| 研究生: |
張力文 Chang, Li-Wen |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
台灣家族企業與非家族企業上市後成長差異 Growth Difference in Family and Non-family Firms after IPO in Taiwan |
| 指導教授: |
梁少懷
Liang, Shao-Huai |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 財務金融研究所 Graduate Institute of Finance |
| 論文出版年: | 2021 |
| 畢業學年度: | 109 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 27 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | IPO 、家族企業 、經營績效 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | IPO, family firm, business performance |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:174 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究欲探討家族企業與非家族企業在IPO後一年內是否會有不同的績效狀況表現以及何者表現較佳。過去文獻多探討家族企業與非家族企業在長期經營上的績效差異,且台灣之家族企業長期而言表現較差。但在近十年公開上市的企業中卻有過半為家族企業,因此,本文透過研究2009至2018十年間公開上市之台灣企業,分別使用以稅前息前折舊前衡量的ROA、以淨利衡量的ROA與Tobin’s Q三者作為公司績效衡量標準,研究公司上市後一年的表現差異。
實證結果顯示,是否為家族企業在IPO後一年內以稅前息前折舊前衡量的ROA和以淨利衡量的ROA都無顯著差異,無法說明家族特性對於公司ROA增長有影響。但對於家族企業的Tobin’s Q表現有正向顯著,考量到公開上市後可能被稀釋股權或控制權減弱等對家族企業影響較大的因素下,家族企業選擇公開上市對市場投資人提供一個較積極正向的訊號,使市場對於家族企業上市的反應較為熱絡與強烈。
Public listing is a way for a company to obtain development funds, and it can also increase its strategic position and market share; but it also makes the company responsible to shareholders and investors and may be merged by competitors.
In the past, research mostly discussed the performance difference between family and non-family businesses in the long-term operation, and family businesses in Taiwan performed poorly in the long term. However, it is interesting that more than half of the companies that have been publicly listed in the past ten years are family companies. Therefore, this article intends to study whether family characteristics will cause family companies and non-family companies to have different performance status within one year of IPO.
This article studies the publicly listed Taiwanese companies from 2009 to 2018, and use ROA measured before tax, interest and depreciation, ROA measured by net profit, and Tobin’s Q as the measurement standards. The empirical results show that whether it is a family business, there is no significant difference in ROA within one year after the IPO. However, the performance of Tobin's Q for family companies is positive and significant. Considering the factors that may have a greater impact on family companies such as dilution of equity or weakening of control rights after public listing, family companies choose public listing to provide a more positive effect for market investors. The positive signals have made the market stronger in response to the listing of family companies.
中文
1. 周行一、陳錦村與陳坤宏,「家族企業、聯屬持股與公司價值之研究」, 中國財務學刊,第四期第一卷,頁115-139,1996
2. 林盈志,「台灣公司股票上市原因之研究」,國立臺灣大學財務金融學系碩士論文,1998
3. 林宛瑩;許崇源,「台灣集團企業之控股型態及公司治理衡量指標之研究與建議」,交大管理學報28(1),269-312頁,2008
4. 林寶人,「台灣上市櫃家族企業與公司績效」,會計學報3(1),52-82頁,2010
5. 林翠蓉;張力;侯啟娉;曾韻如;許雅棠,「家族所有權、公司治理與公司績效關係之實證研究」,績效與策略研究,第八卷第一期,59-78 頁,2011
6. 林玟廷;李佳玲,「成長策略與外部股東資金來源之關係:集團企業之調節效果」,管理與系統,第廿五卷,571-602 頁,2018
7. 俞海琴;陳慧娟,「我國上市公司成長、槓桿與托賓Q關聯之研究」,風險管理學報, 1(1),81-101頁,1999
8. 高惠松、蔡純真,「資本結構、股利政策對公司價值之影響:訊號理論觀點」,會計與公司治理,第九卷第一期,29-62頁,2014
9. 曹壽民;林哲弘,「家族企業與自願性財務預測」,會計學報,第4 卷第2 期,71-113 頁,2012
10. 陳慶隆,「初次公開發行公司盈餘報導行為與上市(櫃)後股價績效之關係」,證券市場發展季刊, 23(2),63-129頁,2011
11. 姜堯民.戴維芯,「台灣股票初次上市櫃相關研究文獻回顧」,經濟論文叢刊(Taiwan Economic Review), 44:1 (2016), 77–125,2016
12. 曾煌鈞,「淺談家族企業之治理」,證券暨期貨月刊第三十五卷第九期,2017
13. 鄭慧敏,「探討公司治理對新上市櫃公司股票初期報酬與長期績效表現之影響」,國立交通大學管理科學系碩士論文,2006
14. 資誠2020台灣家族企業傳承白皮書,2020
英文
1. Benjamin Maury, Family ownership and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Western European corporations, Journal of Corporate Finance 12 (2006), 321– 341,2006
2. Cacheche, L. P., Santos, J. A., Santos, E. B. A., and Akabane, G., “Small Investors: Challenges and Benefits of IPO-a Case Study in a Small Business in the Region of the Capão Redondo-SP,”Independent Journal of Management and Production, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 255-268. , 2015
3. Donnelley, R. G., “The Family Business.” Harvard Business Review, pp.43, 1964
4. Henry R. Feeser and Gary E. Willard, Founding Strategy and Performance: A Comparison of High and Low Growth High Tech Firms, Strategic Management Journal, Feb., 1990, Vol. 11, No. 2, 87-98, 1990
5. Holderness, C.G., and D.P. Sheehan, “The role of majority shareholders in publicly held corporations: an exploratory analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20, pp.317~346., 1988
6. Huimin Cui, Y.T. Mak, The relationship between managerial ownership and firm performance in high R&D firms, Journal of Corporate Finance 8 (2002), 313–336, 2001
7. Ibbotson, R., “Price Performance of Common Stock New Issues,”Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.2, 235-272, 1975
8. Jay R. Ritter, “The "Hot Issue" Market of 1980”, The Journal of Business , Apr., 1984, Vol. 57, No. 2 (Apr., 1984), pp. 215-240, 1984
9. Jay R. Ritter, The Long-Run Performance of Initial Public Offerings, The Journal of Finance VOL. XLVI, NO. 1, 45-64, 1991
10. James C. Brau and Stanley E. Fawcett, Initial Public Offerings: An Analysis of Theory and Practice, The Journal of Finance • VOL. LXI, NO. 1, 399-436, 2006
11. Jean Helwege, Christo Pirinsky and René M. Stulz, “Why Do Firms Become Widely Held? An Analysis of the Dynamics of Corporate Ownership”, The Journal of Finance , Jun., 2007, Vol. 62, No. 3 (Jun., 2007), pp. 995-1028, 2007
12. Lauterbach, B., and A. Vaninsky., “Ownership structure and firm performance: Evidence from Israel.” Journal of Management and Governance, 3, pp.189~201, 1999
13. Levis, Mario. (1993), The long-run performance of initial public offerings: The UK experience 1980-1988, Financial Management 22, pp. 28-41.
14. Mok, H. M. K.,Lam, K.,Cheung, I. Y. K., “Family Control and Return Covariation in Hong Kong's Common Stock.” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 19.pp277-293, 1992
15. McConaughy, D., M. Walker, G. Henderson, and M. Chandra. Founding family controlled firms: efficiency and value. Review of Financial Economics 7: 1-19, 1998
16. Maksimovic, Vojislav and Pegaret Pichler, “Technological Innovation and Initial Public Offerings," Review of Financial Studies, 14 (2), 459-94, 2001
17. Maury, B., “Family ownership and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Western European corporations.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 12, pp.321~341, 2006
18. Reilly, F. K. and Hatfield, K. (1969), “Investor experience with new stock issue,” Financial Analysts Journal 25, pp. 73-80.
19. Ritter, Jay R. (1991),The long-run performance of initial public offerings, Journal of finance 46, pp.3-27.
20. Ronald C. Anderson and david M. Reeb, Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500, The Journal of Finance * VOL.L VIII, NO.3, 1301-1327, 2003
21. Shu-Ching Chou and Wu-Wen Hsu,”Chairman Change in Family and Non-Family Firms: The Evidence of Founder Succession from Entrepreneurial Firms”, Journal of Financial Studies, 22(4),pp 77-113, 2014
22. Simone Wies and Christine Moorman, Going Public: How Stock Market Listing Changes Firm Innovation Behavior, Journal of Marketing Research, october 2015, Vol. 52, No. 5, 694-709, 2015
23. Stijn Claessensa, Simeon Djankova, Larry H.P Lang, “The separation of ownership and control inEast Asian Corporations”, Journal of Financial Economics Volume 58, Issues 1–2, 2000, Pages 81-112, 2000
24. Steven X. Zheng and David A. Stangeland, IPO Underpricing, Firm Quality, and Analyst Forecasts, Financial Management, Summer, 2007, Vol. 36, No. 2, 45-64, 2007
25. Vojislav Maksimovic and Pegaret Pichler, Technological Innovation and Initial Public Offerings, The Review of Financial Studies, Summer, 2001, Vol. 14, No. 2, 459-494, 2001
26. Welch, I., “Seasoned Offerings, Imitation Costs, and the Underpricing of Initial Public Offerings,” Journal of Finance, Vol.44, 421-499, 1989
校內:2026-05-24公開