簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 蔡奇達
TSAI, CHI-TA
論文名稱: 應用量化設計架構矩陣於設計鏈之研究
Applying numerical design structure matrix in the design chain
指導教授: 呂執中
Lyu, Jr-Jung
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 工業與資訊管理學系
Department of Industrial and Information Management
論文出版年: 2007
畢業學年度: 95
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 85
中文關鍵詞: 設計群組設計架構矩陣設計鏈協同設計
外文關鍵詞: Collaborative Design, Design Structure Matrix, Design Chain, Design Group
相關次數: 點閱:128下載:4
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 在市場競爭激烈的條件下,產品日趨複雜、生命週期逐漸縮短,促使協同成為企業取得產品開發競爭優勢的策略性機制。協同設計的基礎為設計鏈上下游廠商於設計階段的早期投入,由於設計活動之資訊高度關聯互動為產品開發的本質,因此如何規劃早期參與廠商的設計群組為此機制能否成功的重要因素。
    過去文獻研究指出,設計架構矩陣(Design Structure Matrix, DSM)具有清楚表達流程工作關聯、有效率地協助流程分析與改善的效益,可作為同步流程及團隊設計之規劃工具。雖然DSM的量化演算及其應用分析已被探討,但對於如何有系統地獲取量化設計架構矩陣乃至協同設計群組分析的整體架構則較缺乏相關研究。
    本研究以企業進行協同設計的需求目標為分析出發點,對設計鏈參與廠商的設計活動進行互動關聯量化分析,進而作為應用DSM進行協同群組規劃分析之輸入,再藉由群集分析法獲得群組規劃方案,將整體設計活動視為一系統,並以系統模擬獲得設計遞迴收斂時間,作為群組規劃之效益評估。經整合上述步驟及相關演算法,可建構出系統化的協同設計群組規劃分析架構,作為企業進行設計鏈重整時,規劃協同設計團隊之參考。
    為驗證所提出之分析架構的可行性,本研究以一已推動協同設計的產品專案為例。應用分析架構進行該產品設計之協同團隊組成分析,比較分析結果與實務案例群組規劃的差異,並提供時間績效分析結果予個案公司進行協同設計群組之重整決策參考。分析結果所呈現之設計群組方案符合個案公司在設計鏈成員參與協同設計之組成要求,並提供28.7%的協同時間績效予決策人員進行設計鏈管理的依據。驗證結果顯示本研究所提出之分析模式可作為該企業未來執行設計鏈重整時,進行協同設計團隊規劃的分析方法,以提供協同設計團隊組成之參考。

    Under the conditions of globally growing intense competition, such as decreasing product life cycle and increasingly complex architecture or functions of product, collaborative design has been deemed as a strategic approach to earn competitiveness of enterprises in product development (PD). This strategic approach is based on the involvement of design chain members during early design stages. Through lead time reduction of PD is commonly known as the main subject of collaborative design, there is a lack of framework to cast design groups during early involvement for time reduction.
    Previous research has shown that Design Structure Matrix (DSM) as an effective approach to cope with the complex information flow. Using DSM to present concurrent process or product architecture can provide the advantage of pictorial simplification for analyzer. While studies had discussed some applications of DSM, but using this tool to deal with casting design groups in the mechanism of collaborative design has not been investigated yet.
    The main goal of this research is to develop a framework that provides enterprises a process to plan collaborative design groups during early involvement for the reduction of lead time. Due to the nature of PD, DSM is applied to analyze the highly complex information flow within design tasks. The framework uses QFDs to transfer collaborative objective into requirements of design tasks which realizes and maintains the constructions of customer oriented process for further design chain integration. The DSM numbering methodology is used to systematically evaluate the interaction strength between design tasks.
    A case study was used to validate the framework. Results of the analysis showed that the framework not only provided as a solution to fulfill the demand of collaboration in casting design groups. The case illustrates an estimation of 28.7% lead time reduction as a decision basis for design chain management. The framework is shown to cast and determine design groups while conducting design chain reformation in order to meet the collaborative objects in the case study.

    第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.2 研究目的 2 1.3 研究限制 3 1.4 研究方法及流程 4 第二章 文獻探討 6 2.1 協同產品設計 6 2.2 設計架構矩陣 17 第三章 模式建構 28 3.1 問題描述 28 3.2 應用DSM於協同設計群組規劃之架構 29 3.3 協同目標與設計活動的資訊推演 31 3.4 設計鏈結關聯強度分析 33 3.5 協同設計群組規劃 38 3.6 設計收斂時間模擬 41 第四章 個案分析 44 4.1 個案背景 44 4.2 個案之協同需求與設計環境 46 4.3 協同設計群組的規劃 53 4.4 驗證與討論 69 第五章 結論與未來研究方向 74 5.1 研究結論與貢獻 74 5.2 未來研究方向 75

    一、 中文部分
    1. 王瑞德(2004),「建構穩健決策模式選擇設計鏈之合作夥伴」,私立逢甲大學工業工程研究所碩士論文。
    2. 呂執中(2004),「協同設計的發展趨勢之探討」,工業自動化電子化,第16期,第7-9頁。
    3. 張志光(2005),「應用設計架構矩陣分析協同設計流程之研究」,國立成功大學工業管理研究所碩士論文。
    4. 黃信豪(2003),「協同設計環境下之供應商早期參與模式之研究」,國立成功大學工業管理研究所碩士論文。
    5. 曾茹卿(2005),「發展設計鏈的概念設計改變控管流程」,私立中原大學工業工程研究所碩士論文。
    6. 楊坤祥(2004),「應用於自行車設計鏈上以快速轉換顧客需求於零件設計需求之智慧型系統」,私立逢甲大學工業工程研究所碩士論文。
    7. 趙致緯(2006),「應用軟性系統動態學建構協同設計流程之研究」,國立成功大學工業管理研究所碩士論文。
    8. 鄭至淦(2006),「建構模具產業設計鏈作業參考模式之研究」,國立成功大學工業管理研究所碩士論文。

    二、 英文部分
    1. Amandeep, R. G. and Stanford, M., 2004, “Intelligent support for software release planning,” Product Focused Software Process Improvement lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3009, 248-262.
    2. Ashihara, K. and Ishii, K., 2005, “Application of quality function deployment for new business R&D strategy development,” ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, IMECE2005-81956.
    3. Batallas, D. A. and Yassine, A., 2006, “Information leaders in product development organizational networks: social network analysis of the design structure matrix,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53, 4, 570-582.
    4. Bidault, F., Despres, C. and Butler, C., 1998, “The drivers of co-operations between buyers and suppliers for product innovation,” Research Policy, 26, 719-732.
    5. Bray, R. M., Kerr, N. L., and Atkin, R. S., 1978, “Effects of group size, problem difficulty, and sex on group performance and member reactions,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 11, 24-40.
    6. Browning, T. R., 2001, “Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48, 3, 292-306.
    7. Browning, T. R. and Eppinger, S. D., 2002, “Modeling impacts of process architecture on cost and schedule risk in product development,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49, 4, 428-442.
    8. Bstieler, L., 2005, “The moderating effect of environmental uncertainty on new product development and time efficiency,” The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22, 267-284.
    9. Chan, L. K. and Wu, M. L., 2002, “Quality function deployment: a literature review,” European Journal of Operational Research, 143, 463-497.
    10. Chen, C. H., Khoo, L. P. and Jiao, L., 2004, “Information deduction approach through quality function deployment for the quantification of the dependency between design tasks,” International Journal of Production Research, 42, 21, 4623-4637.
    11. Chen, C. H., Ling, S. F. and Chen, W., 2003, “Project scheduling for collaborative product development using DSM,” International Journal of Project Management, 21, 291-299.
    12. Chen, L., Ding, Z. and Li, S., 2005, “A formal two-phase method for decomposition of complex design problems,” Journal of Mechanical Design, 127, 184-195.
    13. Chen, S. J. and Lin, L., 2003, “Decomposition of interdependent task group for concurrent engineering,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, 44, 435-459.
    14. Cho, S. H. and Eppinger, S. D., 2005, “A simulation-based process model for managing complex design projects,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52, 3, 316-328.
    15. Choi, Y., Kim, K. and Kim C., 2005, “A design chain collaboration framework using reference models,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 26, 183-190.
    16. Chouinard, M., Amoura, S. D. and Ait-Kadi, D., 2005, “Integration of reverse logistics activities within a supply chain information system,” Computers in Industry, 56, 105-124.
    17. Chu, Chih-Hsing, Chang, Chia-Jung and Cheng, Han-Chung, 2006, “Empirical studies on inter-organizational collaborative product development,” Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 6, 179-187.
    18. Chuang, W., C., and O’Grady, P., 2001, “Design object decomposition in a product development chain,” Technical Report, Iowa E-Commerce lab, Iowa city, Iowa.
    19. Cohen, L., 1995, Quality function deployment: how to make QFD work for you, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
    20. Componation, P. J. and Byrd, J., 2000, “Utilizing cluster analysis to structure concurrent engineering teams,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 47, 2, 269-280.
    21. Cronemyr, P., Ronnback, A. O. and Eppinger, S. D., 2001, “A decision support tools for predicting the impact of development process improvements,” Journal of Engineering Design, 12, 3, 177-199.
    22. Deck, M. and Strom, M., 2002, “Model of co-development emerges.” Research Technology Management, 45, 3, 47-53.
    23. Detienne, F., 2006, “Collaborative design: managing task interdependencies and multiple perspectives.” Interacting with Computers, 18, 1-20.
    24. Dowlatshahi, S., 1998, “Implementing early supplier involvement: a conceptual framework,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 18, 2, 143-167.
    25. Dowlatshahi, S., 2000, “Designer-buyer-supplier interface: theory versus practice.” International Journal Production Economics, 63, 111-130.
    26. Duhovnik, J., Jusar, J. Tomazevic, R. and Starbek, M., 2006, “Development process with regard to customer requirements,” Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 14, 1, 67-82.
    27. Eisenhardt, K. M. and Tabrizi, B. N., 1995, “Accelerating adaptive processes: product innovation in the global computer industry,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 1, 84-110.
    28. Handfield, R. B., Ragatz, G. L., Petersen, K. J., and Monczka, R. M., 1999, “Involving suppliers in new product development,” California Management Review, 42, 59-82.
    29. Hartley, J. L., Meredith, J. R., McCutcheon, D. and Kamath, R. R., 1997, “Suppliers’ contributions to product development: an exploratory study,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 44, 3, 258-267.
    30. Hillebrand, B. and Biemans, W. G., 2003, “The relationship between internal and external cooperation: literature review and propositions.” Journal of Business Research, 56, 735-743.
    31. Hsuan, J., 1999, “Impacts of supplier-buyer relationships on modularization in new product development,” European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 5, 197-209.
    32. Jassawalla, A. R. and Sashittal, H. C., 1998, “An examination of collaboration in high-technology new product development processes,” Journal of Production Innovation Management, 15, 237-254.
    33. Kaldate, A., Thurston, D., Emamipour, H. and Rood, M., 2006, “Engineering parameter selection for design optimization during preliminary design,” Journal of Engineering Design, 17, 4, 291-310.
    34. Kusiak, N. L. and Wang, J., 1994, “Reengineering of design and manufacturing processes,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, 26, 3, 1994, 521-536.
    35. Kusiak, N. L., Wang, J., He, D. W. and Feng, C. X., 1995, “A structured approach for analysis of design processes,” IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology—Part A, 18, 3, 664-673.
    36. Lee, Y. C. and Gilleard, J. D., 2002, “Collaborative design: a process model for refurbishment,” Automation in Construction, 11, 535-544.
    37. Leenders, R., Engelen, V. J. and Kratzer, J., 2003, “Virtuality, communication and new product team creativity: a social network perspective,” Journal of Engineering Technology Management, 20, 69-92.
    38. Liker, J. K., Sobek, D. K., Ward, A. C. and Cristiano, J. J., 1996, “Involving suppliers in product development in the United States and Japan: evidence for set-based concurrent engineering,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 43, 2, 165-178.
    39. Lyu, J. J., Chang, L. Y., Cheng, C. K. and Lin, C. H., 2006, “A case study approach on the development of design chain operations reference-model in the mold industry,” International Journal of Electronic Business Management, 4, 2, 113-122.
    40. Martin, G. and Schirrmeister, F., 2002, “A design chain for embedded systems,” Computer, 35, 3, 100-103.
    41. McIvor, R. and Humphreys, P., 2004, “Early supplier involvement in the design process: lessons learned from electronics industry,” Omega, 32, 179-199.
    42. McIvor, R., and McHugh, M., 2000, “Partnership sourcing: an organizational change management perspective,” Journal of Supply Chain Management, 36, 12-20.
    43. Mikkola, J. H., and Skjoett-Larsen, T., 2003, “Early supplier involvement: implications for new product development outsourcing and supplier-buyer interdependence,” Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 4, 31-41.
    44. Moenaert, R. K., Caeldries, F., Lievens, A. and Wauters, E., 2000, “Communication flows in international product innovations teams,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17, 360-377.
    45. Monczka, R. M., Handfield, R. B., Scannell, T. V., Ragatz, G. L., and Frayer, D. J., 2000, New product development: strategies for supplier integration, Milwaukee, WI: ASQ Quality Press.
    46. Moonen, H. M., Hillegersberg, J. and Zwegers, A.J. R., 2003, “A framework for collaborative applications,” Proceedings of the 10th ISPE International Conference on Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications Madeira Portugal, 481, 26-30.
    47. Ni, Q., Lu, W. F., Yarlagadda, P., and Ming, X., 2006, “A collaborative engine for enterprise application integration.” Computers in Industry, 57, 640-652.
    48. Noori, R. and Lee, W. B., 2004, "Collaborative design in a networked enterprise: the case of the telecommunications industry," International Journal of Production Research, 42, 15, 3041-3054.
    49. Owen, C. L., 1986, “Structured planning: a computer supported process for the development of design concepts,” In Proceeding of the 1986 international symposium and workshop on Industrial Design, Section 2, Tainan, Taiwan, 1-19.
    50. Perks, H., 2005, “Specifying and synchronizing partner activities in the dispersed product development process,” Industrial Marketing Management, 34, 85-95.
    51. Perona, M., and Saccani, N., 2004, “Integration techniques in customer - supplier relationships: an empirical research in the Italian industry of household appliances.” International Journal Production Economics, 89, 189-205.
    52. Petersen, J. K., Handfield, R. B. and Ragatz, G. L., 2003, “A model of supplier integration into new product development,” The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20, 284-299.
    53. Petersen, J. K., Handfield, R. B. and Ragatz, G. L., 2005, “Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design,” Journal of Operations Management, 23, 371-388.
    54. Qiu, H. B. and Li, C. X., 2004, “Conceptual design support system in a collaborative environment for injection molding,” International Journal Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 24, 9-15.
    55. Sered, Y. and Reich, Y., 2006, “Standardization and modularization driven by minimizing overall process effort,” Computer-Aided Design, 38, 405-416.
    56. Sharman, D. M. and Yassine, A., 2004, “Characterizing complex product architectures,” Systems Engineering, 7, 1, 35-60.
    57. Smith, P. and Eppinger, S. D., 1997, “A predictive model of sequential iteration in engineering design,” Management Science, 43, 8, 1104-1119.
    58. Smith, P. and Reinertsen, P., 1995, Developing products in half the time, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
    59. Sosa, M. E., Eppinger, S. D. and Rowles, C. M., 2004, “The misalignment of product architecture and organizational structure in complex product development,” Management Science, 50, 12, 1674-1689.
    60. Sosa, M. E., Eppinger, S. D., Pich, M., McKendrick, D. G. and Stout, S. K., 2002, “Factors that influence technical communication in distributed product development: an empirical study in the telecommunications industry,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49, 1, 45-58.
    61. Steward, D. V., 1981, “The design structure system: a method for managing the design of complex systems,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 78, 3, 71-74.
    62. Su, C. Y., Chen, S. J. and Lin, L., 2003, “A structured approach to measuring functional dependency and sequencing of coupled tasks in engineering design,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, 45, 195-214.
    63. Supply-Chain Council (SCC), 2004, “The design-chain operations reference-model,” (DCOR) Version 1.0.
    64. Tan, B. L., Tang, N. K. H. and Forrester, P. L., 2004, “Application of QFD for e-Business planning,” Production Planning and Control, 15, 8, 802-816.
    65. Twigg, D., 1997, “Design chain management,” The Blackwell Encyclopaedic Dictionary of Operations Management, Blackwell, Oxford.
    66. Twigg, D., 1998, “Managing product development within a design chain,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 18, 5, 508-524.
    67. Wagner, S. M. and Hoegl, M., 2006, “Involving suppliers in product development: insights from R&D directors and project managers,” Industrial Marketing Management, 35, 936-943.
    68. Wang, L., Shen, W., Xie, H., Neelamkavil, J. and Pardasani, A., 2002, “Collaborative conceptual design-state of the art and future trends,” Computer-Aided Design, 34, 981-996.
    69. Yamashina, H., Ito, T. and Kawada, H., 2002, “Innovative product development process by integrating QFD and TRI,” International Journal of Production Research, 40, 1031–1050.
    70. Yassine, A. and Braha, D., 2003, “Complex concurrent engineering and the design structure matrix method,” Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 11, 3, 165-176.
    71. Yassine, A., Falkenburg, D. and Chelst, K., 1999, “Engineering design management: an information structure approach,” International Journal of Production Research, 37, 13, 2957-2975.
    72. Zha, X. F. and Du, H., 2006, “Knowledge-intensive collaborative design modeling and support Part II: system implementation and application.” Computers in Industry, 57, 56-71.
    73. Zirger, B. J. and Hartley, J. L., 1996, “The effect of acceleration techniques on product development time,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 43, 2, 143-152.
    74. Zsidisin, G. A., Smith, M. E., 2005, “Managing supply risk with early supplier involvement: a case study and research propositions,” Journal of Supply Chain Management, 41, 4, 44-57.
    三、網站部分
    1. CIMdata, Http://www.cimdata.com
    2. DSMweb, Http://www.dsmweb.org/
    3. UIOWA, Http://www.icaen.uiowa.edu

    下載圖示 校內:2012-07-11公開
    校外:2017-07-11公開
    QR CODE