使用傳統被動調諧質量阻尼器(TMD)對於結構減振控制是一有效的控制方法，但TMD對於頻率之去調諧效應十分敏感，故藉由提供額外主動控制力之混合型質量阻尼器(HMD)與半主動質量阻尼器(SAMD)相應而生，但此類系統大多利用油壓制動器作為主動控制力來源，在施工或實際應用上皆有一定限制，不僅需要消耗較大能量，並對控制力時間延遲效應較為敏感，可能會使控制效果不如預期，因此本文利用槓桿式勁度可控質量阻尼器(LSCMD)作為減振控制系統改善以上情形並且可降低衝程反應，其可使用被動控制模式或是半主動控制模式作為控制策略，而半主動控制模式是使用LQR最佳控制理論作為基礎。此外，由過去的研究與實際應用案例中可證實基礎隔震可有效降低上傳之結構地震力，然而對於單一週期之摩擦單擺隔震系統(FPS)應用於基礎隔震在遭受近域地震時，此FPS基礎隔震無法有效降低上傳至結構之地震力，甚至會使隔震層位移過大，故本文利用LSCMD配合單擺摩擦隔震結構，改善FPS於近域地震時，隔震效果較差的現象。本文針對一般結構與FPS隔震結構裝設LSCMD進行理論研究與數值分析以探討控制成效，並且由實驗測試其控制成效與驗證數值分析結果，更進一步探討LSCMD本身呈現之特性。由數值分析與實驗測試結果皆可展現LSCMD對於一般結構或是FPS隔震結構之減振控制確實有較佳成效並且有較小衝程反應，並且可發揮其半主動控制之優點與提升FPS於近域地震時之隔震性能。

The conventional tuned mass damper (TMD) is an effective control device for vibration suppression, but it is very sensitive to the fluctuation in tuning of the designed frequency to the natural frequency of the main system. In this regard, the hybrid mass damper (HMD) and the semi-active mass damper (SAMD) equipped with additional active control forces are proposed to provide a better performance. In general, the active control force is supplied by a powered mechanism which is energy-consuming and is more sensitive to the actuation time delay. A leverage-type stiffness controllable mechanism is adopted in this study to improve the performance of a conventional TMD by reducing its required stroke. The proposed LSCMD can be activated either in passive mode or in semi-active mode in accord with the designed control strategy. Based on the optimal LQR output feedback control algorithm, the control performance of the leverage-type stiffness controllable mass damper (LSCMD) can be improved as deigned. The control effectiveness of regular buildings and structures isolated by the friction pendulum system (FPS) is investigated. Both numerical simulations and experimental verifications are conducted in this study when the LSCMD is equipped. From the observations in this study, the structural responses when equipped with LSCMD can be suppressed with smaller stroke. Furthermore, the excessive displacements of the isolated layer due to near field earthquakes can be effectively controlled if the LSCMD is installed.

1. Asami, T., Wakasono, T., Kameoka, K., Hasegawa, M., Sekiguchi, H., “Optimal Design of Dynamic Absorbers for A System Subjected to Random Excitation”, JSME International Joural, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 218.226, (1991).
2. Crandall, S.H., Mark, W.D., “Random Vibration in Mechanical Systems”, Academic Press, New York, pp.55-101, (1973).
3. Chu, S.Y., Soong, T.T., Reinhorn, A.M., “Active, Hybrid and Semi-active Structural Control: A Design and Implementation Handbook”, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, (2005).
4. Chu, S.Y., Lin, C.C., Chung, L.L., Chang, C.C., Lu, K.H., “Optimal Performance of Discrete-time Direct Output-feedback Structural Control with Delayed Control Forces”, Structrual Control and Health Monitoring, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 22-42, (2008).
5. Den Hartog, J.P., “Mechanical Vibrations, 4th edn”, McGraw Hill, New York, (1956).
6. Frahm, H., “Device for Damping Vibration of Bodies”, US Patent, No. 989958, (1909).
7. Housner, G.W., Bergman, L.A., Caughey, T.K., Chassiakos, A.G., Claus, R.O., Masri, S.F., Skelton, R.E., Soong, T.T., Spencer, B.F., Yao J.T.P., “Structural Control: Past, Present, and Future”, Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE), Vol. 123, No. 9, pp. 897-971, (1997).
8. Hrovat, D., Barak, P., Rabins, M., “Semi-Active versus Passive or Active Tuned Mass Dampers For Structural Control”, Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE), Vol. 109, No. 3, pp. 691-705, (1983).
9. Juang, J.N., “Applied System Identification”, PTR Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, (1994).
10. Lin, C.C., Hu, C.M., Wang, J.F., Hu, R.Y., “Vibration Control Effectiveness of Passive Tuned Mass Dampers”, Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 367-376, (1994).
11. Lu, L.Y., Hsu, C.C. Yeh, S.W., “A Leverage-type Semi-active Isolation System for Seismic Structures in Near-fault Regions (in Chinese)” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 319-338,(2009).
12. Lu, L.Y., Lin, T.K., Yeh, S.W., “Experiment and Analysis of A Leverage-type Stiffness Controllable Isolation System for Seismic Engineering” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, in press, DOI:10.1002/eqe.1005, (2010).
13. Lu, L.Y., Chu, S.Y., Yeh, S.W., Peng, C.H., “Modeling and Experimental Verification of a Variable-Stiffness Isolation System Using Leverage Mechanism”, Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, in review.
14. McNamara, R. J., ”Tuned Mass Dampers for Buildings”, Journal of the Structural Division (ASCE), Vol. 103, No. 9, pp. 1785-1798, (1977).
15. Palazzo, B., Petti, L., De Ligio, M., “Response of Base Isolated Systems Equipped with Tuned Mass Dampers to Random Excitations”, Journal of Structural Control, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 9-22, (1997).
16. Soong, T.T., “Active Structural Control: Theory and Practice”, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, (1990).
17. Soong, T.T., Grigoriu, M., “Random Vibration of Mechanical and Structural Systems”, PTR Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, (1993).
18. Sack, R.L., Patten, W.N., “Semi-active Hydraulic Structural Control”, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Structural Control, Honolulu, Hawaii, USC Publication CE-9311, pp. 417-431, (1993).
19. Symans, M.D., Constanionu, M.C., “Semi-active Control Systems for Seismic Protection of Structures: A State-of-the-art Review”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 469-487, (1999).
20. Varadarajan, N., Nagarajaiah, S., “Wind Response Control of Building with Variable Stiffness Tuned Mass Damper Using Empirical Mode Decomposition/Hilbert Transform”, Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE), Vol. 130, No. 4, pp. 451-458, (2004).
21. Wiesner, K. B., ”Tuned Mass Dampers to Reduce Building Wind Motion”, Convention and Exposition (ASCE), Boston, Mass., April 2-6, (1979).
22. Warburton G.B., “Optimum Absorber Parameters for Various Combinations of Response and Excitation Parameters”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp.381-401, (1982).
23. Xu, K., Igusa, T., “Dynamic Characteristics of Multiple Substructures with Closely Spaced Frequencies”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 21, No. 12, pp. 1059-1070, (1992).
24. Zhang, Y., Wilfred D., “Protecting Base-Isolated Structures from Near-Field Ground Motion by Tuned Interaction Damper”, Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE), Vol. 128, No. 3, pp. 287-295, (2002).
25. 王哲夫，「被動調諧質量阻尼器之最佳設計暨應用」，國立中興大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文（1992）。
26. 王健，「變曲率滑動隔震防制近斷層震波之實驗與分析」，國立高雄第一科技大學營建工程研究所，碩士論文（2006）。
27. 李文誠，「勁度可控式質量阻尼器之減振研究」，國立成功大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文（2009）。
28. 林建宏，「狀態空間法於隔減震結構分析上之應用」，國立高雄第一科技大學營建工程研究所，碩士論文（2002）。
29. 吳政彥，「變曲率滑動隔震結構之實驗與分析」，國立高雄第一科技大學營建工程研究所，碩士論文（2004）。
30. 侯佳玟，「最佳化時間延遲補償之擬混合型調諧質量阻尼器於結構振動控制之研究」，國立成功大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文（2007）。
31. 陳昱如，「結構主動控制之時間延遲效應與對策」，國立中興大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文（1995）。
32. 許朝畯，「槓桿式勁度可控隔震系統之實驗與分析」，國立高雄第一科技大學營建工程研究所，碩士論文（2007）。
33. 彭致華，「勁度可控式質量阻尼器可行性實驗－實驗報告書」，國立成功大學土木工程研究所，振動監測與控制實驗室（2009）。
34. 彭致華，「LSCMD應用於FPS結構之效能測試實驗－實驗報告書」，國立成功大學土木工程研究所，振動監測與控制實驗室（2010）。
35. 盧煉元、施明祥、張婉妮，「近斷層震波對滑動式隔震結構之影響評估」，結構工程，第十八卷，第四期，23-48頁（2003）。
36. 盧煉元、郭子敬、林錦隆，「勁度可控式滑動隔震系統」，中國土木水利工程學刊，第十八卷，第二期，265-278頁（2006）。
37. 盧煉元、林錦隆，中華民國發明專利，專利名稱：可控式隔震系統。專利字號：發明第I308610 號，專利証書日期：98年4月11日，專利期限：民國2009年4月11日至2025年10月27日止。