簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳彥廷
Chen, Yen-Ting
論文名稱: 學習動機、學習策略、考試焦慮對數學科學業成績的影響-以台南市立後甲國中為例
Impacts of Learning Motivations, Learning Strategies and Test anxiety for Mathematic Academic Achievement-A Study of Tainan Municipal Houjia Junior High School
指導教授: 陳順宇
Chen, Shun-Yu
溫敏杰
Wen, Miin-Jye
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 統計學系
Department of Statistics
論文出版年: 2008
畢業學年度: 96
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 112
中文關鍵詞: 學習策略學習動機考試焦慮學業成績結構方程模式
外文關鍵詞: Learning Strategies, Structural Equation Modeling, Learning Motivations, Test Anxiety, Academic Achievemen
相關次數: 點閱:154下載:24
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究主要目的在於探討國中生的學習動機、學習策略、考試焦慮對學業成績的影響,學業成績是以96學年度上學期三次段考的數學科平均成績為基準。本研究以台南市後甲國中一年級學生為施測對象,利用分層隨機抽樣9個班級,共283位學生參與測試。以問卷設計量表來測量國中生的學習動機、學習策略與考試焦慮。而透過信、效度分析,可證實本研究之施測問卷具有良好之信、效度。對於成績影響的分析,主要以結構方程模式(SEM)來執行。結果發現,學習動機、學習策略、考試焦慮對學業成績皆有顯著影響,並能解釋37%的變異程度。人口統計變項的影響,主要以變異數分析(ANOVA)來執行。結果發現,是否補習、每週複習課業時間、父母親的教育程度會影響學業成績,而性別對學業成績沒有影響,但性別會影響考試焦慮。經過群組分析後,發現本研究所調查之人口統計變項,並不會干擾所提出之結構方程模式。

    The main purpose of this study is to investigate the influences of learning motivations, learning strategies and test anxiety on the academic achievement for the students in junior high school.The academic achievement is based on the average score in math of three mid-term exams in the first semester in 2007.The subjects of this study were drawn from the students in the seventh grade in Tainan Houjia Junior High School. By means of multistage stratified sampling method, the effective samples are 283 students sampling from 9 classes.
    The study measures the learning motivations, learning strategies and test anxiety of the junior high school students by the questionnaire design.Through the reliability and validity analysis, the questionnaire of this study is with good reliability and validity.The study takes Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to analysis the influences on the academic achievement. According to the findings, the academic achievement is significantly impacted by learning motivations, learning strategies and test anxiety. And it accounts for 37% of the total variance.
    ANOVA was used to analysis the influences of background variables in this study. The finding is that going to cram schools, the time of reviewing schoolwork per week and parents’ educational background were not related to the academic achievement, but sex can make an impact on test anxiety.
    After multiple-group analysis, the study finds that the background variables could not influence the SEM.

    目錄....................................................Ⅰ 表目錄..................................................Ⅲ 圖目錄..................................................Ⅵ 第一章 導論............................................1 第一節 研究背景與動機..................................1 第二節 研究目的........................................2 第三節 研究範圍與抽樣方法 ..............................3 第四節 研究限制........................................4 第二章 文獻探討........................................5 第一節 學習動機........................................5 第二節 學習策略........................................12 第三節 考試焦慮........................................22 第四節 學習動機、學習策略、考試焦慮對學業成績影響之研究26 第三章 研究方法........................................32 第一節 研究架構........................................32 第二節 研究假設........................................33 第三節 研究變項操作型定義與衡量........................33 第四節 問卷設計........................................35 第五節 抽樣設計與資料蒐集 ..............................38 第六節 資料分析方法....................................40 第四章 資料分析........................................46 第一節 樣本結構分析....................................46 第二節 敘述統計分析....................................47 第三節 因素分析........................................51 第四節 信度與效度分析..................................58 第五節 差異性分析......................................64 第六節 結構方程模式....................................74 第七節 兩群結構方程模式之比較..........................84 第五章 結論與建議......................................93 第一節 研究結論........................................93 第二節 建議............................................94 參考文獻.................................................98 附錄一 附表1 支持策略轉置後之因素負荷(原始)..........105 附圖1 學習動機一階驗證性因素分析................106 附圖2 支持策略轉置後之因素負荷(原始)..........107 附圖3 學習動機一階驗證性因素分析................107 附圖4 支持策略轉置後之因素負荷(原始)..........108 附錄二 問卷............................................109

    一、中文部分
    王永裕(2006)。雲林縣國中、小學生成就目標導向、考試焦慮與
    學業成就之關係研究-以數學領域為例。國立彰化師範大學教
    育研究所碩士論文。
    王秀槐(1985)。國中高低成就學生家庭環境與學習態度之比較研
    究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    巫有鎰(1999)。影響國小學生學業成就的因果機制--以台北市和
    台東縣作比較。國立台東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
    余民寧(1987)。考試焦慮、成就動機、學習習慣與學業成就之研
    究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    李仁豪(2005)。以結構方程模式探討並驗證成就目標與學習行為
    的關係。教育與心理研究,28(3),551-580。
    周文松(2007)。國中學生學習動機、家長教育期望與學業成就-
    以中部地區為例。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    林清標(1998)。魏納的歸因理論及教育含意。初等教育集刊,1
    ,177-190。
    林建平(1994)。整合學習策略與動機的訓練方案對國小閱讀理解
    困難兒童的輔導效果。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究
    所博士論文。
    林寶山(1998)。教學原理與技巧。臺北:五南書局。
    汪慧瑜(2006)。腎上腺素不要飆到破錶。張老師月刊,347,90-
    96。
    邱連煌(2004)。考、烤、拷:幽默與測試焦慮(上)。國教天地
    ,158,4-12。
    邱連煌(2005)。考、烤、拷:幽默與測試焦慮(下)。國教天地
    ,159,3-9。
    洪寶蓮 (1990)。學習策略之探討與應用。諮商與輔導,81,19-
    29。
    吳淑珠 (1998)。國小學童自我概念、數學學習動機與數學成就的
    關係。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
    吳統雄(1990)。台灣網路使用者系列調查研究:現況、前景、策
    略、方法。民意研究季刊,214,41-77。
    吳靜吉 程炳林(1991)。國民中小學生學習動機、學習策略與學業
    成績之相關研究。政大學報,66,122-149 。
    吳明隆和蘇耕役(1995)。國民小學學生控制信念、重要他人態度
    與知覺與數學焦慮、數學態度及數學成就關係之研究。初等教
    育學刊,4,181-210。
    胡金枝(1994)。國小資優生的學習動機、批判思考與其國語科學
    業成就之關係。國立台中師範學院初等教育研究所碩士論文。
    張春興(1996)。現代心理學。臺北:東華書局。
    張春興(1997)。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北:東
    華書局。
    張新仁(1989)。國中學生行為─學習方法、學習習慣與學習態度
    之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    張景媛(1988)。教學類型與學習類型適配性研究暨學生學習適應
    理論模式的驗證。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    郭宜君(1996)。嘉義市成人學習策略及其相關因素之研究。中正
    大學成人及繼續教育研究碩士論文。
    郭郁智(2000)。國民中學學生學習策略、批判思考能力與學業成
    就之相關研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究碩士論文。
    陳李綢(1988)。學習策略的研究與教學。資優季刊,29,15-24

    陳婉真(2006)。「試前準備期與考試當下焦慮量表」編制之研究
    。測驗學刊,53(2),181-204。
    陳順宇(2005)。多變量分析。臺北,華泰書局。
    陳順宇(2007)。結構方程模式AMOS操作。臺北,心理出版社。
    陳綠蓉(2001)。考試焦慮的矯治與輔導。學生輔導,75,80-95

    程炳林(1991)。國民中小學生激勵的學習策略之相關研究。國立
    政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    黃淑娟(2002)。原住民國中生的學習動機、學習策略與學業成就
    關係之研究。彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    黃富順(1984)。成人參與繼續教育動機取向及其相關因素之研究
    。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文。
    葉淑瑜(2003)。不同性別國中生的理化學習動機、學習方法與其
    學業成就關係之探討。國立台灣師範大學科學教育研究所碩士
    論文。
    鄭淵全(1997)。社經地位、能力、學校教育過程與國小學生學業
    成就之關係--功能典範與衝突典範之探究。國立高雄師範大學
    教育研究所碩士論文。
    盧青延(1993)。我國國民中學補習學校學生學習動機、學習策略
    與學業成就關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學社會育研究所碩士
    論文。
    鍾宜興(1992)。前階組織模式教學。教育實習輔導通訊,1,16-
    17。
    魏麗敏(1996)。影響國小兒童數學成就之自我調節學習與情感因
    素分析及策略訓練效果之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與
    輔導研究所碩士論文。
    劉信雄(1992)。國小學生認知風格、學習策略、自我效能、與學
    業成就關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。
    劉潔玲(2001)。學業成就不足與學習動機問題之研究。教育研究
    資訊,9(3),86-105。
    劉靜宜(2003)。高中學生學習動機、學習策略、求助行為與學業
    成就之研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。

    二、英文部分
    Aiken, L. R. (1976). Update on attitudes and other
    affective variables in learning mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 46, 239-311.
    Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. NJ: Englewood Cliffs, Prentiec-Hall.
    Betz, N. E. (1978). Prevalence, distribution, and correlates of math anxiety in college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 25, 441-448.
    Biggs, J. B. (1978). Individual and group differences in study processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 48(3), 266-279.
    Borkowski, J. G., & Thorpe, P. K. (1994). Self-regulation and motivation:A life-span perspective on underachievement. in D. H. Schunk(Eds.), Self-regulation oflearning and performance:Issues and educational applications (pp.45-73). Hillsdale, NJ:Lawernce Erlbaum Associates.
    Brush, L. R. (1989). A validation study of the Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale (MARS). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 485-490.
    Culler, R. E. & Holahan, C. J. (1980). Test anxiety and academic performances: The effects of study-related behaviors. Journal of Educational, 72, 16-20.
    Dansereau, D. F. (1985). Learning strategy research. in Segal, J. (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills (pp.209-239). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Elbaum.
    Echols, P. S. (1992). A study of the relationships among students attitude toward mathematics and the varibles of teacher attitude, parental attitude, chievement, ability, sex of the student and grade level of the student. Mich : UMI.
    Felson, R. B. & Trudeau, L. (1991). Gender differences in mathematics performance. Social Psychology Quarterl, 54(2), 113-126.
    Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. in W. Patrick Dickson. (Ed.), Children’s oral communication skills, (pp.35-60). New York : Academic Press.
    Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
    Gagne, R. M. (1985). The condition of learning and theory of instruction. New York:Holt, Rinehert., & Winston.
    Garofalo, J. & Lester, F. K., (1985). Metacognition, Cognitive Monitoring and Mathematical Performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(3), 163-176.
    Gettinger, M. & Seibert, J. K. (2002). Contributions of study skills to academic competence. School Psychology Review, 31, 350-366.
    Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham R. L. & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th edition). Prentice Hall International: UK.
    Harter, S. (1983). Developmental perspectives on the self-esteem. in Mussen, P. H. (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology, New York:Wiley, 4, 275-385.
    Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations, Hillsdale New Jersey: Publication.
    Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.
    Kloosterman, P. & Cougan, M. C. (1994). Students’ beliefs about learning school mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 94(4), 375-388.
    Ley, K. & Young, D. B. (1998). Self-regulation behaviors in underprepared (developmental) and regular admission college students. Contemporary Educational Psychlolgy, 23 (1), 42-64.
    Liabre, M. M.& Suares, E. (1985). Predicting math anxiety and course performance in college women and men.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32(2), 283287.
    Liebert, R. M. & Morris, L. W. (1967). Cognitive and emotional components of test anxiety: A distinction and some initial data. Psychology Reports, 20, 975-978.
    Mandler, G. & Sarason, S. B. (1952). A study of anxiety and learning. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 166-173.
    Marsh, H. W. & Hocevar, D. (1985). The application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept : First and higher order factor structures and their invariance across age groups. Psychological Bulletion, 97(3), 562-582.
    Marsh, H. W. (1993). Self-esteem stability and responses to the stability of self scale. Journal of research in personality, 27, 253-269.
    Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality. NY : John wiley and Sons.
    Mayer, R. E. (1987). Educational psychology : A cognitive Apporach. Bosten : Little Brown and Company.
    McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A. & Lowell, E. L. (1953). The chievement motive. New York : Appletion.
    McCombs, B. L. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement. in Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: theoretical perspectives (pp.39-65). Mahwah, NJ : LEA.
    Morris, L. W. & Engle, W. B. (1981). Assessing various coping strategies and their effects on test performance. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 165-171.
    Paris, S. G. & Oka, E. R. (1989). Strategies for comprehending text and coping with reading difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 32-42.
    Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W. & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 91-105.
    Pintrich, P. R. & De Groot, E.V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
    Pintrich, P. R. & Garcia, T. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. in M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Goals and self-regulatory processes, 7, 371-402.
    Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F. & McKeachie, W. J. (1989). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. (MSLQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(3), 293-316.
    Raffini, J. P. (1996). 150 ways to increase intrinsic motivation in the classroom. Needham Heights, MA : Allyn & Bacon.
    Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(1), 609.
    Rowe, C. (1999). Do social stories benefit children with autism in mainsteam primary schools?British Journal of Special Education, 26(1), 12-14.
    Samuels, W. D. (1991). Mathematics achievement and attitude in grade six through eight in Lebanon, Oregon. Mich: UMI.
    Sassenrath, J. M. (1964). A factor analysis of rating-scale item on the test anxiety questionnaire. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 28, 371-377.
    Sobel, M. E. (1988). Direct and indirect effect in linear structural equation models, in Long, J. S. (Ed.), Common Problems/Proper Solution : Avoid Error in Quantitative Research (pp. 46-64), Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
    Sternberg, R. J. (1983). Criteria for intellectual skills training. Educational Researcher, 12(2), 6-12.
    Stipek, D. J. (1993). Motivation to learn : form theory to practice. Boston : Allyn & Bacon.
    Symons, S., Clark, M., Isaksen, C. J. & Marshall, J. A. (1989). Strategies that improve children’s memory and comprehension of text. Elementary School Journal, 90, 3-32.
    Thomas, J. W. & Rohwer, W. D. Jr. (1986). Academic studying:The role of learning strategies. Education Psychology, 21(1), 19-41.
    Tsai, S. L. & Walberg, H. J. (1983). Mathematics achievement and attitude productivity in junior high school. The Journal of Educational Research, 76, 267-272.
    Wolters, C. A. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 189-205.
    Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21-39.
    Weiner, B. (1979). Achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristown, NJ : General Learning Press.
    Weiner, B. (1985). An attribhutional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.
    Weiner, B. (1986). An attribution theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer Verlag.
    Weinstein, C. E. & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. in Wittrock, M. (Eds.), Handbook of reseach on teaching (pp.305-327). New York : Macmillan.
    Wine, J. (1971). Test anxiety and direction of attention. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 92-104.
    Zimmerman, B. J. & Martinez, P. M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade,sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (3), 51-59.
    Zimmerman, B. J. & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 845-862.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:2008-06-19公開
    QR CODE