| 研究生: |
陳怡仁 Chen, Yi-Jen |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
創新策略與新產品績效 Innovation-oriented Strategy and New Product Performance |
| 指導教授: |
劉宗其
Liu, Tsung-Chi |
| 學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 國際經營管理研究所 Institute of International Management |
| 論文出版年: | 2015 |
| 畢業學年度: | 103 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 60 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 市場導向 、技術導向 、創新導向 、新產品 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Market orientation, technology orientation, innovation orientation, new product |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:111 下載:1 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
企業創新策略正迅速成為企業成功關鍵因素,世界各大企業都投入大量資金在提出新的技術解決方案與發現顧客潛在需求,以順利在市場上推出創新產品做為獲得競爭優勢的策略工具。儘管企業創新導向與推出創新產品明顯很重要,然而鮮少有實證研究去證明這項關係。因此,本研究的目的是採用了動態能力觀點去驗證創新策略與新產品績效之間的關係。作者採用問卷調查的方式收集資料,並進一步去驗證論文中所提出的假設。本研究結果如下:市場導向和技術導向對新產品績效有顯著正相關;其次,創新導向會干擾市場導向與新產品績效之間的關係,但卻扮演著技術導向與新產品績效之間的中介角色。最後,本文將進一步探討理論貢獻、實務意涵及未來研究建議。
A firm’s innovative strategy is fast becoming one of the most critical determining factors in businesses as companies around the world are relying on the introduction of innovative products to the market with investing heavily in novel technological solutions and discovering emerging customer needs and as a strategic tool to achieve competitive advantage. Despite its apparent importance, relatively little study has addressed the firm's innovative strategy that help develop their competitive advantage and overcome economic and financial downturns. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to employs a dynamic capabilities perspective to examine the relationships among innovative strategy and new product performance. The author is going to employ a questionnaire approach to collect data for further testing the validity of three research hypotheses proposed in the current study. The empirical results show that both market orientation and technology orientation are positively associated with new product performance. Moreover, innovation orientation moderates the relationship between market orientation and new product performance, while innovation orientation mediates the relationship between technology orientation and new product performance. Finally, theoretical contribution, managerial implications, and future research directions is discussed.
1.Aiken L. S., & West S. G. 1991. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage: Newbury Park CA.
2.Akgun, A. E., Keskin, H. Byrne, J. C., Aren, S. 2008. Emotional and learning capability and their impact on product innovativeness and firm performance. Technovation, 27(9): 501–513.
3.Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., & Byrne, J. C. (2014). Complex adaptive systems theory and firm product innovativeness. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 31(1): 21–42.
4.Alexander, J., Nuchols, B., Bloom, J., & Lee, S. 1995. Organizational demography and turnover: An examination of multiform and nonlinear heterogeneity. Human Relations 48: 1455–1480.
5.Ali E. Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., Byrne, J. C., & Ilhan, O. O. (2014). Complex adaptive system mechanisms, adaptive management practices, and firm product innovativeness. R&D Management 44(1): 18–41.
6.Atuahene-Gima, K., & Ko, A. 2001. An empirical investigation of the effect of market orientation and entrepreneurship orientation alignment on product innovation. Organization Science, 12(1), 54–74.
7.Atuahene-Gima, K., & Wei, Y. 2011. The vital role of problem-solving competence in new product success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(1): 81–98.
8.Batt, R. (2002). Managing customer services: Human resource practices, quit rates, and sales growth. Academy of Management Journal 45 (3): 587–597.
9.Blau, P. M. 1977. Inequality and heterogeneity. New York: Free Press.
10.Calantone, R. J., Chan, K., & Cui, A. S. 2006. Decomposing product innovativeness and its effects on new product success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(5): 408–421.
11.Calantone, R. J., Harmancioglu, N., & Droge, C. 2010. Inconclusive innovation ‘‘Returns’’: A meta-analysis of research on innovation in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27 (7): 1065–1081.
12.Cannon, J. P. & Homburg, C. 2001. Buyer-supplier relationships and customer firm costs. Journal of Marketing 65 (1) 29–44.
13.Davila, A. 2003. Short-term economic incentives in new product development. Research Policy 32: 1397–1420.
14.Day, G. S. 1994. The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 37–52.
15.Deshpande, R., Farley, J. U., & Webster Jr., F. E. 1993. Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese firms: A quadrad analysis. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 23–37.
16.Ferrier, W. 2001. Navigating the competitive landscape: The drivers and onsequences of competitive aggressiveness. Academy of Management Journal 44(4): 858-877.
17.Gatignon, H., & Xuereb, J. M. 1997. Strategic orientation of the firm new product performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1):77–90.
18.Griffiths-Hemans, J., and Grover, R. 2006. Setting the stage for creative new products: Investigating the idea fruition process. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34(1), 27–39.
19.Hair, J. E., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. 2006. Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
20.Hatch, N. W., & Dyer, J. H. 2004. Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal 25(12), 1155–1178.
21.Hoffman, N. P. 2000. An examination of the “sustainable competitive advantage” concept: Past, present, and future. Academy of Marketing Science Review 2000(4): 1–16.
22.Im, S., & Workman, J. P. Jr. 2004. Market orientation, creativity, and new product performance in high-technology firms. Journal of Marketing 68 (April): 114-132.
23.Jaccard, J., & Turrisi, R. 2003. Interaction effects in multiple regression (2nd Ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
24.Jaworski, B. J. & Kohli, A. K. 1993. Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53–70.
25.Jean, R-J. B., Sinkovics, R. R. & Hiebaum, T. P. (2014). The Effects of Supplier Involvement and Knowledge Protection on Product Innovation in Customer–Supplier Relationships: A Study of Global Automotive Suppliers in China. Journal of Product Innovation Management 31(1):98–113.
26.Jeong, I., Pae, J. H., Zhou, D. 2006. Antecedents and consequences of the strategic orientations in new product development: The case of Chinese manufacturers. Industrial Marketing Management 35(3): 348–358.
27.Joshi, A. W., & Sharma, S. 2004. Customer knowledge development: antecedents and impact on new product performance. Journal of Marketing 68 (October): 47–59.
28.Kibbeling, M, van der Bij, H., & van Weele, A. (2013). Market Orientation and Innovativeness in Supply Chains: Supplier’s Impact on Customer Satisfaction. Journal of Product Innovation Management 30(3):500–515.
29.Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. 1990. Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2): 1–18.
30.Lau, A. K. W., Yam, R. C. M., & Tang, E. 2011. The impact of product modularity on new product performance: Mediation by product innovativeness. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(2): 270–284.
31.Lavie, D. Capability reconfiguration: An analysis of incumbent responses to technological change. Academy of Management Review; 31(1):153–174.
32.Lee Y., & O’Connor, G. C. 2003. The impact of communication strategy on launching new products: The moderating role of product innovativeness. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(1): 4–21.
33.Li, T., & Calantone, R. J. 1994. The impact of market knowledge competence on new product advantage: Conceptualization and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(4): 13–29.
34.Li, Y., Zhao, Y., Tan, J., & Liu, Y. 2008. Moderating effects of entrepreneurial orientation on market orientation-performance linkage: Evidence from Chinese small firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(1): 113–133.
35.Lin, M.-J. J., Tu, Y.-C., Chen, D.-C., & Huang, C.-H. (2013). Customer participation and new product development outcomes: The moderating role of product innovativeness. Journal of Management and Organization 19(3): 314–337.
36.Maniak, R., Midler, C., Beaume, R. von Pechmann, F. (2014). Featuring Capability: How Carmakers Organize to Deploy Innovative Features across Products. Journal of Product Innovation Management 31(1): 114–127.
37.Matting, J., Sanden B., & Edvardsson, B. 2004. New service development: learning from and with customers. International Journal of Service Industry Management 15(5): 479–498.
38.McNally, R. C., Cavusgil, E., & Calantone, R. J. (2010). Product Innovativeness Dimensions and Their Relationships with Product Advantage, Product Financial Performance, and Project Protocol. Journal of Product Innovation Management 27(7): 991–1006.
39.Richard, O. 2000. Racial diversity, business strategy, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal 43(2): 164–177.
40.Ritter, T., & Gemünden, H. G. 2004. The impact of a company's business strategy on its technological competence, network competence and innovation success. Journal of Business Research 57(5): 548–556.
41.Salavou, H. 2005. Do customer and technology orientations influence product innovativeness in SMEs? Some new evidence from Greece. Journal of Marketing Management 21(3): 307–338.
42.Sarin, S., & McDermott, C. 2003. The effect of team leader characteristics on learning, knowledge application, and performance of cross-functional new product development teams. Decision Sciences 34(4): 707–739.
43.Schulze, A., and Hoegl, M. (2006). “Knowledge creation in new product development projects,” Journal of Management 32(2), 210–236.
44.Slater, S. F. & Narver, J. C. 1995. Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 63–74.
45.Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology: 290-312. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
46.Song, M., & Xie, J. 2000. Does innovativeness moderate the relationship between cross-functional integration and product performance? Journal of International Marketing 8(4):61–89.
47.Song, X. M. & Montoya-Weiss, M. 2001. The effect of perceived technological uncertainty on Japanese new product development. Academy of Management Journal 44(1): 61-80.
48.Song, X. M., & Parry, M. E. 1997. A cross-national comparative study of new product development processes: Japan and the United States. Journal of Marketing 61 (April): 1-18.
49.Spanjol, J., William J. Qualls, W. J., & Rosa, J. A. 2011. How many and what kind? The role of strategic orientation in new product ideation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(2): 236–250.
50.Tang, J., & Murphy, P. J. 2012. Prior knowledge and new product and service introductions by entrepreneurial firms: The mediating role of technological innovation. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(1): 41–62.
51.Teece D. J., Pisano G., & Shuen A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7): 509–533.
52.Teece, D. J. (1980). Economics of scope and the scope of the enterprise, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1(2): 223–247.
53.Teece, D. J., Pisano, G; Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management, Strategic Management Journal, 18(7): 509–533.
54.Verhees, F. J. H. M., & Meulenberg, M. T. G. 2004. Market orientation, innovativeness, product innovation, and performance in small firms. Journal of Small Business Management 42(2): 134–154.
55.Wiersema, M., & Bantel, K. 1992. Top management team demography and corporate strategic chance. Academy of management journal, 35(1): 91-121.
56.Wind, J., & Mahajan, V. 1997. Editorial: issues and opportunities in new product development: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1): 1–12.
57.Zhou, K. H., & Li, C. B. 2010. How strategic orientations influence the building of dynamic capability in emerging economies. Journal of Business Research, 63(3): 224–231.