| 研究生: |
李宜珊 Lee, Yi-Shan |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
特教老師在國中教室中使用兒語語言特徵之個案研究 A Special Education Teacher’s Use of Babytalk in the Classroom at Junior High School |
| 指導教授: |
閔慧慈
Min, Hui-Tzu |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
文學院 - 外國語文學系碩士在職專班 Department of Foreign Languages and Literature (on the job class) |
| 論文出版年: | 2008 |
| 畢業學年度: | 96 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 94 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 特教老師 、教室言談 、身心障礙學生 、兒語 、教師語言 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | special education students, special education teachers, classroom discourse, babytalk, teacher talk |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:231 下載:4 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本論文旨在探討國中特教老師的兒語語言特徵之使用頻率和模式。本研究的主要參與者是一位特教老師以及九位身心障礙學生。收集的資料包括從9週觀察收集到的10節課約450分鐘的錄音資料,研究者的觀察記錄,以及和受試教師的面談資料。研究者逐一檢視資料的每個句子(utterance)試圖找出中文兒語語言特徵的存在。在本研究中,兒語語言特徵是定義為音調比較高,發音比較清楚,在言談中比較多重覆,以及比較多句末質詞(sentence final particles)的語言。研究者將收集到的語料,根據內容所傳遞的觀念分成36個主題。結果顯示受試教師頻繁地使用兒語語言特徵。在全部36個主題中,教師使用的兒語語言特徵頻率都超過百分之五十。她使用兒語語言特徵的模式,與學生的心理年齡以及主題呈現的觀念與學生的日常生活密切程度有關。受試教師對心理年齡較小的學生,通常是多重障礙或重度障礙的學生,使用比較多的兒語語言特徵。她也用較多的兒語語言特徵來解釋跟學生生活經驗較不相關的觀念。她的兒語語言特徵主要為上升的語調。對於老師所使用的兒語語言特徵,學生通常會反應以「注意」和「理解」,這兩種反應佔全部反應的百分之七十。受試教師在受訪中承認,她用兒語語言特徵來達到教學目的通常是用來吸引學生注意,以及讓學生能更專注在她的教學內容上。
This study aims to investigate the frequency, pattern, and effect of a special education teacher’s babytalk in the classroom at junior high school. The participants were one special education teacher and nine mentally retarded students. The data included 450-minute audio-recordings of ten classes from a nine-week long observation, the researcher’s field notes, and a semi-structured interview with the special education teacher. The data were examined utterance by utterance to see the occurrence of Chinese babytalk, defined as higher in pitch, clearer in articulation, more repetitions, and more sentence final particles in discourse. The researcher later divided the utterance into thirty-six topics according to the concepts conveyed by the teacher. The result showed that the teacher used babytalk frequently. The frequency of occurrence of babytalk of all the thirty-six topics was over 50%. The way she used babytalk was related to the students’ mental age and the relevancy of topics to students’ daily experience. The teacher used more babytalk to mentally “younger” students, who were usually multi-handicapped or with severe mental retardation. She also used more babytalk to explain concepts less related to students’ daily lives. Her babytalk was characterized by high intonation. With regard to the effect of this babytalk, the students made attentive and comprehensive responses to the teacher’s babytalk, which accounted for 70% of all student responses. The teacher in the interview confirmed that she used babytalk to achieve teaching ends ― to attract the students’ attention and make them more focused on the content of her teaching.
Bishop, D., & Mogford, K. (1997). Language development in exceptional circumstances. In D. Bishop & K. Mogford (Eds.), Language development in exceptional circumstances (pp. 10-28). NY: Psychology Press.
Bochner, S., & Jones, J. (2005). Child language development (2nd ed.). London: Whurr Publishers Ltd.
Bombar, M. L., & Litting, L. W., Jr. (1996). Babytalk as a communication of intimate attachment: An initial study. Personal Relationships, 3, 137-158.
Boysson-Bardies, B. (1999). How language comes to children: From birth to two years (M. B. DeBevoise, Trans.). London: The MIT Press. (Original work published 1996)
Burns, C., & Myhill, D. (2004). Interactive or inactive? A consideration of the nature of interaction in whole class teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education, 34, 35-49.
Cao, C. (2000). 鷹架式語言教學對國小高功能自閉症兒童口語表達能力學習效果研究[A study of the effect of linguistic scaffolding instruction on high-functioning autistic children’s oral expression ability]. 特殊教育研究學刊, 20, 193-220.
Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Chen, M. (1999). 國語文低成就學童口語理解能力的發展[The development of the oral comprehension ability of students of low achievement in Chinese]. 特殊教育研究學刊, 17, 189-204.
Chen, Y., & Niu, W. (2004). 行為支持計畫對國中自閉症學生行為問題處理成效之研究[A study of the effect of the behavioral supportive plan on autistic students’ behavioral problems at junior high school]. 特殊教育研究學刊, 27, 183-201.
Crystal (2004). Prosodic and paralinguistic correlates of social categories. In E. Ardener (Ed.), Social anthropology and language (2nd ed.) (pp. 185-206). London & NY: Routledge.
Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2005). Social learning and social cognition: The case for pedagogy. In M. H. Johnson & Y. Munakata (Eds.), Processes of change in brain and cognitive development. Attention and Performance, XXI (pp. 249-274). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eliot, L. (1999). What’s going on in there? New York: Bantam Books.
Fang, J. (2006). 融合教育與教師教育[Inclusion education and teacher education]. 華東師範大學學報, 24, 37-49.
Farris, C. S. (1992). Chinese preschool codeswitching: Mandarin babytalk and the voice of authority. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 13, 187-213.
Foster-Cohen, S. H. (1999). An introduction to child language development. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
Gallaway, C., & Richards, B. J. (Eds.). (1994). Input and interaction in language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gleason, J. B. (1997). The development of language (4th ed.). MA: Boston University.
Hall, J. K. (1998). Differential teacher attention to student utterances: The construction of different opportunities for learning in the IRF. Linguistics and Education, 9, 287-311.
Horton, A., Martin, C. H., & Brownlow, S. (1993, March). Childern’s use of babytalk in response to target facial maturity. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association, Atlanta, GA.
Huang, J. (2000). 啟智學校語文課教室言談分析[Discourse analysis of Chinese classes in a special education school]. 未出版碩士論文, 高雄市: 國立高雄師範大學.
Hulit, L. M., & Howard, M. R. (2002). Born to talk: An introduction to speech and language development. Boston: Pearson Education Company.
Huttenlocher, J., Haight, W., Bryk, A., Seltzer, M., & Lyons, T. (1991). Early vocabulary growth: Relation to language input and gender. Developmental Psychology, 27, 236-248.
Jarvis, J., & Robinson, M. (1997). Analysing educational discourse: An exploratory study of teacher response and support to pupils’ learning. Applied Linguistics, 18, 212-228.
Jiang, M., & Zhou, T. (2004). 後設認知策略教學對國小數學學習障礙學生解題成效之研究[A study of the effect of metacognitive strategy on students with mathematics learning disabilities at elementary school]. 特殊教育學報, 18, 107-152.
Jourdan, C., & Tuite, K. (Eds.) (2006). Language, culture, and society. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Krashen, S. D. (1987). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. London: Prentice-Hall International.
Lin, B., & Qi, B. (2000). 中文閱讀理解測驗之編製[The production of the Chinese reading comprehension test]. 特殊教育研究學刊, 19, 1-12.
Lin, B., & Zhang, X. (1998). 國中智障學生國語文能力及其相關因素之研究[A study of junior high school mentally retarded students’ literacy abilities and their related factors]. 特殊教育研究學刊, 16, 87-108.
Masataka, N. (2004). The onset of language. Edinburgh, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
McLaughlin, S. (1998). Introduction to language development. San Diego, London: Singular Publishing Group.
Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (2004). Socio-cultural perspectives on second language learning. In R. Mitchell & F. Myles, Second language learning theories (2nd ed.) (pp. 193-222). NY: Oxford.
Mohr, K. A. J. (1998). A summary analysis of effective teachers’ discourse during primary literacy lessons. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 33, 16-23.
Myhill, D., & Warren, P. (2005). Scaffolds or straitjackets? Crtical moments in classroom discourse. Educational Review, 57, 55-69.
Nind, M., Kellett, M., & Hopkins, V. (2001). Teacher’s talk styles: Communicating with learners with severe and complex learning difficulties. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 17, 143-159.
O’Grady, W. (2005). How children learn language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Owens, R. E. Jr. (2001). Language development: An introduction (5th ed.). New York: Pearson Education Company.
Pan, B. A., Rowe, M. L., Singer, J. D., & Snow, C. E. (2005). Maternal correlates of growth in toddler vocabulary production in low-income families. Child Development, 76, 763-782.
Phoenix, C. Y. (1998). A study of the verbal classroom interaction patterns of selected high- and low- rated teachers at Medgar Evers College. Community Review, 16, 52-65.
Pontefract, C., & Hardman, F. (2005). The discourse of classroom interaction in Kenyan primary schools. Comparative Education, 41, 87-106.
Sachweh, S. (1998). Granny darling’s nappies: German nursing homes for the aged. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26, 52-65.
Sadler, J., & Mogford, B. K. (1997a). “Teacher Talk” with children with language disorders: Four case studies Ⅰ. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 13, 15-36.
Sadler, J., & Mogford, B. K. (1997b). “ Teacher Talk” with children with language disorders: Four case studies Ⅱ. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 13, 37-58.
Snow, C. E. (1994). Beginning from babytalk: Twenty years of research on input in interaction. In C. Gallaway & B. J. Richards (Eds.), Input and interaction in language acquisition (pp. 1-12). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Song, Z. (1999). 國民小學啟智班語文課教室言談分析[Discourse analysis of special education classrooms at elementary school]. 未出版碩士論文, 高雄市:國立高雄師範大學.
Su, Y., & Wang, T. (2003). 融合教育的理想與挑戰―國小普通班教師的經驗[The ideal and challenge of inclusion education: Experiences of non-special education teachers at elementary school]. 特殊教育研究學刊, 24, 39-62.
Swain, M., & Nabei, T. (2002). Learner awareness of recasts in classroom interaction: A case study of an adult EFL student’s second language learning. Language Awareness, 11, 43-63.
Tang, R. (2002). 多重障礙孩童固著行為的功能分析與介入[The functional analysis and intervention of multi-handicapped children’s stereotypical behavior]. 特殊教育研究學刊, 22, 171-188.
Walsh, S. (2002). Construction or obstruction: Teacher talk and learner involvement in the EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research, 6, 3-23.
Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating classroom discourse. London & New York: Routledge.
Wang, Z. (1999). 簡易個別智力量表之編製[The production of an easy version of the individual intelligence scale]. 特殊教育研究學刊, 17, 1-12.
Wikipedia: The free encyclopedia. (2001). Mental age. Retrieved November 28, 2007, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mental_age
Wu, Y., & Meng, Y. (2005). 資訊融入解題策略對國小數學障礙學生乘除法文字解題成效之研究[A study of the effect of the incorporation of computer into problem-solving techniques on learning disability students’ mathematical problems of multiplication and division in texts]. 特殊教育學報, 21, 103-128.
Zhang, Z., &Wu, S. (1998). 「自閉症兒童發展測驗」之編製及相關研究[The production and related study of “autistic children’s development test”]. 特殊教育研究學刊, 16, 291-314.
Zhong, J., & Niu, W. (2004). 自閉症兒童固著行為的功能分析與介入成效之研究[A study of the effect of the functional analysis and intervention on autistic children’s stereotypical behavior]. 特殊教育研究學刊, 26, 177-200.
Zhou, T., & Wu, J. (2000). 國民小學閱讀障礙學生錯誤類型分析[The analysis of error types of students with dyslexia at elementary school]. 特殊教育研究學刊, 19, 79-104.