| 研究生: |
鄭閔聰 Cheng, Min-Chung |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
騎乘情緒、安全態度、騎乘風險、風險騎乘習慣與防禦騎乘關係之探討 Exploring the Relationships among Riding Emotion, Safety Attitude, Riding Risk, Risk Riding Habits, and Motorcyclist’s Defensive Ridings |
| 指導教授: |
廖俊雄
Liao, Chun-Hsiung |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 交通管理科學系碩士在職專班 Department of Transportation and Communication Management Science(on-the-job training program) |
| 論文出版年: | 2024 |
| 畢業學年度: | 112 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 130 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 騎乘情緒 、安全態度 、騎乘風險 、風險騎乘習慣 、防禦騎乘 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Defensive riding, Risky riding habits, Safety attitude, Riding risk, Riding emotion |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:51 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
機車防禦騎乘是一種保護自己及他人安全的概念,近年來國內與騎乘機車相關的事故數與死傷數始終居高不下的背景下,為減少機車相關之事故數及死傷數,政府不斷宣導防禦駕駛的重要性,但卻未見明顯成效而且死傷數還持續攀升。本研究基於既有文獻研究結果,依據文獻理論模式並建構一套研究模型,針對機車騎士的風險騎乘習慣、安全態度、騎乘風險、騎乘情緒,與防禦騎乘等五大構面進行研究,藉由本次研究結果提供政府及相關機構作為教育民眾防禦騎乘上的參考依據,針對民眾未採取防禦騎乘之因果關係,進行重點強化與彌補其不足。
這項研究中的實證數據是透過線上問卷,將其藉由親友同事發放給周遭的親朋好友或社群媒體,以滾雪球抽樣給正在使用機車之民眾進行填寫,共回收390份完整的有效問卷。對蒐集到的資料進行描述性統計、探索性因素分析、信度分析、驗證性因素分析、結構方程模式建模,進行資料分析及變異數分析以檢驗各構面間的因果關係與驗證本研究所設定之假設。在結構方程模型的結果中顯示:(1)風險騎乘習慣對防禦騎乘有負向影響;(2)安全態度對防禦騎乘有正向影響;(3)騎乘風險對安全態度有正向影響;(4)騎乘風險對風險騎乘習慣有負向影響;(5)騎乘情緒對安全態度有正向影響;(6)騎乘情緒對騎乘風險有正向影響;最後,研究結果指出,防禦騎乘確實直接或間接地受到風險騎乘習慣、安全態度、騎乘風險、騎乘情緒等因素之影響,並決定了機車騎士是否採取防禦騎乘行為。另外,在變異數分析方面本研究結果指出,騎士本身有發生過相關交通事故的經驗或騎士有子女的情況下,對防禦騎乘行為有顯著性。
Motorcyclists’ defensive riding is a concept that refers to protecting themselves and other road users. In order to reduce motorcycle-related deaths and injuries, the government has continued to promote the importance of defensive riding. Based on a literature review, this study builds a research model with five constructs—motorcycle riders’ risky riding habits, safety attitudes, riding risks, riding emotions, and defensive riding—in attempting to understand why motorcyclists do not ride defensively.
The data used in the analysis were collected via snowball sampling. Respondents who used motorcycles were requested to fill in an online questionnaire, and 390 valid questionnaires were received. Descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis, reliability analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis were sequentially conducted using the collected data; then structural equation modeling was used to examine the causal relationships among the constructs. The results indicate that: (1) risky riding habits have a negative impact on defensive riding; (2) safety attitude has a positive impact on defensive riding; (3) riding risk has a positive impact on safety attitudes; (4) riding risk has a negative impact on risky riding habits; (5) riding emotion has a positive impact on safety attitude; (6) riding emotion has a positive impact on riding risk. Hence, it is found that internal factors of risky riding habits, safety attitudes, riding risks, and riding emotions directly and indirectly determine whether motorcycle riders adopt defensive riding behaviors. Moreover, analysis of variance results reveal that defensive riding is significantly higher among riders with experience of traffic accidents, or who have children.
1.Adeyemi, O. J. (2021). Mobile phone use while driving: Development and validation of knowledge, attitude, and practice survey instruments. Journal of Safety Research, 77, 30-39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2021.01.004
2.Alafnan, M. (2022). Politeness as a nonverbal communication behavior: An investigation into driving habits in asia. Studies in Media and Communication, 10, 112. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v10i1.5455
3.Altmann, T. K. (2008). Attitude: A concept analysis. Nursing Forum, 43(3), 144-150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6198.2008.00106.x
4.Al-Wathinani, A. M., Schwebel, D. C., Al-Nasser, A. H., Alrugaib, A. K., Al-Suwaidan, H. I., Al-Rowais, S. S., AlZahrani, A. N., Abushryei, R. H., Mobrad, A. M., Alhazmi, R. A., Althunayyan, S. M., & Goniewicz, K. (2021). The prevalence of risky driving habits in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 13(13), 7338. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137338
5.Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 815-824.
6.Bentler, P. M. (1983,). Some contributions to efficient statistics in structural models: Specification and estimation of moment structures. Psychometrika, 48(4), 493-517. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293875
7.Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238.
8.Bernstein, J. P. K., DeVito, A., & Calamia, M. (2019). Associations between emotional symptoms and self-reported aberrant driving behaviors in older adults. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 127, 28-34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.02.024
9.Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1997). Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha. British Medical Journal, 314(7080), 570-572.
10.Blows, S., Ameratunga, S., Ivers, R. Q., Lo, S. K., & Norton, R. (2005). Risky driving habits and motor vehicle driver injury. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 37(4), 619-624. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2005.03.003
11.Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1993). Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12.Bollen, K.A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. Hoboken, New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
13.Borowsky, A., & Oron-Gilad, T. (2013). Exploring the effects of driving experience on hazard awareness and risk perception via real-time hazard identification, hazard classification, and rating tasks. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 59, 548-565. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.07.008
14.Chan, M., & Singhal, A. (2013). The emotional side of cognitive distraction: Implications for road safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 50, 147-154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.04.004
15.Chan, M., & Singhal, A. (2015). Emotion matters: Implications for distracted driving. Safety Science, 72, 302-309. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.10.002
16.Cheng, A. S. K., Ng, T. C. K., & Lee, H. C. (2011). A comparison of the hazard perception ability of accident-involved and accident-free motorcycle riders. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(4), 1464-1471. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.02.024
17.Chen, C.-F. (2009). Personality, safety attitudes and risky driving behaviors—Evidence from young Taiwanese motorcyclists. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 41(5), 963-968. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.05.013
18.Chen, F., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 36(4), 462-494.
19.Chin, W. W. (1998). Commentary: Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 22(1), 7-16
20.Clabaux, N., Brenac, T., Perrin, C., Magnin, J., Canu, B., & Van Elslande, P. (2012). Motorcyclists’ speed and “looked-but-failed-to-see” accidents. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 49, 73-77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.07.013
21.Cordellieri, P., Sdoia, S., Ferlazzo, F., Sgalla, R., & Giannini, A. M. (2019). Driving attitudes, behaviours, risk perception and risk concern among young student car-drivers, motorcyclists, and pedestrians in various EU countries. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 65, 56-67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.07.012
22.Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
23.De Pelsmacker, P., & Janssens, W. (2007). The effect of norms, attitudes and habits on speeding behavior: Scale development and model building and estimation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39(1), 6-15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.05.011
24.Deery, H. A. (1999). Hazard and risk perception among young novice drivers. Journal of Safety Research, 30(4), 225-236. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4375(99)00018-3
25.Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Quarterly, 12(2), 259-274.
26.Dudgeon, P. (2004). A note on extending Steiger's (1998) multiple sample RMSEA adjustment to other noncentrality parameter-based statistics. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 305-319.
27.Eisenberg, N., & Spinrad, T. L. (2004). Emotion-related regulation: Sharpening the definition. Child Development, 75(2), 334-339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00674.x
28.Endriulaitienė, A., Šeibokaitė, L., Žardeckaitė-Matulaitienė, K., Markšaitytė, R., & Slavinskienė, J. (2018). Attitudes towards risky driving and Dark Triad personality traits in a group of learner drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 56, 362-370. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.05.017
29.Eherenfreund-Hager, A., Taubman–Ben-Ari, O., Toledo, T., & Farah, H. (2017). The effect of positive and negative emotions on young drivers: A simulator study. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 49, 236-243.
30.Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
31.GAO Hong-li, GAO Li-ying, YANGWei-cheng, FAN Shuang-shuang. (2020). Defensive driving behavior analysis model with follow-up surveys[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 20(2): 151-156.
32.Gâtej, E. R., & Mitrofan, L. (2017). The creative meditation technique as a psychological tool in acquiring defensive driving skills. Journal of Experiential Psychotherapy/Revista de PSIHOterapie Experientiala, 20(3).
33.Ge, Y., Liu, X., Shen, B., & Qu, W. (2021). Can prosocial attitude reduce the risk behavior in simulated driving? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 79, 84-93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.04.003
34.Ge, Y., Liu, X., Shen, B., & Qu, W. (2022). Does a prosocial attitude reduce risky driving behaviour under time pressure? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 84, 1-8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.11.018
35.Goddard, T., McDonald, A. D., Alambeigi, H., Kim, A. J., & Anderson, B. A. (2020). Unsafe bicyclist overtaking behavior in a simulated driving task: The role of implicit and explicit attitudes. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 144, 105595. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105595
36.Haig, B. D. (2005). Exploratory factor analysis, theory generation, and scientific method. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40(3), 303-329.
37.Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
38.Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson University Press.
39.Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., and Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.): Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
40.Hallion, L. S., Steinman, S. A., Tolin, D. F., & Diefenbach, G. J. (2018). Psychometric properties of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale (DERS) and its short forms in adults with emotional disorders [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00539
41.Harbeck, E. L., & Glendon, A. I. (2013). How reinforcement sensitivity and perceived risk influence young drivers’ reported engagement in risky driving behaviors. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 54, 73-80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.02.011
42.Harbeck, E. L., & Glendon, A. I. (2018). Driver prototypes and behavioral willingness: Young driver risk perception and reported engagement in risky driving. Journal of Safety Research, 66, 195-204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2018.07.009
43.Harbeck, E. L., Glendon, A. I., & Hine, T. J. (2017). Reward versus punishment: Reinforcement sensitivity theory, young novice drivers’ perceived risk, and risky driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 47, 13-22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.04.001
44.Harbeck, E. L., Glendon, A. I., & Hine, T. J. (2018). Young driver perceived risk and risky driving: A theoretical approach to the “fatal five”. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 58, 392-404. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.06.018
45.Harris, P. B., Houston, J. M., Vazquez, J. A., Smither, J. A., Harms, A., Dahlke, J. A., & Sachau, D. A. (2014). The prosocial and aggressive driving inventory (PADI): A self-report measure of safe and unsafe driving behaviors. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 72, 1-8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.05.023
46.Haworth, N., Heesch, K. C., & Schramm, A. (2018). Drivers who don't comply with a minimum passing distance rule when passing bicycle riders. Journal of Safety Research, 67, 183-188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2018.10.008
47.Hee, O. C. (2014). Validity and reliability of the customer-oriented behaviour scale in the health tourism hospitals in malaysia. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 7(3), 771-775.
48.Hermann, N., Louis Rachid, S., Sylviane, L., Mireille, C., Marie, Z., & Emmanuel, L. (2007). Attitudes associated with behavioral predictors of serious road traffic crashes: results from the GAZEL cohort. Injury Prevention, 13(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2006.013342
49.Herrero-Fernández, D., Parada-Fernández, P., & Jorge, R. (2021). The mediation effect of emotion dysregulation in the relationship between anger and aggression on the road in a sample of Spanish drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 79, 63-71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.04.009
50.Horswill, M. S., & Helman, S. (2003). A behavioral comparison between motorcyclists and a matched group of non-motorcycling car drivers: factors influencing accident risk. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 35(4), 589-597. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00039-8
51.Horswill, M. S., Taylor, K., Newnam, S., Wetton, M., & Hill, A. (2013). Even highly experienced drivers benefit from a brief hazard perception training intervention. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 52, 100-110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.014
52.Hsu, C. L., & Lu, H. P. (2004). Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Information & Management, 41(7), 853-868.
53.Hu, T.-Y., Xie, X., & Li, J. (2013). Negative or positive? The effect of emotion and mood on risky driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 16, 29-40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2012.08.009
54.Huang, J. L., & Ford, J. K. (2012). Driving locus of control and driving behaviors: Inducing change through driver training. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 15(3), 358-368. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2011.09.002
55.Iacobucci, D. (2010). Structural equations modeling: Fit indices, sample size, and advanced topics. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(1), 90-98.
56.Iversen, H. (2004). Risk-taking attitudes and risky driving behaviour. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 7(3), 135-150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2003.11.003
57.Iversen, H. H., & Rundmo, T. (2012). Changes in Norwegian drivers’ attitudes towards traffic safety and driver behaviour from 2000 to 2008. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 15(2), 95-100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2011.12.006
58.Iversen, H., & Rundmo, T. (2004). Attitudes towards traffic safety, driving behaviour and accident involvement among the Norwegian public. Ergonomics, 47(5), 555-572. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130410001658709
59.Kadoya, Y., Watanapongvanich, S., & Khan, M. S. R. (2021). How is emotion associated with driving speed? A study on taxi drivers in Japan. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 79, 205-216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.04.020
60.Kaufman, E. A., Xia, M., Fosco, G., Yaptangco, M., Skidmore, C. R., & Crowell, S. E. (2016). The difficulties in emotion regulation scale short form (DERS-SF): Validation and replication in adolescent and adult samples. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 38(3), 443-455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-015-9529-3
61.Kleisen, L. (2011). The relationship between thinking and driving styles and their contribution to young driver road safety. Bruce, Australia: University of Canberra.
62.Kovácsová, N., Lajunen, T., & Rošková, E. (2016). Aggression on the road: Relationships between dysfunctional impulsivity, forgiveness, negative emotions, and aggressive driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 42, 286-298. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.02.010
63.Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
64.Kumar, M. K., & Prasad, V. K. (2015). Driver behavior analysis and prediction models: a survey. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 6(4), 3328-3333.
65.Kummeneje, A.-M., & Rundmo, T. (2020). Attitudes, risk perception and risk-taking behaviour among regular cyclists in Norway. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 69, 135-150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.01.007
66.Lajunen, T., & Özkan, T. (2011). Chapter 4 - self-report Instruments and methods. In B. E. Porter (Ed.), Handbook of Traffic Psychology (p. 43-59). Academic Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-381984-0.10004-9
67.Lam, L. W. (2012). Impact of competitiveness on salespeople’s commitment and performance. Journal of Business Research, 65(9), 1328-1334.
68.Lanning, B. A., Melton, K., & Abel, N. (2018). The impact of a supplemental drivers’ education program on teenage risk perception and driving behaviors. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 58, 442-451. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.06.019
69.Lee, Y. M., & Sheppard, E. (2016). The effect of motion and signalling on drivers’ ability to predict intentions of other road users. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 95, 202-208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.07.011
70.Lim, P. C., Sheppard, E., & Crundall, D. (2014). A predictive hazard perception paradigm differentiates driving experience cross-culturally. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 26, 210-217. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.07.010
71.Love, S., Truelove, V., Rowland, B., Kannis-Dymand, L., & Davey, J. (2022). Is all high-risk behaviour premeditated? A qualitative exploratory approach to the self-regulation of habitual and risky driving behaviours. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 90, 312-325. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.09.002
72.Lucidi, F., Mallia, L., Lazuras, L., & Violani, C. (2014). Personality and attitudes as predictors of risky driving among older drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 72, 318-324. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.022
73.Machin, M. A., & Sankey, K. S. (2008). Relationships between young drivers’ personality characteristics, risk perceptions, and driving behaviour. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40(2), 541-547. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2007.08.010
74.Mallat, N., Rossi, M., Tuunainen, V. K., & Öörni, A. (2009). The impact of use context on mobile services acceptance: The case of mobile ticketing. Information & Management, 46(3), 190-195.
75.Masuri, M.G., Dahlan, A., Danis, A. and Md Isa, K.A. (2018). Attitude towards safe driving scale (ASDS-46) as a predictor of young adult quality of life. Asian Journal of Quality of Life. 3, 11 (May 2018), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.21834/ajqol.v3i11.117.
76.McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64-82.
77.Mesken, J., Hagenzieker, M. P., Rothengatter, T., & de Waard, D. (2007). Frequency, determinants, and consequences of different drivers’ emotions: An on-the-road study using self-reports, (observed) behaviour, and physiology. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 10(6), 458-475. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2007.05.001
78.Meyer, S., Sagberg, F., & Torquato, R. (2014). Traffic hazard perception among children. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 26, 190-198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.07.007
79.Minhas, R. S., & Jacobs, E. M. (1996). Benefit segmentation by factor analysis: an improved method of targeting customers for financial services. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 14(3), 3-13.
80.Mirzaei, R., Hafezi-Nejad, N., Sadegh Sabagh, M., Ansari Moghaddam, A., Eslami, V., Rakhshani, F., & Rahimi-Movaghar, V. (2014). Dominant role of drivers’ attitude in prevention of road traffic crashes: A study on knowledge, attitude, and practice of drivers in Iran. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 66, 36-42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.01.013
81.Moser, P. R. (2010). Managing Unsafe Drivers and Their Unsafe Habits. ASSE Professional Development Conference and Exposition.ASSE-10-519.
82.Nandavar, S., Lewis, I., & White, K. M. (2019). Understanding drivers’ altruistic driving decisions: A theoretically guided investigation. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 62, 212-227. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.12.017
83.Navon – Eyal, M., & Taubman – Ben-Ari, O. (2020). Can emotion regulation explain the association between age and driving styles? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 74, 439-445. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.09.008
84.Navon, M., & Taubman – Ben-Ari, O. (2019). Driven by emotions: The association between emotion regulation, forgivingness, and driving styles. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 65, 1-9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.07.005
85.Nguyen-Phuoc, D. Q., Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., Su, D. N., De Gruyter, C., & Nguyen, T. (2020). Mobile phone use among car drivers and motorcycle riders: The effect of problematic mobile phone use, attitudes, beliefs and perceived risk. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 143, 105592. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105592
86.Nordfjærn, T., Jørgensen, S. H., & Rundmo, T. (2010). An investigation of driver attitudes and behaviour in rural and urban areas in Norway. Safety Science, 48(3), 348-356. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2009.12.001
87.Öz, B., Özkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2014). Trip-focused organizational safety climate: Investigating the relationships with errors, violations and positive driver behaviours in professional driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 26, 361-369. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.03.004
88.Pai, C.-W., Hwang, K. P., & Saleh, W. (2009). A mixed logit analysis of motorists’ right-of-way violation in motorcycle accidents at priority T-junctions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 41(3), 565-573. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.02.007
89.Patla, A., Walasek, T., Jakubowicz, J., Blecharz, P., Mitus, J. W., Mucha-Malecka,A., & Reinfuss, M. (2016). Assessing the Validity and Reliability of a Measurement Model in Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Journal of Advances in Mathematics and Computer Science, 20(5), 358-364.
90.Qu, W., Zhang, Y., & Ge, Y. (2022). Social exclusion affects aggressive driving behaviour:The mediating effect of prosocial tendencies and driving anger. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 89, 97-108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.06.010
91.Özkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2005). Multidimensional traffic locus of control scale (T-LOC): Factor structure and relationship to risky driving. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(3), 533-545. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.05.007
92.Ram, T., & Chand, K. (2016). Effect of drivers’ risk perception and perception of driving tasks on road safety attitude. Transportation Research Part F:Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 42, 162-176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.07.012
93.Razmara, A., Aghamolaei, T., Madani, A., Hosseini, Z., & Zare, S. (2018). Prediction of taxi drivers' safe-driving behaviors based on the theory of planned behavior:The role of habit. Journal of education and health promotion, 7, 139. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_61_18
94.Rhodes, N., & Pivik, K. (2011). Age and gender differences in risky driving: The roles of positive affect and risk perception. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(3), 923-931. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.11.015
95.Rundmo, T. (2000). Safety climate, attitudes and risk perception in norsk hydro. Safety Science, 34(1), 47-59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00006-0
96.Rundmo, T., & Iversen, H. (2004). Risk perception and driving behaviour among adolescents in two norwegian counties before and after a traffic safety campaign. Safety Science, 42(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(02)00047-4
97.Sagberg, F., Selpi, Bianchi Piccinini, G. F., & Engström, J. (2015). A review of research on driving styles and road safety. Human Factors, 57(7), 1248-1275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720815591313
98.Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, new jersey: Lawrence erlbaum associates.
99.Shimosaka, M., Kaneko, T., & Nishi, K. (2014). Modeling risk anticipation and defensive driving on residential roads with inverse reinforcement learning. In 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), (pp. 1694-1700). IEEE.
100.Song, X., Yin, Y., Cao, H., Zhao, S., Li, M., & Yi, B. (2021). The mediating effect of driver characteristics on risky driving behaviors moderated by gender, and the classification model of driver’s driving risk. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 153, 106038. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106038
101.St, L., & Wold, S. (1989). Analysis of variance (ANOVA). Chemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems, 6(4), 259-272.
102.Stahl, P., Donmez, B., & Jamieson, G. A. (2014). Anticipation in driving: The role of experience in the efficacy of pre-event conflict cues. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 44(5), 603-613. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2014.2325558
103.Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(2), 173-180.
104.Steimetz, S. S. C. (2008). Defensive driving and the external costs of accidents and travel delays. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 42(9), 703-724. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2008.01.007
105.Steinhauser, K., Leist, F., Maier, K., Michel, V., Pärsch, N., Rigley, P., Wurm, F., & Steinhauser, M. (2018). Effects of emotions on driving behavior. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 59, 150-163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.08.012
106.Steliana Rizeanu, Emil Razvan Gatej, & Mihai Valentin Ciolacu. (2017). Personal development through defensive driving techniques: Implications in the field of emotional intelligence regarding the age factor. American Research Journal of Geriatrics and Aging; Volume 1, Issue 1,; Pages: 1-7
107.Sureshchandar, G., Rajendran, C., & Anantharaman, R. (2002). The relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction–a factor specific approach. Journal of Services Marketing, 16(4), 363-379.
108.Tan, M., & Teo, T. S. (2000). Factors influencing the adoption of Internet banking. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1(5), 1-42.
109.Thøgersen, J. (2012). Seize the opportunity:The importance of timing for breaking commuters’ car driving habits. In A. Klein & V. W. Thoresen(eds.) Making a difference: Putting consumer citizenship into action. Hedmark: Høgskolen Hedmark, 35–47.
110.Trick, L. M., Brandigampola, S., & Enns, J. T. (2012). How fleeting emotions affect hazard perception and steering while driving: The impact of image arousal and valence. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 45, 222-229. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.07.006
111.Trógolo, M. A., Melchior, F., & Medrano, L. A. (2014). The role of difficulties in emotion regulation on driving behavior. Journal of Behavior, Health & Social Issues, 6(1), 107-117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5460/jbhsi.v6.1.47607
112.Ulleberg, P., & Rundmo, T. (2003). Personality, attitudes and risk perception as predictors of risky driving behaviour among young drivers. Safety Science, 41(5), 427-443. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(01)00077-7
113.Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4-70.
114.Vardaki, S., & Yannis, G. (2013). Investigating the self-reported behavior of drivers and their attitudes to traffic violations. Journal of Safety Research, 46, 1-11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2013.03.001
115.Verplanken, B., & Aarts, H. (1999). Habit, attitude, and planned behaviour: Is habit an empty construct or an interesting case of goal-directed automaticity? European Review of Social Psychology, 10(1), 101-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779943000035
116.Verplanken, B., & Orbell, S. (2022). Attitudes, habits, and behavior change. Annual Review of Psychology, 73(1), 327-352. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-011744
117.Victor, S. E., & Klonsky, E. D. (2016). Validation of a brief version of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale (DERS-18) in Five Samples. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 38(4), 582-589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-016-9547-9
118.Vlahogianni, E. I., Yannis, G., & Golias, J. C. (2012). Overview of critical risk factors in Power-Two-Wheeler safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 49, 12-22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.04.009
119.Ward, N. J., Finley, K., Otto, J., Kack, D., Gleason, R., & Lonsdale, T. (2020). Traffic safety culture and prosocial driver behavior for safer vehicle-bicyclist interactions. Journal of Safety Research, 75, 24-31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2020.07.003
120.Wisner, J. D. (2003). A structural equation model of supply chain management strategies and firm performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 24(1), 1-26.
121.Zeyin, Y., Long, S., & Gaoxiao, R. (2022). Effects of safe driving climate among friends on prosocial and aggressive driving behaviors of young drivers: The moderating role of traffic locus of control. Journal of Safety Research, 81, 297-304. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2022.03.006
122.Zhang, T., & Chan, A. H. S. (2016). The association between driving anger and driving outcomes: A meta-analysis of evidence from the past twenty years. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 90, 50-62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.02.009
123.Zhang, T., Chan, A. H. S., & Zhang, W. (2015). Dimensions of driving anger and their relationships with aberrant driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 81, 124-133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.05.005
124.Zhou, D., Liu, H., Ma, H., Wang, X., Zhang, X., & Dong, Y. (2021). Driving behavior prediction considering cognitive prior and driving context. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 22(5), 2669-2678. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2020.2973751
125.Zhou, R., Zhang, Y., & Shi, Y. (2020). Driver's distracted behavior: The contribution of compensatory beliefs increases with higher perceived risk. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 80, 103009. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2020.103009
126.Zicat, E., Bennett, J. M., Chekaluk, E., & Batchelor, J. (2018). Cognitive function and young drivers: The relationship between driving, attitudes, personality, and cognition. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 55, 341-352. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.03.013 .
1.Chih-Hao Tsai (2006)。風險知覺與防禦性駕駛。Taiwan 2.0。Retrieved September 24, 2023, from https://taiwan.chtsai.org/2006/11/24/fengxian_zhijue_yu_fangyuxing_jiashi/
2.World Health Organization (2018)。世界衛生組織(WHO)。2018年全球道路安全狀況報告。https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565684
3.KOMATSU Syun (小松俊) (2022)。「戦争状態」にある台湾の交通環境(前編)。關鍵評論網。Retrieved September 24, 2023, from https://japan.thenewslens.com/article/2110
4.内閣府. (2022.)第1章道路交通の安全についての施策|令和4年交通安全白書(全文). 内閣府ホームページ. Retrieved September 24, 2023, from https://www8.cao.go.jp/koutu/taisaku/r04kou_haku/zenbun/keikaku/b1/b1s1_1.html
5.白佳樺(2017)。機車騎乘之風險行為分析。國立台灣大學工學院土木工程學系碩士論文。
6.交通安全入口網(2021)。機車事故年奪數百性命,加劇台灣少子化國安危機。Retrieved September 24, 2023, from https://168.motc.gov.tw/theme/news/post/2110161200006
7.交通部公路總局(2016,3月31日)。機車考照新變革 105年6月起機車路考增加四項。交通部公路總局。Retrieved September 24, 2023, from https://www.thb.gov.tw/News_Content_table.aspx?n=87&s=51136
8.交通部統計查詢網(2023)。機動車輛登記數。交通部。Retrieved September 24, 2023, from https://stat.motc.gov.tw/mocdb/stmain.jsp?sys=100&funid=a3301
9.交通部公路總局統計查詢網。機車車輛登記數。https://stat.thb.gov.tw/hb01/webMain.aspx?sys=100&funid=11100
10.李琪明(2020)。多面向道德情意量表之發展與信效度考驗。教育心理學報,51(4),561-583。
11.吳佳玲(2007)。駕駛者駕駛經驗、同理心對風險感認之影響研究。淡江大學運輸管理學系運輸科學碩士論文。
12.松山查爾斯專欄(2023)。車禍減少了,還是醫療進步了?看不見重傷者的「交通意外死亡率」,未來城市。Retrieved March 10, 2023, from https://futurecity.cw.com.tw/article/2966。
13.林文鶯、侯傑泰(1995)。結構方程分析模式之等同及修正。教育學報,23(1),149-163。
14.周文生(2014)駕駛人危險感知測驗之研究. 運輸學刊, 26(4), 435-465.
15.姜淳方、李昀修(2012)。台灣連鎖速食餐廳屬性、享樂及功利價值、行為意圖關係之研究-以台灣Y世代消費者為例。行銷科學學報,8(1),77-95。
16.張新立(2021)。從安全文化培育規劃學校之交通安全教育[專題演講]。2021國立交通大學運輸與物流管理學系,新竹縣,台灣。
17.張偉豪(2011)。論文寫作SEM不求人。高雄市:三星統計。
18.鮑雨薇(2009)。人格特質, 態度, 風險感認與大專生機車危險駕駛行為之關係。交通大學運輸科技與管理學系學位論文, Page: 1-73。
19.鍾國良、葉銘鴻、黃嘉聖(2016).機車防禦駕駛手冊(初版)。交通部道路交通安全督導委員會。
20.警政統計通報 (2023)。警政統計通報列表。中華民國內政部警政署全球資訊網。Retrieved September 24, 2023, from https://www.npa.gov.tw/ch/app/data/list?module=wg057&id=2218
校內:2029-07-01公開