政府積極的推動「兩兆雙星」下，TFT-LCD面板產業在現今的眾多產業中，是屬於明日之星的產業，眾多企業主紛紛投入大量資金於製程、原料、面板的製作；將可使國內TFT-LCD產業從上游研發到中游的製造及下游的行銷，形成一強而有力的供應管理價值鏈的群聚效應。面板產業最重要的就是整個供應鏈的管理。而供應鏈管理的第一步就是選擇合適的供應商，若能選擇到符合產業特性、滿足供應鏈需求的供應商時，可以增加供應鏈的競爭力。

　　本研究結合因素分析法(Factor Analysis)、層級分析法(Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP)與德菲法(Delphi Method)建立此一供應商評估模式。研究過程首先藉由問卷方式確定評估構面與準則，再以層級分析法決定各準則權重，最後以德菲法反覆回饋與收斂專家意見建立本模式。

　　本研究結果得出「TFT-LCD面板廠商的選擇」之主要因素及其權重依序如下：
1. 產品品質因素28.75%　　2. 成本因素26.17%　　3. 技術因素14.77%　　4. 交期因素12.63%　　5. 營運管理因素6.66%　　6. 服務因素6.23%　　7. 品質系統因素4.78%

　　本研究建立一套TFT-LCD產業業普遍可適用的供應商選擇評估模式，使目前台灣的廠商有心朝向TFT-LCD產業發展的企業只要依本模式一步步分析便可以找出適合自己的供應商，且可以讓供應商自我檢視，本身這個企業有沒有能力通過光電產業種種稽核認證。

　　Taiwan Government develops prospects of the Two Trillion, Twin Stars Industries, TFT-LCD panel industry which count among the future the star Industries. A mass of enterprisers invest much money in this field include process, raw material and manufacture. Such as from research and development to mass production for the industry, with the integration from up to down stream, to make this industry be a complete supply chain in order to have competitive advantage now and in future. Meanwhile, TFT-LCD industries have been cluster now. The supplier chain management is very important in the TFT-LCD industry. And the first step that is supplier selection. If we can control this supplier chain and select the best supplier for us, we can have a competitive advantage in the world.

　　The research here combines three methods that are Factor Analysis Method, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Delphi Method to create a survey model of supplier selection. First, the research began to fill the questionnaire by outsourcing member in Taiwan panel house. And create such an survey supplier criteria. Second, this research use Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Delphi Method to interview the specialists to come out differing weight ratings to each standard. Lastly, this research need to make a repetition usage of the Delphi Method combined together with specialist opinions.

　　The results of this research come out the major criteria and the weight ratings of relative criteria as the below. The panel house can use these criteria to select supplier of TFT-LCD industry.
1. Product Quality: 28.75%　　2. Cost: 26.17%　　3. Technology: 14.77%　　4. Delivery: 12.63%　　5. Operation Management: 6.66%　　6. Service: 6.23%　　7. Quality System: 4.78%

　　This research hopes to set up one model that is supplier selection in TFT-LCD industry. If have some enterprisers want to involve this industry can follow this model to select suitable supplier for themselves. And this research can let supplier do a test to review themselves if can pass TFT-LCD panel house’s auditing.

一、 中文部份
1. 蘇雄義 (1999)，「供應鏈整合-觀念性分析架構、整合程序、與個案」，國際物流研討會論文集，頁 97-106。

2. 林清河、周福星、譚伯群、施坤壽 (1998)，「品質管理與組織氣候及績效之關聯性分析」，中山管理評論，6卷，4期，頁 1057-1080。

3. 陳家祥、許吉男、張厚瑩 (1999)，「台灣零售通路供應鍊管理應用特性與展望」，國際物流研討會論文集，頁 144~151。

4. 施坤壽, （2003）「應用資訊系統整合全面品質管理與供應鏈管理建構企業競爭優勢之結構化模式分析—台灣製造產業之驗證與比較」，管理評論，22卷，4期，頁 1-33。

5. 譚伯群、林清河、施坤壽、張音 (2000)，「網際網路應用（價值鏈觀點）與經營策略及資訊 化成熟度之關係—台灣製造業的實證研究」，管理評論，頁151-182。

6. 張揚鴻 (1999)，「供貨連鎖管理（SCM）專題報導」。

7. 顏榮祥、張子明 (2002)，「整合灰關聯分析與層級分析法在供應商評選之應用研究」，運籌研究集刊第一期，頁15-42。

8. 鄧淵源、曾國雄(1989)，層級分析法（AHP）的內涵特性與應用 （上），中國統計學報，27 卷，6 期 頁 5-22。

9. 鄧淵源、曾國雄(1989)，層級分析法（AHP）的內涵特性與應用 （下），中國統計學報，27卷，7 期 頁 1-20。

10. 盧敏雄，(2003) ，「結合層級分析法與德菲法建立航太企業投資評估模式」，國立成功大學工程管理碩士論文。

二、 英文部分
1. Dowlatshahi, S., 1992, “Purchasing ’s Role in a Concurrent Engineering Environment”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 28(1), pp. 21-25.

2. Wynstra, F., Weele A.V., and Axelsson, B., 1999, “Purchasing Involvement in Product Development : a framework”, European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 5, pp. 129-141.

3. Thomas, D.J. and P.M. Griffin, 1996, Coordinated Supply Chain Management, European Journal of Operational Research, 94(1), pp. 1-15.

4. Wu, Wann-Yih, Chwan-Yi Chiang, Ya-Jung Wu, and Hui-Ju Tu, 2004, “The Influencing Factors of Commitments and Business Integration on Supply Chain Management,” Industrial Management and Data Systems, 104(4), pp. 322-323.

5. Dowlatshahi S., 2000, “Designer-buyer-supplier interface: Theory versus practice”, International journal of production economics, 63(2), pp. 111-130.

6. Houshyar, A. and David, L., 1992 “A systematic Selection Procedure”, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 23(1), pp. 173-176.

7. Monczka, R. M., Petersen, K. J., Handfield, E. B. and Ragatz, G. L., 1998, “Success Factors in Strategic Supplier Alliances: The Buying Company Perspective”, Decision Sciences, 29(3), pp. 553-577..

8. Krause, D. R., M. Pagell and S. Curkovic, 2001, “Toward a measure of competitive priorities for purchasing”, Journal of Operations Management, 19(4), pp. 497-512.

9. Degraeve, Z., E. Labro and F. Roodhooft, 2000, “An evaluation of vendor selection models from a total cost of ownership perspective”, European Journal of
Operational Research, 125(1), pp. 34-58.

10. Matthyssens, P. and C.V. den Bulte, 1994, “Getting Closer and Nicer: Partnerships in the Supply Chain”, Long Range Planning, 27(1), pp. 72-83.

11. Monczka, R.M. and S.J. Trecha, 1988, “Cost-Based Supplier Performance Evaluation”, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 24(1), pp. 2-7.
12. Ragatz G. L., Handfield, R.B., and Scannell T.V.,1997, “Success Factors for Integrating Suppliers into New Product Development”, Journal Product Innovation Management, 14(2), pp 190-202.

13. Wynstra, F. and Pierick, E.t. 2000, “Managing Supplier Involvement in New Product Development: a portfolio approach”, European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 6(1), pp. 49-57.

14. Stuart, F. I., 1993, “Supplier Partnerships: Influencing Factors and Strategic Benefits”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 29(4), pp. 21-28.

15. Matthyssens, P. and C.V. den Bulte, 1994, “Getting Closer and Nicer: Partnerships in the Supply Chain”, Long Range Planning, 27(1), pp. 72-83.

16. Houlihan, John B., 1985 “International Supply Chain Management”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Materials Management, 15(1), pp. 22-38.

17. Maloni, M. J. & Benton, W. C., 1997, “Supply Chain Partnership: Opportunities for Operations Research”, European Journal of Operational Research, 101(3), pp. 419-429.

18. Dickson, Gray W., 1996, “An Analysis of Supplier Selection Systems and Decision”, Journal of Purchasing, 2(1), pp. 5-17.

19. Weber, Charles A., John R. Current and W. C. Benton, 1991, “Vendor Selection Criteria and Methods”, European Journal of Operational Research, 50(1), pp. 2-18.

20. Carter, J. R. & Ferrin, B. G., 1995, “The Impact of Transportation Costs on Supply chain Management”, Journal Of Business Logistics, 16(1), pp. 189-212.

21. Wilson , E. J. 1994 , “ The Relative Importance of Supplier Selection Criteria：A Review and Update ” , International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management , 30(3), pp. 35-41.

22. Handfield, R. B., Kannan, V. R., and Tan, K. C. ,1998. “Supply chain management: Supplier performance and firm performance” International Journal of
Purchasing and Material Management, 34(3), pp. 2-9.
23. Degraeve, Z., E. Labro and F. Roodhooft, 2000, “An evaluation of vendor selection models from a total cost of ownership perspective”, European Journal of Operational Research, 125(1), pp. 34-60.

24. Das, A. and Narasimhan, R. , 2000 , “Purchasing Competence and Its Relationship with Manufacturing Performance”, The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 36(2), pp. 17-28.

25. Soukup, W. R., 1987, ”Supplier Selection Strategies”, Journal of Purchasing and Material Management, 23(2), pp. 7-13.

26. Weber, C. A., and J. R. Current, 1993, “A Multi objective Approach to Vendor Selection”, European Journal of Operational Research, 68(2), pp. 173-176.

27. Chaudhry, S. S., F. G. Forst, and J. L. Zydiak, 1993, “Vendor Selection with Price Breaks”, European Journal of Operation Research, 70(1), pp. 52-56.

28. Timmerman, E., 1986, “An Approach to Vendor Performance Evaluation”, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 22(4), pp. 2-8.

29. Thompson, K.N., 1990, “Vendor Profile Analysis”, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 26(1), pp. 11-18.

30. Narasimhan, R., 1983, “An Analytical Approach to Supplier Selection”, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 19(4), pp. 27-32.

31. Nydick, R.L. and R.P. Hill, 1992, “Using The Analytic Hierarchy Process to Structure The Supplier Selection Procedure”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, .28(2), pp. 31-36.

32.Saaty, T.L. and Vargas L.G. 1994, “Decision Making in Economic, Political, Social and Technological Environment： The Analytic Hierarchy Process.” RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.