桌上陣營類遊戲以其高針對性、身份的不確定性及故事性強的特徵，廣受大眾喜愛。而陣營類遊戲中，角色能力與用途的設計更是許多遊戲中不可或缺的一環。如何得知玩家在使用其角色時引發的情緒，能夠衡量玩家在遊戲過程是否保持高度興趣，及驗證玩家情緒反應是否與設計師設計遊戲時預設的結果接近，故建立一套遊戲規則的檢驗流程是目前桌上遊戲設計待發展的課題。

本研究聚焦於桌上陣營類遊戲中隱藏角色的玩家經驗，探討玩家扮演不同角色對情緒反應的影響，透過生理量測與影像觀察的方式，分析事件與玩家情緒的關聯。由實驗可驗證，此流程能夠量化因角色機制的不對稱引發的玩家情緒反應，並藉由觀察玩家的生理趨勢，來得知機制的設計是否有觸發預期效果。此流程適用對象為桌上陣營遊戲中的角色隱藏遊戲類型，可協助遊戲開發團隊發想未來產品方向及現有產品的改善，以提昇玩家對遊戲商品的滿意度。

People love camp board games because of several reasons, including highly player-targeted feature, the uncertainty of identity trust and fascinating stories. However, designing character’s ability and function is the most essential part of many camp board games. Upon observing players’ emotions caused by the characters they use, we can measure if players are highly interested in this game and verify if players’ emotional reactions accord with the ones that designers have expected when designing the game. Therefore, founding a set of inspection steps for game rules is the current issue that needs further development in board games.

This thesis focuses on player’s experience of using hidden characters in camp board games so that we can explore the impacts on players’ emotions when they act as different characters. The correlation between players’ emotions and events they met could be analyzed via physiological measurement and video content analysis. These methods can quantify the player’s emotions caused by asymmetric role mechanics. By observing player’s physiological changes, we would know if game mechanic design has caused expected results. This method applies to camp board games with hidden characters, helps game development teams inspire directions for futuristic products and improvements towards current products, and elevates player’s satisfaction towards board games.

徐世平. (2007). 生理訊號監控應用於智慧生活環境之研究. 國立政治大學資訊科學系所學位論文, 1-83.

黃勝宏, 林榮輝, 黃崇儒, & 洪聰敏. (2008). 心率變異度與焦慮之關係. 中華體育季刊, 22(1), 72-79.

慎基德. (2006). 以生理訊號探討多媒體環境之使用者情感反應. 臺灣大學電機工程學研究所學位論文(2006 年), 1-74.

潘威翰. (2008). 利用機器學習技術找出眼動軌跡與情緒之間的關聯性.國立政治大學資訊科學系所學位論文, 1-56.

鍾金龍. (2009). 一個利用生理訊號辨識情緒的研究.國立中正大學電機工程所學位論文, 1-70.

李靜芳, & 溫福星. (2008). 階層線性模式於追蹤研究之應用--以子宮切除婦女之術後初期症狀困擾為例. 護理雜誌, 55(4), 63-72.

高新建, & 吳幼吾. (1997). 階層線性模式在內屬結構教育資料上的應用. Educational Research & Information, 5(2), 31-50.

日本能率協會編著，沈士良譯（1988）。KJ法應用實務。臺北：超越企管顧問股份有限公司。

Ho, H.-J. (2010). 基於多變量偏斜 t 分佈之穩健的線性混合模型. 中興大學應用數學系所學位論文, 1-71.

Alden, S. (2000). BoardGameGeek.

Alofs, T., Theune, M., & Swartjes, I. (2012). A tabletop board game interface for multi-user interaction with a storytelling system Intelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment (pp. 123-128): Springer.

Appelhans, B. M., & Luecken, L. J. (2006). Heart rate variability as an index of regulated emotional responding. Review of general psychology, 10(3), 229.

Bjork, S., & Holopainen, J. (2004). Patterns in game design (game development series). Charles River Media; 1 edition .

Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., Cuthbert, B. N., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Emotion and motivation I: Defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. Emotion, 1(3), 276-298.

Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 25(1), 49-59.

Cacioppo, J. T., & Tassinary, L. G. (1990). Principles of psychophysiology: Physical, social, and inferential elements: Cambridge University Press.

Cai, H., & Lin, Y. (2011). Modeling of operators' emotion and task performance in a virtual driving environment. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69(9), 571-586.

Dimitrova, N., Zhang, H.-J., Shahraray, B., Sezan, I., Huang, T., & Zakhor, A. (2002). Applications of video-content analysis and retrieval. IEEE multimedia, 9(3), 42-55.

Jones, C. M., & Troen, T. (2007). Biometric valence and arousal recognition. Proceedings of the 19th Australasian conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Entertaining User Interfaces.

Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research: introducing focus groups. Bmj, 311(7000), 299-302.

Kobayashi, E., Kobayashi, M., & Fujimura, T. (2014). A Functional Analysis of EFL Students' Discourse in the Social Practice of Learning to Play a Board Game. 共愛学園前橋国際大学論集.

Lang, P. (1985). The cognitive psychophysiology of emotion: Anxiety and the anxiety disorders. Lawrence Eribaum, Hillsdale.

Lang, P. J. (1995). The emotion probe. American psychologist, 50(5), 372-385.

Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1999). International affective picture system (IAPS): Technical manual and affective ratings: Gainesville, FL: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.

Lee, H. L. J. (2012). SMARTies: Using a board game in the English classroom for edutainment and assessment. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 8(1), 1-35.

Levenson, R. W. (2003). Blood, sweat, and fears. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1000(1), 348-366.

Li, X., Zhou, H., Song, S., Ran, T., & Fu, X. (2005). The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of abbreviated PAD emotion scales Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (pp. 513-518): Springer.

Mandryk, R. (2008). Physiological measures for game evaluation. Game usability: Advice from the experts for advancing the player experience, 207-235.

Mandryk, R. L., & Maranan, D. S. (2002). False prophets: exploring hybrid board/video games. CHI'02 on Human factors in computing systems.

Ramani, G. B., & Siegler, R. S. (2011). Reducing the gap in numerical knowledge between low-and middle-income preschoolers. Journal of applied developmental Psychology, 32(3), 146-159.

Scherer, K. R. (1993). Neuroscience projections to current debates in emotion psychology. Cognition & Emotion, 7(1), 1-41.

Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990). The past explains the present: Emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethology and sociobiology, 11(4), 375-424.