簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李依璇
LEE, YI-HSUAN
論文名稱: 建立基於GNSS之地殼變動模型:應用於臺灣大地基準雙框架策略
On the establishment of a GNSS-based crustal deformation model: applied to Taiwan Geodetic Datum dual-frame strategy
指導教授: 楊名
Yang, Ming
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 測量及空間資訊學系
Department of Geomatics
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 105
中文關鍵詞: 地殼變動模型臺灣大地基準臺灣時變參考框架坐標轉換
外文關鍵詞: crustal deformation model, Taiwan Geodetic Datum, Taiwan Terrestrial Reference Frame, coordinate transformation
相關次數: 點閱:5下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 臺灣現行國家坐標系統為一九九七臺灣大地基準(Taiwan Geodetic Datum 1997, TWD97),由於臺灣位於歐亞板塊與菲律賓海板塊之交界,地殼運動、斷層活動和地震事件頻繁,使得點位坐標隨時間變動,至今已陸續發布三個版本,分別為TWD97、TWD97[2010]與TWD97[2020],以維持法定坐標系統之可用性。然而,TWD97屬於靜態框架,無法真實反應點位在地表上之實際坐標,且頻繁更新坐標系統易造成測量業務使用上之不便。本研究利用內政部國土測繪中心提供2020至2025年之每日解坐標成果,進行時間序列分析與坐標函數擬合,使用兩種方法建立地殼變動模型,應用於臺灣時變參考框架(Taiwan Terrestrial Reference Frame, TTRF),並利用179個測試站進行六個時刻下之TWD97[2020]與TTRF坐標轉換。在TTRF轉TWD97[2020]之轉換誤差成果顯示,發生規模大於6.0之地震前,兩個方法之RMS值於E、N方向在1公分內,U方向約在1.6公分內,而在規模大於6.0之地震後,RMS值皆增加,至2025年12月31日時,方法一在E、N、U方向之RMS約為1.3公分、1公分及3.1公分,方法二約為1.8公分、1.3公分、3公分。而在TWD97[2020]轉TTRF之轉換誤差成果顯示,發生規模大於6.0之地震前,兩個方法之RMS值於E、N方向在7毫米內,U方向約在1公分內;而在地震後,RMS值明顯增加,至2025年12月31日,方法一在E、N、U方向之RMS約為1.3公分、1公分及2.3公分,方法二約為1.8公分、1.1公分、2.3公分。由坐標轉換成果顯示,坐標轉換誤差皆在公分級,RMS值在3.1公分內。為了驗證地殼變動模型於實務上之適用性,本研究選用2024年LiDAR及2025年LiDAR已知控制點檢測之24小時觀測資料,根據衛星定位測量方法實施一等基本控制測量之精度規範,若使用TWD97[2020]大地基準,前者有82.1%而後者有90%測站無法通過規範而被剔除;而使用TTRF框架進行檢測,兩個案例皆僅有3%測站未通過規範,顯示雙框架策略能有效應用於大範圍之基本控制測量。

    Taiwan Geodetic Datum 1997 (TWD97) is the national geodetic reference frame of Taiwan. Since Taiwan is located at the boundary between the Eurasian Plate and the Philippine Sea Plate, where complex crustal deformation and earthquakes cause continuous coordinate changes of geodetic control points. To maintain the usability of the national geodetic datum, Taiwan has released several versions, including TWD97, TWD97[2010], and TWD97[2020]. However, TWD97 is a static datum which fixed at a specific reference epoch and frequent update the datum has resulted in reduced stability for the surveying and mapping industry and land administration agencies. To address this problem, this study establishes crustal deformation model and applied on the Taiwan Terrestrial Reference Frame (TTRF). Two crustal deformation modeling methods are proposed in this study. Method 1 is based on velocity models and coseismic displacement models, while Method 2 is based on a displacement model. In addition, 179 test stations are used to perform coordinate transformation between TWD97[2020] and TTRF at six different epoch. For the transformation from TTRF to TWD97[2020], the results show that before earthquakes with magnitudes greater than 6.0 occurred, the RMS values of both methods were within 1 cm in the E and N directions and within about 1.6 cm in the U direction. At the end of 2025, the RMS values of Method 1 in the E, N, and U directions were about 1.3 cm, 1 cm, and 3.1 cm, respectively, while those of Method 2 were about 1.8 cm, 1.3 cm, and 3 cm, respectively. For the transformation from TWD97[2020] to TTRF, the results show that before earthquakes with magnitudes greater than 6.0 occurred, the RMS values of both methods were within 7 mm in the E and N directions and within about 1 cm in the U direction. At the end of 2025, the RMS values of Method 1 in the E, N, and U directions were about 1.3 cm, 1 cm, and 2.3 cm, respectively, while those of Method 2 were about 1.8 cm, 1.1 cm, and 2.3 cm, respectively. In addition, LiDAR control survey data from 2024 and 2025 are used for case studies. The results show that when TWD97[2020] coordinates are used for known control point, most stations fail to meet the criteria. On the other hand, using TTRF coordinates, only about 3% stations fail to meet the criteria. This indicates that the crustal deformation model can effectively reduce coordinate differences caused by different observation times and is feasible for practical control surveying.

    摘要 I EXTENDED ABSTRACT II 致謝 IX 目錄 X 表目錄 XII 圖目錄 XIII 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景 1 1.2 文獻回顧 3 1.3 研究動機與目的 6 第二章 國際發展趨勢:時變參考框架 7 2.1 國際地球參考框架ITRF 7 2.2 美國時變參考框架 9 2.3 澳洲雙框架 11 2.4 日本半動態框架 13 第三章 臺灣大地基準 16 3.1 TWD67大地基準 16 3.2 TWD97大地基準 17 3.3 臺灣時變參考框架 20 第四章 GNSS時間序列分析方法 22 4.1 每日解坐標之框架轉換 22 4.2 每日解剔錯 25 4.3 同震位移之判斷標準 25 4.4 坐標擬合函數 26 第五章 地殼變動模型建置及內插方法 28 5.1 實驗資料 30 5.2 每日解剔錯成效分析 33 5.3 克利金法 33 第六章 實驗成果與分析 37 6.1 速度場與同震位移場 37 6.2 坐標轉換之精度分析 42 6.2.1 TTRF轉TWD97[2020] 42 6.2.2 TWD97[2020]轉TTRF 53 6.3 實例分析 64 6.3.1 2024 LiDAR已知控制點檢測 65 6.3.2 2025 LiDAR已知控制點檢測 72 第七章 結論與建議 80 參考文獻 82

    內政部國土測繪中心(1998)。內政部衛星追蹤站及衛星控制點測量成果說明。
    內政部國土測繪中心(2012)。大地基準及一九九七坐標系統2010年成果。
    內政部國土測繪中心(2013)。102年度建置現代化TWD97國家坐標系統變位模式工作總報告。
    內政部國土測繪中心(2019)。108年度精進現代化TWD97 國家坐標系統變位模式工作總報告。
    內政部國土測繪中心(2020)。基本測量2020年成果說明。
    內政部國土測繪中心(2024)。113年度臺灣時變參考框架先期作業委託研究成果報告。
    內政部國土測繪中心(2025)。基本控制測量-平面控制,http://www.nlsc.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=1482 (2026年3月24日)。
    尤瑞哲(2019)。基礎測量平差法。
    熊育賢(2017)。建立台灣半動態基準之水平速度場。國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文。
    Altamimi, Z., Angermann, D., Argus, D., Blewitt, G., Boucher, C., Chao, B., Drewes, H., Eanes, R., Feissel, M., Ferland, R., Herring, T., Holt, B., Johannson, J., Larson, K., Ma, C., Manning, J., Meertens, C., Nothnagel, A., Pavlis, E., Petit, G., Ray, J., Ries, J., Scherneck, H.-G., Sillard, P., Watkins, M. (2001). The terrestrial reference frame and the dynamic Earth. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 82(25), 273–279.
    Altamimi, Z., Rebischung, P., Collilieux, X., Métivier, L., & Chanard, K. (2023). ITRF2020: An augmented reference frame refining the modeling of nonlinear station motions. Journal of Geodesy, 97(5), 47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-023-01738-w
    Altamimi, Z., Rebischung, P., Métivier, L., & Collilieux, X. (2016). ITRF2014: A new release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame modeling nonlinear station motions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 121(8), 6109–6131. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013098
    Bos, A. G., Spakman, W., & Nyst, M. C. J. (2003). Surface deformation and tectonic setting of Taiwan inferred from a GPS velocity field. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 108, B10, 2458.
    Bourne, S. J., England, P. C., & Parsons, B. (1998). The motion of crustal blocks driven by flow of the lower lithosphere and implications for slip rates of continental strike-slip faults. Nature, 391(6668), 655–659.
    Ching, K.-E., & Chen, K.-H. (2015). Tectonic effect for establishing a semi-dynamic datum in Southwest Taiwan. Earth, Planets and Space, 67(1), 1-14.
    Chlieh, M., De Chabalier, J. B., Ruegg, J. C., Armijo, R., Dmowska, R., Campos, J., & Feigl, K. L. (2004). Crustal deformation and fault slip during the seismic cycle in the North Chile subduction zone, from GPS and InSAR observations. Geophysical Journal International, 158(2), 695–711.
    Dach, R., Lutz, S., Walser, P., & Fridez, P. (2015). Bernese GNSS Software Version 5.2. Retrieved from: https://www.bernese.unibe.ch/docs/DOCU52.pdf
    Geoscience Australia (2017). Geocentric Datum of Australia 2020 (GDA2020). Retrieved from: https://www.ga.gov.au/scientific-topics/positioning-navigation/positioning-australia/geodesy/datums-projections/gda2020 (March 17, 2026)
    Grant, D. B., Blick, G. H., Pearse, M. B., Beavan, R. J., & Morgan, P. J. (1999). The development and implementation of New Zealand Geodetic Datum 2000. IUGG99 General Assembly, Birmingham UK, 18–30.
    GSI (2026a). Geodetic survey. Retrieved from: https://www.gsi.go.jp/ENGLISH/page_e30030.html (March 14, 2026)
    GSI (2026b). The Niigata-Kobe Tectonic Zone. Retrieved from: https://www.gsi.go.jp/cais/tectonics_niigata_kobe-e.html (March 14, 2026)
    Hofmann-Wellenhof, B., Lichtenegger, H., & Wasle, E. (2008). GNSS — Global Navigation Satellite Systems. Springer-Verlag Wien. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-73017-1
    ICSM (2017). GDA2020 Technical Manual v1.8. Retrieved from: https://www.anzlic.gov.au/sites/default/files/files/GDA2020%20Technical%20Manual%20V1.8_published.pdf (March 19, 2026)
    ICSM (2020). Australian Terrestrial Reference Frame (ATRF) Technical Implementation Plan v2.3. Retrieved from: https://www.icsm.gov.au/publications/australian-terrestrial-reference-frametechnical-implementation-plan-v23 (March 24, 2026)
    ITRF (2026a). ITRF2020 Station positions at epoch 2015.0 and velocities. Retrieved from: https://itrf.ign.fr/ftp/pub/itrf/itrf2020/ITRF2020_GNSS.SSC.txt (April 8, 2026)
    ITRF (2026b). Transformation parameters between ITRF Solutions. Retrieved from: https://itrf.ign.fr/en/solutions/transformations?form%5BfromItrf%5D=ITRF2014&form%5BtoItrf%5D=ITRF2020&form%5Bsubmit%5D=&form%5B_token%5D=c57dfc19ab5.6mm2fuTgko9YU7mtHY4BTyAYd02eE6hsDmL9InR7mwU.hljPNqyv_sUJGMnPf-Bofxh7EALwQ8MCZjKiawRI8V2AKu4Vgaq_1jI60g (April 8, 2026)
    Kirkland, E. J. (1998). Advanced Computing in Electron Microscopy. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4406-4
    Lee, J.-C., Angelier, J., Chu, H.-T., Hu, J.-C., & Jeng, F.-S. (2001). Continuous monitoring of an active fault in a plate suture zone: A creepmeter study of the Chihshang Fault, eastern Taiwan. Tectonophysics, 333(1–2), 219–240.
    Li, C.-K., Ching, K.-E., & Chen, K.-H. (2019). The ongoing modernization of the Taiwan semi-dynamic datum based on the surface horizontal deformation model using GNSS data from 2000 to 2016. Journal of Geodesy, 93, 1543–1558.
    Matheron, G. (1963). Principles of Geostatistics. Economic Geology, 58(8): 1246–1266.
    NGS (2017). Blueprint for the Modernized NSRS, Part 1: Geometric Coordinates and Terrestrial Reference Frames, NOAA Technical Report NOS NGS 62.
    NGS (2019). Blueprint for the Modernized NSRS, Part 3: Working in the Modernized NSRS, NOAA Technical Report NOS NGS 67.
    NGS (2021). The Mathematical Relation between IFVM2022 as Expressed in ITRF2020 with IFVM2022 as Expressed in the Four Terrestrial Reference Frames of the Modernized NSRS with Dependence on EPP2022, NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NGS 90.
    Nikolaidis, R. (2002). Observation of Geodetic and Seismic Deformation with the Global Positioning System. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, San Diego.
    NOAA (2026). Horizontal and Geometric Datums. Retrieved from: https://geodesy.noaa.gov/datums/horizontal/index.shtml (March 17, 2026)
    Pearson, C., McCaffrey, R., Elliott, J. L., & Snay, R. (2010). HTDP 3.0: Software for Coping with the Coordinate Changes Associated with Crustal Motion. Journal of Surveying Engineering, 136(2), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000013
    Pearson, C., & Snay, R. (2013). Introducing HTDP 3.1 to transform coordinates across time and spatial reference frames. GPS Solutions, 17(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-012-0255-y
    Petit, G., & Luzum, B. (2010). IERS Conventions (2010). Retrieved from: https://iers-conventions.obspm.fr/content/tn36.pdf (March 4, 2026)
    Rau, R., Ching, K., Hu, J., & Lee, J. (2008). Crustal deformation and block kinematics in transition from collision to subduction: Global positioning system measurements in northern Taiwan, 1995–2005. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 113, B09404.
    Savage, J. C., & Burford, R. O. (1973). Geodetic determination of relative plate motion in central California. Journal of Geophysical Research, 78(5), 832–845.
    Seeber, G. (2003). Satellite Geodesy: Foundations, Methods, and Applications (2nd ed). Walter de Gruyter.
    Snay, R. A. (1999). Using the HTDP Software to Transform Spatial Coordinates Across Time and Between Reference Frames. Retrieved from: https://geodesy.noaa.gov/TOOLS/Htdp/Using_HTDP.pdf (March 8, 2026)
    Tse, S. T., & Rice, J. R. (1986). Crustal earthquake instability in relation to the depth variation of frictional slip properties. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 91(B9), 9452–9472.
    Tsuji, H., Hatanaka, Y., Hiyama, Y., Yamaguchi, K., Furuya, T., Kawamoto, S., & Fukuzaki, Y. (2017). Twenty-Year Successful Operation of GEONET. Retrieved from: https://www.gsi.go.jp/common/000195831.pdf (March 13, 2026)
    Tsuji, H., & Matsuzaka, S. (2000). Realization of Horizontal Geodetic Coordinates 2000. Retrieved from: https://www.gsi.go.jp/common/000001196.pdf (March 14, 2026)
    Yang, M., Tseng, C.-L., & Yu, J.-Y. (2001). Establishment and Maintenance of Taiwan Geodetic Datum 1997. Journal of Surveying Engineering, 127(4), 119–132.
    Yu, S.-B., Chen, H.-Y., & Kuo, L.-C. (1997). Velocity field of GPS stations in the Taiwan area. Tectonophysics, 274(1–3), 41–59.
    Yu, S.-B., & Kuo, L.-C. (2001). Present-day crustal motion along the Longitudinal Valley Fault, eastern Taiwan. Tectonophysics, 333(1–2), 199–217.

    QR CODE