近年都市規劃強調以綠地完備都市生態系統為目標。在考量既有都市系統的前提下，景觀都市主義以重新組織建成區綠地系統為原則，透過動態評估方式，強調以疊加概念將既存與即將面臨空間轉變的未來重大計畫機會下，使自然元素融入於各類型土地使用中，達成綠地系統之連續性，與回應提升生物、能量等流動與交換目標之都市生態廊道相關研究不謀而合。目前以分析地景變遷或結合生態網絡議題雖不在少數，然而在景觀都市主義綜合人與自然的思維下，惟缺乏實質空間上之觀察而無法更精確回應受到人為活動影響的動態變遷下之重要綠地地景結構特徵區位，進而影響生態網絡規劃與人類發展需求契合度。

本研究旨於建構符合在地綠地變遷趨勢下組成特徵之最具生態價值之生態網絡系統。本研究研究設計上分為兩階段：首先將都市環境視為一生態系統下，首先以景觀生態學為框架進行綠地生態潛力之評估，以大型綠地嵌塊體(Large Patch)與踏腳石系統(Stepping Stone)視為生態網絡之組成單元，並透過地景格局指標觀察其兩者20年間於變遷趨勢下之結構特徵。而後，透過最小累績阻力模型(MCR)，以未綠化之道路基盤與重大計畫視為可完善綠地連續性之潛力路徑，評估多情境下綠網結構之差異以及最具生態價值之綠網方案。

研究結果顯示，嘉義市綠地變遷趨勢中，呈現南北側大型綠地嵌塊體呈現退化而建成區東西兩側較為穩定，而作為廊道之踏腳石在建成區中呈現明顯整體退化且部分穩定與擴張的情況下，踏腳石分布在連結東西大型綠地系統之目標下，漸呈現南北兩條東西向軸帶之分布。在此綠網結構特徵下，生態網絡結果以道路結合重大計畫共同作為完善綠地系統整體性之情境下得到最佳之網絡結構。透過彌陀路、垂楊路、高鐵大道、新生路、友愛路、博愛路等路段以及市中心嘉義車站周邊如後站都更地區、乙種工業區等重大計畫之共同綠化，對於促進都市綠地生物、能量流動具有較高之生態意義。綜合上述結果，未來都市設計準則之擬定上，道路需以提升綠覆程度為目標，在重大計畫區位上則以優先留設開放空間並規範綠覆程度，不同土地使用間之綠化則應著重規範彼此之銜接，逐步完備都市生態系統。

Landscape urbanism emphasizes integrating natural elements into various land uses through dynamic assessments and overlay concepts. This approach aims to achieve green space continuity and aligns with urban ecological corridor research focused on enhancing the flow and exchange of biological and energy elements. Many studies analyze landscape changes or integrated ecological network issues. However, under the concept of landscape urbanism integrating humans and nature, often lacks practical spatial observations. This gap hampers accurate responses to dynamic changes in important green space structures influenced by human activities, affecting the alignment between ecological network planning and human development needs.

This study aims to develop an ecologically valuable network system that aligns with local trends in green space transformation. The research is conducted in two stages: First, the urban environment is treated as an ecosystem, using landscape ecology to assess the ecological potential of green spaces. Large Patch and Stepping Stone systems are analyzed as network components, with their structural changes over 20 years observed through landscape pattern indices. Next, using the MCR model, the study identifies potential pathways for enhancing green space continuity by considering unvegetated roadways and major projects and evaluates the differences in green network structures across multiple situations to find the most ecologically valuable network.

The study shows that the large green patches on the east and west sides of Chiayi City remain relatively stable. The stepping stones connecting these green systems exhibit significant overall degradation, with some areas showing stability and expansion. This results in a distribution along two east-western oriented axes. Given this green network structure, the optimal network configuration is achieved by integrating roads with major projects to enhance the overall green system and promotes the ecological flow of biological and energy elements in urban green spaces.

王小璘、曾詠宜(2003)。都市公園綠地區位地景生態評估之研究。設計學報，8(3)，53-74。https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.6381/JD.200312.0053
王偉帆(2009)。生態廊道觀之都市綠園道評估架構之研究－以台南市為例［碩士論文，國立成功大學都市計劃研究所］。碩博士論文網。
吳振發、林裕彬(2006)。汐止市土地利用時空間變遷模式。都市與計劃，33(3)，231-259。https://doi.org/10.6128/CP.33.3.231
李盈潔(2013)。台灣西部海岸平原土地使用變遷對農地景觀與其生態系統服務影響之研究［博士論文，國立臺北大學都市計劃研究所］。碩博士論文網。
李盈潔、蔡雅妃(2023)。綠基盤因應氣候變遷之綜效、權衡與共效益初探：以臺北都會區為例。都市與計劃，50(2)，195-218。https://doi.org/10.6128/CP.202306_50(2).0003
周書賢(2012)。都市、景觀「在」建築 景觀都市主義 (Landscape Urbanism)。建築學會會刊。https://www.architw.org.tw/ftp/magazine/mag66/66th53.pdf
周鶴樹(2013)。玉山國家公園景觀變遷的驅動機制剖析。台灣土地研究，16(2)，23-61。https://doi.org/10.6677/JTLR.201311_16(2).0002
林裕彬、吳振發、鄧東波(2004)。景觀生態面指數分析汐止地區1990一2001年土地利用時空問鑲嵌特徵。都市與計劃，31(3)，239-268。 https://doi.org/10.6128/CP.31.3.239
林裕彬、鄭東波(2001)。以衛星影像及碎形理論探討都市綠空間之發展結構一以台北市信義計畫區為例。都市與計劃，28(2)，127-154。https://doi.org/10.6128/CP.31.3.239
施乃禎(2022)。綠基盤規劃方案因應氣候變遷之綜效與權衡分析-以臺北都會區為例［碩士論文，國立臺北大學都市計劃研究所］。碩博士論文網。
柯嘉鈞、歐聖榮(2011)。台中都會區綠地系統與結構之建置初探。興大園藝，36(4)，65-76。https://hort.nchu.edu.tw/public/ckfinder/files/5 -柯嘉鈞-興大園藝- 36-4-5-MJT-保全.pdf
唐春曉(2015)。應用地景指數探討台北市信義區建成環境綠地生態系統服務之強化［碩士論文，中國文化大學景觀學系］。碩博士論文網。
莊孟憲、劉芳如(2020)。嘉義地區友善諸羅樹蛙棲地管理方法推廣與研究。行政院農業委員會林務局嘉義林區管理處
許哲瑜、歐聖榮(2014)。應用地理資訊系統與景觀結構指數分析得子口溪流域景觀變遷之研究。興大園藝，39(2)，83-96。https://hort.nchu.edu.tw/public/ckfinder/files/7-39-2-7 -興大園藝-許哲瑜-應用地理資訊系統- MJT-OK-加密.pdf
郭瓊瑩、葉佳宗(2011)。自景觀生態取向之綠色基盤系統建設探討氣候變遷回應之城市治理。城市學學刊， 2(1)，31-63。https://doi.org/10.29853/JU.201103.0002
陳彥勳、李盈潔(2020)。農地地景特徵之生態系統服務功能初探。農林學報，67(4)，233-248。https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30089/JAF.202012_67(4).0002
黃志成、馮豐隆(1998)。淺論地景生態學。台灣林業，24(4)，37-49。
詹葳葳(2014)。以景觀指數分析方法探討都市生態綠網規劃之研究-以南港區為例［碩士論文，國立臺北科技大學建築與都市設計研究所］。碩博士論文網。
鄔建國(2003)。地景生態學－格局、過程、尺度與等級。五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
趙羿、賴明洲、薛怡珍(2003)。地景生態學：理論與實務。地景企業股份有限公司。
劉立偉、黃子珍(2011)。公園綠地空間分布的評析：從漸進規劃的觀點談都市公共設施用地檢討。建築學報，76(S)，91-112。https://doi.org/10.6377/JA.201106.0011
蔡佩真(2004)。都市綠網評估體系之建構與應用［碩士論文，逢甲大學土地管 理學系碩士班］。碩博士論文網。
蔡岡廷、謝逸晴(2013)。應用景觀生態學探討都市綠地空間之變遷。造園地景學報，19(4)，73-91。
鄭新奇、張春曉、付梅臣、劉東亞、胡業翠、鄭敏睿(2022)。地景格局空間分析技術及其應用(第二版)。科學出版社。
羅健文、林楨家(2009)。以既有道路網布設都市綠廊道網絡之規劃模式。臺灣土地研究12(1)，83-123。https://doi.org/10.6677/JTLR.200905_12(1).0004
Adriaensen, F., Chardon, J. P., De Blust, G., Swinnen, E., Villalba, S., Gulinck, H., & Matthysen, E. (2003). The application of ‘least-cost’ modelling as a functional landscape model. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64(4), 233-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-2046(02)00242-6
Anselin, L. (1995). Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27(2), 93-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x
Bueno, J. A., Tsihrintzis, V. A., & Alvarez, L. (1995). South Florida greenways a conceptual framework for the ecological reconnectivity of the region. Landscape and Urban Planning, 33(1-3), 247-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(94)02021-7
Corner, J. (2006). Terra Fluxus. In C. Waldheim (Ed.), The landscape urbanism reader (1st ed., pp. 21-33). Princeton Architectural Press.
Dadashpoor, H., Azizi, P., & Moghadasi, M. (2019). Land use change, urbanization, and change in landscape pattern in a metropolitan area. Sci Total Environ, 655, 707-719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.267
de Sousa Silva, C., Viegas, I., Panagopoulos, Τ., & Bell, S. (2018). Environmental Justice in Accessibility to Green Infrastructure in Two European Cities. Land, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/land7040134
Do, D., Huang, J., Cheng, Y., & Truong, T. (2018). Da Nang Green Space System Planning: An Ecology Landscape Approach. Sustainability, 10(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103506
Dramstad, W., Olson, J. D., & Forman, R. T. T. (1996). Landscape Ecology Principles in Landscape Architecture and Land-Use Planning. Island Press.
Fan, P., Xu, L., Yue, W., & Chen, J. (2017). Accessibility of public urban green space in an urban periphery: The case of Shanghai. Landscape and Urban Planning, 165, 177-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.11.007
Forman, R. T. T. (1995). Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions.
Forman, R. T. T., & Godron, M. (1986). Landscape Ecology. John Wiley & Sons.
Girot, C. (2006). Vision in Motion: Representing Landscape in Time. In C. Waldheim (Ed.), The landscape urbanism reader (1st ed.). Princeton Architectural Press.
Graviola, G. R., Ribeiro, M. C., & Pena, J. C. (2022). Reconciling humans and birds when designing ecological corridors and parks within urban landscapes. Ambio, 51(1), 253-268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01551-9
Huang, B.-X., Chiou, S.-C., & Li, W.-Y. (2021). Landscape Pattern and Ecological Network Structure in Urban Green Space Planning: A Case Study of Fuzhou City. Land, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/land10080769
Huang, X., Wang, H., Shan, L., & Xiao, F. (2021). Constructing and optimizing urban ecological network in the context of rapid urbanization for improving landscape connectivity. Ecological Indicators, 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108319
Kabisch, N., Strohbach, M., Haase, D., & Kronenberg, J. (2016). Urban green space availability in European cities. Ecological Indicators, 70, 586-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.029
Kang, J., Zhang, X., Zhu, X., & Zhang, B. (2021). Ecological security pattern: A new idea for balancing regional development and ecological protection. A case study of the Jiaodong Peninsula, China. Global Ecology and Conservation, 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01472
Knaapen, J. P., Scheffer, M., & Harms, B. (1992). Estimating habitat isolation in landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 23(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(92)90060-D
Kong, F., Yin, H., Nakagoshi, N., & Zong, Y. (2010). Urban green space network development for biodiversity conservation: Identification based on graph theory and gravity modeling. Landscape and Urban Planning, 95(1-2), 16-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.11.001
La Rosa, D. (2014). Accessibility to greenspaces: GIS based indicators for sustainable planning in a dense urban context. Ecological Indicators, 42, 122-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.011
Li, H., Chen, W., & He, W. (2015). Planning of Green Space Ecological Network in Urban Areas: An Example of Nanchang, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 12(10), 12889-12904. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph121012889
Linehan, J., Gross, M., & Finn, J. (1995). Greenway planning developing a landscape ecological network approach. Landscape and Urban Planning, 33(1-3), 179-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(94)02017-A
Luo, Y., Wu, J., Wang, X., & Peng, J. (2021). Using stepping-stone theory to evaluate the maintenance of landscape connectivity under China’s ecological control line policy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126356
Luo, Y., Wu, J., Wang, X., Wang, Z., & Zhao, Y. (2020). Can policy maintain habitat connectivity under landscape fragmentation? A case study of Shenzhen, China. Sci Total Environ, 715, 136829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136829
Luo, Y., Zhu, Z., Wu, J., Zhang, Y., Li, X., Zhao, W., Yuan, Y., Duanmu, Z., & Li, M. (2022). Exploring habitat patch clusters based on network community detection to identify restored priority areas of ecological networks in urban areas. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127771
Lynch, A. J. (2018). Creating Effective Urban Greenways and Stepping-stones: Four Critical Gaps in Habitat Connectivity Planning Research. Journal of Planning Literature, 34(2), 131-155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412218798334
Miller, J., Ahern, J., Leitao, A. B., & McGarigal, K. (2006). Measuring Landscapes. Washington, DC : Island Press.
Navarrete-Hernandez, P., & Laffan, K. (2019). A greener urban environment: Designing green infrastructure interventions to promote citizens’ subjective wellbeing. Landscape and Urban Planning, 191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103618
Panagopoulos, T. (2019). Special Issue: Landscape Urbanism and Green Infrastructure. Land, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/land8070112
Peng, J., Pan, Y., Liu, Y., Zhao, H., & Wang, Y. (2018). Linking ecological degradation risk to identify ecological security patterns in a rapidly urbanizing landscape. Habitat International, 71, 110-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.11.010
Peng, J., Yang, Y., Liu, Y., Hu, Y., Du, Y., Meersmans, J., & Qiu, S. (2018). Linking ecosystem services and circuit theory to identify ecological security patterns. Sci Total Environ, 644, 781-790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.292
Qian, M., Huang, Y., Cao, Y., Wu, J., & Xiong, Y. (2023). Ecological network construction and optimization in Guangzhou from the perspective of biodiversity conservation. J Environ Manage, 336, 117692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117692
Rudd, H., Vala, J., & Schaefer, V. (2002). Importance of Backyard Habitat in a Comprehensive Biodiversity Conservation Strategy: A Connectivity Analysis of Urban Green Spaces. Restoration Ecology, 10(2), 368-375. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.2002.02041.x
Song, S., Gong, Y., & Yu, Y. (2024). Integrating pattern, process, and function in urban landscape ecological network planning: A case study of Harbin central city. Ecological Indicators, 159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111671
Song, S., Wang, S.-H., Shi, M.-X., Hu, S.-S., & Xu, D.-W. (2022). Multiple scenario simulation and optimization of an urban green infrastructure network based on complex network theory: a case study in Harbin City, China. Ecological Processes, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-022-00372-2
Steiner, F. (2014). Frontiers in urban ecological design and planning research. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 304-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.023
Stoia, N. L., Niţă, M. R., Popa, A. M., & Iojă, I. C. (2022). The green walk—An analysis for evaluating the accessibility of urban green spaces. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127685
Tannous, H. O., Major, M. D., & Furlan, R. (2021). Accessibility of green spaces in a metropolitan network using space syntax to objectively evaluate the spatial locations of parks and promenades in Doha, State of Qatar. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126892
Thompson, I. H. (2012). Ten Tenets and Six Questions for Landscape Urbanism. Landscape Research, 37(1), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2011.632081
Tobler, W. R. (1970). A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region. Economic Geography, 46, 234-240. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/143141
Urban, D. L., O'Neill, R. V., & Herman H. Shugart, J. (1987). Landscape Ecology. BioScience, 37(2), 119-127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1310366
Waldheim, C. (2006). Landscape as Urbanism. In C. Waldheim (Ed.), The landscape urbanism reader (1st ed., pp. 35-53). Princeton Architectural Press.
Wang, T., Huang, Y., Cheng, J., Xiong, H., Ying, Y., Feng, Y., & Wang, J. (2024). Construction and optimization of watershed-scale ecological network based on complex network method: A case study of Erhai Lake Basin in China. Ecological Indicators, 160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111794
Wang, Y., Qu, Z., Zhong, Q., Zhang, Q., Zhang, L., Zhang, R., Yi, Y., Zhang, G., Li, X., & Liu, J. (2022). Delimitation of ecological corridors in a highly urbanizing region based on circuit theory and MSPA. Ecological Indicators, 142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109258
Xie, J., Xie, B., Zhou, K., Li, J., Xiao, J., & Liu, C. (2022). Impacts of landscape pattern on ecological network evolution in Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan Urban Agglomeration, China. Ecological Indicators, 145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109716
Yu, K. (1996). Security patterns and surface model in landscape ecological planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 36, 1-17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(96)00331-3
Zhang, X., Wang, X., Zhang, C., & Zhai, J. (2022). Development of a cross-scale landscape infrastructure network guided by the new Jiangnan watertown urbanism: A case study of the ecological green integration demonstration zone in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Ecological Indicators, 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109317
Zhang, Z., Meerow, S., Newell, J. P., & Lindquist, M. (2019). Enhancing landscape connectivity through multifunctional green infrastructure corridor modeling and design. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 38, 305-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.10.014
Zhao, S.-m., Ma, Y.-f., Wang, J.-l., & You, X.-y. (2019). Landscape pattern analysis and ecological network planning of Tianjin City. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126479
Zhou, Y., Zheng, Z., Wu, Z., Guo, C., & Chen, Y. (2023). Construction and evaluation of ecological networks in highly urbanised regions: A case study of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao greater Bay Area, China. Ecological Indicators, 152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110336