| 研究生: |
江恩暉 Chiang, En-hui |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
液流阻尼器與調諧質量阻尼器系統共構之耐震分析 Seismic systems with Fluid Damper and Tuned Mass Damper |
| 指導教授: |
朱世禹
Chu, Shih-yu 徐德修 Hsu, Deh-shiu |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 土木工程學系 Department of Civil Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2008 |
| 畢業學年度: | 96 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 101 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 離頻效應 、調諧質量阻尼器 、液流阻尼器 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | TMD, Fluid Damper, detuning effect |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:147 下載:5 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
調諧質量阻尼器(Tuned Mass Damper簡稱TMD)是一種在世界各大樓中廣泛被應用之減震裝置,其減震原理是將阻尼器之振動頻率設計成與主結構系統之第一振頻相近,當主結構受外力擺動時,TMD會因共振原理隨結構擺盪,而TMD在擺盪過程中與結構間的互制作用會減小結構之振幅。在結構控制中,以TMD作為控制元件之相關研究與實際應用,一直以來都是以控制因風力引起之振動或是中小規模地震力為設計考量,對於TMD之防震減震功能則較少討論。
TMD僅隨主結構之第一振頻擺盪,在外力造成遠離第一振頻之振動時,TMD之減震功能會因離頻效應而有所折減。本論文嘗試分析以液流阻尼器(Fluid Damper)對含TMD結構進行補強之功能。
由數值模擬結果可知TMD固然能降低主結構之反應,而經由液流阻尼器之補強後,即使地震力造成之振動頻率遠離第一振頻時,亦能進一步提升結構之位移與加速度反應,達到減震效果。
TMD only swung follows the first mode vibration of structure. If seismic force is far away from the first mode vibration of structure,it would reduce the effects upon TMD because of detuning effect.But someone would worry that it is not enough of energy dissipation.The Fluid Damper is chosen to reinforce the structural seismic resistance ability of the TMD system in this thesis.In accordance with the simulation results,it can be shown that TMD can effectively reduce the response of the structure.With the reinforcement of the Fluid Damper even if seismic force is far away from the first mode vibration of structure,it can also provide further reducing effects both in displacement and acceleration response.
參考文獻
1. Masato Abe’ (1996), “Tuned Mass Dampers for Structures with Bilinear Hysteresis,"Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 122, No. 8, 797~800.
2. Hsiang-Chuan Tsai and Guan-Cheng Lin (1993), “Optimum Tuned-Mass Dampers for Minimizing Steady-State Response of Support-Excited and Damped Systems,"Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 23, 957-973.
3. J.P.Den Hartog, Mechanical Vibrations, 4th edn, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1956.
4. G.B.Warburton and E.O.Ayorinde(1980), “Optimum Absorber Parameters for Simple Systems,"Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol.8, 197-217.
5. G.B.Warburton(1982), “Optimal absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 10, 381-401.
6. Rahul Rana and T.T.Song (1998), “Parametric study and simplified design of response and excitation parameters,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 10, 381-401.
7. P.Lukkunaprasit and A.Wanitkorkul(2001), “Inelastic building with tuned mass dampers under moderate ground motions from distant earthquakes,"Journal of Earthquake engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 30, 537-551.
8. T.Pinkaew, P.Lukkunaprasit, P.Chatupote(2003), “Seismic effectiveness of tuned mass dampers for damage reduction of structures,” Journal of Engineering Structures, Vol. 25, 39-46.
9. 王秋文,「含被動調諧質量阻尼器結構之耐震行為研究」,國立臺灣大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,民國96年6月。
10. Taylor, D.P. (1996) “Fluid Dampers for Applications of Seismic Energy Dissipation and Seismic Isolation”, Eleventh Word Conference on Earthquake Engineering, No.798.
11. Chu S.Y., Soong T.T., Lin C.C., Chen Y.Z.(2002), “Time Delay Effect and Compensation on Direct Output Feedback Controlled Mass Damper System.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31(4): 121-137.
12. Chu S.Y., Soong T.T., and Reinhorn A.M.(2005). Active, Hybrid and Semi-Active Structural Control-A Design and Implementation Handbook. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
13. Den Hartog, J.P.(1947)Mechanical Vibrations, New York City, N.Y., McGraw-Hill.
14. Chopra, Anil K., “Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering”, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J., 2001, Chapter 3.
15. 林家銘,「磁流變阻尼器之結構半主動模糊控制」,國立成功大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,民國93年6月。
16. 吳騏,「磁流變阻尼器之研發」,國立成功大學土木工程研究所博士論文,民國96年8月。
17. 唐治平、柯孝勳、柯忠良,「高阻尼樓房結構耐震研究」,中國土木水利工程學刊,第十三卷,第四期,pp.793,(2001)。