簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林佳霓
Lin, Chia-Ni
論文名稱: 探討早產兒接受視網膜病變檢查之疼痛與壓力臨床實境
Exploring Clinical Facts of Pain and Stress for Preterm Infants Receiving Retinopathy of Prematurity Examination
指導教授: 黃美智
Huang, Mei-Chih
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 醫學院 - 護理學系
Department of Nursing
論文出版年: 2015
畢業學年度: 103
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 112
中文關鍵詞: 早產兒早產兒視網膜病變檢查疼痛壓力
外文關鍵詞: Preterm infant, retinopathy of prematurity examination, pain, stress
相關次數: 點閱:145下載:5
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 目的:早產兒視網膜病變(Retinopathy of prematurity, ROP)是極低體重早產兒常見之合併症,檢查過程造成的早產兒疼痛/壓力處理研究,除局部麻醉劑有實證成效外,其餘照護措施仍莫衷一是,且未涵蓋點散瞳劑至檢查結束後期間,實有必要重新探索臨床場域之真實現象,了解早產兒疼痛與壓力反應以及可能相關因素,提供建立完整照護方案之參考。
    方法:採自然觀察研究法,以非參與式角色錄製自接受散瞳前20分鐘至ROP檢查結束後2小時之影片,包括早產兒本身及生命徵象監視器,並書寫現場觀察日誌。根據文獻查證及臨床經驗發展自擬半結構性譯碼指引,並檢驗專家效度(CVI 0.97)、評分者內與評分者間信度(百分同意度88%;85%)。觀察變項包括個案屬性、執行流暢度、發展性照護介入措施評值(Evaluation of Intervention, EVIN)等,疼痛與壓力表現除哭泣反應、心搏過緩情形外,以行為評估(Behavioral Evaluation)量表測量壓力行為,早產兒疼痛量表修訂版(Premature Infant Pain Profile- Revised, PIPP-R)測量疼痛反應。於南部某醫學中心之新生兒加護病房接受ROP檢查之早產兒方便取樣,排除最近一次腦部超音波檢查結果為腦室周圍白質軟化症(periventricular leukomalacia, PVL)或其他嚴重腦部疾病者,每人最多被觀察4次,每人次觀察12個事件/時間點。
    結果:自2014年8月至2015年4月,共23位早產兒參加研究,取得43次檢查過程影片,出生週數平均為27.6周,體重1025克,檢查時矯正年齡平均為33.7週,體重1612克。ROP檢查平均約花3分鐘,點完雙眼藥水平均約為36秒。壓力(BE)與疼痛(PIPP-R)分數具類似趨勢,點散瞳劑與檢查過程各觀察事件/時間點與基礎點有統計上顯著差異,最高者依序為固定壓迫眼球、放入張眼器及第一次點散瞳劑(p<0.001),並且通常伴隨著哭泣,體重較低的早產兒則傾向以心搏過緩代替哭泣。收案對象大多在檢查結束後平均約12.4分鐘(742.2 ± 764.5秒) 後回到原本生命徵象狀態(心跳、呼吸、血氧濃度),壓力與疼痛分數則於檢查後10分鐘之觀察時間點回復。出生時疾病嚴重度(Apgar scores 1’ and 5’及CRIB分數)、性別、發展性照護分數(EVIN)、檢查時週數、檢查時體重與最近一次血比容值跟部分觀察事件/時間點的疼痛、壓力分數或復原時間相關(p<0.05)。質性觀察分析後發現手直接寧握與非營養性吸吮有助於早產兒放鬆、自我整合與調整狀態。此外,在生命徵象狀態回復後立即停止檢查期間給予的額外氧氣或是檢查後立即進行例行性照護活動,例如換尿布或口胃管護理,會使有些早產兒出現生命徵象不穩定情形。
    早產兒接受ROP檢查時,從點散瞳劑即開始表現疼痛與壓力反應直至結束後10分鐘,且約13分鐘後生命徵象才回復。出生疾病嚴重度、性別、檢查時週數與體重、最近一次血比容數值、發展性照護、以手寧握、非營養性吸吮、延長額外氧氣給予時間,以及足夠的復原時間均與早產兒較低的疼痛與壓力反應有關。性別與檢查時的體重對疼痛及壓力表現的影響,需未來研究收集更多樣本以釐清,建議發展早產兒ROP檢查之疼痛與壓力處理方案或照護準則時應將本研究所發現之相關因素、疼痛/壓力時間點、及評值時間點與項目列入考量。

    Background: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a common complication affecting premature infants. Except for the local anesthetic eye drops proved by empirical studies, there is no consensus among the pain/stress managements from initial of mydriasis until after the examination and discussing associated factors rarely. It is essential to explore the clinical fact thoroughly to understand the pain/stress performances under ROP exams and to investigate the associated factors.
    Method: A natural observation method was used. Period from twenty minutes before administration of mydriatic eye drops until one hour after ROP exam was digital videotaped and described qualitatively. A semi-structured coding instruction was developed and the content validity index was 0.97, and the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability was 88% and 85% respectively. The potential associated items contained characteristics of participants and context, smoothness level of the administration, developmental care quantified by Evaluation of Intervention (EVIN), and other possible factors. Meanwhile, except for crying and bradycardia, pain and stress performances were measured by Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised (PIPP-R) and Behavioral Evaluation (BE) respectively. Convenient sampling was used in a neonatal intensive care unit in a tertiary hospital in southern Taiwan. Each participant was observed four times maximally. Each recording of exam was sampled at 12 event/time points.
    Results: Between August 2014 to April 2015, 23 preterm infants were enrolled and 43 ROP exams were recorded. In average, the participants were 27.6 weeks gestational age (GA) with body weight (BW) 1025 gm at birth and 33.7 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) with 1612 gm when they received the exam. Approximately, the mean period of each administration of mydriatic eye drops was 36 seconds while the ROP exam was 3 minutes. The trends of pain/stress performances are similar. Scores at event/time points were statistically significantly higher than baseline from the initial of administration of mydriatic eye drops until ten minutes after the exam. The top pain/stress scores were measured at scleral indention, insertion of eye lid speculum, and first dosage of mydratic eye drops (p<0.001) and usually accompanied with crying or bradycardia. Instead of crying, participants with lower BW tended to show bradycardia. Most of the participants took about 12.4 minutes (742.2 ± 764.5 seconds) to get back to the baseline heart rate, respiratory rate and oxygen saturation level, and BE and PIPP-R scores decreased to baseline at the point of 10 minutes after exam. We also found Apgar scores at 1st and 5th minute (Apgar 1’ and 5’), CRIB scores at birth, sex, the EVIN scores, mode of ventilation, environmental housing care, PMA and BW on exam day (RBW) and the latest hematocrit (lHct) level were associated with PIPP-R or BE scores at part event/time points, or recovery time (p<0.05). Qualitative analysis revealed that containment directly by hands and non-nutritive sucking may make the participants relax, self-integration, and adjust their infant state. In addition, some participants showed unstable vital signs after the immediate cease of the extra oxygen providing during examination determined by SpO2 recovery or after the routine care activities right after the completion of examination, such as changing diapers or oral gastric tube care.
    Conclusion: The premature infants showed pain/stress performances from the initial of administration of mydriatic eye drops until ten minutes and physiologically recovered until around 13 minutes after the exam. Severity of the condition at birth, sex, severity of the condition on exam day, growth characteristics of the preterm infants, developmental care, containment directly by hands, non-nutritive sucking, extend the duration of extra oxygen supply, and enough time to recover were correlated to pain/stress responses. Further studies with larger sample size were needed to identify the influences of sex and RBW. We suggested considering these measuring points, outcome variables, and associated factors when developing intervention program or clinical guideline of providing effective care for ROP exam.

    ABSTRACT...................................................I 中文摘要..................................................III ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...........................................V TABLE OF CONTENTS.........................................VI LIST OF TABLES............................................IX LIST OF FIGURES...........................................XI LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS....................................XII CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION..................................1 1.1 Research Background and Significance...............1 1.2 Research Objectives and Aims.......................3 CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW.............................4 2.1 Retinopathy of Prematurity.........................4 2.2 Pain/Stress Measurements in Premature Infants......6 2.3 Pain/Stress Relief for ROP Examination............12 CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY................................17 3.1 Research Design...................................17 3.2 Research Framework................................19 3.3 Research Questions and Hypothesis.................23 3.4 Sampling and Settings.............................24 3.4.1 Sampling of Participants..........................24 3.4.2 Characteristics of Participants...................25 3.4.3 Sampling of Phenomenon............................27 3.5 Instruments.......................................28 3.5.1 Picture in Picture Layout.........................28 3.5.2 Pain Assessment- Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised, PIPP-R...........................................29 3.5.3 Stress Evaluation- Behavioral Evaluation, BE......31 3.5.4 Scoring of Developmental Care- Evaluation of Intervention, EVIN........................................33 3.5.5 Semi-Structure Coding Instruction.................34 3.5.5.1 Time to Observe...................................34 3.5.5.2 Items to Observe and Scoring......................36 3.5.5.3 Reliability and Validity of Observation...........39 3.6 Data Collection...................................40 3.7 Data Analysis.....................................41 3.8 Ethical Consideration.............................43 CHAPTER FOUR: RESULTS.....................................44 4.1 Recruitments......................................44 4.2 Characteristics of Participants...................45 4.3 Characteristics of Context........................48 4.4 Phenomenon of ROP examination.....................49 4.4.1 Pain/Stress Performances..........................49 4.4.2 Recovery Time.....................................55 4.5 Associated Factors of Pain/Stress Performances....56 4.5.1 PIPP-R, BE, and Recovery Time.....................56 4.5.2 Crying and Bradycardia............................69 CHAPTER FIVE: DISCUSSION..................................73 5.1 Trends of Pain/Stress Performances................73 5.2 Administration of Mydriasis and Anesthesia........75 5.3 Crying and Bradycardia............................77 5.4 Associated Factors of Pain/Stress Performances....78 5.5 Strengths, Limitations, and Further Studies.......81 5.6 Clinical Suggestions..............................83 CHAPTER SIX: CONCLUSION...................................86 REFERENCES................................................88 Appendix A. Evidence Level and Characteristics of Studies Regarding Pain/stress Managements for ROP Examinations- Original Articles (n=13)..................................94 Appendix B. Characteristics of Studies Regarding Pain/stress Managements for ROP Examinations- Review articles (n=3)..101 Appendix C. 早產兒疼痛量表修訂版 (The Premature Infant Pain Profile: Revised, PIPP-R)................................102 Appendix D. 早產兒視網膜病變檢查過程之發展性照護措施評分量表 (General Guidelines for the NIDCAP Care during the ROP Examination, ROP NIDCAP).................................104 Appendix E. Semi-Structure Observation Instruction.......107 Appendix F. Observation Form.............................112

    Allegaert, K., Casteels, I., & Tibboel, D. (2010). Pain management during eye examinations for retinopathy of prematurity: What about procedural adaptations to blunt the pain response? Acta Paediatrica, 99(4), 488-489. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01672.x
    Als, H. (1995). Revised manual for the naturalistic observation of newborn behavior: Preterm and fullterm newborns. Boston: The Children’s Hospital.
    American Academy of Pediatrics (2006). Screening examination of premature infants for retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatrics, 117(2), 572-576. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2749
    Ballantyne, M., Stevens, B., McAllister, M., Dionne, K., & Jack, A. (1999). Validation of the premature infant pain profile in the clinical setting. Clinical Journal of Pain, 15(4), 297–303.doi: 10.1097/00002508-199912000-00006
    Castellanos, M. A., Schwartz, S., Leal, R., Chan, R. V., & Quiros-Mercado, H. (2013). Pain assessment in premature infants treated with intravitreal antiangiogenic therapy for retinopathy of prematurity under topical anesthesia. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 251(2), 491-494.doi: 10.1007/s00417-012-2060-2. Epub 2012 May 18
    Chen, Y. C., Chang, H. M., & Chen, C. H. (2005). Neonatal individualized developmental care and assessment program for preterm infants. VGH Nursing, 22(2), 204-210. doi: 10.6142/VGHN [In Chinese].
    Cogen, M. S., Parker, J. S., Sleep, T. E., Elsas, F. J., Metz, T. H. Jr., & McGwin, G. Jr. (2011). Masked trial of topical anesthesia for retinopathy of prematurity eye examinations. Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 15(1), 45-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2010.11.011
    Cohen, A. M., Cook, N., Harris, M. C., Ying, G. S., & Binenbaum, G. (2013). The pain response to mydriatic eye drops in preterm infants. Journal of Perinatology, 33(6), 462-465. doi: 10.1038/jp.2012.149
    Debillon, T., Zupan, V., Ravaoult, N., Magny, J .F.,& Dehan, M. (2001). Development and initial validation of the EDIN scale: A new tool for assessing prolonged pain in preterm infants. Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 85(1), F36-F41.doi:10.1136/fn.85.1.F36
    Dempsey, E., & McCreery, K. (2011). Local anaesthetic eye drops for prevention of pain in preterm infants undergoing screening for retinopathy of prematurity. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 7(9), 1-19. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007645.pub2
    Fineout-Overholt, E., & Johnston, L. (2005). Teaching EBP: Asking searchable, answerable clinical questions. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 2(3), 157-160.doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2005.00032.x
    Gibbins, S., Stevens, B. J., Yamada, J., Dionne, K., Campbell-Yeo, M., Lee, G., Caddell, K., Johnston, C., &Taddio, A. (2014). Validation of the Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised (PIPP-R). Early Human Development,90(4), 189-193. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2014.01.005. Epub 2014 Feb 1
    Hered, R. W., & Gyland, E. A. (2010). The retinopathy of prematurity screening examination: ensuring a safe and efficient examination while minimizing infant discomfort. Neonatal Network, 29(3), 143-151.doi: 10.1891/0730-0832.29.3.143
    Hummel, P., Puchalski, M., Creech, S. D., & Weiss, M. G. (2008). Clinical reliability and validity of the N-PASS: neonatal pain, agitation and sedation scale with prolonged pain. Journal of Perinatology, 28(1), 55-60. doi:10.1038/sj.jp.7211861
    Kandasamy, Y., Smith, R., Wright, I. M., & Hartley, L. (2011). Pain relief for premature infants during ophthalmology assessment. Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 15(3), 276-280. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.03.009
    Kleberg, A., Warren, I., Norman, E., Mörelius, E., Berg, A. C., Mat-Ali, E., Holm, K., Fielder, A., Nelson, N., & Hellström-Westas, L. (2008). Lower stress responses after Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program care during eye screening examinations for retinopathy of prematurity: a randomized study. Pediatrics, 121(5), e1267-1278.doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-2510
    Krechel, S. W., & Bildner, J. (1995). CRIES: A new neonatal postoperative pain measurement score- Initial testing of validity and reliability. Paediatric Anaesthesia, 5(1), 53-61.doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.1995.tb00242.x
    Kyle, T., & Carman, S. (2013). Pain management in children. In T. Kyle, & S. Carmen (Eds.), Essentials of pediatric nursing. (2nd ed., pp. 404-441). St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier.
    Lago, P., Garetti, E., Merazzi, D., Pieragostini, L., Ancora, G., Pirelli, A., & Bellieni, C. V. (2009). Guidelines for procedural pain in the newborn. Acta Paediatrica, 98(6), 932-939. doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01291.x
    Lai, Y. H. (2011, Oct.). From retinopathy of prematurity to related ophthalmological examinations. Kaohsiung Medical Communication Journal, 31(5), 15.Retrieved from http://www.kmuh.org.tw/www/kmcj/data/10010/15.htm.
    Lawrence, J., Alcock, D., McGrath, P., Kay, J., Macmurray, S. B.,& Dulberg, C. (1993). The development of a tool to assess neonatal pain. Neonatal Network, 12(6), 59-66. doi: 10.1016/0885-3924(91)91127-U
    Lin, C. H., Chang, Y. J., Lin, C. N., & Huang, M. C. (2012). Feeding preterm infants: Application of developmental care. The Journal of Nursing, 59(3), 107-112. doi: 10.6224/JN.59.3.107 [In Chinese].
    Liu, M. F., & Lee, T. Y. (2006).Pain management and nursing assessment of preterm and term neonates, The Journal of Nursing, 53(6), 65-72.doi:10.6224/JN.53.6.65 [In Chinese].
    Manjunatha, C.M., Ibhanesebhor, S.E., Rennix, C., Fisher, H., & Abara R. (2009). Pain control during retinopathy of prematurity screening: double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study. Infant, 5(5), 155-158.
    Meek, J. (2012). Options for procedural pain in newborn infants. Archives of Disease in Childhood-Education and Practice Edition, 97(1), 23-28. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2011-300508
    Mehta, M., Adams, G. G., Bunce, C., Xing, W., & Hill, M. (2005). Pilot study of the systemic effects of three different screening methods used for retinopathy of prematurity. Early Human Development, 81(4), 355-360. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2004.09.005
    Mehta, M., Mansfield, T., & VanderVeen, D. K. (2010). Effect of topical anesthesia and age on pain scores during retinopathy of prematurity screening. Journal of Perinatology, 30(11), 731-735. doi: 10.1038/jp.2010.36
    Mitchell, A. J., Green, A., Jeffs, D. A., & Roberson, P. K. (2011). Physiologic effects of retinopathy of prematurity screening examinations. Advances in Neonatal Care, 11(4), 291-297. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0b013e318225a332
    Olsson, E., & Eriksson, M. (2011). Oral glucose for pain relief during eye examinations for retinopathy of prematurity. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20(7-8), 1054-1059. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03529.x. Epub 2011 Feb 10
    O'Sullivan, A., O'Connor, M., Brosnahan, D., McCreery, K., & Dempsey, E. M. (2010). Sweeten, soother and swaddle for retinopathy of prematurity screening: A randomized placebo controlled trial. Archives in Disease of Childhood- Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 95(6), 419-422. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.180943. Epub 2010 Sep 28
    Padhi, T. R., Sareen, D., Pradhan, L., Jalali, S., Sutar, S., Das, T., Modi, R. R., & Behera U.C. (2015). Evaluation of retinopathy of prematurity screening in reverse Kangaroo Mother Care: a pilot study. Eye (Lond), 29(4), 505-508. doi: 10.1038/eye.2014.340. Epub 2015 Jan 23
    Pressler, J. L., & Hepworth, J. T. (2002). A quantitative use of the NIDCAP tool. The effect of gender and race on very preterm neonates’ behavior. Clinical Nursing Research, 11(1), 89-102.doi:10.1177/1054773802011001007
    Richey, R. G., Roath, A. S., Whipple, J. M., & Pawcett, S. E. (2010). Exploring a governance theory of supply chain management: Barriers and facilitators to integration. Journal of Business Logistics, 31(1), 237-256. doi: 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2010.tb00137.x
    Rush, R., Rush, S., Farshid, I., Anderson, B., Irwin, M., & Naqvi, M. (2005). The effects of comfort care on the pain response in preterm infant undergoing screening for retinopathy of prematurity. Retina, 25(1), 59-62.doi: 10.1097/00006982-200501000-00008
    Samra, H. A., & McGrath, J. M. (2009). Pain management during retinopathy of prematurity eye examinations: a systematic review. Advanced Neonatal Care, 9(3), 99-110.doi: 10.1097/ANC.0b013e3181a68b48
    Stevens, B. J., Gibbins, S., Yamada, J., Dionne, K., Lee, G., Johnston, C., &Taddio, A. (2014). The Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised (PIPP-R): Initial Validation and Feasibility. Clinical Journal of Pain, 30(3), 238-243. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182906aed
    Stevens, B., Johnston, C., Petryshen, P., &Taddio, A. (1996). Premature Infant Pain Profile: Development and initial validation. Clinical Journal of Pain, 12(1), 13-22.doi: 10.1097/00002508-199603000-00004
    Stevens, B., Johnston, C., Taddio, A., Gibbins, S., & Yamada, J. (2010). The premature infant pain profile: Evaluation 13 years after development. Clinical Journal of Pain, 26(9), 813-830.doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181ed1070
    Sun, X., Lemyre, B., Barrowman, N., & O'Connor, M. (2010). Pain management during eye examinations for retinopathy of prematurity in preterm infants: A systematic review. Acta Peadiatrica, 99(3), 329-334. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01612.x. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
    Waltz, C., Strickland, O., & Lenz, E. (2010). Observational methods. In C. Waltz, O. Strickland, & E., Lenz (Eds.), Measurement in nursing and health research (4th ed., pp. 271-278). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
    Zeng, W. P., Yin, T., Yang, M. H., & Liaw, J. J. (2009). Neonatal pain: A concept analysis. Yuan-Yuan Nursing, 3(2), 38-45. [In Chinese]

    下載圖示 校內:2020-08-12公開
    校外:2020-08-12公開
    QR CODE