| 研究生: |
林廷駿 Lin, Ting-Chun |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
普通混凝土梁在彎矩、剪力與扭矩組合載重下之承力行為研究 |
| 指導教授: |
方一匡
Fang, I-Kuang |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 土木工程學系 Department of Civil Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2005 |
| 畢業學年度: | 93 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 72 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 扭矩 、剪力 、彎矩 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | shear, torsion, bending |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:65 下載:6 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本文旨在探討鋼筋混凝土梁在低扭矩作用下受到彎矩(M)、剪力(V)及扭矩(T)組合載重作用下之承力行為,隨著扭矩之增加對試體在整體承力行為之差異性。本研究共規劃10根斷面尺寸為250*350mm,長度分別為1.5 m及2.1m之鋼筋混凝土梁,主要考慮變數為扭矩和彎矩組合載重比例值T/M=0、1/10與1/8及實心斷面與空心斷面試體。
主要研究結果如下:(1)實心斷面與空心斷面試體之扭矩開裂強度實測值與Collins的預測式所得到之開裂強度的比值平均數分別為1.27與0.94,此結果表示以Collins預測式來預測實心試體略為保守,但對空心斷面試體而言理論值則較接近實驗值; (2)以Elfgren預測式來預測對實心或空心斷面試體之扭矩及彎矩極限強度皆有不錯的效果,比值平均數約為1.03~1.08;(3) 試體之強度與韌性會隨扭矩的增加而減少,1.5m的梁在T/M比值由0、1/10 及1/8增加時,實心斷面試體之極限撓曲強度約折減10~14%,空心斷面試體折減約為9~15%,撓曲韌性方面,實心與空心斷面試體在T/M比值由1/10增加至1/8時的折減情形分別為36%與52%。 (4) 當試體達極限階段時,頂面混凝土之主張應變會隨T/M比值增加而增加,並根據混凝土受到雙軸向應力的觀念,試體的頂面混凝土之極限主壓應變值會隨 比值的增加而下降。
none
1. Lessig, N. N.,“Determination of Load-Carrying Capacity of Rectangular
Reinforced Concrete Elements Subjected to Flexural and torsion,”Trudy No.
5, Institut Betona i Zhelezobetona (Concrete and Reinforced Concrete
Institute), Moscow, pp. 5-28, 1959 (in Russian). Translated by Portland
Cement Association, Foreign Literature study No. 371. Available from S.L.A.
Translation Center, The John Crerar Library Translation Center, 35 W. 33rd
St., Chicago, Illinois 60616.
2. Lessig,N. N.,“Studies of Cases of Concrete Failure in Rectangular
Reinforced Concrete Elements Subjected to Flexure and Torsion,”Design of
Reinforced Concrete Structures, State Publishing Offices of Literature on
Structural Engineering, Architecture and Construction Materials (Moscow),
pp.229-271, 1961 (in Russian). Translated by Portland Cement Association,
Foreign Literature Study NO.398.
3. Ewida, A. A., and McMullen, A. E.,“Torsion-shear-flexure interaction in
reinforced concrete members,” Magazine of Concrete Research, Vol.33,
No.115, June 1981.
4. Collins, M. P.,and Mitchell, D.,“Shear and Torsion Design of Prestressed
and Non-Prestressed Concrete Beams,”PCI JOURNAL, V.5., No.5, pp.44-76,
Sept.-Oct. 1980.
5. Rahal, K. N., and Collins, M. P.,“Analysis of Sections Subjected to
Combined Shear and Torsion-A Theoretical Model,” ACI Structural Journal,
July-August 1995.
6. State Committee on Construction of the USSR council of Ministers,
“Structural Standards and Regulations.”SNiP H-B, 1-62, State Publishing
Offices for Literature on Structural Engineering, Architecture and
Structural Materials, Moscow, 1962 (in Russian).
7. Collins, M. P.; Walsh, P. F.; Archer, F. E.; and Hall, A. S.,“Reinforced
Concrete Beam Subjected to Combined Torsion, Bending and Shear,” UNICIV
Report, No. R-14, University of New South Wales, October 1965.
8. Collins, M. P.; Walsh, P. F.; Archer, F. E.; and Hall, A. S.,“Ultimate
Strength of Reinforced Concrete Beam Subjected to Combined Torsion and
Bending,” Torsion of Structural Concrete, SP-18, American Concrete
Institute, Detroit, pp.279~420, 1968.
9. Elfgren, L.; Karlsson, I.; and Losberg, A.,“Torsion-Bending-Shear
Interaction for Concrete Beams,”Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE,
V.100, No. ST 8, pp.1657-1676, Aug. 1974.
10.Elfgren, L.,“Reinforced Concrete Beams Loaded in Combined Torsion, Bending
and Shear,”Publication 71:3, Division of Concrete Structures, Chalmers
University of Technology, Goteborg, Sweden, 1972.
11.朱信澈,「鋼筋混凝土梁在扭矩與剪力組合載重作用下之行為研究」, 國立成功大學
土木工程研究所碩士論文,(2002).