簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 高佳銘
Kao, Chia-Ming
論文名稱: 公司內部因素、資本結構與績效之關聯性研究
Performance Implications of Internal Factors and Capital Structure
指導教授: 張淑昭
Chang, Su-Chao
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理學系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2009
畢業學年度: 97
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 88
中文關鍵詞: 公司價值最適資本結構理論資本結構
外文關鍵詞: Optimal Capital Structure, Firm Value, Capital Structure
相關次數: 點閱:94下載:11
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究主要目的是探討:1.台灣上市公司資本結構影響因素;2.資本結構與公司價值之關聯性。研究期間為2004~2008年共計5年,研究樣本為19種產業,155家台灣上市公司為對象。資本結構解釋變數包括:公司規模、公司風險程度、非負債稅盾、資產抵押價值、股利政策、長期投資、大陸投資、ROA、ROE及創新績效共10個變數;資本結構以總負債比率、長期負債比率及短期負債比率為代理變數;公司價值以Tobin’Q及附加市場價值(MVA)為代理變數,本研究利用簡單迴歸分析、多元迴歸分析及逐步迴歸分析為研究方法。根據實證結果顯示:

    1. 總負債比率與公司規模、資產抵押價值、長期投資等呈顯著正相關;與ROA、ROE呈顯著負相關。
    2. 長期負債比率與公司規模、資產抵押價值、大陸投資等呈顯著正相關;與股利政策、ROA等呈顯著負相關。
    3. 短期負債比率與資產抵押價值、長期投資等呈顯著正相關;與股利政策、ROA呈顯著負相關。
    4. 根據逐步迴歸分析結果,以資產抵押價值及公司規模最具解釋能力。
    5. 上市公司因產業別不同,其負債比率包括短期、長期及總負債等皆有顯著性之差異。
    6. 上市公司因產業別不同,其公司價值存在顯著差異。

    The main purpose of this study is to explore:1. The influencing factors on the capital structure of Taiwan listed companies. 2. The relatedness between capital structure and firm value. The period of this study covers 5 years from 2004 to 2008, and the samples include 155 companies and 19 Industries of Taiwan listed companies. There are 10 factors chosen as the explanatory variable, including corporate size, assets mortgage debt, non-debt shields, operating risk, financial performance (ROA & ROE), cash dividend policy, capital investment(Long-term & China) and innovation performance. The proxy variables of capital structure are short-term debt ratio, long-term debt ratio and total debt ratio. The proxy variables of firm value are Tobin’s Q and Market Value Added. The empirical results are as below:
    1. Corporate size, assets mortgage debt and long-term investment have positive correlation with the total debt ratio; ROA and ROE have negative correlation with total debt ratio.
    2. Corporate size, assets mortgage debt and China investment have positive correlation with long-term debt ratio; cash dividend policy and ROA have negative correlation with long-term debt ratio.
    3. Assets mortgage debt and long-term investment have positive correlation with short-term debt ratio; cash dividend policy and ROA have negative correlation with short-term debt ratio.
    4. According to the result of stepwise regression, corporate size and assets mortgage debt have better explanatory power.
    5. Industries classification has a significant variance about the firm value and the corporate capital structure.

    論文摘要..............................I 誌謝辭..............................III 目錄...............................IV 表目錄..............................V 圖目錄..............................V 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究動機........................1 第二節 研究目的........................2 第三節 研究流程........................3 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 資本結構理論......................4 第二節 國外相關實證研究....................20 第三節 國內相關實證研究....................27 第四節 資本結構影響因素探討..................38 第五節 資本結構與公司價值...................43 第三章 研究設計 第一節 觀念性研究架構.....................50 第二節 研究假說........................51 第三節 研究變數衡量......................52 第四節 研究方法........................59 第五節 資料來源與樣本選取標準.................61 第四章 實證結果與分析 第一節 資本結構影響因素之迴歸分析...............64 第二節 資本結構對公司價值迴歸分析...............72 第五章 結論與建議 第一節 結論..........................78 第二節 建議..........................81 參考文獻..............................83

    1. 呂麒麟、洪嘉聲、范麗雪、陳淑貞(2005) 金融機構所有權結構、公司特性與逾放比率之研究,第2卷第1期,61-79。
    2. 吳建良(2005) 資本適足率與逾期放款率對銀行財務之績效,台灣銀行季刊,第56卷第2期,1-27。
    3. 周淑卿、吳欽杉、陳安琳(2004) 電子資訊產業與非電子資訊產業之研究發展支出、股權結構與公司績效之關聯性研究,台北科技大學學報,第37卷第2期,267-280。
    4. 楊朝旭、黃潔(2004) 企業生命週期、資產組合與企業未來績效關聯性之研究,商管科技季刊,第5卷第1期,49-71。
    5. 戴錦周、嚴月玲(2004) 資本節構、股權結構、股利政策與公司價值之互動關係—以1997-2001年之台灣上市公司為例,台灣銀行季刊,第55卷第4期,295-316。
    6. 王祝三(2004) 我國上市公司偏好發放股票股利程度之決定因素及其對長期股價之影響,風險管理學報,第6卷第3期,307-352。
    7. 林祝英、劉正義(2003) 企業研發投資對融資、股利政策與成長機會之影響—以電子資訊產業為例,風險管理學報,第5卷第3期,319-339。
    8. 劉玉珍(2003) 財務管理,新陸書局。
    9. 謝劍平(2002) 財務管理—新觀念與本土化,智勝文化。
    10. 陳隆麒、溫育芳(2002) 國內上市公司資本結構決定因素之研究,台灣銀行季刊,第53卷第1期,171-194。
    11. 葉銀華、柯承恩、蘇裕惠(2000) 中小企業財務結構與經營績效關係之研究,中山管理評論,第8卷第2期,303-323。
    12. 葉銀華、邱顯比(1996) 資本結構、股權結構與公司價值關聯性之實證研究:代理成本理論,台大管理叢論,第七卷第2期,57-90。
    13. 黃瑛如(2008) 台灣資本結構、股權結構和公司績效關係之研究—從生命週期的角度來探討,國立台灣科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
    14. 林冠宇(2008) 公司財務歷史對於資本結構之影響—兩階段迴歸模型之應用,國立台北大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    15. 張朝義(2007) 所有權結構與資本結構對公司價值影響之研究—以台灣上市電子公司為例,國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    16. 蔡宗孝(2007) 企業資本結構及融資決策選擇之探討,國立中山大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。
    17. 阮黛玲(2006) 資本結構影響因素之探討—以台積電為例,國立中央大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
    18. 陳佳汝(2006) 資本結構變化與信用風險探討,國立台灣大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
    19. 陳晴榆(2006) 資本結構、所有權結構與成本效率之研究—以台灣生物科技產業為例,銘傳大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
    20. 王珮珊(2006) 台灣地區銀行資本結構與經營績效之分析—代理成本觀點,銘傳大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
    21. 施其佑(2006) 股權結構、資本結構與公司價值關聯性之研究,大同大學事業經營研究所碩士論文。
    22. 吳宗輔(2006) 台灣上市公司股權結構、董事會組成特性對公司經營績效及股利政策影響之研究,國立中正大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
    23. 劉宜和(2006) 債務結構及股權結構與公司價值之關係,國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    24. 劉育鑫 (2005) 組織內外部因素、多角化相關程度與公司績效之關聯性研究,國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    25. 陳家馴 (2004) 董事會組成、公股角色與企業績效之關聯性研究,國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    26. 洪麗芳(2004) 股權結構、財務決策與公司績效關聯性之研究,中原大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
    27. 沈立平(2003) 台灣上市公司股權結構、財務決策與公司價值之關聯性研究,國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    28. 林玉霞(2002) 台灣上市公司代理問題、公司治理與股東價值之研究,中原大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
    1. Almazam, A., Suarez, J., Titman, S., (2003), Capital Structure and Transparency, Unpublished Working Paper, University of Texas, Austin.
    2. Altunba Y., Ming-Hau Lin, Molyneux P. and Seth R. (2000), Efficiency and Risk in Japanese Banking, Journal of Banking and Finance, 24(10), 1605-1628.
    3. Ang J. S., Cole R. A. and Lin J. W. (2000), Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, Journal of Finance, 55(1), 81-106.

    4. Bah, R., Dumontier, P. (2001), R&D Intensity and Corporate Financial Policy: Some International Evidence, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 28, 671-693.
    5. Baker M., Wurgler, J. (2002), Market Timing and Capital Structure, Journal of Finance, 57, 1-32.
    6. Bauer, R., Gunster, N. and Otten, R., (2004), Empirical evidence on corporate governance in Europe: The Effect on Stock Returns, Firm Value and Performance, Journal of Asset Management, forthcoming, 5, 91-105.
    7. Berger A. N. and Patti E. B. D. (2002), Capital Structure and Firm Performance: A New Approach to Testing Agency Theory and An Application to the Banking Industry, Finance and Economics Discussion Series Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
    8. Booth, L., V. Aivazian, A. Demirguc-Kunt and V. Maskimovic (2001), Capital Structure in Developing Countries, Journal of Finance, 56-1, 87-130.
    9. Brailsford, T.J., Oliver B. R. and Pus S. L. H. (2002), On the relation between ownership structure and capital structure, Accounting and Finance, 42, 1-26.
    10. Bredley, R. and Stewart Myers, (2003), Principles of Corporate Finance, Profitability of Small and Medium-Size Enterprises in High-Tech Industries: The Case of the Biotechnology Industry, Strategic Management Journal, 24, 881-887.
    11. Chen T. Y. and Yen T. L. (2000), A Measurement of Bank Efficiency, Ownership and Productivity Changes in Taiwan, The Service Industries Journal, 20, 95-109.
    12. Chen, C. R. Guo, W. and Mande, V. (2003), Managerial ownership and firm valuation: Evidence from Japanese firms, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 11,267-283.
    13. Chin C. L., Tsao, S. M. and Chi, H. Y. (2005), Trademark value and Accounting Performance: analysis from corporate life cycle, The Journal of American Academy of Business, 106-112.
    14. Chu, E. Y. and Cheah, K. G. (2006), Does Ownership Structure Matter? Evidence from Malaysian Equity Market, Corporate Ownership and Control, 4(1), 77-90.
    15. Collin-Dufresne, Pierre, and Robert. S. Goldstein (2001), Do Credit Spreads Reflect Stationary Leverage Ratios? Journal of Finance, 56(5), 1929-1957.
    16. Connie X. Mao, (2003), Interaction of Debt Agency Problem and Optimal Capital Structure: Theory and Evidence, Journal of Finance and Quantitative Analysis, 38(2), 399-423.
    17. Cordeiro, J. J., Veliyath R. (2003), Beyond pay for performance: A panel study of the determinants of CEO compensation, American Business Review, 21(1), 56-66.
    18. Dangl, Thomas, and Josef Zechner(2004), Credit Risk and Dynamic Capital Structure Choice, Journal of Finance Intermediation 13, 183-204.
    19. David, P., Hitt, M., Gimeno, J. (2001), The role of institution Investors in influencing R&D, Academy of Management Journal, 44, 144-157.
    20. Davies, J. R., Hillier, D. and McColgan, P. (2005), Ownership structure, managerial behavior and corporate value, Journal of Corporate Finance, 11, 645-660.
    21. Demsetz, H. and Villalonga, B. (2001), Ownership Structure and Corporate Performance, Journal of Corporate Finance, 7, 209-233.
    22. Drobetz, W., Schillhofer, A. and Zimmermann, H., (2004), Corporate Governance and Expected Stock Returns: Evidence from Germany, European Financial Management, 10, 267-293.
    23. Ericsson, J. and J. Reneby (2002), The Valuation of Corporate Liabilities: Theory and Tests, Stockholm School of Economics, Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance No. 445.
    24. Fama, E. F., and French, K. R., (2005), Financing Decisions: Who Issues Stock? Journal of Financial Economics, 76, 549-582.
    25. Fama, E., French, K. R., (2002), Testing Tradeoff and Pecking Order Predictions about Dividends and Debt, Review of Financial Studies, 15, 1-33.

    26. Fosberg, R. H. (2004), Agency problem and debt financing: leadership structure effects, Corporate Governance, 4(1), 31-38.
    27. Frank, M., Goyal, V., (2005), Testing the Pecking Order Theory of Capital Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 67, 17-48.
    28. Gleason, K., Mathur, I. (2000), The interrelationship between culture, capital structure, and performance: Evidence from European Retailers, Journal of Business Research, 50(2), 185-191.
    29. Goldstein, R., Nengjiu Ju, and Hayne E. Leland (2001), An EBIT-based Model of Dynamic Capital Structure, Journal of Business 74, No.4, 483-511.
    30. Gompers, Paul, Ishii, Joy and Metrick, Andrew (2003), Corporate Governance and Equity Prices, NBER Working Paper No. 8449.
    31. Graham, J. R. and Harvey, C. R. (2001), The theory and practice fo corporate finance: evidence from the field, Journal of Financial Economics, 60, 187-243.
    32. Grier, P. and Zychowicz, E. J., (1994), Institutional Investors, Corporate Displine and the Role of Debt, Journal of Economics and Business, 46(1), 1-11.
    33. Gu, F. and Lev, B. (2001), Intangible assets: Measurement, drivers, usefulness, Working paper, Boston University.
    34. Harvey C. R., Lins K. V. and Roper A. H., (2004), The Effect of Capital Structure When Expected Agency Costs are Extreme, Journal of Finance Economics, 74,3-30.
    35. Homaifar, G., Zietz, J. and Benkato, O., (1994), An Empirical Model of Capital Structure: Some New Evidence, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 21(1), 1-14.
    36. Hovakimian, A., (2004), The Role of Target Leverage in Security Issues and Repurchases, Journal of Business, 1041-1072.
    37. Hovakimian, A., (2005), Are Observed Capital Structures Determined by Equity Marketing? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, forthcoming.
    38. Hovakimian, A., G. Hovakimian, and H. Tehranian (2004), Determinants of Target Capital Structure: The Case of Dual Debt and Equity Issues, Journal of Financial Economics 71, 517-540.
    39. Hovakimian, A., T. Opler, and S. Titman (2001), The Debt-equity Choice, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 36, No.1, 1-24.
    40. James C. Brau, (2002), Do Bank Price Owner-Manager Agency Costs? An Examination of Small Business Borrowing, Journal of Small Business Management, 40(4), 273-286.
    41. Jian-zhong Lin, Yan-yan Qiao (2007), Empirical study on the relationship between the capital structure of listed companies and the performance in energy industry, Journal of Modern Accounting & Auditing, 3(3), 39-44.
    42. Kahle, K. M., Shastri, K.(2005), Firm performance, capital structure, and the tax benefits of employee stock options, Journal of Finance & Quantitative Analysis, 40(1), 135-160.
    43. Kim, E. (2006), The impact of family ownership and capital structures on productivity performance of Korean manufacturing firms: Corporate governance and the “chaebol problem”, Journal of Japanese & International Economies, 20(2), 209-233.
    44. King, M. R., Santor, E.(2008), Family values: Ownership structure , performance and capital structure of Canadian firms, Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(1), 2423-2432.
    45. Klapper, L. F. and Love, I., (2004), Corporate Governance, Investor Protection, and Performance Immerging Markets, Journal of Corporate Finance.
    46. Le Claire, J., Hadden, J., Jaggers, K. (2001), Performance deals: A crystal ball in the capital structure, Venture Capital Journal, 41(12).
    47. Minzer, Rudi (2004), The factors Explaining Cost Efficiency Differences in Israeli Banks: A Stochastic Frontier Approach, PhD. Thesis from the Aharon Meir Center for Banking Department of Economics in Bar-Ilan University.
    48. Myers, Stewart C. (2001), Capital structure, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2), 81-102.
    49. Omet, G. (2006), Ownership Structure and Capital Structure: Evidence from the Jordenian Capital Market, Corporate Ownership and Control, 3(4), 99-106.
    50. Ozkan, A. (2001), Determinants of Capital Structure and Adjustment to Long Run Target: Evidence from UK Company Panel Data, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 28(1-3), 175-198.
    51. Robinson, S. (2000), Key survival issues: Practical steps toward corporate environmental sustainability, Corporate Environmental Strategy, 7, 1, 92-105.
    52. Roberta Dessi and Donald Robertson, (2003), Debt, Incentives and Performance: Evidence from UK Panel Data, The Economic Journal, 113, 903-919.
    53. Rodrigo Fuentes and Marcos Vergara, (2003), Explaining Bank Efficiency: Bank Size or Ownership Structure?
    54. Simeon, Papadopoulos (2004), Market Structure Performance and Efficiency in European Banking, International Journal of Commerce and Management, 14(1), 79-97.
    55. Stefan Beiner, Wolfgang Drobets, Markus M. Schmid, and Heinz Zimmermann, (2006), An Integrated Framework of Corporate Governance and Firm Valuation, European Financial Management, 12(2), 249-293.
    56. Sundaramurthy, C., Rhoades, D. L. and Rechner, P. L. (2005), A Meta-analysis of the Effects of Executive and Institutional Ownership on Firm Performance, Journal of Managerial Issues, 17, 494-510.
    57. Thorsten B., Asli Demirgȕc-Kunt, Vojislav M. (2008), Finance patterns around the world: Are small firms different? Journal of Financial Economics, (89), 467-487.
    58. Titman, S., Tsyplakov, S., (2005), A Dynamic Model of Optimal Capital Structure, Unpublished Working Paper, University of Texas, Austin.
    59. Varouj A. Aivazian, Ying Ge and Jiaping Qin, (2005), Debt Maturity Structure and Firm Investment, Finance Management, 34(4), 107.

    下載圖示 校內:2019-06-23公開
    校外:2019-06-23公開
    QR CODE