簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李遠婷
Lee, Yuan-ting
論文名稱: 組合型基金績效評估:運用平均變異數及基因演算法來建構最佳基金投資組合權重之研究
Performance Evaluation for Fund of Funds based on Mean-Variance Model and Genetic Algorithms to Construct Optimal Weights of Portfolio of Funds
指導教授: 顏盟峯
Yen, Meng-Feng
李宏志
Li, Hung-Chih
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融研究所
Graduate Institute of Finance
論文出版年: 2009
畢業學年度: 97
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 92
中文關鍵詞: 績效持續性平均數變異數模型基因演算法基金投資組合績效評估
外文關鍵詞: Performance Persistence, Performance Evaluation, Mean-Variance Model, Genetic Algorithms, Portfolio Selection
相關次數: 點閱:150下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 摘要
    本研究利用Markowitiz 所提出的平均變異數模型以及人工智慧裡的基因演算法,來建構最佳化權重的基金投資組合。有別於過去的研究直接採用所有的投資組合作樣本,本研究為了更符合實際的投資狀況,在給定報酬下求最小風險及給定風險下求最大報酬的兩種情境,挑選出績效優異的前百分之三、前百分之五、前百分之十、前百分之十五及前百分之二十的投資組合做為下一期的投資,為了更客觀的指出績效較佳的投資組合具有較好的績效及績效持續性,本研究另挑選出績效較差的前百分之三、前百分之五、前百分之十、前百分之十五及前百分之二十,評估其績效持續性及績效差異。並利用MSCI 全球指數、S&P500 以及平均權重基金投資組合來比較其績效的優異。
    受限於平均變異數模型要求的假設,例如:常態分配,造成大部分過去研究顯示基因演算法的績效優於平均變異數模型。本研究透過擴大樣本藉選定十七檔富蘭克林基金及十七檔富達基金分別共選出360檔及288檔組合型基金,進一步探討基因演算法所建構的基金投資組合是否還能優於平均變異數模型。
    本研究發現:
    一、 在報酬最大操作的績效表現優於風險最小下的績效表現。
    二、 在大部分的情況下,平均變異數模型的績效顯著優於人工基因演算法。
    三、 在平均變異數模型及人工基因演算法都顯示投資組合具有短期的績效持續性。透過增加投資組合數,可以提升績效持續性,然而本研究發現將投資組合增加至百分二十區間,可達較佳的績效持續性。

    ABSTRACT
    The study applies the Mean-Variance Model (MV) proposed by Markowitz and the Genetic Algorithms (GA) developed from artificial intelligence to construct optimal-weighted simulated fund portfolios. The main difference between this thesis and past studies is that we do not invest all portfolios; instead, we only choose the past top performance portfolios including three percent, five percent, ten percent, fifteen percent and twenty percent of all portfolio which is more rational, since investors might only want to choose past top percent of portfolio performing better due to expectation of continuing higher performance. To be more objective to evidence top performance portfolios have better performance, the study chooses the worse performance portfolios including three percent, five percent, ten percent, fifteen percent and twenty percent of all portfolio to examine whether there exists performance difference between portfolio invested based on past top and worse performance portfolios. The study also compares the performance of MV and GA with that of MSCI, S&P500 and Equally Weighted portfolio. Since there is the limitation required from the Markowitz model such as normal distribution of target asset, most prior researches demonstrate that the Genetic Algorithms outperforms the Mean-Variance Model. We proceed to examine whether the Genetic Algorithms can perform better than the Mean-Variance Model by examining funds portfolio based on 360 Franklin and 288 Fidelity funds portfolio.
    There are several findings. First, the performance of the Mean-Variance Model and the Genetic Algorithms under maximizing return for a given risk is better than that under minimizing risk for a given return. Second, in most situations, the Mean-Variance Model outperforms the Genetic Algorithms. Finally, the result presents that the Mean-Variance Model and the Genetic Algorithms can improve performance persistence by increasing portfolios. Nevertheless, the phenomenon of performance persistence becomes better when the size of portfolio ranges in twenty percent.

    CONTENTS 摘要 I ABSTRACT II CONTENTS III TABLE OF CONTENTS V FIGURE OF CONTENTS VII Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Research Background and Motivation 1 1.2 Objectives 3 1.3 Importance of the Study 4 Chapter 2 Literature Review and Development of Hypotheses 6 2.1 Fund of Funds (FoF) 6 2.2 Models for Portfolio Construction 7 2.2.1 Markowitz Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection Model 7 2.2.2 The Genetic Algorithms 12 2.3 Performance Persistence 17 2.4 Development of Hypotheses 18 Chapter 3 Model Specifications and Methodology 21 3.1 Data 21 3.2 Research Designs and Procedures 23 3.3 Definition of Parameters 25 3.3.1 Estimation of Monthly Volatility of MSCI All Country World Index 25 3.3.2 Estimation of the Systematic Risk 25 3.3.3 Sharpe’s Measure 26 3.3.4 Treynor’s Measure 27 3.3.5 Jensen’s Measure 27 3.4 Methodology 28 3.4.1 Markowitz Mean-Variance Model 28 3.5 Normal Distribution Test: One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test 39 3.6 Performance Persistence Test: Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient Test 40 3.7 Performance Difference Test: Paired-T Test and Wilcoxon Singed-Rank Test 42 Chapter 4 Empirical Results 45 4.1 Normality Test 46 4.2 Performance Comparison 51 4.3 Performance Persistence 66 Chapter 5 Conclusions 81 5.1 Conclusions 81 Reference 85 Appendix 89 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table 3-1: List of Sample Funds of Franklin 22 Table 3-2: List of Sample Funds of Fidelity 22 Table 3-3: List of Genetic Algorithms Parameter 39 Table 4-1: Summary Statistic for Number of Normal Distribution 47 Table 4-2: Descriptive Statistics for Global Area 47 Table 4-3: Descriptive Statistics for European Area 48 Table 4-4: Descriptive Statistics for Emerging Area 48 Table 4-5: Descriptive Statistics for America Area 48 Table 4-6: Descriptive Statistics for Single Area 49 Table 4-7: Descriptive Statistics for European Area 49 Table 4-8: Descriptive Statistics for European Area 49 Table 4-9: Descriptive Statistics for Emerging Area 50 Table 4-10: Descriptive Statistics for Pacific Area 50 Table 4-11: Descriptive Statistics for South AsiaArea 50 Table 4-12: Descriptive Statistics for Asia Pacific Area 51 Table 4-13: Descriptive Statistics for America Area 51 Table 4-14: Descriptive Statistics for Global Area 51 Table 4-15: Correlation Coefficient for Franklin Funds 54 Table 4-16: Correlation Coefficient for Fidelity Funds 55 Table 4-17: Performance Comparison for Franklin Funds Based on Scenario1: Risk-Minimizing 56 Table 4-18: Performance Comparison for Franklin Funds Based on Scenario2: Return-Maximizing 58 Table 4-19: Performance Comparison for Fidelity Funds Based on Scenario1: Risk-Minimizing 60 Table 4-20: Performance Comparison for Fidelity Funds Based on Scenario2: Return-Maximizing 62 Table 4-21: Summary of Performance Comparison 64 Table 4-22: Summary of the Number of Performance Persistence of Top Performance Portfolio under Risk-Minimizing Scenario for Franklin Funds 71 Table 4-23: Summary of the Number of Performance Persistence of Top Performance Portfolio under Rrturn-Maximizing Scenario for Franklin Funds 71 Table 4-24: Summary of the Number of Performance Persistence of Top Performance Portfolio under Risk-Minimizing Scenario for Fidelity Funds 72 Table 4-25: Summary of the Number of Performance Persistence of Top Performance Portfolio under Return-Maximizing Scenario for Fidelity Funds 72 Table 4-26: Summary of the Number of Performance Persistence of Worse Performance Portfolio under Risk-Minimizing Scenario for of Franklin Funds 73 Table 4-27: Summary of the Number of Performance Persistence of Worse Performance Portfolio under Return-Maximizing Scenario for of Franklin 73 Table 4-28: Summary of the Number of Performance Persistence of Worse Performance Portfolio under Risk-Minimizing Scenario for of Fidelity Funds 74 Table 4-29: Summary of the Number of Performance Persistence of Worse Performance Portfolio under Return-Maximizing Scenario for of Fidelity Funds 74 Table 4-30: Mean difference between top and worse performance portfolio for Franklin Fund under Risk-Minimizing Scenario 75 Table 4-31: Mean difference between top and worse performance portfolio for Franklin Fund under Return-Maximizing Scenario 76 Table 4-32: Mean difference between top and worse performance portfolio for Fidelity Fund under Risk-Minimizing Scenari 77 Table 4-33: Mean difference between top and worse performance portfolio for Fidelity Fund under Risk-Minimiz 78 Table 4-34: The Summary Table of Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test for Franklin Fund under Risk-Minimizing Scenario 79 Table 4-35: The Summary Table of Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test for Franklin Fund under Return-Maximizing Scenario 79 Table 4-36: The Summary Table of Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test for Fidelity Fund under Risk-Minimizing Scenario 80 Table 4-37: The Summary Table of Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test for Fidelity Fund under Return-Maximizing Scenario 80 FIGURE OF CONTENTS Figure 3-1: Rolling procedure from Franklin funds and Fidelity funds 25 Figure 3-2 Efficient Frontier 32 Appendix Figure A : Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Franklin Funds 89 Appendix Figure B: Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Fidelity Funds 991

    Reference
    Abiyev, R. H. and M. Menekay, (2007),“Fuzzy portfolio selection using Genetic Algorithms”, Soft Computing - A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies & Applications, Vol. 11 Issue 12, 1157-1163.
    Adler, T. and M. Kritzman, (2007),“Mean–variance versus full-scale optimization: In and out of sample”, Journal of Asset Management, Vol. 7 Issue 5, 302-311.
    Allen, F. and R. Karjalainen, (1999),“Using Genetic Algorithms to Find Technical Trading Rules”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 51, 245-271.
    Altay-Salih, A., G. Muradoglu and M. Mercan, (2002),“Performance of the efficient frontier in an emerging market setting”, Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 9 Issue 3, 177-183.
    Babalos, V., Kostakis, A. and Philippas, N., (2007),” Spurious results in testing mutual fund performance persistence: evidence from the Greek market.” Applied Financial Economics Letters, 2007, 3, 103–108
    Ballestero, E. and C. Romero, (1996) , “Portfolio Selection: A Compromise Programming Solution”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 47, No. 11, 1377-1386.
    Ballestero, E., (2005) , “Mean-Semivariance Efficient Frontier: A Downside Risk Model for Portfolio Selection”, Applied Mathematical Finance, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1-15.
    Berk, J., and R. Green, (2004) , ‘‘Mutual Fund Flows and Performance in Rational Markets.’’ Forthcoming, Journal of Political Economy
    Bian, J. S., (1995) , “An Genetic-Algorithm Model for Taiwan Stock Index Portfolio” M.A. thesis, Graduate Institute of Information Management, National Chiao Tung University, in Chinese.
    Blake, D. and Timmermann, A. (1998), “Mutual Fund Performance: Evidence from the UK”, European Finance Review, 2, 57-77.
    Bollen, N. P.B. and Busse, J.A., (2004),“Short-Term Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance.” Review of Financial Studies 2005 18(2) , 569-597.
    Brands, S. and D. R. Gallagher, (2005), “Portfolio selection, diversification and fund-of-funds: a note”, Accounting & Finance, Vol. 45 Issue 2, 185-197.
    Breuer, W. and M. Gurtler, (2006) , “Performance Evaluation, Portfolio Selection, and HARA Utility”, European Journal of Finance, Vol. 12 Issue 8, 649-669.
    Brown, S. J., and W. N. Goetzmann, (1995),“Performance Persistence”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 50, No. 2, 679-698.
    Carhart, M. M., (1997) , “On persistence in mutual fund performance”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 52, No. 1, 57-82.
    Carlson, R. S. (1970),”Aggregate performance of mutual funds”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 5, 1–31.
    Casarin, R., Pelizzon, L. and Piva, A., (2008), Italian Equity Funds: Efficiency and Performance Persistence, ICFAI Journal of Financial Economics, 6 (1), 7-28.
    Chan, K.S., (2008),” Applying Mean-Variance Model and Genetic Algorithms to Construct Optimal Weights of Portfolio of Funds.” M.A. thesis, Graduate Institute of Finance, National Cheng Kung University
    Chang, C. C., (2003),“Construction of Stock Index Simulation Portfolio Using Genetic Algorithms” M.A. thesis, Graduate Institute of Accounting, National Taipei University, in Chinese.
    Chang, T. J., N. Meade, J. E. Beasley and Y. M. Sharaiha, (1998) , “Heuristics for cardinality constrained portfolio optimisation” The Management School, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
    Chang, T.J., Yang, S. C. and Chang, K.J., (2009),“Portfolio Optimization Problems in Different Risk Measures Using Genetic Algorithms.” Expert Systems with Applications 36,10529–10537
    Chen, A. H. Y., F. C. Jen and S. Zionts, (1971),“The optimal portfolio revision policy”, Journal of Business, 44, 51-61.
    Chen, L.H. and Huang, L.,(2008),“Portfolio Optimization of Equity Mutual Funds with Fuzzy Return Rates and Risks.” Expert Systems with Applications 36 , 3720–3727
    Chiu, C. R., (1998) , “An Application of Genetic Algorithms on Portfolio Strategies” M.A. thesis, Graduate Institute of Economics, National Sun Yat-sen University, in Chinese.
    Crama, Y. and M. Schyns, (2003),“Simulated annealing for complex portfolio selection problems”, European Journal of Operational Research 150, 546-571.
    Deng, X. T., Z. F. Li and S. Y. Wang, (2005),“A minimax portfolio selection strategy with equilibrium”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 166 Issue 1, 278-292.
    Drakos, K. and Zachouris, P., (2007) ,”On performance persistence in the Greek equity fund market.” Global Business and Economics Review, 2007, vol. 9, issue 1, 75-91
    Elton, E. J., M. J. Gruber and C. R. Blake, (1996),“The Persistence of Risk-Adjusted Mutual Fund Performance”, The Journal of Business, Vol. 69, No. 2, 133-157.
    Goetzmann, W.N. and Ibbotson, R.G. (1994), “Do Winners Repeat? Patterns in
    Mutual Fund Performance”, Journal of Portfolio Management, 20, 9-18.
    Grinblatt, M. and Titman, S. (1992),“ The Persistence of Mutual Funds”, Journal of Finance, 47, 1977-1984.
    Hendricks, D., Patel, J. and Zeckhauser, R. (1993), “Hot Hands in Mutual Funds: Short-Run Persistence of Relative Performance, 1974-1988”, Journal of Finance, 48(1), 93-130.
    Holland, J., (1975) , “Adaptation in Natural and Artificial System”, MIT Press Cambridge, MA, USA.
    Huang, X., (2006) , “Fuzzy chance-constrained portfolio selection”, Applied Mathematics & Computation, Vol. 177 Issue 2, 500-507.
    Jensen, M. (1968),”The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945–
    1964”, Journal of Finance, 23, 389–416.
    Jensen, M. C., (1969) , “The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945-1964”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 23, No. 2, 389-416.
    Konno, H., (1990) , “Piecewise linear risk function and portfolio optimization”, Journal of the Operational Research Society of Japan Vol. 33, No. 2, 139-156.
    Konno, H., & Yamazaki, H. (1991),”Mean-absolute deviation portfolio optimization
    model and its application to the Tokyo Stock Market”, Management Science, 37,
    519–531
    Konno, H., Waki, H., & Yuuki, A. (2002),”Portfolio optimization under lower partial
    risk measures”, Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 9, 127–140.
    Korczak, J. J, 2001, “Portfolio Design and Simulation Using Evolution Based Strategy”, M.A. thesis, Graduate Institute of Finance & Banking, National Cheng Kung University
    Lai, S. and Li, H., (2008), “The performance evaluation for fund of funds by comparing asset allocation of mean–variance model or Genetic Algorithms to that of fund managers”, Applied Financial Economics, 2008, 18, 483–499
    Lai, J.H., (2007),” Using Mean-Variance Model and Genetic Algorithm to Find the Optimized Weights of Portfolio of Funds”, M.A. thesis, Graduate Institute of Finance, National Cheng Kung University
    Lin, C.C. and Liu, Y.T.,(2006), “Genetic Algorithms for Portfolio Selection Problems with Minimum Transaction Lots.” European Journal of Operational Research 185, 393–404
    Lin, C.,Hsu, S. and Chen, S.,(2008),” Applying Genetic Algorithms to Explore Fund of Funds on Efficient Frontier and Product Design.” The 3rd Intetnational Conference on Innovative Computing Information and Control (ICICIC'08)
    Lintner, J., (1965) , “The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets”, Journal of Finance, Dec65, Vol. 20 Issue 4, 587-615.
    Malkiel, B. (1995), “Returns from Investing in Equity Mutual Funds 1971-1991”, Journal of Finance, 50, 549-573.
    Markowitz, H., (1952) , “Portfolio selection”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 7, Issue 1, 77-91.
    Markowitz, H., P. Todd, G. Xu and Y. Yamane, (1993) , “Computation of mean-semivariance efficient sets by the Critical Line Algorithm”, Annals of Operations Research 45, 307-317.
    Oh, K. J., T. Y. Kim and S. Min, (2005) , “Using Genetic Algorithms to support portfolio optimization for index fund management”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 28 Issue 2, 371-379.
    Oh, K. J., T. Y. Kim, S. H. Min and H. Y. Lee, (2006), “Portfolio algorithm based on portfolio beta using Genetic Algorithms”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 30 Issue 3, 527-534.
    Pogue, G. A., (1970) , “An Extension of the Markowitz Portfolio Selection Model to Include Variable Transactions’ Costs, Short Sales, Leverage Policies and Taxes”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 25, No. 5, 1005-1027.
    Sharpe, W. (1966), ” Mutual fund performance”, Journal of Business, 39,119–138.
    Sharpe, W. F., (1964) , “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk”, Journal of Finance Vol. 19, No. 3, 425-442.
    Sharpe, W. F., (2007) , “Expected Utility Asset Allocation”, Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 63 Issue 5, 18-30.
    Shapcott, J., (1992), “Index Tracking: Genetic Algorithms for Investment Portfolio Selection”, Edinburgh Parallel Computing Centre, EPCC–SS92–24.
    Soleimani, H., Golmakani, H. R. and Salimi, H., (2008),”Markowitz-Based Portfolio Selection with Minimum Transaction Lots, Cardinality Constraints and Regarding Sector Capitalization Using Genetic Algorithms” Expert Systems with Applications 36, 5058–5063
    Treynor, J. L., (1965),“How to rate management of investment funds”, Harvard Business Review 43, 63-75.
    Venugopal, M., S. Subramanian and U. S. Rao, (2004), “Usefulness of Genetic Algorithms Model for Dynamic Portfolio Selection”, Journal of Financial Management & Analysis, Vol. 17, Issue 1, 45-53.
    Williamson, P. J. (1972),”Measurement and forecasting of mutual fund performance: choosing an investment strategy”, Financial Analysts Journal, 28, 78–84.
    Xia, Y., Wang, S. and Deng, X.,(2000),” A Compromise Solution to Mutual Funds Portfolio Selection with Transaction Costs.” European Fournal of Operational Research 134,564-581
    Yang, X.,(2006), “ Improving Portfolio Efficiency: A Genetic Algorithms Approach.” Computational Economics 28, 1–14
    Yan, W., R. Miao and S. Li, (2007), “Multi-period semi-variance portfolio selection: Model and numerical solution”, Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 194, 128-134.

    無法下載圖示 校內:2109-06-25公開
    校外:2111-06-25公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE