成功大學博碩士論文系統

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表

研究生：	卡特州 Jose Carlos Castro Miralda
論文名稱：	以本體論為基礎建構輸油管道維護作業之風險管理架構—以宏都拉斯為例 Ontology-based Risk Management Framework for Petroleum Pipeline Maintenance-A Case Study of Honduras
指導教授：	馮重偉 Feng, Chung-Wei
學位類別：	碩士 Master
系所名稱：	工學院 - 土木工程學系 Department of Civil Engineering
論文出版年：	2021
畢業學年度：	109
語文別：	英文
論文頁數：	114
外文關鍵詞：	Risk management, Risks, Petroleum pipeline, Codes and Standards, Ontology, Pipeline maintenance
相關次數：	點閱：67 下載：0
分享至:	分享至facebook 分享至twitter

查詢本校圖書館目錄查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統勘誤回報

Risk management in the petroleum pipeline maintenance process is indispensable. Risk avoidance and risk reduction should be addressed in every maintenance process due to the harmful consequences that can be derived from risk events. Existing studies mostly focus on minimizing the probability of a failure that produces damages to humans and the environment, whereas this study takes them into consideration, however it also considers any risk that might generate any type of threat during the maintenance process related to budget, schedule, and work quality. This paper presents the development of an ontology-based risk management framework for petroleum pipeline maintenance based on existing international codes and standards and aims to mitigate the risks involved in the maintenance process. The framework was created under the ontology development methodology, and it includes the knowledge of previous works related to the risk management domain, and information extracted from the operational documents.
The validation of the framework consists in the evaluation of the current forms and a case study analysis. The outcome of the framework is the precise identification and analysis of the risk factors in order to determine the risks related to the maintenance project. Moreover, it presents the interrelationship between the different stakeholder and the risk factors. The case study result demonstrates the ability of the proposed framework to pinpoint features that present the trigger events of the risk factors.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT	I
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS	II
TABLE OF CONTENTS	IV
LIST OF TABLES	VIII
LIST OF FIGURES	IX
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION	1
1.1 Research Background	1
1.1.1 Petroleum Pipeline Maintenance	1
1.1.2 Risk Management	2
1.2 Motivation	4
1.3 Objectives	4
1.4 Limitations	5
1.5 Research Procedure	6
1.6 Thesis Structure	8
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW AND PROBLEM STATEMENT	10
2.1 Problem Statement.	10
2.1.1 Petroleum Pipeline Maintenance Processes and International Codes and Standards	10
2.1.2 Risk Management and Risk Monitoring System Requirements	12
2.1.2.1 Risk Management Approach	12
2.1.2.2 Risk Management Gap in Petroleum Pipeline Maintenance	12
2.1.2.3 Risk Monitoring Data Control	13
2.1.2.4 Summary of Problem Statement	14
2.2 Literature Review.	15
2.2.1 Risk Management in Petroleum Pipeline Maintenance.	15
2.2.2 Overview of Maintenance Processes	19
2.2.2.1 Preventive Maintenance	20
2.2.2.2 Corrective Maintenance	21
2.2.3 Ontology Models in Construction Risk Management.	21
2.2.4 Overview of the International Codes and Standards.	26
2.2.5 Literature Review Summary.	28
CHAPTER THREE RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY	30
3.1 Scope Description	30
3.1.1 Domain Definition	30
3.1.2 Scope Definition	30
3.1.3 Competency Questions	32
3.1.4 Ontology Specification	33
3.2 Data Collection	35
3.2.1 Documentation Analysis	35
3.2.2 Extraction of Important Concepts	38
3.3 Ontology Development	38
3.3.1 Organization of Concepts into Hierarchies	38
3.3.2 Implementation	40
3.4 Ontology-based Risk Management in Petroleum Pipeline Maintenance	40
3.4.1 Risk Domain	43
3.4.1.1 Risk	43
3.4.1.2 Risk Factor and Stakeholder	44
3.4.1.3 Observable Variables	50
3.4.1.4 Risk Responses	51
3.4.2 Documents Domain	53
3.4.2.1 Operational Documents	53
3.4.2.2 International Codes and Standards	55
3.4.2.3 Text	56
3.4.2.4 Features	60
3.4.2.5 Documentation	67
3.4.3 Maintenance Domain	68
3.4.3.1 Monitoring	68
3.4.3.2 Maintenance Type	69
CHAPTER FOUR RESEARCH RESULTS AND VALIDATION	71
4.1 Results.	71
4.2 Framework Validation.	72
4.2.1 Evaluation of Current Forms	72
4.2.1.1 Activity Delayed Scenario.	72
4.2.1.2 Data Requested Scenario.	76
4.2.1.3 Leakage Scenario.	77
4.2.2 Petroleum Pipeline Maintenance Case Study Analysis	80
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION AND FUTURE STUDY	86
5.1 Conclusion.	86
5.2 Future Study.	88
REFERENCES	89
APPENDICES	95
Appendix 1: Risk Hierarchy	95
Appendix 2: Risk Factor and Stakeholder Hierarchy	95
Appendix 3: Observed Variables Hierarchy	97
Appendix 4: Risk Responses Hierarchy	100
Appendix 5: Operational Document Hierarchy	100
Appendix 6: International Codes and Standards Hierarchy	101
Appendix 7: Text Hierarchy	104
Appendix 8: Documentation Hierarchy	106
Appendix 9: Feature Hierarchy	106
Appendix 10: Monitoring Hierarchy	110
Appendix 11: Maintenance Hierarchy	110
Appendix 12: Risk Classification Operation Phase Preventive Maintenance	113
Appendix 13: Risk Classification Operation Phase Corrective Maintenance	114
                                    

Achilla, M. E. (2015). Development of a risk-based. http://ir.jkuat.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/123456789/1800/Thesis%20for%20Mark%20Achilla%20%28Edited%29.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
Ahmad, R., & Kamaruddin, S. (2012). An overview of time-based and condition-based maintenance in industrial application. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 63(1), 135-149. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2012.02.002
American Welding Society. (1999). API 1104, Welding of Pipelines and Related Facilities. Retrieved from https://www.aws.org/certification/detail/api-1104-welding-of-pipelines-and-related-facilities
Australian Standards AS 2885.3, (2001). Pipelines-Gas and liquid petroleum. Part 3: Operation and maintenance.
American National Standard ASME B31, (2002). Pipeline Transportation Systems for Liquid Hydrocarbons and other Liquids.
Bai, Y., & Jin, W. (2016). Marine structural design. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Baker Jr., M., Pipeline Corrosion Final Report. Rep. No. DTRS56-02-D-70036, US Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Office of Pipeline Safety, Washington, DC., 2008.
Baloi, D., & Price, A. D. (2003). Modelling global risk factors affecting construction cost performance. International Journal of Project Management, 21(4), 261-269. doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(02)00017-0
Biondini, F., & Frangopol, D. M. (2020). Introduction. Design, Assessment, Monitoring and Maintenance of Bridges and Infrastructure Networks, 1-2. doi:10.1201/9781351038140-1
British Standards Institution. (2001). BS EN 13306:2001 Maintenance Terminology. Retrieved from https://webstore.ansi.org/Standards/BSI/BSEN133062001
Castro, I., & Sanjuán, E. (2008). An optimal maintenance policy for repairable systems with delayed repairs. Operations Research Letters, 36(5), 561-564. doi:10.1016/j.orl.2008.05.007

Chen, F., Wang, H., Xu, G., Ji, H., Ding, S., & Wei, Y. (2020). Data-driven safety enhancing strategies for risk networks in construction engineering. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 197, 106806. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2020.106806
Cosham, A., Hopkins, P., & Macdonald, K. (2007). Best practice for the assessment of defects in pipelines – Corrosion. Engineering Failure Analysis, 14(7), 1245-1265. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.11.035
Dziadosz, A., & Rejment, M. (2015). Risk Analysis in Construction Project - Chosen Methods. Procedia Engineering, 122, 258-265. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.034
Dawotola, A. W., Trafalis, T. B., Mustaffa, Z., P. H. A. J. M. Van Gelder, & Vrijling, J. K. (2013). Risk-Based Maintenance of a Cross-Country Petroleum Pipeline System. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 4(3), 141-148. doi:10.1061/(asce)ps.1949-1204.0000121
Dey, P. (2001). A risk‐based model for inspection and maintenance of cross‐country petroleum pipeline. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 7(1), 25-43. doi:10.1108/13552510110386874
Dikmen, I. T., Birgonul, M. T., Fidan, G. T., & Ozcan, G. T. (2007). A risk and vulnerability ontology for construction projects. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.467.9593
Ding, L., Zhong, B., Wu, S., & Luo, H. (2016). Construction risk knowledge management in BIM using ontology and semantic web technology. Safety Science, 87, 202-213. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2016.04.008
Duffuaa, S., Ben‐Daya, M., Al‐Sultan, K., & Andijani, A. (2001). A generic conceptual simulation model for maintenance systems. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 7(3), 207-219. doi:10.1108/13552510110404512
Falquet, G., & Guyot, J. (2011). Ontologies and Multilingualism. Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing Ontologies in Urban Development Projects, 69-79. doi:10.1007/978-0-85729-724-2_5
Feng, G., George-Williams, H., Patelli, E., Coolen, F., & Beer, M. (2018). An efficient reliability analysis on complex non-repairable systems with common-cause failures. Safety and Reliability – Safe Societies in a Changing World, 2531-2537. doi:10.1201/9781351174664-318
Fidan, G., Dikmen, I., Tanyer, A. M., & Birgonul, M. T. (2011). Ontology for Relating Risk and Vulnerability to Cost Overrun in International Projects. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 25(4), 302-315. doi:10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000090
Grüninger, M., and M. S. Fox. (1995). Methodology for the Design and Evaluation of Ontologies. citeseer.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.44.8723.
Iqbal, H., Tesfamariam, S., Haider, H., & Sadiq, R. (2016). Inspection and maintenance of oil & gas pipelines: A review of policies. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 13(6), 794-815. doi:10.1080/15732479.2016.1187632
Hillson, D. (2003). Using a risk breakdown structure in project management. S. Machold (Module Leader).
International Organization for Standardization ISO 31000:2009 Risk management — Principles and Guidelines. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/43170.html
International Organization for Standardization ISO 16708:2006. (2016). Petroleum and Natural Gas Industries – Pipeline Transportation System. Retrieved from www.sis.se/api/document/preview/45065/.
International Organization for Standardization ISO 14224:2016. (2016). Petroleum, petrochemical and natural gas industries Collection and exchange of reliability and maintenance data for equipment. Retrieved from https://webstore.ansi.org/preview-pages/ISO/preview_ISO 14224-2016.pdf
Keller, S.A. (2006) Information Technology Project Management A Concise Study. Prentice-Hall, New Delhi. - References - Scientific Research Publishing, www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers.aspx?referenceid=2922123.
Keshk, A. M., Maarouf, I., & Annany, Y. (2018). Special studies in management of construction project risks, risk concept, plan building, risk quantitative and qualitative analysis, risk response strategies. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 57(4), 3179-3187. doi:10.1016/j.aej.2017.12.003
Kishawy, Hossam A., and Hossam A. Gabbar. “Review of Pipeline Integrity Management Practices.” International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, Elsevier, 11 May 2010, www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308016110000827.
Lee, E., Park, Y., & Shin, J. G. (2009). Large engineering project risk management using a Bayesian belief network. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 5880-5887. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.07.057
Lu L, Liang W, Zhang L, Zhang H. Theory of risk interface and its application in risk analysis. China Saf Sci J 2015;25(4):30–5.
Mobley, R. K. (2002). Predictive Maintenance Techniques. An Introduction to Predictive Maintenance, 99-113. doi:10.1016/b978-075067531-4/50006-3
Moghaddam, K. S., & Usher, J. S. (2011). Sensitivity analysis and comparison of algorithms in preventive maintenance and replacement scheduling optimization models. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 61(1), 64-75. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2011.02.012
Mohitpour, M., Hardeveld, T. V., Peterson, W., & Szabo, J. (n.d.). Pipeline System Maintenance. Pipeline Operation & Maintenance, 127-287. doi:10.1115/1.859605.ch4
Noy, N. F., and D. L. McGuinness. (2001). Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology. protege.stanford.edu/publications/ontology_development/ontology101.pdf.
Odimabo, O., & Oduoza, C. F. (2018). Guidelines to Aid Project Managers in Conceptualising and Implementing Risk Management in Building Projects. Procedia Manufacturing, 17, 515-522. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2018.10.091
Olsson, R. (2007). In search of opportunity management: Is the risk management process enough? International Journal of Project Management, 25(8), 745-752. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.03.005
Rose, K. H., & Indelicato, G. (2009). Book Review: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), Fourth Edition. Project Management Journal, 40(2), 104-104. doi:10.1002/pmj.20125
Rahim, Y., Refsdal, I., & Kenett, R. S. (2010). The 5C model: A new approach to asset integrity management. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 87(2-3), 88-93. doi:10.1016/j.ijpvp.2009.12.007
Rios-Alvarado, A. B., Lopez-Arevalo, I., & Sosa-Sosa, V. J. (2013). Learning concept hierarchies from textual resources for ontologies construction. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(15), 5907-5915. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.05.005
Roa Flores, O., (2018). An Ontology-based Construction Operation Feature Extraction Framework for Building Project Schedule Risk Monitoring Dataset. (Master in Civil Engineering and Management), National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Sahraoui, Y., Khelif, R., & Chateauneuf, A. (2013). Maintenance planning under imperfect inspections of corroded pipelines. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 104, 76-82. doi:10.1016/j.ijpvp.2013.01.009
Santoso, H. A., Haw, S., & Abdul-Mehdi, Z. (2011). Ontology extraction from relational database: Concept hierarchy as background knowledge. Knowledge-Based Systems, 24(3), 457-464. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2010.11.003
Serpella, A. F., Ferrada, X., Howard, R., & Rubio, L. (2014). Risk Management in Construction Projects: A Knowledge-based Approach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 653-662. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.073
Srinivasan, N., & Dhivya, S. (2020). An empirical study on stakeholder management in construction projects. Materials Today: Proceedings, 21, 60-62. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2019.05.361
Sure, Y., Erdmann, M., Angele, J., Staab, S., Studer, R., & Wenke, D. (2002). OntoEdit: Collaborative Ontology Development for the Semantic Web. The Semantic Web — ISWC 2002 Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 221-235. doi:10.1007/3-540-48005-6_18
Szymański, P. (2017). Risk management in construction projects. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877705817360290
Tah, J. H. M., and V. Carr. (2001) “Knowledge-Based Approach to Construction Project Risk Management.” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers, ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/%28ASCE%290887-3801%282001%2915%3A3%28170%29.
Tohidi, H. (2011). The role of risk management in IT systems of organizations. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 881-887. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.144
Tserng, H. P., Yin, S. Y., Dzeng, R., Wou, B., Tsai, M., & Chen, W. (2009). A study of ontology-based risk management framework of construction projects through project life cycle. Automation in Construction, 18(7), 994-1008. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2009.05.005
Vegetti, M., Roldán, L., Gonnet, S., Leone, H., & Henning, G. (2016). A framework to represent, capture, and trace ontology development processes. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952197616301762
Wang, H. (2011, January 13). A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221701001977
Wang, S. Q., Dulaimi, M. F., & Aguria, M. Y. (2004). Risk management framework for construction projects in developing countries. Construction Management and Economics, 22(3), 237-252. doi:10.1080/0144619032000124689
Wang, T., Feng, Q., Zheng, H., Sun, L., & Chang, Q. (2011). Establishment and Discovery of Pipeline Integrity Management System. Icptt 2011. doi:10.1061/41202(423)162
Wu, P., Xu, Y., Jin, R., Lu, Q., Madgwick, D., & Hancock, C. M. (2019). Perceptions towards risks involved in off-site construction in the integrated design & construction project delivery. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 899-914. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.226
Well-Stam, D Van, et al. “Project Risk Management.” Kogan Page, www.koganpage.com/product/project-risk-management-9780749442750.
Wide man, R. max, Project Risk Management, The Project Management Handbook, PMI Institute, Pennsylvania, 2004.
Xing, X., Zhong, B., Luo, H., Li, H., & Wu, H. (2019, April 09). Ontology for safety risk identification in metro construction. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016636151830397X
Xu, J., & Xu, L. (2017). Integrated System Health Management. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780128122075/integrated-system-health-management
Yang, B. (2020). Construction of logistics financial security risk ontology model based on risk association and machine learning. Safety Science, 123, 104437. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.08.005
Yang, L., Cormican, K., & Yu, M. (2019). Ontology-based systems engineering: A state-of-the-art review. Computers in Industry, 111, 148-171. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2019.05.003
Yu, X., Liang, W., Zhang, L., Reniers, G., & Lu, L. (2018). Risk assessment of the maintenance process for onshore oil and gas transmission pipelines under uncertainty. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 177, 50-67. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2018.05.001
Yu, Z. (n.d.). Integrated risk management under deregulation. IEEE Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting,. doi:10.1109/pess.2002.1043535

校內：2026-08-25公開
校外：2026-08-25公開電子論文尚未授權公開，紙本請查館藏目錄

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

相關論文