及第二線的免疫檢查點抑制劑可改善病人的整體存活期,尤其是PD-L1表現量高的族群可能有較好的療效,甚至可併用化學治療藥物提升治療反應率。然而亞洲肺癌族群在流行病學上有些特徵與西方國家不同,過去文獻大多來自臨床試驗的結果,目前針對亞洲真實世界的實證研究相對較少。

    研究目的
    本研究目的為瞭解使用免疫檢查點抑制劑的台灣晚期非小細胞肺癌病人人口學與臨床病理學特性,並比較在不同臨床治療情境下與傳統化學治療之療效與安全性差異,進一步分析免疫檢查點抑制劑的療效和嚴重不良事件相關因子。

    研究方法
    本研究為台灣多中心回溯性世代研究,為了比較免疫檢查點抑制劑與傳統化學治療用於晚期非小細胞肺癌的療效,研究對象將分為接受免疫抑制劑的治療組與接受化學治療的對照組。治療組納入2016年1月至2018年12月期間於台灣三家醫學中心(國立成功大學附設醫院、永康奇美醫院和中國醫藥大學附設醫院)就醫且使用過pembrolizumab、nivolumab或atezolizumab任一種免疫檢查點抑制劑,並排除參加臨床試驗和使用過兩種以上免疫檢查點抑制劑的晚期非小細胞肺癌病人;對照組則納入2016年1月至2018年12月期間於國立成功大學附設醫院使用第一線或後線化學治療組合,並排除參加臨床試驗和觀察期間只使用過一種化療藥物的晚期非小細胞肺癌病人。兩組病人的研究資料從醫院電子病歷獲得,並依據性別、年紀、肺癌基因突變有無(EGFR/ALK mutation)、日常體能狀態評分(performance status)為0-1或2-4和第一線、第二線或三線以上治療情境等五項特性進行1:1非隨機性配對,獲得配對後治療組和對照組。接著,使用存活分析中的存活曲線圖(kaplan-meier curves)比較治療組與對照組之整體存活期差異,並以Cox迴歸分析(cox proportional hazard regression analysis)計算兩組間的死亡風險比率(hazard ratio)。免疫檢查點抑制劑存活療效相關因子以Cox迴歸模式進行單變項分析和多變項分析,嚴重藥物不良事件相關因子以Cox迴歸模式進行單變項分析,研究病人臨床病理特性與存活和不良事件之相關性。

    研究結果
    本研究治療組收入91位於2016至2018年期間使用免疫檢查點抑制的晚期非小細胞肺癌病人,其中使用pembrolizumab為37人(40.7%),使用nivolumab為42人(46.2%),使用atezolizumab為12人(13.2%),平均治療時間為5.24個月(範圍: 1天-32.6個月)。治療組病人平均年紀為62.87歲,大部分為男性、無吸菸習慣、組織學型態為非鱗狀細胞癌、臨床分期為第四期、日常體能狀態為0-1和無腦部轉移。大多數病人未攜帶EGFR/ALK突變基因,然而PD-L1表現量僅有54人(59.3%)檢測,其中46人(50.5%)為陽性,表現量小於1%為3人(3.3%)、1-49%為19人(20.9%)、大於50%為22人(24.2%)。大多數免疫檢查點抑制劑為病人自費使用,其中第一線治療有30人(33%),第二線治療有17人(18.7%),第三線以上治療有44人(48.4%)。約一半的病人有合併化學治療,大部分未合併放射線治療。
    本研究對照組納入236人,經過臨床治療情境分組,在第一線治療情境下治療組(N=30)與對照組(N=130)整體存活期中位數分別為14.4個月和17.4個月(HR:1.3;95 CI% 0.68-2.46;P=0.428);在第二線治療情境下治療組(N=17)與對照組(N=92)整體存活期中位數分別為11.3個月和9.5個月(HR:0.76;95 CI% 0.36-1.59;P=0.46);在第三線以上治療情境下治療組(N=44)與對照組(N=78)整體存活期中位數分別為10.8個月和8.6個月(HR:0.82;95 CI% 0.52-1.29;P=0.394),二組皆未達統計上顯著差異。接著,依據性別、年紀、有無EGFR/ALK突變基因、日常體能狀態評分0-1或2-4和第一線、第二線或第三線以上治療情境進行配對,配對後治療組與對照組各有79人,其中第一線、第二線和第三線以上治療情境分別占42.9%、16.5%和45.6%。整體存活期中位數分別為11.2個月和10.5個月 (HR:0.96;95 CI% 0.64-1.44;P=0.838),二組未達統計上顯著差異。
    在安全性部分,配對後治療組和對照組的grade 3以上嚴重藥物不良事件發生率分別為12.7%和21.5%。治療組發生的不良事件大部分為免疫相關副作用,最常見的類型是pneumonitis(6.3%)和skin rash(3.8%)。對照組最常見的不良事件類型為neutropenia(12.7%)、alopecia(3.8%)和anemia(2.5%)。
    在免疫檢查點抑制劑療效相關因子分析結果顯示,日常體能狀態評分為0-1和PD-L1表現量為陽性的病人有較好的存活,而治療初期使用全身性類固醇大於一周的病人則死亡風險較高;嚴重藥物不良事件相關因子分析結果顯示,合併使用化療發生不良事件的風險較高。

    研究結論
    本研究發現,台灣晚期非小細胞肺癌病人使用免疫檢查點抑制劑的整體存活期,不論是在第一線或是後線的治療情境下使用,與傳統化學治療之臨床表現相似。本研究也觀察到,相較於傳統化學治療,免疫檢查點抑制劑的嚴重藥物不良事件發生率較低。儘管如此併用化療可能增加發生風險,治療時仍需注意免疫相關副作用並盡早給予適當處置。另外,病人日常體能狀態和PD-L1檢測可作為臨床上評估免疫檢查點抑制劑療效的項目,建議治療初期避免併用全身性類固醇,減少對於免疫系統的影響。然而,因本研究樣本數較少和觀察期較短,仍有待更大型的世代研究來進一步證實台灣晚期非小細胞肺癌病人使用免疫檢查點抑制劑的療效及安全性。

    Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer-related death in Taiwan. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been confirmed to improve survival in patients with advanced NSCLC. However, there is still inadequate knowledge among Asian patients on real-world effectiveness and safety of ICI compared to chemotherapy. We retrospectively reviewed patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC who received ICI or chemotherapy in Taiwan to compared overall survival and treatment related adverse events. Factor associated with survival and adverse events with ICI were investigated. Between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2018, 91 and 236 patients were enrolled in ICI group and chemotherapy group. The median overall survival of ICI group and chemotherapy group were 14.4 and 17.4 months in first-line setting (HR:1.3;95 CI% 0.68-2.46; P=0.428), 11.3 and 9.5 months in second-line setting (HR: 0.76; 95 CI% 0.36-1.59; P=0.46), 10.8 and 8.6 months in more than third-line setting (HR: 0.82; 95 CI% 0.52-1.29; P=0.394), respectively. Treatment related adverse events of grade 3 or more occurred in 12.7% of the patients with ICI and 21.5% of the patients with chemotherapy. Good performance status and PD-L1 expression were associated with better survival and systemic steroid use at the time of initiating ICI was associated poorer survival. Combination with chemotherapy correlated with treatment related adverse events of above grade 3. The study showed ICI had similar survival to chemotherapy, regardless of first line or subsequent line setting. Large cohort studies are required for Asian patients with advanced NSCLC.

    第一篇、 台灣非小細胞肺癌之藥物療效與安全性分析 1 第一章、 緒論 1 第一節、 研究背景與動機 1 第二節、 研究目的與重要性 2 第二章、 文獻回顧 3 第一節、 非小細胞肺癌簡介 3 一、 流行病學與危險因子 3 二、 病理學與分子生物學 6 三、 診斷、臨床分期與風險評估 8 四、 非小細胞肺癌治療模式 10 第二節、 免疫檢查點抑制劑簡介 12 第三節、 免疫檢查點抑制劑之療效 16 一、 免疫檢查點抑制劑與傳統化療之比較效果 16 二、 治療反應影響因素 22 第四節、 免疫檢查點抑制劑之安全性 26 一、 免疫相關副作用簡介 26 二、 免疫檢查點抑制劑與傳統化療之安全性比較 27 第三章、 研究方法 28 第一節、 研究流程 28 第二節、 研究設計 29 一、 研究類型 29 二、 研究藥品 29 三、 研究對象 30 第三節、 研究資料蒐集 33 一、 治療組研究特徵 33 二、 對照組研究特徵 35 第四節、 統計分析 36 第四章、 研究結果 37 第一節、 研究對象納入與排除 37 第二節、 研究對象基本特性分析 39 第三節、 主要研究事件 48 一、 整體存活期 48 二、 嚴重藥物不良事件 52 第四節、 次要研究事件 55 一、 免疫檢查點抑制劑之療效相關因子 55 二、 免疫檢查點抑制劑之嚴重藥物不良事件相關因子 55 第五章、 研究討論 60 第一節、 研究對象基本特性分析 60 第二節、 整體存活期 65 第三節、 嚴重藥物不良事件 67 第四節、 免疫檢查點抑制劑之療效相關因子 70 第五節、 免疫檢查點抑制劑之嚴重藥物不良事件相關因子 72 第六節、 研究優勢與限制 73 第六章、 結論與建議 75 第七章、 未來研究方向 77 第二篇、 臨床藥事服務: 專案藥師 78 第一章、 服務緣起 78 第二章、 服務內容 78 第三章、 服務成果 79 第四章、 服務反思 81 第三篇、 參考文獻 82 第四篇、 附錄 88 附錄一、非小細胞肺癌亞型之病理學特性 88 附錄二、第八版肺癌TNM分期定義 89 附錄三、第八版肺癌分期 91 附錄四、敏感性分析-排除治療組與對照組存活小於一個月的病人之整體存活期 92 附錄五、PD-L1表現量≥1%和<1%之整體存活期 95

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394-424.
    2. 中華民國 105 年癌症登記報告, CANCER REGISTRY ANNUAL REPORT, 2016 TAIWAN.
    3. 衛生福利部. 民國106年死因統計年報電子書. 2018.
    4. Committee EG, Planchard D, Hellmann MD, et al. Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†. Ann Oncol 2018;29:iv192-iv237.
    5. Taylor R, Najafi F, Dobson A. Meta-analysis of studies of passive smoking and lung cancer: effects of study type and continent. Int J Epidemiol 2007;36:1048-59.
    6. de Groot PM, Wu CC, Carter BW, Munden RF. The epidemiology of lung cancer. Translational lung cancer research 2018;7:220-33.
    7. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. 2019.
    8. Toh CK, Gao F, Lim WT, et al. Never-smokers with lung cancer: epidemiologic evidence of a distinct disease entity. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:2245-51.
    9. Couraud S, Souquet PJ, Paris C, et al. BioCAST/IFCT-1002: epidemiological and molecular features of lung cancer in never-smokers. Eur Respir J 2015;45:1403-14.
    10. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Nicholson AG, et al. The 2015 World Health Organization Classification of Lung Tumors: Impact of Genetic, Clinical and Radiologic Advances Since the 2004 Classification. J Thorac Oncol 2015;10:1243-60.
    11. Testa U, Castelli G, Pelosi E. Lung Cancers: Molecular Characterization, Clonal Heterogeneity and Evolution, and Cancer Stem Cells. Cancers (Basel) 2018;10.
    12. Ryan C, Burke L. Pathology of lung tumours. Surgery (United Kingdom) 2017;35:234-42.
    13. Herbst RS, Morgensztern D, Boshoff C. The biology and management of non-small cell lung cancer. Nature 2018;553:446.
    14. Sholl LM. The Molecular Pathology of Lung Cancer. Surg Pathol Clin 2016;9:353-78.
    15. Hsu KH, Ho CC, Hsia TC, et al. Identification of five driver gene mutations in patients with treatment-naive lung adenocarcinoma in Taiwan. PLoS One 2015;10:e0120852.
    16. Chan EY, Gaur P, Ge Y, et al. Management of the Solitary Pulmonary Nodule. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2017;141:927-31.
    17. Goldstraw P, Chansky K, Crowley J, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for Revision of the TNM Stage Groupings in the Forthcoming (Eighth) Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2016;11:39-51.
    18. Noone AM HN, Krapcho M. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2015, based on November 2017 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2018. National Cancer Institute; 2018 2018.
    19. American Cancer Society: Treatment Choices for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, by Stage.
    20. Kazandjian D, Suzman DL, Blumenthal G, et al. FDA Approval Summary: Nivolumab for the Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Progression On or After Platinum-Based Chemotherapy. Oncologist 2016;21:634-42.
    21. Pardoll DM. The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nature Reviews Cancer 2012;12:252.
    22. Ohaegbulam KC, Assal A, Lazar-Molnar E, Yao Y, Zang X. Human cancer immunotherapy with antibodies to the PD-1 and PD-L1 pathway. Trends Mol Med 2015;21:24-33.
    23. Philips GK, Atkins M. Therapeutic uses of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies. Int Immunol 2015;27:39-46.
    24. 衛生福利部中央健康保險署藥品給付規定: 第9節抗癌瘤藥物Antineoplasticsdrugs.
    25. 免疫檢查點抑制劑品項查詢. drugscom.
    26. 成大醫院藥劑部.
    27. Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L, et al. Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med2015:1627-39.
    28. Brahmer J, Reckamp KL, Baas P, et al. Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med 2015;373:123‐35.
    29. Herbst RS, Baas P, Kim DW, et al. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet (london, england) 2016;387:1540‐50.
    30. Rittmeyer A, Barlesi F, Waterkamp D, et al. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 2017;389:255-65.
    31. Reck M, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, et al. Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med 2016;375:1823‐33.
    32. Gandhi L, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Gadgeel S, et al. Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;378:2078-92.
    33. Paz-Ares L, Luft A, Vicente D, et al. Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy for Squamous Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;0:null.
    34. Carbone DP, Reck M, Paz-Ares L, et al. First-line nivolumab in stage IV or recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2017;376:2415-26.
    35. Hellmann MD, Ciuleanu TE, Pluzanski A, et al. Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Lung Cancer with a High Tumor Mutational Burden. N Engl J Med 2018;378:2093‐104.
    36. Socinski MA, Jotte RM, Cappuzzo F, et al. Atezolizumab for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC. N Engl J Med 2018;378:2288‐301.
    37. Jotte RM, Cappuzzo F, Vynnychenko I, et al. IMpower131: Primary PFS and safety analysis of a randomized phase III study of atezolizumab + carboplatin + paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel vs carboplatin + nab-paclitaxel as 1L therapy in advanced squamous NSCLC. J Clin Oncol 2018;36:LBA9000-LBA.
    38. Calpe-Armero P, Ferriols-Lisart R, Ferriols-Lisart F, Pérez-Pitarch A. Effectiveness of Nivolumab versus Docetaxel as Second-Line Treatment in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in Clinical Practice. Chemotherapy 2017;62:374-80.
    39. Lin SY, Yang CY, Liao BC, et al. Tumor PD-L1 Expression and Clinical Outcomes in Advanced-stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Nivolumab or Pembrolizumab: Real-World Data in Taiwan. J Cancer 2018;9:1813-20.
    40. Hsu JC, Lin J-Y, Hsu M-Y, Lin P-C. Effectiveness and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors: A retrospective study in Taiwan. PLoS One 2018;13:e0202725.
    41. Fujimoto D, Yoshioka H, Kataoka Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of nivolumab in previously treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A multicenter retrospective cohort study. Lung Cancer 2018;119:14-20.
    42. Oya Y, Yoshida T, Kuroda H, et al. Predictive clinical parameters for the response of nivolumab in pretreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Oncotarget 2017;8:103117-28.
    43. Nakaya A, Kurata T, Yoshioka H, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as an early marker of outcomes in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab. Int J Clin Oncol 2018;23:634-40.
    44. Kobayashi H, Omori S, Nakashima K, et al. Response to the treatment immediately before nivolumab monotherapy may predict clinical response to nivolumab in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2017;22:690-7.
    45. Areses Manrique MC, Mosquera Martínez J, García González J, et al. Real world data of nivolumab for previously treated non-small cell lung cancer patients: a Galician lung cancer group clinical experience. Translational lung cancer research 2018;7:404-15.
    46. Bagley SJ, Kothari S, Aggarwal C, et al. Pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a marker of outcomes in nivolumab-treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2017;106:1-7.
    47. Tiu AC, Potdar R, Djibo DA, Masab M, Dourado C. Clinical outcomes of African American patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer on Nivolumab in a single community-based cancer center. Med Oncol 2018;35:109.
    48. Juergens RA, Mariano C, Jolivet J, et al. Real-world benefit of nivolumab in a Canadian non-small-cell lung cancer cohort. Curr Oncol 2018;25:384-92.
    49. Merino Almazan M, Duarte Perez JM, Marin Pozo JF, et al. A multicentre observational study of the effectiveness, safety and economic impact of nivolumab on non-small-cell lung cancer in real clinical practice. Int J Clin Pharm 2019;41:272-9.
    50. Montana M, Garcia ME, Ausias N, et al. Efficacy and safety of nivolumab in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study in clinical practice. J Chemother 2019;31:90-4.
    51. Lee CK, Man J, Lord S, et al. Clinical and Molecular Characteristics Associated With Survival Among Patients Treated With Checkpoint Inhibitors for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Jama Oncology 2018;4:210-6.
    52. Wang S, Hao J, Wang H, Fang Y, Tan L. Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncoimmunology 2018;7.
    53. Zhao Q, Xie R, Lin S, You X, Weng X. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Antibody Therapy for Pretreated Advanced or Metastatic Nonsmall Cell Lung Carcinomas and the Correlation between PD-L1 Expression and Treatment Effectiveness: An Update Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. BioMed research international 2018;2018:3820956.
    54. Shen K, Cui J, Wei Y, et al. Effectiveness and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 or CTLA4 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for lung cancer: A meta-analysis. J Thorac Dis 2018;10:6636-52.
    55. Kim R, Keam B, Hahn S, et al. First-line Pembrolizumab Versus Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Clin Lung Cancer 2019.
    56. Freeman-Keller M, Kim Y, Cronin H, Richards A, Gibney G, Weber JS. Nivolumab in Resected and Unresectable Metastatic Melanoma: Characteristics of Immune-Related Adverse Events and Association with Outcomes. Clin Cancer Res 2016;22:886-94.
    57. Hua C, Boussemart L, Mateus C, et al. Association of Vitiligo With Tumor Response in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma Treated With Pembrolizumab. JAMA Dermatol 2016;152:45-51.
    58. Haratani K, Hayashi H, Chiba Y, et al. Association of Immune-Related Adverse Events With Nivolumab Efficacy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2018;4:374-8.
    59. Teraoka S, Fujimoto D, Morimoto T, et al. Early Immune-Related Adverse Events and Association with Outcome in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Nivolumab: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Thorac Oncol 2017;12:1798-805.
    60. Osorio JC, Ni A, Chaft JE, et al. Antibody-mediated thyroid dysfunction during T-cell checkpoint blockade in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 2017;28:583-9.
    61. Franchimont D. Overview of the actions of glucocorticoids on the immune response: a good model to characterize new pathways of immunosuppression for new treatment strategies. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2004;1024:124-37.
    62. Arbour KC, Mezquita L, Long N, et al. Impact of Baseline Steroids on Efficacy of Programmed Cell Death-1 and Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Blockade in Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2018;36:2872-8.
    63. Scott SC, Pennell NA. Early Use of Systemic Corticosteroids in Patients with Advanced NSCLC Treated with Nivolumab. J Thorac Oncol 2018;13:1771-5.
    64. Haanen J, Carbonnel F, Robert C, et al. Management of toxicities from immunotherapy: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2017;28:iv119-iv42.
    65. Brahmer JR, Lacchetti C, Schneider BJ, et al. Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2018:JCO.2017.77.6385.
    66. Luo W, Wang Z, Tian P, Li W. Safety and tolerability of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2018;144:1851-9.
    67. Zhou Y, Chen C, Zhang X, et al. Immune-checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy versus conventional chemotherapy for first-line treatment in advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Immunother Cancer 2018;6:155.
    68. Lisberg A, Cummings A, Goldman JW, et al. A Phase II Study of Pembrolizumab in EGFR-Mutant, PD-L1+, Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Naive Patients With Advanced NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol 2018;13:1138-45.
    69. Gandara DR, Kawaguchi T, Crowley J, et al. Japanese-US common-arm analysis of paclitaxel plus carboplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a model for assessing population-related pharmacogenomics. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:3540-6.
    70. Ahn M-J, Lee J, Park Y-H, et al. Korean Ethnicity as Compared with White Ethnicity Is an Independent Favorable Prognostic Factor for Overall Survival in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer before and after the Oral Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Era. J Thorac Oncol 2010;5:1185-96.
    71. Soo RA, Loh M, Mok TS, et al. Ethnic Differences in Survival Outcome in Patients with Advanced Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Results of a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Thorac Oncol 2011;6:1030-8.
    72. Zhou W, Christiani DC. East meets West: ethnic differences in epidemiology and clinical behaviors of lung cancer between East Asians and Caucasians. Chin J Cancer 2011;30:287-92.
    73. Soo RA, Kawaguchi T, Loh M, et al. Differences in outcome and toxicity between Asian and caucasian patients with lung cancer treated with systemic therapy. Future Oncol 2012;8:451-62.
    74. Liang Y-H, Shao Y-Y, Liao B-C, et al. Cytotoxic Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Taiwan: Daily Practice. J Cancer 2016;7:1515-23.
    75. Borcoman E, Kanjanapan Y, Champiat S, et al. Novel patterns of response under immunotherapy. Ann Oncol 2019;30:385-96.
    76. Borcoman E, Nandikolla A, Long G, Goel S, Tourneau CL. Patterns of Response and Progression to Immunotherapy. American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book 2018:169-78.
    77. Garassino MC, Gelibter AJ, Grossi F, et al. Italian Nivolumab Expanded Access Program in Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Results in Never-Smokers and EGFR-Mutant Patients. J Thorac Oncol 2018;13:1146-55.
    78. Heinhuis KM, Ros W, Kok M, Steeghs N, Beijnen JH, Schellens JHM. Enhancing antitumor response by combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy in solid tumors. Ann Oncol 2019;30:219-35.
    79. Martins F, Sofiya L, Sykiotis GP, et al. Adverse effects of immune-checkpoint inhibitors: epidemiology, management and surveillance. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2019.
    80. Johnson DB, Sullivan RJ, Menzies AM. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in challenging populations. Cancer 2017;123:1904-11.

    下載圖示 校內:2024-09-01公開
    校外:2024-09-01公開
    QR CODE