簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 楊淇纓
Yang, Chi-Ying
論文名稱: 公司 ESG 表現對長期財務績效之影響:以 CEO 權力為調節變數
The Impact of Firms' ESG Performance on their Long-Term Financial Performance: CEO Power as a Moderator
指導教授: 顏盟峯
Yen, Meng-Feng
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融研究所
Graduate Institute of Finance
論文出版年: 2023
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 26
中文關鍵詞: ESG長期財務績效CEO 權力
外文關鍵詞: ESG, long-term financial performance, CEO power
相關次數: 點閱:203下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究以 2011 至 2021 年台灣公司為樣本,使用 Refinitiv 資料庫的 ESG 資料與台灣經濟新報資料庫的財務數據,探討公司 ESG 表現與長期財務績效之關聯性,並驗證 CEO 權力是否可以作為公司 ESG 表現與長期財務績效之間的調節變數。實證結果顯示,ESG 分數的係數顯著為正,而 ESG 分數與 CEO 權力的交乘項係數顯著為負,代表公司的 ESG 表現與長期財務績效表現呈正向關係,但若 CEO 的權力越大,將會削弱此一正向關係。透過 2SLS 迴歸分析,進一步確認了研究模型並無反向因果關係所引起的內生性問題。

    This study used Taiwan companies from 2011 to 2021 as samples. It explored the relationship between ESG performance and long-term financial performance by using ESG data from the Refinitiv database and financial data from the Taiwan Economic Journal database. It also verified whether CEO power can act as a moderator between ESG performance and long-term financial performance. The empirical results showed that the coefficient of the ESG score is significantly positive, while the coefficient of the interaction term between the ESG score and CEO power is significantly negative. It suggests that there is a positive relationship between a company's ESG performance and long-term financial performance, but if CEO's power is too excessive, this positive relationship will be weakened. Through 2SLS regression analysis, the empirical model was further confirmed such that no endogeneity concerns were caused by reverse causality.

    摘要 i ABSTRACT ii 目錄 vii 表目錄 viii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與貢獻 2 第三節 研究架構 3 第二章 文獻回顧與假說發展 4 第一節 ESG 表現與長期財務績效 4 第二節 CEO 權力相關文獻 6 第三章 研究方法 8 第一節 資料樣本 8 第二節 變數定義與衡量 9 第三節 研究模型 13 第四章 實證結果 14 第一節 敘述性統計 14 第二節 相關係數分析 14 第三節 迴歸結果分析 17 第五章 穩健性測試 19 第一節 ESG 表現對滯後兩期長期財務績效的影響 19 第二節 加入產業與時間的交乘固定效果 20 第六章 結論 22 參考文獻 23

    一、中文文獻
    林穎芬、祝道松、洪晨桓(2006)。經濟附加價值與總經理更替之探討。當代會計,7(1),103-134。
    二、英文文獻
    Attig, N., El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., and Suh, J. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and credit ratings. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(4), 679-694.
    Barnea, A., Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 71-86.
    Buchanan, B., Cao, C.X., and Chen, C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility, firm value, and influential institutional ownership. Journal of Corporate Finance, 52, 73-95.
    Choi, J. J., Park, S. W., and Yoo, S. S. (2007). The value of outside directors: evidence from corporate governance reform in Korea. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 42(4), 941-962.
    Chung, K.H. and Pruitt, S.W. (1994). A simple approximation of Tobin’s q. Financial Management, 23, 70-74.
    Di Giuli, A. and Kostovetsky, L. (2014). Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Financial Economics, 111(1), 158-180.
    Ferrell, A., Liang, H., and Renneboog, L. (2016). Socially responsible firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 122(3), 585-606.
    Finkelstein, S. (1992). Power in top management teams, measurement and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 505-538.
    Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
    Gao, L. and Zhang, J.H. (2015). Firms’ earnings smoothing, corporate social responsibility, and valuation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 32, 108-127.
    Green, J.P., Stark, A., and Thomas, H.W. (1996). UK evidence of the market valuation of R&D expenditures. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 23(2), 191-217.
    Hambrick, D.C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32, 334-343.
    Hambrick, D. C. and Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206.
    Huang, J. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The moderating role of the turnover of local officials. Finance Research Letters, 46.
    Javed, M., Rashid, M.A., Hussain, G., Ali, H.Y. (2019). The effects of corporate social responsibility on corporate reputation and firm financial performance: Moderating role of responsible leadership. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(3), 1395-1409.
    Javeed, S. A. and Lefen, L. (2019). An analysis of corporate social responsibility and firm performance with moderating effects of CEO power and ownership structure: A case study of the manufacturing sector of Pakistan. Sustainability, 11(1), 1-25.
    Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
    Jiraporn, P. and Chintrakarn, P. (2013). How do powerful CEOs view corporate social responsibility (CSR)? An empirical note. Economics Letters, 19, 344-347.
    Jo, H. and Harjoto, M. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business & Ethics, 103(3), 351-383.
    Jouber, H. (2019). How does CEO pay slice influence corporate social responsibility? U.S.-Canadian versus Spanish-French listed firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 502-517.
    Li, Y., Gong, M., Zhang, X., and Koh, L. (2018). The impact of environmental, social, and governance disclosure on firm value. The British Accounting Review, 50(1), 60-75.
    Lisic, L. L., Neal, T. L., Zhang, I. X., and Zhang, Y. (2016). CEO power, internal control quality, and audit committee effectiveness in substance versus in form. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(3), 1199-1237.
    Muttakin, M.B., Khan, A., and Mihret, D.G. (2018). The effect of board capital and CEO power on corporate social responsibility disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(1), 41-56.
    Opler, T.C. and Titman, S. (1994). Financial distress and corporate performance. Journal of Finance, 49(3), 1015-1040.
    Porter, M.E. and Kramer, M.R. (2006). Strategy & society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84, 78-85.
    Rangan, S. (1998). Earnings management and the performance of seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 50(1), 101-122.
    Roberts, P.W. and Dowling, G.R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 1077-1093.
    Schuler, D. A. and Cording, M. (2006). A corporate social performance-corporate financial performance behavioral model for consumers. Academy of Management Review. 31(3), 540-558.
    Servaes, H. and Tamayo, A. (2013). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: the role of customer awareness. Management Science, 59(5), 1045-1061.
    Sheikh, S. (2019). An examination of the dimensions of CEO power and corporate social responsibility. Review of Accounting and Finance, 18(2), 221-244.
    Shu, P.G. and Chiang, S.J. (2020). The impact of corporate governance on corporate social performance: Cases from listed firms in Taiwan. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 61.
    Tobin, J. (1969). A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1, 15-29.
    Waddock, S. and Graves, S. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303-319.
    Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation for firms with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40, 185-211.

    無法下載圖示 校內:2026-07-04公開
    校外:2026-07-04公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE