簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林祐禾
Lin, You-Ho
論文名稱: 對人與對事:再探威權領導與仁慈領導
Focusing on issue or person? To re-clarify the effects of authoritarian leadership and benevolent leadership
指導教授: 周麗芳
Chou, Li-Fang
胡中凡
Hu, Jon-Fan
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 社會科學院 - 心理學系認知科學碩士班
MS in Cognitive Science
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 107
中文關鍵詞: 專權領導尚嚴領導生活關懷工作照顧關係性權力
外文關鍵詞: authoritarian leadership and authoritative leadership, life caring and work support of benevolent leadership, relationalsim
相關次數: 點閱:209下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 家長式領導中的威權領導行為以及仁慈領導行為已經在許多的華人組織中被發現以及證實。然而隨著時代的演進以及社會變遷,學者們發現威權領導以及仁慈領導可以依據針對的對象不同而分成對人的專權領導、對事的尚嚴領導,對人的生活關懷、對事的工作照顧,並對部屬產生不同的影響。本研究透過社會訊息處理理論、與關係性權力的觀點,探討了不同焦點之仁慈、威權領導對部屬的影響。

    本研究包含了兩個部分,第一個部分以台灣私人企業的381個領導者-部屬對偶為對象,研究發現:(1)專權領導對於三種不同的部屬建言行為(改善型、預警型、異議型建言)有顯著的負向影響效果;(2)尚嚴領導對於改善型建言行為有正向的影響效果、生活關懷的仁慈領導對部屬的改善型建言和異議型建言亦有正向影響效果;(3)仁慈領導中的工作照顧對異議型建言行為有顯著的負向影響效果。第二個部分則分析了368個領導者-部屬對偶,結果顯示出:(1)尚嚴領導以及工作照顧對於部屬的忠誠式服從有正向影響效果;(2)尚嚴領導以及生活關懷對於部屬的心理資本有正向的影響效果;(3)專權領導對於部屬的創造性績效有負向影響效果,生活關懷則是對部屬的創造性績效有正向影響效果。

    最後,根據結果進行探討並對研究限制、未來方向、及管理實務意涵加以闡述。

    Both authoritarian leadership and benevolent leadership of paternalistic leadership are universal and evident leadership behaviors in Chinese organizations. Along with modernization and social change, Chinese scholars have made further distinctions based on their content and focus. Authoritarian leadership includes people-related authoritarian leadership and task-related authoritative leadership while benevolent leadership involves life caring (people-focused) and work (task-focused) support. From a relationalism perspective, the purpose of this research is to clarify the effects of these four leadership behaviors on subordinates.

    Two studies were conducted to explore the effects of four types of leadership, people-related authoritarian leadership, task-related authoritative leadership, people-focused life caring, and task-focused work support. In Study1, we used 381dyads (subordinate-supervisor) from private enterprises of southern Taiwan as participants. Results showed that: (1) authoritarian leadership had negative effects on improving, preventing, and dissenting voice (rated by supervisors); (2) authoritative leadership was related positively to preventing voice and life caring and benevolent leadership was related positively to improving and dissenting voice; (3) work support of benevolent leadership had a negative effect on dissenting voice. In Study 2, we adopted a questionnaire survey and took 368 employees from private Taiwanese enterprises as participants. Results showed that: (1) authoritative leadership and work support of benevolent leadership were related positively to obedience to supervisor; (2) authoritative leadership and life caring of benevolent leadership had positive significant effects on employees’ psychological capital; (3) authoritarian leadership was negatively related to creative performance (rated by supervisor), but life caring of benevolent leadership had a positive effect. Finally, we also discussed the implications of theory/practice and limitations/future directions.

    第一章 緒論 1 第二章 威權領導與仁慈領導:對人與對事 4 第一節 威權領導與仁慈領導 4 第二節 對人與對事 7 第三節 對人對事的威權領導與仁慈領導 9 第三章 研究一:威權領導、仁慈領導與建言行為 12 第一節 理論與假設 13 第二節 威權領導、仁慈領導對建言行為的影響 17 第三節 研究方法 21 第四節 研究一結果 31 第五節 研究一討論 40 第四章 研究二:威權領導、仁慈領導與部屬效能 42 第一節 理論與假設 43 第二節 研究方法 54 第三節 研究二結果 65 第四節 研究二討論 74 第五章 討論與建議 76 第一節 結果與討論 76 第二節 研究貢獻 78 第三節 研究限制 80 第四節 未來研究方向 81 中文參考文獻 83 英文參考文獻 86 附錄一 92 附錄二 96 附錄三 100 附錄四 103 表、圖目次 表一 威權領導與仁慈領導的分類 11 表二 促進型建言與抑制型建言的比較 15 表三 改善型、預警型、及異議型建言的定義 16 表四 研究一樣本組成 22 表五 威權領導之探索性因素分析 24 表六 威權領導之描述性資料 25 表七 仁慈領導之探索性因素分析 26 表八 仁慈領導之描述性資料 26 表九 建言行為之探索性因素分析 27 表十 建言行為之描述性資料 28 表十一 權力距離之探索性因數分析及描述性資料 29 表十二 LMX之探索性因數分析及描述性資料 30 表十三 研究一測量模式之適合度比較 33 表十四 研究一各變項描述統計值與相關係數 36 表十五 不同領導行為對不同建言行為之區段迴歸分析 39 表十六 研究一結果摘要 40 表十七 研究二樣本組成 55 表十八 威權領導之探索性因素分析 57 表十九 威權領導之描述性資料 58 表二十 仁慈領導之探索性因素分析 59 表二十一 仁慈領導之描述性資料 59 表二十二 忠誠式服從之探索性因素分析及描述性資料 60 表二十三 心理資本之探索性因素分析及描述性資料 61 表二十四 主管上評創造性績效之探索性因素分析及描述性資料 62 表二十五 權力距離之探索性因素分析及描述性資料 63 表二十六 社會讚許之探索性因素分析及描述性資料 64 表二十七 研究二 測量模式之適合度比較 67 表二十八 各變項描述統計與相關係數 70 表二十九 不同領導行為對不同部屬效能之區段迴歸分析 73 表三十 研究二結果摘要 74 表三十一 威權領導與仁慈領導對三個部屬效能的實際影響原因 75 表三十二 研究一與研究二之結果摘要 77 圖一 研究一架構 20 圖二 儒家的心之模型 45 圖三 情感性基礎、義務性基礎關係性權力 47 圖四 研究二架構 53

    中文文獻
    白崇亮 (1979)。我國企業經營者個人價值觀念之研究。政治大學企業管理研究所。碩士論文。
    任金剛、樊景立、鄭伯壎、周麗芳(2003)。高階主管之家長式領導與組織效能:一項個人與組織層次的分析。教育部華人本土心理學研究追求卓越計畫研究報告,報告編號89-H-FA01-2-4-4。台北:教育部。
    吳宗祐 (2008)。主管威權領導與部屬的工作滿意度與組織承諾: 信任的中介歷程與情緒智力的調節效果。本土心理學研究,(30),3-63。
    吳宗祐、周麗芳、鄭伯壎 (2008)。主管的權威取向及其對部屬順從與畏懼的知覺對威權領導的預測效果。本土心理學研究,(30),65-115。
    周婉茹、周麗芳、鄭伯壎、任金剛 (2010)。專權與尚嚴之辨:再探威權領導。本土心理學研究,(34),223-284。
    周逸衡 (1984)。國人價值觀體系與台灣大型企業管理行為關係之研究。政治大學企業管理研究所。博士論文。
    林姿葶、鄭伯壎 (2012)。華人領導者的噓寒問暖與提攜:仁慈領導的雙構面模式。本土心理學研究,(37),253-302。
    林家五、王悅縈、胡宛仙 (2012)。真誠領導與仁慈領導對組織公民行為及主管忠誠之差異效果。本土心理學研究,(38),205-256。
    林淑萍 (1999)。情理與法理:事件合理性判斷的兩種準則。台灣大學心理學研究所。碩士論文。
    姜定宇、鄭伯壎、鄭紀塋、周麗芳 (2007)。華人效忠主管的概念分析與量表建構。中華心理學刊,49(4),407-432。
    紀漢民 (2009)。諫法研究─以左傳、史記為範疇。屏東教育大學中國語文學系碩士班。碩士論文。
    徐瑋伶、鄭伯壎、黃敏萍 (2002)。華人企業領導人的員工歸類與管理行為。本土心理學研究,(18),51-94。
    楊國樞(1998)。家族化歷程、泛家族主義及組織管理。見鄭伯壎、黃國隆、郭建志(主編):海峽兩岸之組織與管理。台北:遠流出版公司。
    楊國樞、鄭伯壎 (1989)。傳統價值觀、個人現代性及組織行為:後儒家假說的一項微觀驗證。中央研究院民族研究所集刊,(64),3-47。
    黃光國 (1988)。中國人的權力遊戲。台北:巨流圖書公司。
    黃光國 (1995)。知識與行動:中華文化傳統的社會心理詮釋。台灣:心理出版社。
    樊景立、鄭伯壎 (2000)。華人組織的家長式領導:一項文化觀點的分析。本土心理學研究, (13), 127-180。
    鄭伯壎(1993)。家長權威價值與領導行為之關係探討。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究報告(計畫編號:NSC82-0301-H002-029)。
    鄭伯壎 (1995a)。家長權威與領導行為之關係:一個台灣民營企業主持人的個案研究。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,(79),105-159。
    鄭伯壎 (1995b)。差序格局與華人組織行為。本土心理學研究,(3),142-219。
    鄭伯壎 (2005)。華人領導:理論與實際。台北: 桂冠圖書公司。
    鄭伯壎、任金剛、周麗芳(2004)。家長式領導:現代轉化及其影響機制。見國立台灣大學心理學系(主編):教育部華人本土心理學研究追求卓越計畫研究報告。台北:國立台灣大學心理學系。
    鄭伯壎、周麗芳(2005)。家長式領導三元模式:現代轉化及其影響機制──威權領導:法家概念的現代轉化。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,報告編號NSC94-2413-H-002-003-PAE。台北:行政院國家科學委員會。
    鄭伯壎、姜定宇 (2000)。華人組織中的主管忠誠:主位與客位概念對員工效能的效果。本土心理學研究,(14),65-113。
    鄭伯壎、樊景立、周麗芳 (2006)。家長式領導:模式與證據。台北:華泰文化公司。
    鄭伯壎、鄭紀瑩、周麗芳 (1999)。效忠主管:概念建構,測量及相關因素的探討。中國科學院心理研究所主辦 [第三屆華人心理學家學術研討會](北京) 宣讀之論文。
    鄭宜芳 (2014)。家長式領導、情感信任與員工建言行為。成功大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班,碩士論文。
    鄭紀瑩 (1996)。華人企業的組織忠誠:結構與歷程。台灣大學心理學研究所。碩士論文。
    蘇柏丞 (2013)。威權領導與創造性績效:心理資源的中介。成功大學認知科學研究所。碩士論文。

    英文文獻
    Alge, B. (2004). CERIAS Tech Report 2006-59 Information Privacy in Organizations: Empowering Creative and Extra-role Performance.
    Ashford, S. J., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Christianson, M. K. (2009). Leadership, voice, and silence. In J. Greenberg, & M.S. Edwards (Eds.), Voice and Silence in Organizations: 175-201. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
    Amabile, T. M. (1988). From individual creativity to organizational innovation. In Innovation: A Cross-disciplinary Perspective, edited by K. Gronhaug and G. Kaufmann. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian University Press.
    Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to" the social psychology of creativity.": Westview press.
    Amabile, T. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial creativity through motivational synergy. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 31(1), 18-26.
    Avey, J. B., Luthans, F., & Jensen, S. M. (2009). Psychological capital: A positive resource for combating employee stress and turnover. Human Resource Management, 48(5), 677-693.
    Avey, J. B., Luthans, F., & Mhatre, K. H. (2008). A call for longitudinal research in positive organizational behavior. Journal of organizational behavior, 29(5), 705-711.
    Aycan, Z. (2006). Paternalism. In Indigenous and cultural psychology (pp. 445-466). Springer US.
    Bagozzi, R. P., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self‐esteem. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1(1), 35-67.
    Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control: New York: Freeman.
    Bass, B. M. (1960). Leadership, psychology, and organizational behavior, New York: Harper.
    Bass, B. (1990). Bass & Stogdill's Handbook of Leadership (3rd ed.). New York: The Free
    Press. Blake, R., & Mouton, J. (1964). The managerial grid: The key to leadership excellence. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company, 140-142.
    Block, P. (1987). Tiie Empowered Manager. San Francisco: Jossey-BassPublishers.
    Bowers, D. G., & Seashore, S. E. (1966). Predicting organizational effectiveness with a four-factor theory of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 11, 238-263.
    Brown, B. B. (2003). Employees’ organizational commitment and their perception of supervisors’ relations-oriented and task-oriented leadership behaviors. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
    Chemers, M. M. (1993). Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and directions. , Chemers, Martin M. (Ed); Ayman, Roya (Ed), An integrative theory of leadership. (pp. 293-319). San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press, xx, 347 pp.
    Chen, X., & Farh, J. (1999). The effectiveness of transactional and transformational leader behaviors in Chinese organizations: Evidence from Taiwan. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago.
    Cheng, B. S., Huang, M. P., & Chou, L. F. (2002). Paternalistic leadership and its effectiveness: Evidence from Chinese organizational teams. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies(Hong Kong), 3(1), 85-112.
    Cheng, B. S., Shieh, P. Y., & Chou, L. F. (2002). The principal’s leadership, leader-member exchange quality, and the teacher’s extra-role behavior: The effects of transformational and paternalistic leadership. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 17, 105-161.
    Chia, H., Landau, J., & Ong, J. S.-W. (2000). Predictors of voice: The moderating effect of the general economic climate. Research and Practice in Human Resource Management, 8(2), 3-28.
    Collins, J. (2001). Good to Great - Why Some Companies Make the Leap and Others Don't. New York: Harper Business.
    Coutu, D. L. (2002). How resilience works. Harvard business review, 80(5), 46-56.
    Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive: Studies in evaluative dependence: Wiley New York.
    Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of research in personality, 19(2), 109-134.
    Dyne, L. V., Ang, S., & Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as Multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1359-1392.
    Essentials, H. B. (2005). Power, Influence, and Persuasion. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.
    Etzioni, A. (1975). Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations, Rev: Simon and Schuster.
    Farh, J.-L., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S.-C. (1997). Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 421-444.
    Farh, J., & Cheng, B. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic Leadership in Chinese organizations. In: J. T. Li, Tsui, A. S. & E. Weldon(eds). Management and organizations in Chinese Context, pp. 94-127. London: Macmillan.
    Fleishman, E. A. (1953). The description of supervisory behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 37(1), 1-6.
    Fleishman, E. A. (1957). A leader behavior description for industry. Leader behavior: Its description and measurement, 103-119.
    Glassman, E. (1989). Creative problem solving. Supervisory management, 34(1), 21-26.
    Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states (25): Harvard university press.
    Hofstede, G. (1980). Motivation, leadership, and organization: do American theories apply abroad? Organizational dynamics, 9(1), 42-63.
    Lewis, G. (1999). Motivation for productive creativity. In A. S. Fishkin, B. Cramond & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.), Investigating creativity in youth (pp. 179-202). Dreskills, NJ: Hampton Press. Liang, J., Farh, C. I. C., & Farh, J. L. (2012). Psychological Antecedents of Promotive and Prohibitive Voice: A Two-Wave Examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71-92. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0176
    Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of organizational behavior, 23(6), 695-706.
    Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 541-572.
    Luthans, F., Luthans, K. W., & Luthans, B. C. (2004). Positive psychological capital: Beyond human and social capital. Business Horizons, 47(1), 45-50.
    Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2007). Emerging positive organizational behavior. Journal of Management, 33(3), 321-349.
    Maynes, T. D., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2014). Speaking more broadly: an examination of the nature, antecedents, and consequences of an expanded set of employee voice behaviors. Journal of Applied Psycologyl, 99(1), 87-112. doi: 10.1037/a0034284
    Misumi, J., & Peterson, M. F. (1985). The behavioral science of leadership: An interdisciplinary Japanese research program: The University of Michigan Press.
    Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee Voice Behavior: Integration and Directions for Future Research. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373-412. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2011.574506
    Mumford, M. D., & Hunter, S. T. (2005). Innovation in organizations: A multi-level perspective on creativity. Research in Multi Level Issues, 4, 9-73.
    Norman, S. M., Avolio, B. J., & Luthans, F. (2010). The impact of positivity and transparency on trust in leaders and their perceived effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(3), 350-364.
    Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634.
    Pellegrini, E. K., & Scandura, T. A. (2008). Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 34(3), 566-593.
    Rahim, M. A. (2009). Bases of leader power and effectiveness. In D. Tjosvold, & B. Wisse (Eds.), Power and Interdependence in Organizations, (pp. 224-243). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Redding, S. G. (1990). The spirit of Chinese capitalism. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    Reivich, K., & Shatte, A. (2002). The resilience factor: 7 essential skills for overcoming life's inevitable obtacles. New York: Broadway Books.
    Rusbult, C. E., Farrell, D., Rogers, G., & Mainous, A. G. (1988). Impact of exchange variables on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: An integrative model of responses to declining job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 599-627.
    Russell, B. (1938). Power: A New Basis of Social Analysis, New York: Norton.
    Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224-253.
    Sartorius, N., & Kuyken, W. (1994). Translation of health status instruments Quality of life assessment: International perspectives, 3-18.
    Schulman, P. (1999). Applying learned optimism to increase sales productivity. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 19(1), 31-37.
    Shalley, C. E., & Zhou, J. (2008). Organizational creativity research: A historical review. In J. Zhou and C. E. Shalley (Eds.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 3-31). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Shang, Y. F., Fu, P. P. and Chong, M. (2012), ‘Relational Power in the Chinese Context’, In
    X. Huang and M. H. Bond, eds, Handbook of Chinese Organizational Behavior: Integrating
    Theory, Research and Practice, 436–48. Edward Elgar Pub.
    Silin, R. F.(1976). Leadership and values.Cambridge, MA:Harvard UniversityPress.
    Snyder, C. R., Sympson, S. C., Ybasco, F. C., Borders, T. F., Babyak, M. A., & Higgins, R. L. (1996). Development and validation of the State Hope Scale. Journal of personality and social psychology, 70(2), 321.
    Talbot, R. J. (1993). Creativity in the organizational context: Implications for training. In S. G. Isaksen, M. C. Murdock, R. L. Firestein & D. J. Treffinger (Eds.), Nurturing and developing creativity. The emergence of a dis¬cipline (pp. 177-214). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137-1148.
    Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 52(3), 591-620.
    Vakola, M., & Bouradas, D. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of organisational silence: an empirical investigation. Employee Relations, 27(5), 441-458.
    Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108-119.
    Vernon, P. E. (1989). The nature-nurture problem in creativity. In Handbook of creativity (pp. 93-110). Springer US. Wallis, N. C., Yammarino, F. J., & Feyerherm, A. (2011). Individualized leadership: A qualitative study of senior executive leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 182-206.
    Westwood, R. (1997). Harmony and patriarchy: The cultural basis for'paternalistic headship'among the overseas Chinese. Organization studies, 18(3), 445-480.
    Wexley, K., & Yukl, G. (1977). Organization Behavior and Personnel Psychology, Homewood: Richard D: Irwin.
    Wu, M., & Xu, E. (2012). 24 Paternalistic leadership: from here to where? In X. Huang and M. H. Bond, eds, Handbook of Chinese Organizational Behavior: Integrating Theory, Research and Practice, (pp. 449–466). Edward Elgar Pub.
    Zhang, Y., Huai, M.-y., & Xie, Y.-h. (2014). Paternalistic leadership and employee voice in China: A dual process model. The Leadership Quarterly. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.01.002

    無法下載圖示 校內:2024-07-24公開
    校外:不公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE