簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 彭于峰
Peng, Yu-Fong
論文名稱: 水平井之水錐貫穿與臨界產率之模擬研究
Numerical Simulation Study of Breakthrough of Water Conning and Critical Rate for Horizontal Oil Well
指導教授: 林再興
Lin, Zsay-Shing
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 資源工程學系
Department of Resources Engineering
論文出版年: 2007
畢業學年度: 95
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 88
中文關鍵詞: 水錐貫穿時間水平井水錐臨界產率數值模擬
外文關鍵詞: Critical production rate, Numerical simulation, breakthrough time, Horizontal well water conning
相關次數: 點閱:99下載:1
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究的主要目的是利用數值模擬法,建立油水兩相數值模式,研究水平井生產所造成之水錐形成速度與生產率的關係,而計算臨界產率並建立水錐貫穿時間典型曲線。其中,研究不同的水平孔段高度、水平孔段長度、地層毛細壓力、地質異向性對臨界產率的影響。本研究使用CMG公司的IMEX數值模擬軟體建立數值模式。

    由模擬研究可以得到不同生產率之水錐上升高度隨時間變化曲線,而推求水錐貫穿時間。經過無因次轉換,繪製而得無因次水錐貫穿時間隨無因次生產率變化之典型曲線,利用該典型曲線的趨勢可推求臨界產率。地層參數(毛細壓力及地層異向性)及完井條件(水平孔段高度及水平孔段長度)對於臨界產率及水錐貫穿時間之影響如下:(1)毛細壓力地層的臨界產率較無毛細壓力地層的臨界產率為低;(2)水平孔段高度(水平鑽井的位置)越高,水錐到達井底的距離較長,出水的時間較慢,其臨界產率越高;(3)水平孔段長度越長,水錐貫穿時間越長,臨界產率越高;(4)在地質異向性方面,垂直/水平滲透率比越小,其臨界產率越高;(5)在相同地層條件下,垂直井之臨界產率較水平井之臨界產率為低。

    The purpose of this study is to develop a water conning numerical model of a horizontal well for studying the relationship between the conning breakthrough time and the production rate, and for estimating the critical production rate. The effects of well location, length of the horizontal section, capillary pressure, and formation anisotropy on the critical production rate are considered in the model. A black-oil model simulator, IMEX from CMG, is used in this study to simulate the behavior of water conning of horizontal well.

    The results of the relationship of the coning breakthrough time and the production rate from simulation study are used to establish the coning breakthrough time type curves. These type curves can be used to estimate the critical production rate of horizontal well. The results of this study show that: (1) The critical production rate for a formation with capillary pressure is smaller than that without capillary pressure; (2) The higher critical production rate will be obtained the higher well location; (3) The higher critical production rate will be higher for the longer horizontal section; (4) In the case of anisotropic formation, critical production rate will be higher for the smaller ratio of vertical/horizontal permeability; (5) The critical production rate for a horizontal well is higher than that of a vertical well; thus, the producitivity of a horizontal well is better than that of a vertical well.

    中文摘要--- I 英文摘要--- III 致謝--- V 目錄--- VI 表目錄---IX 圖目錄---XI 第一章 緒論---1 1-1 前言---1 1-2 研究目的---3 第二章 文獻回顧---4 2-1 臨界產率---4 2-2 水錐貫穿時間---8 第三章 理論基礎---11 3-1 半解析模式---11 3-2 數值模式---14 第四章 基礎模式建立及驗證---17 4-1 無水錐之水平井暫態壓力解析模式---18 4-2 基礎數值模式驗證---20 4-3 水平井油水兩相地層數值模式---22 第五章 結果與討論---23 5-1 生產率對水錐形成及水錐貫穿時間之影響---23 5-2 毛細壓力對臨界產率及水錐貫穿時間之影響---25 5-3 水平孔段高度對臨界產率及水錐貫穿時間之影響---27 5-3-1 無因次水平孔段高度為0.75---27 5-3-2 無因次水平孔段高度為0.25---28 5-4 水平孔段長度對臨界產率及水錐貫穿時間之影響---30 5-4-1 無因次水平孔段長度為20---30 5-4-2 無因次水平孔段長度為30---30 5-5 異向性地層對臨界產率及水錐貫穿時間之影響---33 5-5-1 垂直/水平滲透率比為0.1---33 5-5-2 垂直/水平滲透率比為0.3---34 5-5-3 垂直/水平滲透率比為0.5---35 5-6 水平井與垂直井臨界產率之比較---37 5-7 本研究與前人文獻結果之比較---39 第六章 結論---41 參考文獻---42 符號說明---45

    1.Abass, H.H. and Bass, D.M., “The Critical Production Rate in Water-Coning Systems,” Paper spe 17311 presented at Permian Basin Oil and Gas Recovery Conference, Midland, Texas, p.351-360 (March 1988).

    2.Bournazel, C., and Jeanson, B., “Fast Water-Coning Evaluation Method,” Paper spe 3628 presented at the SPE 46th Annual Fall Meeting, New Orleans, p.594-600 (October 1964).

    3.Chaney, P.E., Noble, M. D., Henson, W.L., and Rice, T.D., “How to Perforate Your Well to Prevent Water and Gas Coning,” The Oil and Gas Journal, vol.55, p.108-144 (May 1956).

    4.Chaperon, I., “Theoretical Study of Coning Toward Horizontal and Vertical Wells in Anisotropic Formations: Subcritical and Critical Rates,” Paper spe 15377 presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, p.1-12 (October 1986).

    5.Mohammed, F. and Hatzignatiou, D.G., “Water and Gas Conning in Horizontal and Vertical Wells,” Paper presented at 45th Annual CIM Petroleum Society Technical Meeting, Calgary, Canada, (June 1991).

    6.Guo, B. and Lee, R.L., “A General Solution of Gas/Water Coning Problem for Horizontal Wells,” Proceedings of the European Petroleum Conference, Cannes, p.327-337 (November 1992).

    7.Giger, F.M., “Analytic Two-Dimensional Models of Water Cresting Before Breakthrough for Horizontal Wells,” Paper spe 15378 presented at 61st Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the Society of Petroleum Engineers., New Orleans, p.1-14 (1986).

    8.Hoyland, L.A., Papatzacos, P. and Skjaevland, S.M., “Critical Rate for Water Coning: Correlation and Analytical Solution,” Paper spe 15855 presented at the European Petroleum Conference, London, vol.3, no.6, p.59-70 (November 1986).

    9.Karcher, B.J., Elf Aquitaine and Giger, F.M., “Some Practical Formulas to Predict Horizontal Well Behavior,” Paper spe 15430 presented at 61st Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, New Orleans, p.1-12 (October 1986).

    10.MacDonald, R.C. and Coats, K.H., “Methods for Numerical Simulation of Water and Gas Coning,” Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, vol.10, no.4, p.425-436 (December 1970).

    11.Wheatley, M.J., “An Approximate Theory of Oil/Water. Coning,” Paper spe 14210 presented at 60th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Las Vegas (September 1985).

    12.Muskat, M. and Wyckoff, R.D., “An Approximate Theory of Water Coning in Oil Production,” Transaction of the AIME, vol.114, p.144-163 (1935).

    13.Meyer, H.L. and Gardner, A.O., “Mechanics of two Immiscible Fluids in Porous Media,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol.25, no.11, p.1400 (1954).

    14.Ozkan, E., “Breakthrough Time Correlation for Coning Toward Horizontal Wells,” Paper spe 20964 presented at European Petroleum Conference, The Hague, p.209-218 (October 1990).

    15.Ozkan, E., Raghavan, R. and Joshi, D.S., “Horizontal Well Pressure Analysis,” SPE Formation Evaluation, vol.4, no.4, p.567-575 (December 1989).

    16.Papatzacos, P., Herring, T.R., Martinsen, R.and Skjaevland, S.M., “Cone Breakthrough Time for Horizontal Wells,” Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, vol.6, no.3, p.311-318 (August 1991).

    17.Permadi, P., “Behavior of Water Cresting Under Horizontal Wells,” Peper spe 30743 presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, p.431- 438 (October 1995).

    18.Sherrard, D.W., Brice, B.W., and McDonald, D.G., “Application of Horizontal Wells at Prudhoe Bay,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, vol.39, no.11, p.1417-1425 (1986).

    19.Sobocinski, D.P. and Cornelius, A.J., “Correlation for Predicting Water Coning,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, vol.17, no.5, p.594-600 (May 1965).

    20.Schols, R.S., “An Empirical Formula for the Critical Oil Production Rate,” Erdoel-Erdgas, vol.88, no.1, p.6-11 (January 1972).

    21.Wagenhofer, T. and Hatzignatiou, D. G., “Optimization of Horizontal Well Placement,” Peper spe presented at SPE 66th Annual Western Regional Meeting , Anchorage, p.629-639 (May 1996).

    22.Thomas, G.W., Principles of hydrocarbon Reservoir Simulation, Iternational Human Resources Development Corporation, Boston (1982).

    23.Yang, W. and Wattenbarger, R.A., “Water Coning Calculations for Vertical and Horizontal Wells,” Peper 22931 presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, p.459- 470 (October 1991).

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:2007-08-10公開
    QR CODE