研究生: |
黃冠珽 Hwang, Kuan-Ting |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
耐蝕合金選用專家系統之開發 Development of an Anticorrosion Alloy Selection Expert System |
指導教授: |
黃文星
Hwang, Weng-Sing |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
工學院 - 材料科學及工程學系 Department of Materials Science and Engineering |
論文出版年: | 2006 |
畢業學年度: | 94 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 114 |
中文關鍵詞: | 專家系統 、集群分析 、材料抉擇陣列 、耐蝕合金 |
外文關鍵詞: | Anticorrosion alloy, expert system, decision metrics, cluster analysis |
相關次數: | 點閱:88 下載:2 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
為了幫助腐蝕工程師與設備工程師精準且有效率的挑選合適的耐蝕性合金,本研究開發一耐蝕合金挑選專家系統,其中模擬相關領域專家挑選材料的思考邏輯,而採用階層式的案例比對推理手法,先從範圍較廣且精準度較低的材料具體層級(此指合金種類)進行推論,再把範圍縮小到高精準度的材料細節層級(此指合金規格)。
在本研究中,建構系統的關鍵在於如何擷取相關領域專家與文獻中的知識,於是知識工程師採用不同的知識擷取手法分析不同層級與類型的知識,在針對合金種類與合金規格的可數值化知識時採用材料抉擇陣列來擷取:而在合金規格中的無法數值化的知識,特別是耐蝕相關知識,則是先行透過從專家及文獻所提供的經驗公式,將其轉換成數值的結果之後,在利用集群分析加以分級,此些擷取知識的手法皆可以有效率的將專家與文獻的知識導入系統中,進而符合一個耐蝕合金專家系統的需求。
最後,本研究列舉六個中華民國防蝕工程學會年會論文中的真實案例作為系統的驗證,系統推論之結果經過專家的審查與確認後,認為其推論之材質非常適用於案例所處之環境下。因此,藉由以上的評估,本系統將可預期成為一項在耐蝕合金挑選上非常有用之協助工具。
To help engineers and designers efficiently and precisely to select the optimal anticorrosion alloys (ACAs), this work is carried out to develop an expert system with the Hierarchical Case-Based Reasoning (HCBR) approach which simulates the logics of the materials selection process from the lower precious embodiment stage(alloy class) to the finally precious detail stage (alloy specification) .
In this study, the key to the establishment of an expert system is to acquire knowledge from the domain experts or documents to help identify the materials. Knowledge engineers use the distinguishable knowledge acquisition approach to analyze the knowledge of different stages of materials. Decision metrics are used to collecte alloy class and quantitative knowledge of alloy specification. Empirical equations designed by experts and documents are used to analyze the qualitative knowledge (especially corrosion type resistance) of alloy specification, and then cetogorize the values calculated by the equations with cluster analysis method. This acquisition approach allows format the knowledge into the forms that can be effectively adopted by computer programming.
The developed system is then demonstrated by using the six real cases from the theses of The Corrosion Engineering Association of the Republic of China. The system is able to infer appropriate ACAs for each case through the domain experts’ examinations and agreements. Therefore, it can be expected that this system can become a useful ACAs selection tool depending on the evaluation.
1. E.L. Langer, Metals Handbook Vol.1, ASM International, USA, pp. 841-907, 1990.
2. M.J. Donachie, S.J. Donachie, Superalloys A Technical Guide Second Edition, ASM International, USA, pp. 11-39, 2002.
3. E.L. Langer, Metals Handbook Vol.2, ASM International, USA, pp. 3-14, 1990.
4. N.A. Waterman, M.F. Ashby, The Materials Selector Vol.2, Chapman & Hall, UK, pp. 440-446, 1997.
5. N.A. Waterman, M.F. Ashby, The Materials Selector Vol.1, Chapman & Hall, UK, pp. 115-121, 1997.
6. M.F. Ashby, Materials Section in Mechanical Design, Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 5-55, 1992.
7. M. Kutz, Handbook of Materials Selection, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 3-24, 2002.
8. E.L. Langer, ASM Handbook Vol.20, ASM International, USA, pp. 243-296, 1997
9. 許日榮, “材料選擇專家系統之初步構建”, 國立中央大學碩士論文, 1990.
10. 王惠森,廖皇盛,賴信邦,陳國銘,劉宏義, “具多種推理功能的設備破損分析專家系統之設計與開發”,94年防蝕年會邀請報告論文, 2005.
11. R. Amen, P. Vomacka, “Case-based reasoning as a tool for materials selection”, Materials and Design, Vol.22, pp. 353-358, 2001.
12. C. S. Smith Ⅲ, “The Manufacturing Advisory Service: Web Based Process and Material Selection”, Ph. D. Thesis, 2005.
13. M. Đurić, V. Devedžić, “I Promise-intelligent protective material selection”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 23, pp. 219-227, 2002.
14. S.M. Sapuan, “A knowledge-based system for materials selection in mechanical engineering design”, Materials and Design, Vol. 22, pp. 687-695, 2001.
15. C. I. Hsu, C. C. Chiu, P. L. Hsu, “Predicting Information Systems Outsourcing Success Using a Hierarchical Design of Case-Based Reasoning”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 26, pp. 435-441, 2004.
16. T. W. Liao, Z. M. Zhang, C. R. Mount, “A Case-Based Reasoning System for Identifying Failure Mechanisms”, Engineering Application of Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 13, pp. 199-213, 2000.
17. 吳萬益, 林清河, 企業研究方法, 吳萬益發行, 臺南市, pp. 383-405, 2000.
18. 吳美惠, 莊棠尊, “氧氣工廠CF8M不銹鋼閥門破損分析”, 第四屆 海峽兩岸材料腐蝕與防護研討會論文集, pp. 87-96, 2004.
19. 陳國銘, 劉宏義, “Ladle furnace 水式爐蓋冷卻水管破損原因分析”, 防蝕工程, 第18卷第2期, pp.185-194, 2004.
20. 彭富福, 王朝正, 林裕章, “2205雙相不銹鋼沈積率化鈉之高溫腐蝕”, 第四屆 海峽兩岸材料腐蝕與防護研討會論文集, pp. 559-570, 2004.
21. 蘇銘鴻, 崔大中, 黃文照, “SUS 304 不銹鋼純水管破損分析”, 中華民國防蝕工程學會94年年會論文集, pp. 48-53, 2005.
22. 曹常成, 張祐語, 王朝正, 劉正章, “冷媒產生器採樣閥304不銹鋼固定螺栓破斷分析”, 中華民國防蝕工程學會94年年會論文集, pp. 11-20, 2005.
23. 吳美惠, “高雄港碼頭水下結構腐蝕檢測與評估”, 中華民國防蝕工程學會94年年會論文集, pp. 98-110, 2005.
24. H.C. Wang, H.S. Wang, “A hybrid expert system for equipment failure analysis”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.28, pp. 615-622, 2005.
25. O. Kulak, “A decision support system for fuzzy multi-attribute selection of material handling equipments”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.29, pp.310-319, 2005.
26. M.K. Park, I. Lee, K.M. Shon, “Using case based reasoning for problem solving in a complex production process”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.15, pp. 69-75, 1998.
27. J.R. Davis, Alloy Digest Sourcebook: Stainless Steels, ASM International, USA, pp. 1-392, 2000
28. D.H. Jee, K.J. Kang, “A methodfor optimal materiall selection aided with decision making theory”, Materials and Design, Vol.21, pp. 199-206, 2000.
29. K.R. Tretheway, R.J.K. Wood, Y. Puget, P.R. Roberge, “Development of a knowledge-based system for materials management”, Materials and Design, Vol.19, pp.39-56, 1998.