簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 蔡昌達
Tsai, Chang-Ta
論文名稱: 團隊衝突對團隊績效間關係之研究
The relationship between team conflict and team performances
指導教授: 史習安
Shih, Hsi-An
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理學系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2011
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 80
中文關鍵詞: 任務衝突關係衝突團隊創新領導─成員交換
外文關鍵詞: Task Conflict, Relationship Conflict, Team Creativity, Leader-Member Exchange(LMX)
相關次數: 點閱:171下載:11
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 摘要
    企業日漸重視團隊形式的工作形態,而「團隊衝突」對於團隊所造成的影響是相當對於企業相當重要的議題。其中,團隊衝突又可以分為任務衝突與關係衝突兩種不同形式、不同本質的衝突。我們試圖瞭解任務衝突是否會透過關係衝突而對於團隊產出如團隊創新、團隊滿意度與團隊績效進行影響。除此之外,本研究也試圖以領導─成員交換(Leader-Member Exchange)、目標相依程度與任務導向做為調節變數,探討這些變數會對於任務衝突以及關係衝突所造成的調節效果。
    本研究使用層級迴歸來進行假設的驗證,並且以台灣企業中的團隊作為研究對象,屬於團隊層級的研究。樣本之產業主要來自於製造業與服務業,經由實證分析我們得到下列結論:
    一、 任務衝突與關係衝突存在顯著的正向關係,且關係衝突在任務衝突與團隊產出(團隊創新、團隊成員滿意度、團隊績效)之間存在中介效果。
    二、 領導─成員交換、目標相依程度與任務導向對於任務衝突與團隊衝突並無調節關係,然而我們發現,領導─成員交換、目標相依程度與任務導向是以直接效果的方式影響關係衝突。
    透過本研究,提供學術日後在團隊衝突領域研究的實證參考之一,並且我們希望本研究能夠在實務界運用上有所助益。

    Abstract
    Team-based work design has become more and more important for every organization. Therefore the effects of team conflict became critical issue for many companies. Team conflict can be classified into two different categories such as task conflict and relationship conflict, those are differentiated in characters and forms. Our research tried to find out if there is mediate effect of relationship conflict between task conflict and team outcomes such as team creativity, team members’ satisfaction, and overall team performance. Besides, our research tried to find out if there are moderate effects of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX), goal interdependence, and task orientation.
    We used hierarchical regression as the research method to verify our hypotheses and came to the conclusions as follow:
    1. Task conflict is positively related to relationship conflict. Also, relationship conflict significantly mediates the negative relationship between task conflict and team outcome (team creativity, team members’ satisfaction, and overall team performance).
    2. There are no significant moderate effects of LMX, goal interdependence, and task orientation between task conflict and relationship conflict. However, those variables directly affect relationship conflict.
    Finally, we hope the results of our research could provide empirical evidences for the territory of team conflict studies.

    目錄 目錄 IV 表目錄 V 圖目錄 VI 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 章節架構 3 第二章 文獻探討 4 第一節 團隊創新 4 第二節 任務衝突與關係衝突 6 第三節 關係衝突的中介影響 13 第四節 目標相依程度、領導─成員交換 (LMX)與任務導向 14 第三章 研究方法 18 第一節 研究架構 18 第二節 研究假設 19 第三節 研究變數 20 第四節 問卷設計 23 第五節 抽樣方法 30 第六節 資料分析方法 32 第四章 實證分析與結果 34 第一節 樣本基本分析 34 第二節 因素分析 37 第三節 信度分析 38 第四節 建構效度分析 45 第五節 相關係數分析 49 第六節 層級迴歸分析 51 第七節 研究假說結果整理 59 第五章 結論與建議 60 第一節 研究結論 60 第二節 研究貢獻與限制 63 第三節 研究建議 65 參考文獻 68 附錄 I 76 附錄 II 78

    參考文獻
    Alper, S., Tjosvold, D., & Law, K. S. (1998). Interdependence and controversy in group decision making: Antecedents to effective self-managing teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74(1), 33-52.
    Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
    Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 123-148.
    Amason, A. C., & Sapienza, H. J. (1997). The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. Journal of Management, 23(4), 495-516.
    Amason, A. C., Thompson, K. R., Hochwarter, W. A., & Harrison, A. W. (1995). Conflict - an important dimension in successful management teams. Organizational Dynamics, 24(2), 20-35.
    Anderson, N., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2004). The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 147-173.
    Anderson, N. R., & King, N. (1993). Innovation in organizations. In: Cooper, c. L. And robertson, i. T. (eds). International Review of Industrial Organizational Psychology: Wiley, Chichester.
    Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(3), 235-258.
    Bailin, S. (1988). Achieving extraordinary ends: An essay on creativity.: Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological-research - conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
    Barsade, S. G., Ward, A. J., Turner, J. D. F., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (2000). To your heart's content: A model of affective diversity in top management teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(4), 802-836.
    Bliese, P. D. (2000). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques. Personnel Psychology, 53(4), 1062-1065.
    Boies, K., & Howell, J. A. (2006). Leader-member exchange in teams: An examination of the interaction between relationship differentiation and mean lmx in explaining team-level outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 246-257.
    Bourgeois, L. J. (1985). Strategic goals, perceived uncertainty, and economic-performance in volatile environments. Academy of Management Journal, 28(3), 548-573.
    Brodbeck, F. C., Kerschreiter, R., Mojzisch, A., Frey, D., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2002). The dissemination of critical, unshared information in decision-making groups: The effects of pre-discussion dissent. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32(1), 35-56.
    Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, G. D., & Klesh, J. R. (1983). In price, j. L. And mueller, c. W. (eds), handbook of organizational measurement, 1986. Marshfield, MA.: Pitman Publishing.
    Carnevale, P. J., & Probst, T. M. (1998). Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving and categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1300-1309.
    Chen, M.-H. (2006). Understanding the benefits and detriments of conflict on team creativity process. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(1), 105-116.
    Cogliser, C. C., & Schriesheim, C. A. (2000). Exploring work unit context and leader-member exchange: A multi-level perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(5), 487-511.
    Cosier, R. A., & Rose, G. L. (1977). Cognitive conflict and goal conflict effects on task-performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 19(2), 378-391.
    Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). Vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations - longitudinal investigation of role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(1), 46-78.
    Davis, R. C. (1951). Fundamentals of top management. New York: Harper Brothers.
    De Dreu. (2006). When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams. Journal of Management, 32(1), 83-107.
    De Dreu, & Van de Vliert, E. (1997). Using conflict in organizations.: Sage: London.
    De Dreu, & Van Vianen, A. E. M. (2001). Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of organizational teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(3), 309-328.
    De Dreu, & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 741-749.
    De Dreu, & West, M. A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1191-1201.
    Duffy, M. K., Shaw, J. D., & Stark, E. M. (2000). Performance and satisfaction in conflicted interdependent groups: When and how does self-esteem make a difference? Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 772-782.
    Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1990). Organizational growth - linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among united-states semiconductor ventures, 1978-1988. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 504-529.
    Farh, J. L., Lee, C., & Farh, C. I. C. (2010). Task conflict and team creativity: A question of how much and when. [Article]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1173-1180.
    Farmer, S. M., Tierney, P., & Kung-McIntyre, K. (2003). Employee creativity in taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 618-630.
    Ford, C. M. (1996). Theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1112-1142.
    Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
    George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 605-622.
    Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Groups in context - a model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), 499-517.
    Gong, Y. P., Huang, J. C., & Farh, J. L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 765-778.
    Graen, G., & Cashman, J. (1975). A role-making model of leadership in formal organizations: A development approach. In J G Hunt & L L Lawson (Eds), Leadership frontiers: Kent, OH Kent State University Press
    Hargadon, A. B., & Bechky, B. A. (2006). When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science, 17(4), 484-500.
    Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199-1228.
    Hooper, D. T., & Martin, R. (2008). Beyond personal leader-member exchange (lmx) quality: The effects of perceived lmx variability on employee reactions. Leadership Quarterly, 19(1), 20-30.
    Hulsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128-1145.
    Janssen, O., Van de Vliert, E., & Veenstra, C. (1999). How task and person conflict shape the role of positive interdependence in management teams. Journal of Management, 25(2), 117-141.
    Jehn, K. A. (1994). Enhancing effectiveness - an investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based intragroup conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5(3), 223-238.
    Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256-282.
    Jehn, K. A. (1997). Qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 530-557.
    Jehn, K. A., & Bendersky, C. (2003). Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship Research in organizational behavior, vol 25 (Vol. 25, pp. 187-242).
    Jehn, K. A., & Chatman, J. A. (2000). The influence of proportional and perceptual conflict composition on team performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 11(1), 56-73.
    Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 238-251.
    Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741-763.
    Jehn, K. A., & Weldon, E. (1992). A comparative-study of attitudes towards conflict - managers in the prc and the united-states. International Journal of Psychology, 27(3-4), 549-549.
    Kellermanns, F. W., & Eddleston, K. A. (2004). Feuding families: When conflict does a family firm good. Entrepreneurship-Theory and Practice, 28(3), 209-228.
    Kratzer, J., Leenders, R., & Van Engelen, J. M. L. (2006). Managing creative team performance in virtual environments: An empirical study in 44 r&d teams. Technovation, 26(1), 42-49.
    Kurtzberg, T. R., & Amabile, T. M. (2000). From guilford to creative synergy: Opening the black box of team-level creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3-4), 285-294.
    Lau, R. S., & Cobb, A. T. (2010). Understanding the connections between relationship conflict and performance: The intervening roles of trust and exchange. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(6), 898-917.
    Leenders, R., van Engelen, J. M. L., & Kratzer, J. (2003). Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: A social network perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20(1-2), 69-92.
    Liden, R. C., & Graen, G. (1980). Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 23(3), 451-465.
    Locke, E. A. (1969). What is job satisfaction? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4(4), 309-336.
    Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D. L., & Weingart, L. R. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 779-793.
    Marma, V. J., & Deutsch, K. W. (1973). Survival in unfair conflict - odds, resources, and random-walk models. Behavioral Science, 18(5), 313-334.
    Mason, R. O., & Mitroff, II. (1981). Policy analysis as argument. Policy Studies Journal, 9, 579-585.
    Metzger, M. B., & Schwenk, C. R. (1990). Decision-making models, devils advocacy, and the control of corporate crime. American Business Law Journal, 28(3), 323-377.
    Mooney, A. C., Holahan, P. J., & Amason, A. C. (2007). Don't take it personally: Exploring cognitive conflict as a mediator of affective conflict. Journal of Management Studies, 44(5), 733-758.
    Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome - integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 27-43.
    Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634.
    Pelled, L. H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science, 7(6), 615-631.
    Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1-28.
    Perry-Smith, J. E. (2006). Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 85-101.
    Pinkley, R. L. (1990). Dimensions of conflict frame - disputant interpretations of conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(2), 117-126.
    Pirola-Merlo, A., Mann, L., & Shields, M. (2004). Testing the causal link from organisational climate to rd team performance. International Journal of Psychology, 39(5-6), 261-261.
    Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research - problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544.
    Saavedra, R., Earley, P. C., & Vandyne, L. (1993). Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 61-72.
    Scandura, T. A. (1999). Rethinking leader-member exchange: An organizational justice perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 10(1), 25-40.
    Scandura, T. A., & Graen, G. B. (1984). Moderating effects of initial leader member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(3), 428-436.
    Schneider, B., White, S. S., & Paul, M. C. (1998). Linking service climate and customer perceptions of service quality: Test of a causal model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 150-163.
    Schriesheim, C. A., Castro, S. L., Zhou, X., & Yammarino, F. J. (2001). The folly of theorizing "a" but testing "b" - a selective level-of-analysis review of the field and a detailed leader-member exchange illustration. Leadership Quarterly, 12(4), 515-551.
    Schriesheim, C. A., Neider, L. L., & Scandura, T. A. (1998). Delegation and leader-member exchange: Main effects, moderators, and measurement issues. Academy of Management Journal, 41(3), 298-318.
    Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R., & Rechner, P. L. (1989). Experiential effects of dialectical inquiry, devils advocacy, and consensus approaches to strategic decision-making. Academy of Management Journal, 32(4), 745-772.
    Schwenk, C. R. (1990). Conflict in organizational decision-making - an exploratory-study of its effects in for-profit and not-for-profit organizations. Management Science, 36(4), 436-448.
    Shalley, C. E. (1991). Effects of productivity goals, creativity goals, and personal discretion on individual creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(2), 179-185.
    Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 33-53.
    Shalley, C. E., & Perry-Smith, J. E. (2001). Effects of social-psychological factors on creative performance: The role of informational and controlling expected evaluation and modeling experience. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84(1), 1-22.
    Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933-958.
    Shaw, J. D., Zhu, J., Duffy, M. K., Scott, K. L., Shih, H. A., & Susanto, E. (2011). A contingency model of conflict and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 391-400.
    Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2007). When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1709-1721.
    Simons, T. L., & Peterson, R. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 102-111.
    Simonton, D. K. (1999). Creativity as blind variation and selective retention: Is the creative process darwinian? Psychological Inquiry, 10(4), 309-328.
    Somech, A. (2006). The effects of leadership style and team process on performance and innovation in functionally heterogeneous teams. Journal of Management, 32(1), 132-157.
    Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 316-325.
    Taggar, S. (2002). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 315-330.
    Thomas, K. (1992). Overview of conflict and conflict-management. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(3), 263-264.
    Tiwana, A., & McLean, E. R. (2005). Expertise integration and creativity in information systems development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(1), 13-43.
    Tjosvold, D., & Su, F. (2007). Managing anger and annoyance in organizations in china - the role of constructive controversy. Group & Organization Management, 32(3), 260-289.
    Tjosvold, D., Tang, M. M. L., & West, M. (2004). Reflexivity for team innovation in china - the contribution of goal interdependence. Group & Organization Management, 29(5), 540-559.
    van der Vegt, G., Emans, B., & van de Vliert, E. (1999). Effects of interdependencies in project teams. Journal of Social Psychology, 139(2), 202-214.
    Van der Vegt, G., & Van de Vliert, E. (2002). Intragroup interdependence and effectiveness: Review and proposed directions for theory and practice. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(1), 50-67.
    Van der Vegt, G. S., & Janssen, O. (2003). Joint impact of interdependence and group diversity on innovation. Journal of Management, 29(5), 729-751.
    Van Dyne, L., Jehn, K. A., & Cummings, A. (2002). Differential effects of strain on two forms of work performance: Individual employee sales and creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(1), 57-74.
    Wall, J. A., & Callister, R. R. (1995). Conflict and its management. Journal of Management, 21(3), 515-558.
    Wall, V. D., & Nolan, L. L. (1986). Perceptions of inequity, satisfaction, and conflict in task-oriented groups. Human Relations, 39(11), 1033-1051.
    Wang, A. C., & Cheng, B. S. (2010). When does benevolent leadership lead to creativity? The moderating role of creative role identity and job autonomy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1), 106-121.
    West, M. A. (1990). The social psychology of innovation in groups. In m. A. West & j. L. Farr (eds.), innovation and creativity at work. Chichester, England: Wiley.
    West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology-an International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale, 51(3), 355-387.
    West, M. A., & Anderson, N. R. (1996). Innovation in top management teams. [Article]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 680-693.
    Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321.
    Yang, J. X., & Mossholder, K. W. (2004). Decoupling task and relationship conflict: The role of intragroup emotional processing. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(5), 589-605.
    Zand, D. E. (1972). Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 229-239.

    下載圖示 校內:2016-07-11公開
    校外:2016-07-11公開
    QR CODE