簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林怡光
Lin, Yi-Kuang
論文名稱: 臨床實驗室之風險評估模式-以基因檢測為例
A Risk Assessment Model for Clinical Laboratories - Case of Genetic Testing
指導教授: 呂執中
Lyu, Jr-Jung
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 工業與資訊管理學系
Department of Industrial and Information Management
論文出版年: 2017
畢業學年度: 105
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 89
中文關鍵詞: 臨床實驗室基因檢測模糊理論失效模式與效應分析
外文關鍵詞: clinical laboratory, genetic testing, fuzzy theory, failure mode and effects analysis
相關次數: 點閱:103下載:2
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著民眾知識水準的提高,社會健康意識的抬頭,對於疾病的認知不再停留於診斷後的治療,預防醫學的概念漸漸蔚為風尚。近年來,基因檢測技術與醫療科技進步,人們獲得基因數據能力也已迅速在臨床上實施,帶動個人化醫療趨勢。國內各大醫院、檢驗中心以及生技公司無不踏入基因檢測的行列。然而,報告結果決定受試者的一生,因此每項實驗失誤都不可忽視,檢測品質仰賴臨床實驗室檢驗流程的嚴謹度。欲達到精準檢測,實驗室必須藉由更完善的風險評估工具探討關鍵失效因子,再對其進行品質改善,才能提供管理者最正確的判斷,最終達成精準醫療之目的。
    本研究結合模糊理論(Fuzzy Theory)及失效模式與效應分析(FMEA),提出一適用於臨床實驗室的風險評估模式。將FMEA風險因子:嚴重程度(S)、發生頻率(O)、檢測程度(D)模糊化,與專家討論其相對關係設計風險規則庫,完成Fuzzy邏輯系統建構。以基因檢測實驗室為例,將流程分為檢測前、檢測中、檢測後,與專家歸類各階段之失效模式、原因、效應建立FMEA表格;接著將各失效因子之S、O、D導入模糊邏輯系統得出FRPN值。最後,根據FRPN值判斷流程高風險流程因子並給予建議。
    本研究以一個案進行分析,發現基因檢測流程中,高風險因子以檢測前階段最高為「樣本混淆」、「樣本標示錯誤」。顯示實驗室管理者較難對樣本採樣、樣本辨別進行品質管制。綜觀檢測前、中、後實驗流程階段,檢測前階段的實驗錯誤除了發生頻率、檢測程度最高外,其風險程度最高。意味著實驗室管理者評估實驗室風險僅確保實驗內部流程,而忽略了來源檢體之品質控管是不夠的。管理者不僅要確保內部品質,還需考量實驗室外部品質管控。最後,針對基因檢測之高風險流程提出改善建議,供實驗室管理者改善流程風險參考,並彙整此風險評估模式於實務上的參考價值。

    Owing to advances in genetic testing and medical technology, genetic data can now be used to support clinical decisions. Since the test results can affect the diagnosis and treatment of patients, the quality of laboratory testing, which highly depends on the rigor of the testing process, should be enhanced. Therefore, a comprehensive risk assessment model for clinical laboratories should be in place in order to identify the high risk process and to prevent the potential errors. A risk assessment model is proposed in this study, which integrates Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) and fuzzy logic system (FLS), with a clinical rules based on experts’ experience and judgement. Laboratory managers could better identify high risk factors for pre-analytical phase, analytical phase, and post-analytical phase during laboratory testing process using the proposed model.
    The proposed indicator, fuzzy risk priority number (FRPN) rating, was highest in the pre-analytical phase, and should be the focus to reduce risk, applying the proposed model. It is further found out that “specimen misidentification” and “incorrect data entry”, which incurred at the pre-analytical phase, are the major risk errors, and the laboratory managers should be cautious on “sample collection” and “specimen identification” periods. That is, external quality assessment and control are critical in the genetic testing laboratories. The proposed assessment model is shown to be effective on case laboratory, while its practicability requires further study.

    目錄 摘要 i Abstract ii 致謝 viii 目錄 ix 表目錄 xii 圖目錄 xiii 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.2 研究目的 2 1.3 研究範圍與限制 3 1.4 研究流程 3 第二章 文獻探討 5 2.1 臨床實驗室 5 2.1.1 臨床實驗室簡介 5 2.1.2 實驗室錯誤 5 2.1.3 實驗室國際標準認證 9 2.1.4 實驗室風險管理 10 2.2 基因檢測 12 2.2.1 基因檢測定義 12 2.2.2 基因檢測起源與發展 12 2.2.3 基因檢測現況 13 2.2.4 基因檢測服務類型 16 2.2.5 常見的基因檢測技術 19 2.2.6 基因檢測流程風險 21 2.3 失效模式與效應分析 22 2.3.1 失效模式與效應分析簡介 22 2.3.2 失效模式與效應分析發展 23 2.3.3 風險優先數 25 2.3.4 失效模式與效應分析缺陷 26 2.4 模糊理論 26 2.4.1 模糊數 27 2.4.2 模糊邏輯系統 27 2.4.3 模糊失效模式與效應分析 30 2.5 文獻小結 30 第三章 研究方法 32 3.1 基因檢測實驗室風險評估架構 32 3.2 Fuzzy邏輯系統建構 34 3.2.1風險語意尺度 34 3.2.2建構隸屬函數 38 3.2.3構建臨床實驗室風險規則 38 3.2.4規則庫解模糊 43 3.3 FMEA表格建構 46 3.3.1 確認檢測流程 46 3.3.2 失效模式確認 48 第四章 個案研究 50 4.1 FMEA建構 50 4.1.1 基因檢測流程圖 50 4.1.2 失效因子確認建構FMEA 56 4.2模糊邏輯系統運算 61 4.3 Fuzzy FMEA結果分析 63 4.4改善建議 67 4.5專家訪談 79 4.6綜合討論 81 第五章 結論與建議 82 5.1研究結論 82 5.2未來建議 83 參考文獻 84 英文文獻 84 中文文獻 89

    英文文獻
    Adachi, W., & Lodolce, A. E. (2005). Use of failure mode and effects analysis in improving the safety of iv drug administration. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 62(9) , 917-920.
    Bonini, P., Plebani, M., Ceriotti, F., & Rubboli, F. (2002). Errors in Laboratory Medicine. Clinical Chemistry, 48(5), 691-698.
    Bowles, J. B., & Peláez, C. E. (1995). Fuzzy Logic Prioritization of Failures in a System Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 50(2), 203-213.
    Braglia, M., Frosolini, M., & Montanari, R. (2003). Fuzzy Criticality Assessment Model for Failure Modes and Effects Analysis. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20(4), 503-524.
    Chana, P., Johnston, M. J., Pullyblank, A. M., Burns, E. M., Faiz, O. D., & Arora, S. (2014). Identifying Organizational Failures in Emergency General Surgical Admissions in the United Kingdom: A Healthcare Failure Mode Effect Analysis. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 219(3), S92.
    Chanamool, N., & Naenna, T. (2016). Fuzzy FMEA Application to Improve Decision-Making Process in an Emergency Department. Applied Soft Computing, 43, 441-453.
    Chin, K.-S., Chan, A., & Yang, J.-B. (2008). Development of a Fuzzy FMEA Based Product Design System. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 36(7-8), 633-649.
    Collins, F. S., & Varmus, H. (2015). A New Initiative on Precision Medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 372(9), 793-795.
    Coutinho, J. S. (1964). Division of Engineering: Failure‐Effect Analysis. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 26(5 Series II), 564-584.
    Crown, P. L. (1969). Design effective failure mode and effect analysis. In Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium , 70-74.
    David, R. E., & Dobreanu, M. (2015). Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA)–An Assessment Tool for Risk Management in Clinical Laboratories. Acta Medica Transilvanica, 20(4) , 130-134.
    DeRosier, J., Stalhandske, E., Bagian, J. P., & Nudell, T. (2002). Using health care failure mode and effect analysis™: the VA National Center for Patient Safety’s prospective risk analysis system. The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement, 28(5), 248-267.
    Dequeker, E., & Cassiman, J. J. (2000). Genetic testing and quality control in diagnostic laboratories. Nature genetics, 25(3), 259-260.
    Dhami, P., Coffey, A. J., Abbs, S., Vermeesch, J. R., Dumanski, J. P., Woodward, K. J., Andrews,R.M., & Vetrie, D. (2005). Exon Array Cgh: Detection of Copy-Number Changes at the Resolution of Individual Exons in the Human Genome. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 76(5), 750-762.
    Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1983). Ranking Fuzzy Numbers in the Setting of Possibility Theory. Information sciences, 30(3), 183-224.
    Eliza, D. R., & Minodora, D. (2015). Risk Management in Clinical Laboratory: From Theory to Practice. Acta Medica Marisiensis, 61(4) , 372-377.
    EP18A2, C. (2009). Risk Management Techniques to Identify and Control Laboratory Error Sources. Approved Guideline,29(26), 1-83.
    Forsman, R. W. (1996). Why Is the Laboratory an Afterthought for Managed Care Organization. Clinical Chernistiy, 42(5), 813-816.
    Geum, Y., Cho, Y., & Park, Y. (2011). A Systematic Approach for Diagnosing Service Failure: Service-Specific Fmea and Grey Relational Analysis Approach. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 54(11-12), 3126-3142.
    Gilchrist, W. (1993). Modelling Failure Modes and Effects Analysis. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 10(5), 16-23.
    Ho, C. C., & Liao, C. J. (2011). The use of failure mode and effects analysis to construct an effective disposal and prevention mechanism for infectious hospital waste. Waste Management, 31(12), 2631-2637.
    Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. (2005). Hospital accreditation standards 2005. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.
    Jiang, Y., Jiang, H., Ding, S., & Liu, Q. (2015). Application of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in a Clinical Chemistry Laboratory. Clin Chim Acta, 448, 80-85.
    Kumru, M., & Kumru, P. Y. (2013). Fuzzy FMEA Application to Improve Purchasing Process in a Public Hospital. Applied Soft Computing, 13(1), 721-733.
    Linda T. Kohn, Janet M. Corrigan, & Molla S. Donaldson (2000). To Err Is Human:Building a Safer Health System. Institute of Medicine.
    Mamdani, E. H. (1977). Application of Fuzzy Logic to Approximate Reasoning Using Linguistic Synthesis. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 100(12), 1182-1191.
    Mattsson, F. (1995). An introduction to risk analysis for medical devices. Compliance Engineering, 11(12), 47-57.
    Mendes, M. E., Ebner, P. D. A. R., Romano, P., Pacheco Neto, M., Sant’anna, A., & Sumita, N. M. (2013). Practical Aspects of the Use of FMEA Tool in Clinical Laboratory Risk Management. Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial, 174-181.
    Mode, P. F. (1988). Effects Analysis In Design (Design FMEA) and For Manufacturing and Assembly Processes (Process FMEA) Instruction Manual. Ford Motor Company, Dearborn, Michigan.
    Nelson, M. R., Tipney, H., Painter, J. L., Shen, J., Nicoletti, P., Shen, Y., & Sanseau, P. (2015). The Support of Human Genetic Evidence for Approved Drug Indications. Nat Genet, 47(8), 856-860.
    Niel-Laine, J., Martelli, N., Bonan, B., Talon, D., Desroches, A., Prognon, P., & Vincent, F. (2011). Interest of the Preliminary Risk Analysis Method in a Central Sterile Supply Department. BMJ Qual Saf, 20(8), 698-703.
    Plebani, M. (2006). Errors in Clinical Laboratories or Errors in Laboratory Medicine?. Clin Chem Lab Med, 44(6), 750-759.
    Plebani, M. (2009). Exploring the Iceberg of Errors in Laboratory Medicine. Clin Chim Acta, 404(1), 16-23.
    Plebani, M. (2010). The Detection and Prevention of Errors in Laboratory Medicine. Ann Clin Biochem, 47( 2), 101-110.
    Plebani, M., Laposata, M., & Lundberg, G. D. (2011). The Brain-to-Brain Loop Concept for Laboratory Testing 40 Years after Its Introduction. Am J Clin Pathol, 136(6), 829-833.
    Ravi Sankar, N., & Prabhu, B. S. (2001). Modified Approach for Prioritization of Failures in a System Failure Mode and Effects Analysis. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 18(3), 324-336.
    Ravine, D., & Suthers, G. (2012). Quality standards and samples in genetic testing. Journal of clinical pathology, 65(5), 389-393.
    Riehle, M. A., Bergeron, D., & Hyrkäs, K. (2008). Improving process while changing practice: FMEA and medication administration. Nursing management, 39(2), 28-33.
    Scheuner, M. T., Marshall, N., Lanto, A., Hamilton, A. B., Oishi, S., Lerner, B., Martin Lee, Yano, E. M. (2014). Delivery of Clinical Genetic Consultative Services in the Veterans Health Administration. Genetics in Medicine, 16(8), 609-619.
    Schwartz, M. K. (1999). Genetic Testing and the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 Present and Future. Clinical Chemistry, 45(5), 739-745.
    Seyed-Hosseini, S. M., Safaei, N., & Asgharpour, M. J. (2006). Reprioritization of Failures in a System Failure Mode and Effects Analysis by Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory Technique. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 91(8), 872-881.
    Sharma, R. K., Kumar, D., & Kumar, P. (2005). Systematic Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA) Using Fuzzy Linguistic Modelling. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 22(9), 986-1004.
    Teutsch, S. M., Bradley, L. A., Palomaki, G. E., Haddow, J. E., Piper, M., Calonge, N., &Berg, A. O. (2009). The Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (Egapp) Initiative: Methods of the Egapp Working Group. Genetics in Medicine, 11(1), 3-14.
    United States. Department of Defense. (1980). Mil-Std-1629a: 1980: Procedures for Performing a Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis. Department of Defense.
    Wang, Y.-M., Chin, K.-S., Poon, G. K. K., & Yang, J.-B. (2009). Risk Evaluation in Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Using Fuzzy Weighted Geometric Mean. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 1195-1207.
    Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Information and control, 8(3), 338-353.
    Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and Its Application to Approximate Reasoning—I. Information sciences, 8(3), 199-249.
    中文文獻
    小野寺勝重. (1998). 實踐 Fmea手法. 日科技連出版社.
    周宗諺. (2011). Fmea方法與產品開發流程結合之研究:以dlp光學投影機可動元件開發為例. 清華大學工業工程與工程管理學系學位論文, 1-93.
    張紹勳. (2012). 模糊多準則評估法及統計: 台灣五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
    張錦標, 吳竹蘭, 曹國倩, 謝文祥, 黃仰仰, 施勇綸, 高全良. (2007). 台灣地區醫學實驗室適用 Iso15189 認證標準之調查研究. Journal of Biomedical & Laboratory Sciences, 19(2), 47-55.
    叢玉隆, 秦小玲, 鄧新立. (2009). 醫學實驗室管理: 原理與實用. 台北市:合記圖書出版社.
    網站:
    國研院科政中心:https://www.stpi.narlabs.org.tw/index.htm
    美國衛生研究院GeneTests官方網站:https://www.genetests.org/
    Grand View Research, Inc 2016基因檢測市場調查:http://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/dna-testing-market

    無法下載圖示 校內:2022-06-09公開
    校外:不公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE