現存關於組織記憶塑模方法之研究，多半採用純粹圖形、純粹文字，甚至自行創造的圖形或語法。本研究嘗試提出一個新的架構，首先以UML (Unified Modeling Language) 為前端圖形式塑模工具，再轉譯為符合OWL (Web Ontology Language) 標準之RDF文件來儲存。基於UML與OWL本身語言的差異，我們必須先探討如何轉譯兩者之Metamodel (相當於文法與塑模規則)，方能轉譯實際的模型元素，並設法使轉譯工作能自動化進行。當導出Metamodel轉換方法後，具體的塑模流程將為，先以一般UML開發軟體塑模組織中真實事物、流程或知識，而後匯出成為XMI (XML Metadata Interchange) 文件，再透過轉譯軟體來自動化轉譯成為遵守OWL結構之RDF文件。除了轉譯方法之研究與自動化轉譯軟體的設計，本研究最後以一案例流程來檢視及分析，証明轉譯過程是可行且前後一致的，而產生之RDF碼亦是有利於電腦分析和儲存的。

none

Alvarado, M., Romero-Salcedo, M., Sheremetov, L. (2004), A Corporative Memory Based on the User Profiles. Expert Systems with Application, 26, pp. 87-94.
AT&T/Gentleware, DSTC, IBM, & Sandpiper Software (2004), OWL Full and UML 2.0 Compared.
Baclawski, K., Kokar, M. K., Kogut, P. A., Hart, L., Smith, J., & Letkowski, J. (2002), Extending the Unified Modeling Language for Ontology Development, International Journal on Software and System Modeling, 11(2), pp. 142-156.
Bergenti, F., & Poggi, A.(2002), Supporting Agent-Oriented Modeling with UML. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 12(6), pp. 605-618.
Brewster, C., & O’Hara, K. (2004), Knowledge Representation with Ontologies: The Present and Future. IEEE Intelligent System, 19(1), pp. 72-81
Chang, J., Choi, B., & Lee, H. (2004), An Organizational Memory for Facilitating knowledge: an Application to e-business Architecture. Expert Systems with Applications, 26, pp. 203-215.
Cranefield S. (2001), Networked Knowledge Representation and Exchange Using UML and RDF, Journal of Digital Information, 1(8), http://jodi.ecs.soton.ac.uk/Articles/v01/i08/Cranefield/.
Dori, D. (2004), ViSWeb—the Visual Semantic Web: Unifying human and machine knowledge representations with Object-Process Methodology. The VLDB Journal, 13, pp. 120-147.
Duric, D. (2004), MDA-based Ontology Infrastructure. Computer Science and Information Systems, 1(1), pp. 91-116.
Felfernig, A., Friedrich, G. E., & Jannach, D. (2000). UML as Domain Specific Language for the Construction of Knowledge-based Configuration Systems. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 10(4), pp. 449-469.
IBM (2003), Ontology Definition Metamodel (ODM) Proposal. http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ad/03-07-02 .
Isoda, S. (2001), Object-Oriented Real-World Modeling Revisited. The Journal of Systems and Software, 59, pp. 153-162.
Kingston, J., Macintosh, A., (2000), Knowledge management through multi-perspective modeling: representing and distributing organizational memory. Knowledge-Based Systems, 13, pp. 121-131.
OMG (2002). Meta Object Facility (MOF) Specification version 1.4.
OMG (2002b). XML Metadata Interchange Specification version 1.2.
OMG (2003), UML 1.5 Specification.
Qu, Y. (2004), A Predicate-ordered Logic for Knowledge Representation on the Web. Future Generation Computer Systems, 20, pp. 19-26.
Rabarijaona, A., Dieng, R., Corby, O., & Ouaddari, R. (2000), Building and Searching an XML-Based Corporate Memory. IEEE Intelligent System, 15(3), pp. 56-63.
Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I., & Booch, G. (1998). The Unified Modeling Language User Guide, Addison-Wesley.
Selonen, P., Koskimies K., & Sakkinen, M. (2003), Transformations between UML Diagrams. Journal of Database Management, 14(3), pp. 37-55.
Song, C., & Baik, D. (2003). A Layered Metamodel for Hierarchical Modeling in UML. International Journal of Software Engineering and knowledge engineering, 13(2), pp. 191-214.
Staab, S., Studer, R., Schnurr, H., & Sure, Y. (2001), Knowledge Processes and Ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16(1), pp. 26-34.
W3C (1998), A Discussion of the Relationship between RDF-Schema and UML, http://www.w3c.org/TR/1998/NOTE-rdf-uml-19980804/.
W3C (2003), OWL Web Ontology Language Reference.
經濟部 (2003) 「線上付款服務之電子商務法制研究報告」。