成功大學博碩士論文系統

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表

研究生：	沈奕呈 Shen, Yi-Chen
論文名稱：	評估生成式人工智慧於英國建築實務工作流程的影響與潛能：以倫敦適應性再利用與改造計畫為例 Evaluating the Influence and Potential of GenAI on Practical Workflow within the RIBA Plan of Work: A Case Study of Adaptive Reuse and Retrofit Projects in London
指導教授：	劉舜仁 Liou, Shuenn-Ren 王逸璇 Wang, I-Hsuan
學位類別：	碩士 Master
系所名稱：	規劃與設計學院 - 建築學系 Department of Architecture
論文出版年：	2026
畢業學年度：	114
語文別：	英文
論文頁數：	159
中文關鍵詞：	生成式人工智慧、英國皇家建築師協會工作計劃指引、改造與活化再利用、非結構化資料、實務工作類型
外文關鍵詞：	Generative AI, RIBA Plan of Work, Adaptive Reuse & Retrofit, Unstructured Information, Practical Work Types
相關次數：	點閱：3 下載：0
分享至:	分享至facebook 分享至twitter

查詢本校圖書館目錄查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統勘誤回報

生成式人工智慧 (GenAI) 正迅速改變全球建築、工程與營建(AEC)產業。然而在英國這個高度競爭且具豐富歷史紋理的實務環境中，該技術整合的狀況仍缺乏研究實證。本研究透過了解 GenAI 對建築工作流程的影響，特別針對倫敦複雜的改造（Retrofit）與舊建築再利用 (Adaptive Reuse) 專案中存在的「非結構化資訊落差」做進一步探討。
將英國皇家建築師協會工作計劃指引 (RIBA Plan of Work) 作為研究基礎，本研究採用混合研究方法架構，運用三角檢證策略分析九位參與者的半結構式訪談，其中具備歷史建築改建與使用GenAI雙重經驗的焦點案例受訪者為研究聚焦範例。
研究結果突顯了一個關鍵的偏差：雖然 GenAI 普遍為建築事務所加速了專案早期概念視覺化的工作，但由於嚴格的專業責任要求，它在專案中後期技術交付階段出現驗證上的落差 (Verification Gap)。此外透過比對分析方法，了解到RIBA工作線性流程，與專項處理非結構化歷史資料專案的遞迴流程有本質上的衝突，因此影響該類型專案在工作類型樣態上的呈現。本研究認為，在英國歷史建築改造與再利用實務中，GenAI 的主要價值不在創造新的形式，而是推動前置化 (Front-Loading) 後期的驗證工作，並在專案流程早期透過語意串接，將相關歷史資料進行結構化處理。
這使得專業能動性 (Professional Agency) 必須發生根本轉變，從過往「創作(Authorship)」轉向「定義 (Definition)」。為了解決實務運作上的問題，研究結論指出建築師必須從手工生產者進一步轉變為邏輯的策略管理者，利用 AI 生成來協助建築從業人在專案過程中，讓當今的設計符合文資價值與法規標準的客觀論述。

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly transforming the global Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) sector. However, empirical evidence regarding its integration within the UK’s highly competitive and historically dense environment remains scarce. This research examines the influence of GenAI on architectural workflows, specifically addressing the "unstructured information gap" in London's complex retrofit and adaptive reuse projects. Adopting a mixed-methods framework anchored in the RIBA Plan of Work, the study employs a triangulation strategy to analyse semi-structured interviews with nine participants, including the pre-setting focal case experts in heritage contexts.
The results highlight a critical misalignment: while GenAI accelerates conceptual visualisation, it creates a "Verification Gap" in technical delivery because of strict professional liability requirements. The analysis confirms that the linear RIBA workflow conflicts with the recursive nature of processing unstructured legacy data. Consequently, the study establishes that GenAI's primary value lies not in generating new forms but in "Front-Loading" verification, acting as a semantic bridge to structure historical data early in the process. This necessitates a fundamental shift in professional agency from "Authorship" to "Definition". To resolve operational friction, the research concludes that architects must evolve from manual producers to strategic supervisors of logic, utilising AI to generate objective rationale that aligns with heritage values and regulatory standards.

摘要 i
誌謝 iv
CONTENTS v
FIGURES viii
TABLES ix
Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1 Motivation & Background 1
1.1 The Emerging Role of GenAI in UK Architectural Practice 1
1.2 The London Urban Regeneration within the UK Practical Context 3
1.3 Towards a Re-examination of the Architect's Role in a Digital Future 4
2 Significance 6
2.1 A Classification Framework for Human–GenAI Interaction 6
2.2 Clarifying the Practical Value of GenAI in Information-Heavy Projects 6
2.3 Strategic Guidelines for Systemic Adaptation in Retrofit Practice 7
3 Purpose 8
Chapter 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 10
1 GenAI as Architectural New Media 10
1.1 Traditional Architectural Media Characteristics 10
1.2 GenAI as a Multi-Media Translation Engine 12
2 Architectural Work Types as an Analytical Framework 14
2.1 From Tool Use to "Human-Machine Communication" 14
2.2 Defining Four Work Types 15
3 Professional and Heritage Potential in the Context of the UK 19
3.1 RIBA Plan of Work 2020: A Professional Framework for Design and Construction 19
3.2 UK Heritage Complexity in Context: Definitions and London Case Studies 21
3.3 Existing Technical Responses 23
4 The Professional Implication: Redefining Professional Agency 25
4.1 Redefining Professional Agency 25
4.2 The Ethical and Regulatory Void 25
Chapter 3 RESEARCH METHOD 27
1 Framework & Method Process 27
2 Research Scope & Limitation 29
2.1 Subjects 29
2.2 Limitation 30
3 Data Collection Methods/Procedures & Research Tools 32
3.1 In-Depth Interview 32
3.2 Interview Outline Design 33
3.3 Technical and Analytical Tools 42
4 Data Processing and Analysis Method 43
4.1 Comparative Alignment Analysis (Demand-Potential Mapping) 44
4.2 Task-Media-Stage Correlation (Validating the Semantic Barrier) 44
4.3 Stratified Contextual Interpretation Comparison 44
Chapter 4 ANALYSIS & RESULTS 46
1 Participant Profiles and Data Overview 46
2 Phenomenon: Functional Misalignment across Work Types 48
2.1 The Overlap Zone: Convergence in High-Complexity Tasks 48
2.2 The Deviation Zones: Speculative Potential vs. Practical Gaps 49
2.3 Findings on Functional Misalignment 50
3 Structure: Deconstructing RIBA Stages and Media Friction 56
3.1 Analytical Strategy & Cross-Examination 56
3.2 The Cognitive Decoding Crisis as a Universal Bottleneck 59
3.3 Focal Cases: The Unstructured Data Gap in Heritage Retrofit Project 60
3.4 Summary of Findings: From Manual Decoding to Logical Augmentation 61
4 Subjective: Narratives of Risk, Trust, Professional Identity 70
4.1 Specific Professional Expertise: Focal Cases vs. General GenAI Users 70
4.2 Organisational Attributes: Strategic Divergence between Commercial Barriers & Technical Capability 74
4.3 Professional Seniority: Liability Management versus Process Disruption 79
4.4 Findings From Instrumental Rationality to Structural Restructuring 83
5 Conclusion of Analysis and Findings 85
Chapter 5 DISCUSSION & CONCLUSIONS 87
1 Discussion: Reconfiguring the Architectural Workflow 87
1.1 The Challenge of Verification: From Visual Output to Logical Evidence 87
1.2 The Workflow Conflict: Aligning Recursive Tasks with Professional Stage 88
1.3 The Definition of Heritage Value: From Subjective Narrative to Objective Rationale 88
2 Strategic Implications for Management & Planning 89
2.1 Internal Dynamics: Establishing Firm-Wide Protocols for Front-Loading 89
2.2 External Mediation: Integrating an Objective Verification Layer in Planning 89
2.3 Cross-Contextual Inspiration: Critical Insights for Taiwan's Architectural Sector 91
3 Limitations of the Study 92
4 Conclusions 93
BIBLIOGRAPHY 94
APPENDIX-A: Summary of Interview Responses  A.1~A.17
APPENDIX-B: Interview Materials & Data Collection Documentation B.1~B.23
APPENDIX-C: Record of Data Collection  C.1~C.9
                                    

Architects, R. I. o. B. (2020). RIBA Plan of Work 2020 Overview. Royal Institute of British Architects,, Retrieved from https://www.architecture.com/knowledge-and-resources/resources-landing-page/riba-plan-of-work
Architects, R. I. o. B. (2022). RIBA’ S 2034 MASTERPLAN. Royal Institute of British Architects,,
Architects, R. I. o. B. (2024). RIBA AI Report 2024. Royal Institute of British Architects,,
Architects, R. I. o. B. (2025). RIBA AI Report 2025. Royal Institute of British Architects,,
Ascione, F., Cheche, N., De Masi, R. F., Minichiello, F., & Vanoli, G. P. (2015). Design the refurbishment of historic buildings with the cost-optimal methodology: The case study of a XV century Italian building. Energy and Buildings, 99, 162-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.04.027
Associates, D. I. (2015). Millennium Mills Heritage: Assessment For The Silvertown Partnership. Chartered Architects and Historic Building Consultants
Becker, C. R. (2021, Aug 31, 2021). A comprehensive list of human-computer interactions: A review of the opportunities with humans, computers, and software. https://uxdesign.cc/a-comprehensive-list-of-human-computer-interactions-d72eaca2c0df
Bienvenido-Huertas, D., Nieto-Julián, J. E., Moyano, J. J., Macías-Bernal, J. M., & Castro, J. (2020). Implementing Artificial Intelligence in H-BIM Using the J48 Algorithm to Manage Historic Buildings. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 14(8), 1148-1160. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2019.1589602
Chuang, C.-L. (2022). Facilitating Architec-Client Communication in the Pre-Design Phase through Machine Learning Based Tools National Cheng Kung University]. National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan. Taiwan. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/zrpb4h
Ghimire, P., Kim, K., & Acharya, M. (2024). Opportunities and Challenges of Generative AI in Construction Industry: Focusing on Adoption of Text-Based Models. Buildings, 14(1), 220. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/14/1/220
Gong, C.-C. (2023). AI-assisted BIM Architectural Design Workflow National Cheng Kung University]. National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/326d8q
Hou, J.-H. (2024). Exploring AI-assisted Design: From Design to Partner. Taiwan Architecture Magazine, 343, 30-37.
Institution, B. S. (2018). Organization and digitization of information about buildings and civil engineering works, including building information modelling (BIM) — Information management using building information modelling — Part 1: Concepts and principles. In: BSI / ISO.
Kalay, Y. E. (2004). Architecture's New Media: Principles, Theories, and Methods of Computer-Aided Design. The MIT Press.
London, M. o. (2021). The London Plan. Greater London Authority City Hall
López, F. J., Lerones, P. M., Llamas, J., Gómez-García-Bermejo, J., & Zalama, E. (2018). A Review of Heritage Building Information Modeling (H-BIM). Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/mti2020021
Lovell, L. J., Davies, R. J., & Hunt, D. V. L. (2023). The Application of Historic Building Information Modelling (HBIM) to Cultural Heritage: A Review [Review]. Heritage, 6(10), 6691-6717. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6100350
Moyano, J., Musicco, A., Nieto-Julián, J. E., & Domínguez-Morales, J. P. (2024). Geometric characterization and segmentation of historic buildings using classification algorithms and convolutional networks in HBIM. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 167, 19, Article 105728. https://doi.org/ARTN 10572810.1016/j.autcon.2024.105728
Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T. B., & Wickens, C. D. (2000). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics. Part A, Systems and humans : a publication of the IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society, 30 3, 286-297.
Rodrigues, C., & Freire, F. (2017). Adaptive reuse of buildings: Eco-efficiency assessment of retrofit strategies for alternative uses of an historic building. Journal of Cleaner Production, 157, 94-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.104
Royal Institute of British Architects. (2021). Plan for Use Guide. Royal Institute of British Architects,,
Sobhkhiz, S., & El-Diraby, T. (2023). Dynamic integration of unstructured data with BIM using a no-model approach based on machine learning and concept networks. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 150, 104859. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104859

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

相關論文