簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 葉茂淞
Yeh, Mao-Sung
論文名稱: 開發促進脂胜肽類生物界面活性劑-表面素生產之醱酵策略
Exploring fermentation strategies for enhanced production of a lipopeptide biosurfactant – surfactin
指導教授: 張嘉修
Chang, Jo-Shu
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 工學院 - 化學工程學系
Department of Chemical Engineering
論文出版年: 2006
畢業學年度: 94
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 149
中文關鍵詞: 固定化細胞活性碳生物界面活性劑改良式生物反應器枯草桿菌脂胜肽表面素乳膠共聚物
外文關鍵詞: bioreactor design, carrier-assisted fermentation, activated carbon, polyurethane-polyurea copolymer, immobilized cell, surfactin, lipopeptide, Biosurfactant, Bacillus subtiils
相關次數: 點閱:122下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  •   本研究首先針對七株篩選自油品污染廠址之菌種(Rhodococcus erythropolis BC11, Bacillus pumillus CA20, Nocardioides simplex BC04, Comamonas testosterone CF3, Gordonia nitida JG39, Bacillus subtilis JG4, 及Pseudomonas aeruginosa RS1)與一株購買自美國菌種保存中心之菌種(Bacillus subtilis ATCC 21332),進行其生產生物界面活性劑之潛力評估。菌株生產生物界面活性劑之定性分析測試項目,包括表面活性、乳化指數、菌體表面疏水性、溶血活性等。其測試結果顯示,B. subtilis ATCC 21332具最佳之表面與乳化活性,可將純水之表面張力從72降低至27 mN m-1,與正己烷之界面張力從37.9降低至1.0 mN m-1,且對煤、柴油之乳化指數可以高達70%,其所生產出之生物界面活性劑-表面素(surfactin)為目前最具效果之生物界面活性劑之一,並有令人期待之商業應用價值,然其生產價格偏高,影響其實際應用之可行性。有鑑於此,本研究乃致力於發展更有效率且更經濟之表面素醱酵技術,以降低其商業化應用之門檻。

      首先,本研究以重複批次操作策略評估以乳膠共聚物(polyurethane-polyurea copolymer)固定化B. subtilis ATCC 21332菌株生產surfactin之可行性。實驗結果顯示,在第一次批次操作時,surfactin之產量可達721 mg L-1,相較於懸浮細胞批次培養之產率(約100 mg L-1)有七倍以上之提升。同時,本研究亦發現培養基中添加適量之多孔性固體載體(如活性碳或發泡煉石)能夠顯著提升surfactin之產量,在培養基中加入25 g L-1之活性碳為載體時,可得最佳surfactin產值為3600 mg L-1,約為不添加固體載體控制組之36倍,顯示固體載體的存在能夠明顯地促進細胞生長,並提升surfactin產量。碳源濃度對於surfactin之生產亦相當重要,實驗結果顯示,最佳glucose初始濃度為40 g L-1。此外,適當之攪拌速率對於surfactin之生產也有正面之幫助,當控制於200 rpm時可得到最佳之產量。本研究利用一連串之酸沉澱與溶劑萃取將surfactin從醱酵液中分離並進一步純化,其產物之純度可達90%,且回收率亦有約72%。此產物可將純水之表面張力從72降低至27 mN m-1且具有相當低之臨界微胞濃度 (約10 mg L-1)。而此surfactin產物在100與600 mg L-1濃度下即分別可使煤、柴油之乳化指數達70%。

      基於解決醱酵生產生物界面活性劑時所產生大量泡沫之問題及連續移除surfactin以誘發surfactin之大量生產考量下,本研究進一步開發改良式生物反應器。該改良式反應器乃在傳統醱酵槽外加裝泡沫收集器、細胞迴流系統與surfactin酸沉澱槽,同時在醱酵液中添加適當之固體載體(活性碳)藉以提高細胞濃度與surfactin產能。此反應器設計可以在嚴重發泡狀態下提供surfactin穩定、高效率之生產環境,且不須添加任何消泡劑。透過不同曝氣速率與攪拌速率之組合,本研究嘗試探討氧氣傳輸與質傳效率對surfactin生產之影響,實驗結果顯示其最佳組合為1.5 vvm與300 rpm,可得到最佳之surfactin最大生產速率、總生產速率、最高濃度與最大產量分別為190 mg L-1 h-1、106 mg L-1 h-1、6.45 g L-1以及161 mg surfactin (g glucose)-1。

      最後,本研究嘗試利用重覆批次與饋料批次操作策略,企圖再提升surfactin之產量。搖瓶重覆批次實驗結果顯示,B. subtilis ATCC 21332之surfactin生產活性在三次重覆批次操作過程仍可以維持在75%以上,但在重覆批次時必須同時更換新鮮之培養基質與固體載體(活性碳)。然而,在一系列不同進料組成與進料體積之初步饋料批次實驗發現,除了在饋料批次時進料總濃度為2% glucose之實驗可以將總產量小幅度提高12%(12.90增加至14.47 g)以外,其他實驗則無法再提升surfactin之濃度與產量。整合所有饋料批次實驗之數據發現,造成饋料批次操作效果不彰之原因,可能是由於菌體細胞在surfactin合成時,受到quorum sensing控制機制之影響、或是代謝物與使用過固體載體對surfactin生產之抑制,或是pH高於6.5時所引起之嚴重起泡現象所致。因此,若要使饋料批次操作策略能夠成功的應用於surfactin之量產,必須對上述各可能之影響因素進行更深入之研究。

      Eight bacterial strains (purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) or isolated from oil-contaminated sites) were evaluated for their potential of biosurfactant production. The strains examined were Bacillus subtilis ATCC 21332, Rhodococcus erythropolis BC11, Bacillus pumillus CA20, Nocardioides simplex BC04, Comamonas testosterone CF3, Gordonia nitida JG39, Bacillus subtilis JG4, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa RS1. The results from batch experiments demonstrated that B. subtilis ATCC 21332 exhibited excellent surface and emulsion activity. The biosurfactant produced by the 21332 strain, surfactin, is recognized as one of the most effective biosurfactant available and possesses promising commercial applications. This motivated us to develop viable fermentation technology to produce surfactin in a more efficient and cost-effective way.

      Surfactin production was first carried out by using immobilized cells of B. subtilis ATCC 21332 via matrix entrapment of polyurethane-polyurea copolymers. Repeated-batch experiments were conducted to evaluate the ability of surfactin production. The results show that the surfactin yield was about 721 mg L-1, which was 7 fold higher than that attained from fermentation with suspended culture of free cells. We also discovered that addition of a small quantity of solid porous carriers (e.g., activated carbon or expanded clay) into fermentation broth significantly increased surfactin production with B. subtilis ATCC 21332. Culture medium containing 25 g L-1 of activated carbon gave an optimal surfactin yield of 3600 mg L-1, which was approximately 36 fold higher than that obtained from carrier-free liquid culture. The marked increase in surfactin production was primarily attributed to stimulation of cell growth due to the presence of activated carbon carriers. Carbon source (glucose) concentration was essential to the production of surfactin with an optimal initial glucose concentration of 40 g L-1. An appropriate agitation rate also benefited surfactin production, as the best yield appeared at an agitation rate of 200 rpm. Surfactin was purified from fermentation broth via a series of acidic precipitation and solvent extraction. The resulting product was nearly 90% pure with a recovery efficiency of ca. 72%. The purified surfactin reduced the surface tension of water from 72 to 27 mN m-1 with a critical micelle concentration of ca. 10 mg L-1. Addition of 10 mg L-1 of surfactin also reduced the interfacial tension between water and normal hexane from 37.9 to 1.0 mN m-1. The surfactin product also attained an emulsion index of 70% for kerosene and diesel at a low concentration of 100 and 600 mg L-1, respectively.

      Furthermore, an innovative bioreactor was tailored to solve the problems of severe foaming arising from production of surfactin. To cope with the rapid foam generation, a conventional jar fermentor was integrated with a foam collector, a cell recycler, and a surfactin precipitation unit. Meanwhile, solid carriers (e.g., activated carbon) were added into the fermentation broth to increase cell mass concentration and surfactin yield. The proposed bioreactor allowed stable and efficient surfactin fermentation under intensive foaming conditions without the need of adding antifoam agents. The effect of oxygen transfer rate and mass transfer efficiency on surfactin production was also explored by employing various combinations of aeration and agitation rates. The best combination was 1.5 vvm and 300 rpm, giving an excellent maximum production rate, overall production rate, surfactin concentration, and surfactin yield of 190 mg L-1 h-1, 106 mg L-1 h-1, 6.45 g L-1, and 161 mg surfactin (g glucose)-1, respectively.

      Finally, we attempted to utilize repeated-batch and fed-batch operation strategies to further enhance the surfactin yield. The results show that the surfactin-producing activity of B. subtilis ATCC 21332 could maintain at a high level (> 75% during three operation runs) by replacing flash MSI medium and solid carriers when carrying out the repeated-batch experiments by carrier-added liquid culture in flask. However, with a series of fed-batch operations, the surfactin concentration was not significantly improved, while feeding of 2% glucose alone led to a 12% increase in total production of surfactin (from 12.90 to 14.47 g). The unsatisfactory outcome of fed-batch operation is thought to be due to be closely associated with the bacterial regulation mechanism (i.e., quorum sensing system) involved in surfactin synthesis by B. subtilis ATCC 21332. In addition, there are also some crucial factors influencing the production of surfactin, such as the inhibition of metabolites, the repression of used solid carriers, and the severe foaming that was pH sensitive. Apparently, it would require further systematic investigation to identify the role of those factors in the performance of surfactin production to elevate surfactin producing activity to a higher level.

    Contents Abstract (Chinese) Ⅰ Abstract (English) Ⅴ Contents ⅤⅢ List of Figures ⅩⅡ List of Tables ⅩⅤⅡ Notations ⅩⅤⅢ Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation and purpose 1 1.2 Outline of the thesis 2 Chapter 2 Literature review 6 2.1 Surfactants 6 2.2 Biosurfactants 15 2.3 Surfactin 22 2.4 Characterization of surfactin 25 2.4.1 Essential characteristics 25 2.4.2 Surface activity and hemolytic activity 25 2.4.3 Foaming property 27 2.4.4 Activity of oil displacement 27 2.4.5 Hydrophobicity 28 2.4.6 Surface mobility 28 2.4.7 Membrane solubilization 29 2.5 Surfactin production and purification 30 2.5.1 Effects of medium compositions and fermentative conditions 30 2.5.2 Bioreactor designs and development of recovery methods 33 Chapter 3 Materials and Methods 38 3.1 Chemicals and materials 38 3.2 Equipment 40 3.3 Medium composition 43 3.4 Flask experiments 44 3.4.1 Microorganisms and cultivation 44 3.4.2 Culture medium for surfactin production 44 3.4.3 Preparation of polyurethane-polyurea copolymer immobilized cells of Bacillus subtilis ATCC 21332 and repeated-batch fermentation of surfactin 44 3.4.4 Solid carriers 45 3.4.5 Procedures for carrier-amended fermentation 48 3.4.6 Procedures for repeated-batch experiments 48 3.4.7 Procedues for surfactin adsorption by solid carriers 48 3.5 Fermentor experiments 49 3.5.1 Bioreactor configuration 49 3.5.2 Carrier-assisted surfactin fermentation 49 3.5.3 Fed-batch surfactin fermentation 50 3.6 Analytical methods and surfactin purification 52 3.6.1 Emulsification test and measurements of surface and interfacial tension 52 3.6.2 Determination of hemolytic activity 53 3.6.3 Examination of emulsification activity of supernatant, cytoplasm, and cell residue 53 3.6.4 Hydrophobicity of cell surface 55 3.6.5 Determination of cell concentration 55 3.6.6 Measurement of glucose concentration 55 3.6.7 Surfactin analysis with HPLC 56 3.6.8 Isolation and purification of surfactin 59 Chapter 4 Bacteria selection and biosurfactant characterization 60 4.1 Summary 60 4.2 Determinations of surface and interfacial tension reduction 61 4.3 Emulsion Index test for kerosene and diesel 61 4.4 Comparison of emulsion index of supernatant, cytoplasm, and cell residue 68 4.5 Examination of cellular hydrophobicity 70 4.6 Blood agar test 72 4.7 Qualitative and quantitative analysis of surfactin 75 Chapter 5 Carrier-assisted and immobilized-cell fermentation for surfactin production with Bacillus subtilis ATCC 21332 77 5.1 Summary 77 5.2 Surfactin production activity of immobilized cells of Bacillus subtilis ATCC 21332 78 5.3 Effect of solid carriers on surfactin production 82 5.4 Dynamics of glucose-limited cell growth and surfactin production 84 5.5 Effect of activated carbon dosage on surfactin production 86 5.6 Effect of solid carrier adsorption on the measurement of surfactin concentration 87 5.7 Effect of glucose concentration on surfactin production 93 5.8 Effect of agitation rate on surfactin production 96 5.9 Characterization of surface activity of the purified surfactin98 Chapter 6 Bioreactor design for enhanced carrier-assisted surfactin production with Bacillus subtilis ATCC 21332 102 6.1 Summary 102 6.2 Time-course profile of batch surfactin fermentation using the modified bioreactor 103 6.3 Effect of aeration and agitation rates on surfactin production rate 108 6.4 Effect of aeration and agitation rates on surfactin yield and Concentration 109 6.5 Effects of dissolved oxygen and pH on surfactin production 113 Chapter 7 Feasibility analysis of fed-batch operation strategy 118 7.1 Summary 118 7.2 The effect of feeding strategy on surfactin production 118 7.3 Effect of solid carriers in repeated-batch fermentation 121 7.4 Implementing carrier replacement to fed-batch operations 126 Chapter 8 Conclusions 131 References 134 Appendix Curriculum vitae and acknowledgement i

    Abu-Ruwaida, A.S., Banat, I.M., Haditirto, S., and Khamis, A. Nutritional requirements and growth characteristics of a biosurfactant-producing Rhodococcus bacterium. World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 7, pp. 53-61, 1991.

    Ahimou, F., Jacques, P., and Deleu, M. Surfactin and iturin A effects on Bacillus subtilis surface hydrophobicity. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 27, pp. 749-754, 2000.

    Akihiro, O., Takashi, A., and Makoto, S. Effect of temperature on production of lipopeptide antibiotics, iturin A and surfactin by a dual producer, Bacillus subtilis RB14, in solid-state fermentation. Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering, 80: 5, pp. 517-519, 1995b.

    Akihiro, O., Takashi, A., and Makoto, S. Production of a lipopeptide antibiotic, Surfactin, by recombinant Bacillus subtilis in solid state fermentation. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 47, pp. 209-214, 1995a.

    Arima, K., Kakinuma, A., and Tamura, G. Surfactin, a crystalline peptide lipid surfactant produced by Bacillus subtilis: isolation, characterization and its inhibition of fibrin clot formation. Biochemical Biophysical Research Communications, 31, pp. 488-494, 1968.

    Atlas, R.M. Microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons: an environmental perspective. Microbiological Reviews, 45, pp. 180-209, 1981.

    Attwood, D. and Florence, A.T. Surfactant systems: Their chemistry, pharmacy and biology. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 1-39, 1983.

    Bailey, K. and Ollins, N. Biosurfactants for cosmetic applications. International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 13, pp. 61-64, 1986.

    Banat, I.M. Biosurfactants production and possible uses in microbial enhanced oil recovery and oil pollution remediation: a review. Bioresource Technology, 51, pp.1-12, 1995.

    Banat, I.M., Makkar, R.S., and Cameotra, S.S. Potential applications of microbial surfactants. Applied Microbiology Biotechnology, 53, pp. 495-508, 2000.

    Baumgard, F., Kluge, B., Ullrich, C., Vatter, J., and Ziessow, D. Identification of amino acid substitutions in the lipopeptide surfactin using 2D NMR spectroscopy, Biochemical Biophysical Research Communications, 177, pp. 998-1005, 1991.

    Becher, P. Emulsions, Theory and Practice. second ed. Reinhold Publishing, New York, pp. 1-15, 1965.

    Biermann, M., Lange, F., Piorr, R., Ploog, U., Rutzen, H., Schindler, J., Schmidt, R. In: Falbe, J. (Ed.), Surfactants in Consumer Products, Theory, Technology and Application. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 1-10, 1987.

    Carmen, C., Jose, A. T., Francisco, J. A., and Antonio, O. Molecular mechanism of membrane permeabilization by the peptide antibiotic surfactin. Biochimica Biophysica Acta., 1611, pp. 91-97, 2003.

    Cameotra, S.S. and Makkar, R.S. Recent applications of biosurfactants as biological and immunological molecules. Current Opinion in Microbiology, 7, pp. 262–266, 2004.

    Cooper, D.G. Biosurfactants. Microbiological Sciences, 3, pp. 145-149, 1986.

    Cooper, D.G. and Goldenberg, B.G. Surface-active agents from two Bacillus species. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 53, pp. 224-229, 1987.

    Cooper, D.G., MacDonald, C.R., Duff, J. B., and Kosaric, N. Enhanced production of surfactant from Bacillus subtilis by continuous product removal and metal cation addition. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 42, pp. 408-412, 1981.

    Davis, D.A., Lynch, H.C., and Varley, J. The application of foaming for the recovery of Surfactin from B. subtilis ATCC 21332 cultures. Enzyme Microbial Technology, 28, pp. 346-354, 2001.

    Davis, D.A., Lynch, H.C., and Varley, J. The production of surfactin in batch culture by Bacillus subtilis ATCC 21332 is strongly influenced by the conditions of nitrogen metabolism. Enzyme Microbial Technology 25, pp. 322-329, 1999.

    Deleu, M., Razafindralambo, H., Popineau, Y., Jacques, P., Thonart, P., and Paquot, M. Interfacial and emulsifying properties of lipopeptides from Bacillus subtilis. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 152, pp. 3-10, 1999.

    Desai, J.D. and Banat, I.M. Microbial production of surfactants and their commercial potential. Microbiology and Molecular biology Reviews, 61, pp. 47-64, 1997.

    Desai, J.D. and Desai, A.J. Production of biosurfactants. In Kosaric, N. (ed.), Biosurfactants. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 65-97, 1993.

    Drouin, C.M. and Cooper, D.G. Biosurfactants and aqueous two-phase fermentation. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 40, pp. 86-90, 1992.

    Fiechter, A. Biosurfactants: moving towards industrial application. Trends in Biotechnogy, 10, pp. 208-217, 1992.

    Fox, S.L. and Bala, G.A. Production of surfactant from Bacillus subtilis ATCC 21332 using potato substrates. Bioresource Technology, 75, pp. 235-240, 2000.

    Georgiou, G., Lin, S., and Sharma, M. M. Surface active compounds from microorganisms. Bio/Tech., 10, pp. 60-65, 1992.

    Gholamreza, D.N., Mohammadreza H., and Bibi, S.F.B. Isolation, characterization, and investigation of surface and hemolytic activities of a lipopeptide biosurfactant produced by Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633. The Journal of Microbiology, 43: 3, pp. 272-276, 2005.

    Grangemard, I., Wallach, J., and Maget-dana, R. Peypoux, F. A more efficient cation chelator than surfactin. Applied Biochemistry Biotechnology, 90, pp. 199-210, 2001.

    Grau, A., Juan C. Gomez Fernandez, Peypoux, F., and Ortiz, A. A study on the interactions of surfactin with phospholipid vesicles. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1418, pp. 307-319, 1999.

    Guerra-Santos, L., Kappeli, O., and Fiechter, A. Dependence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa continuous culture biosurfactant production on nutritional and environmental factors. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 24, pp. 443-448, 1986.

    Guerra-Santos, L., Kappeli, O., and Fiechter, A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa biosurfactant production in continuous culture with glucose as carbon source. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 48, pp. 301-305, 1984.

    Haferburg, D., Hommel, R., Claus, R., and Kleber, H. Extracellular microbial lipids as biosurfactants. Adv. Biochem. Engng/Biotech., 33, pp. 53-93, 1986.

    Healy, M.G., Devine, C.M., and Murphy, R. Microbial production of biosurfactants. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 18, pp. 41-57, 1996.

    Hommel, R.K. and Huse, K. Regulation of sophorose lipid production by Candida (Torulopsis) apicola. Biotechnology Letters, 15, pp.853-858, 1993.

    Imaizumi, A., Suzuki, Y., Ono, S., and Sato, H. Heptakis (2,6-O-dimethyl) β-cyclodextrin: a novel growth stimulant for Bordetella pertussis phase I. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 17, pp. 781-786, 1983.

    Kakinuma, A., Ouchida, A., Shima, T., Sugino, H., Isono, M., Tamura, G., and Arima, K. Confirmation of the structure of surfactin by mass spectrometry. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, 33, pp. 1669-1671, 1969.

    Kim, H.S., Yoon, B.D., Choung, D.H., Oh, H.M., Katsuragi, T., and Tani, Y. Characterization of a biosurfactant, mannosylerythritol lipid produced from Candida sp. SY 16. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 52, pp. 713-721, 1999.

    Kim, H.S., Yoon, B.D., Lee, C.H., Suh, H.H., Oh, H.M., Katsuragy, T., and Tani, Y. Production and properties of a lipopeptide biosurfactant from Bacillus subtilis C9. Journal of Fermentation and Engineering, 84, pp. 41-46, 1997.

    Kinsinger, R.F., Shirk, M.C., and Fall, R. Rapid surface motility in Bacillus subtilis is dependent on extracellular surfactin and potassium ion. Journal of Bacteriology, pp. 5627-5631, 2003.

    Kitamoto, D., Yanagishita, H., Shinbo, T., Nakane, T., Kamisava, C., and Nakahara, T. Surface-active properties and antimicrobial activities of mannosylerythritol lipids as biosurfactants produced by Candida Antarctica. Journal of Biotechnology, 29, 91-96, 1993.

    Lang, S. Biological amphiphiles (microbial biosurfactants). Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, 7, pp. 12-20, 2002.

    Lazazzera, B.A., Kurtser, I.G., Mcquade, R.S., and Grossman, A.D. An autoregulatory circuit affecting peptide signalling in Bacillus subtilis. Journal of Bacteriology, 181: 17, pp. 5193-5200, 1999.

    Lazazzera, B.A., Solomon, J.M., and Grossman, A.D. An exported peptide functions intracellularly to contribute to cell density signaling in B. subtilis. Ceil, 89, pp. 917-925, 1997.

    Lee, B.S. and Kim, E.K. Lipopeptide production from Bacillus sp. GB16 using a novel oxygenation method. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 35, pp. 639-647, 2004.

    Lin, S.C. Biosurfactant: recent advances. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 63, 109-120, 1996.

    Lin, S.C., Carswell, K.S., Sharma, M.M., and Georgiou, G. Continuous production of the lipopeptide biosurfactant of Bacillus licheniformis JF-2. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 41, 281-285, 1994.

    Lin, S.C., Sharma, M.M., and Georgiou, G. Production and deactivation of biosurfactant by Bacillus licheniformis JF-2. Biotechnology Progress, 9, pp. 138-145, 1993.

    Lin, T.C., Young, C.C., Ho, M.J., Yeh, M.S., Chou, C.L., Wei, Y.H., and Chang, J.S. Characterization of floating activity of indigenous diesel-assimilating bacterial isolates. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 99: 5, pp. 466-472, 2005.

    Liu, X.H., Huang, W.M., and Wang E.K. An electrochemical study on the interaction of surfactin with a supported bilayer lipid membrane on a glassy carbon electrode. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 577, pp. 349-354, 2005.

    Magnuson, R., Solomon, J., and Grossman, A.D. Biochemical and genetic characterization of a competence pheromone from B. subtilis. Ceil, 77, pp. 207-216, 1994.

    Maier, R.M. and Soberon-Chavez, G. Pseudomonas aeruginosa rhamnolipids: biosynthesis and potential applications. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 54, pp. 625-633, 2000.

    Kowall, M., Vater, J., Kluge, B., Stein, T., Franke, P., and Ziessow, D. Separation and characterization of surfactin isoforms produced by Bacillus subtilis OKB 105. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 204, pp. 1-8, 1998.

    Masaaki, M., Yoshihiko, H., and Tadayuki, I. A study on the structure-function relationship of lipopeptide biosurfactants. Biochimica Biophysica Acta., 1488, pp. 211-218, 2000.

    Menkhaus, M., UIIrich, C., Kluge, B., Vater, J., Vollenbroich, D., and Kemp, R.M. Structural and functional organization of the surfactin synthetase multienzyme system. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 268, pp. 7678-7684, 1993.

    Miller, G.L. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Analytical Chemistry, 31, pp. 426-428, 1959.

    Mukherjee, A.K. and Das, K. Correlation between diverse cyclic lipopeptides production and regulation of growth and substrate utilization by Bacillus subtilis strains in a particular habitat. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 54, pp. 479-489, 2005.

    Mulligan, C.N. and Gibbs, B.F. Factors influencing the economics of biosurfactants. In: Kosaric, N. (Ed.), Biosurfactants, Production, Properties, Applications. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 329-371, 1993.

    Mulligan, C.N., Cooper, D.G., and Beufeldm, R.G. Selection of microbes producing biosurfactants in mediua without hydrocarbons. Journal of Fermentation Technology, 62, pp. 311-314, 1984.

    Mulligan, C.N. Environmental applications for biosurfactants. Environmental Pollution, 133, pp. 183-198, 2005.

    Nicolas, J.P. Molecular dynamics simulation of surfactin molecules at the water-hexane interface. Biophysical Journal, 85, pp. 1377-1391, 2003.

    Nitschke M. and Pastore G.M. Production and properties of a surfactant obtained from Bacillus subtilis grown on cassava wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 97, pp. 336-341, 2006.

    Noah, K.S., Fox, S.L., Bruhn, D.F., Thompson, D.N., and Bala, G.A. Development of continuous surfactin production from potato process effluent by Bacillus subtilis in an airlift reactor. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 98-100, pp. 803-813, 2002.

    Oka, K., Hirano, T., Homma, M., Ishii. H., Murakami, K., Mogami, S., Motizuki, A., Morita, H., Takeya, K., and Itokawa, H. Satisfactory separation and MS-MS spectrometry of six surfactin isolated from Bacillus subtilis natto. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 41, pp. 1000-1002, 1993.

    Palejwala, S. and Desai, J.D. Production of an extracellular emulsifier by a Gram negative bacterium. Biotechnology Letters, 11, pp. 115-118, 1989.

    Passeri, A. Marine biosurfactants: Ⅳ. Production, characterization and biosynthesis of an anionic glucose lipid from the marine bacterial strain MM1. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 37, pp. 281-286, 1992.

    Peypoux, F., Bonmatin, J.M., and Wallach, J. Recent trends in the biochemistry of surfactin. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 51, pp. 553-563, 1999.

    Rautenbach, M., Swarta, P., and van der Merwe, M.J. The interaction of analogues of the antimicrobial lipopeptide, iturin A2, with alkali metal ions. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry, 8, pp. 2539-2548, 2000.

    Razafindralambo, H., Popineau, Y., Deleu, M., Hbid, C., Jacques, P., Thonart, P., and Paquot, M. Foaming properties of lipopeptides produced by Bacillus subtilis: Effect of lipid and peptide structural attributes. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry, 46, pp. 911-916, 1998.

    Razafindralambo, H., Thonart, P., and Paquot, M. Dynamic and equilibrium surface tensions of surfactin aqueous solutions. Journal of surfactants and detergents, 7: 1, pp. 41-46, 2004.

    Rosenberg, E. Microbial surfactants. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 3, pp. 109-132, 1986.

    Rosenberg, M., Gutnick, D., and Rosenberg, E. Adherence of bacteria to hydrocarbons: a simple method for measuring cell-surface hydrophobicity. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 9, pp. 29-33, 1980.

    Rosen, M.J. and Goldsmith, H.A. Systematic analysis of surface active agents. Second ed. Wiley, New York, pp. 5-36, 1972.

    Samuel, D., Magali, D., Katherine, N., Bernard, W., Philippe, T., and Michel P. Hemolytic activity of new linear surfactin analogs in relation to their physico-chemical properties. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1726, pp. 87-95, 2005.

    Sandrin, C., Peypoux, F., and Michel, F. Coproduction of surfactin and iturin A, lipopeptides with surfactant and antifungal properties, by Bacillus subtilis. Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry, 12, pp. 370-375, 1990.

    Sen, R. and Swaminathan, T. Characterization of concentration and purification parameters and operating conditions for the small-scale recovery of surfactin. Process Biochemistry, 40, pp. 2953-2958, 2005.

    Sen, R. and Swaminathan, T. Response surface modeling and optimization to elucidate and analyze the effects of inoculum age and size on surfactin production. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 21, pp. 141–148, 2004.

    Sen, R. Response surface optimization of the critical media components for the production of surfactin. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 68, pp. 263-270, 1997.

    Singh, P. and Cameotra, S.S. Potential applications of microbial surfactants in biomedical sciences. TRENDS in Biotechnology, 22: 3, pp. 142-146, 2004.

    Sullivan, E.R. Molecular genetics of biosurfactant production. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 9, pp. 263-269, 1998.

    Thimon, L., Peypoux, F., Maget-Dana, R., Roux, B., and Michel, G. Interactions of bioactive lipopeptides, iturin A and surfactin from Bacillus subtilis. Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry, 16, pp. 144-151, 1992.

    Thompson, D.N., Fox, S.L., and Bala, G.A. Biosurfactants from potato process effluents. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 84-86, pp. 917-930, 2000.

    Thompson, D.N., Fox, S.L., and Bala, G.A. The effect of pretreatments on surfactin production from potato process effluent by Bacillus subtilis. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 91-93, pp. 487-501, 2001.

    Ueno, M. and Esumi, K. Structure/Performance relationship in surfactants. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 1-24 ,1984.

    Vater, J., Stein, T., Voltenbroich, D., Kruft, V., Wittmann-Liebold, B., Franke, P., Liu, L., and Zuber, P. The modular organization of multifunctional peptide synthetases. Journal of Protein Chemistry, 16, pp. 557-564, 1997.

    Wei, Y.H. and Chu, I.M. Enhancement of surfactin production in iron-enriched media by Bacillus subtilis ATCC 21332. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 22, pp. 724-728, 1998.

    Wei, Y.H. and Chu, I.M. Mn2+ improves surfactin production by Bacillus subtilis. Biotechnology Letters, 24, pp. 479-482, 2002.

    Wei, Y.H., Wang, L.F., and Chang, J.S. Optimizing iron supplement strategies for enhanced surfactin production with Bacillus subtilis. Biotechnology Progress, 20, pp. 979-983, 2004.

    Wei, Y.H., Wang, L.F., Chang, J.S., and Kung, S.S. Identification of induced acidification in iron-enriched cultures of Bacillus subtilis during biosurfactant fermentation. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 96, pp. 174-178, 2003.

    Yamashita, M., Nakagawa, Y., Li, H., and Matsuyama, T. Silica gel-dependent production of prodigiosin and serrawettins by Serratia marcescens in a liquid culture. Microbes and Environments, 16, pp. 250-254, 2001.

    Yeh, M.S., Wei, Y.H., Chang, J.S. Enhanced production of surfactin from Bacillus subtilis by Addition of Solid Carriers. Biotechnology Progress, 21, pp. 1329-1334, 2005.

    Yeh, M.S., Wei, Y.H., Chang, J.S. Bioreactor design for enhanced carrier-assisted surfactin production with Bacillus subtilis. Process Biochemistry, 41, pp. 1799-1805, 2006.

    Young, C.C., Lin, T.C., Yeh, M.S., Shen, F.T., and Chang, J.S. Identification and kinetic characteristics of an indigenous diesel-degrading Gordonia alkanivorans strain. World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 21, pp. 1409-1414, 2005.

    Yutaka, I., Mohamad, O., Hisae, N., Yoh, S., Ryo, I., and Mutsuo, M. Significance of β-sheet formation for micellization and surface adsorption of surfactin. Colloids and surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 4, pp. 341-348, 1995.

    Zhang, J., Alexander, G., Richard, A.G., Alfred, L.A., and David, K. Incorporation of 2-hydroxy fatty acids by Acinetobacter calcoaceticus RAG-1 to tailor emulsan structure. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 20, pp. 9-21, 1997.

    無法下載圖示 校內:2026-07-27公開
    校外:2026-07-27公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE