為了滿足第一類(CAT I)精確進場所需之準確性，完整性，連續性和可用性等導航性能(RNP)，使用陸基增強系統(GBAS)是提高全球導航衛星系統(GNSS)性能的解決方式。本論文實現了GBAS地面設施之演算法原型機，也就是完整性監控測試平台(IMT)。在此論文中將使用三個 IMT參考站收集全球定位系統(GPS)之訊號，並將 GPS觀測量儲存後送至 IMT主站進行完整性監測的流程。在IMT主站中包含三個品質監測機制(QM)之演算法，即衛星訊號品質監測機制(SQM)、衛星星曆品質監測機制(DQM)以及衛星觀測量品質監測機制(MQM)，目的在於監測任何GPS訊號品質上的錯誤。本文將利用高斯overbounding之方法計算監測機制所需之門檻值做為檢測標準。經過這些品質監測機制之檢測後，邏輯判斷機制(EXM)將排除錯誤之GPS觀測量，並且使用確保後之GPS觀測量計算修正量。邏輯判斷機制中包含了參考站一致性檢查(MRCC)、標準差平均檢驗和修正量範圍檢測(MFRT)，皆用以確保在傳送修正量與使用者前之最後檢測。因此，本論文中將就IMT之軟硬體設計進行詳細介紹，並且呈現此系統於分析和驗證上之結果。
關鍵字：全球定位系統、陸基增強系統、完整性監控

For meeting the Required Navigation Performance (RNP) of CAT I (Category I) precision approaches on accuracy, integrity, continuity, and availability, the use of the Ground Based Augmentation System (GBAS) is a solution for enhancing the performance of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS). This thesis implements the Integrity Monitoring Test-bed (IMT) algorithms that is a prototype of the GBAS ground facility. In this thesis, three IMT reference stations are used to collect GPS measurements, and then these GPS measurements are sent to the IMT master station for integrity processes. In the IMT master station; three Quality Monitoring (QM) algorithms, namely the Signal Quality Monitoring (SQM), the Data Quality Monitoring (DQM), and the Measurement Quality Monitoring (MQM), are employed for various detections of failures in the measurements. This thesis utilizes the Gaussian overbounding method to determine the thresholds and the detection criteria that are used in these QM algorithms. After these QM processes, the measurements with flags are excluded by the Executive Monitoring (EXM), and the EXM then uses the remaining measurements to compute the corrections. The EXM runs the Multiple Reference Consistency Check (MRCC), the Sigma-Mean monitoring, and Message Field Range Test (MFRT) to ensure the qualities of the computed corrections before broadcasting them. Accordingly, the hardware and software designs of this IMT are detailed in this thesis, and the analyses and validation tests of this IMT are presented as well.
Keyword：GPS, Ground Based Augmentation System, Integrity Monitoring

[1] Misra, P. and Enge, P., Global Positioning System: Signals, Measurements, and Performance, Ganga-Jamuna Press, Lincoln, 2001.
[2] Navigation and Landing Transition Strategy, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Washington, D.C., August 2002.
[3] FAA, http://www.faa.gov/
[4] Enge, P., “Local Area Augmentation of GPS for the Precision Approach of Aircraft,” Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 87, No. 1, January, 1999.
[5] Pullen, S., Walter, T., Enge, P., “System Overview, Recent Developments, and Future Outlook for WAAS and LAAS,” Tokyo University of Mercantile Marine GPS Symposium, Tokyo, Japan, Nov. 11-13, 2002.
[6] CAA, http://www.caa.gov.tw/
[7] Luo, M., Pullen, S., Zhang, J., Gleason, S., Xie, G., Yang, J., Akos, D., Enge, P., Pervan, B., “Development and Testing of the Stanford LAAS Ground Facility Prototype,” Proceedings of the ION National Technical Meeting. AnaheimCA., pp. 210-219, January 26-28, 2000.
[8] Normark, P.L., Akos, D., Pullen, S., Xie, G., Lee, J., Luo, M., Enge, P., Pervan, B., “Integration of the Multipath Limiting Antenna with the LAAS Integrity Monitor Testbed,” ION GPS, Portland, OR. , September 24-27, 2002
[9] "IMT II Hardware and Software Design Meeting," R.O.C. Civil Aviation Administration, Communication and Navigation System Lab, IMT2-DO04, July 21, 2011.
[10] Skidmore, T., Van Graas, F., “DGPS Ground Station Integrity Monitoring,” ION National Technical Meeting, San Diego, CA, January 24-26, 1994.
[11] Pervan, B., and Sayim, I., "Sigma Inflation for the Local Area Augmentation of GPS," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 37, October, 2001.
[12] Lee, J., Pullen, S., Xie, G., Enge, P., “LAAS Position Domain Monitor Analysis and Failure-Test Verification,” AIAA 21st International Communications Satellite Systems Conference, Yokohama, Japan, April 15-19, 2003.
[13] "IMT Hardware and Software Design Meeting," R.O.C. Civil Aviation Administration, Communication and Navigation System Lab, IMT-D05, August 9, 2011.
[14] Minimum Aviation System Performance Standards for Local Area Augmentation System. Washington, D.C., RTCA SC-159, WG-4A, DO-245, September 28. 1998.
[15] Minimum Operational Performance Standards for GPS/Local Area Augmentation System airborne equipment, Washington, D.C., RTCA SC-159, WG-4A, DO- 253A, November 28, 2001.
[16] Minimum Operational Performance Standards for GPS/Wide Area Augmentation System airborne equipment, Washington, D.C.: RTCA SC-159, WG-2, DO-229C, November 28, 2001.
[17] Xie, G., Optimal On-Airport Monitoring of the Integrity of GPS-Based Landing Systems, Department of Electrical Engineering Thesis, Stanford University, 2004.
[18] U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, Specification: Performance Type Local Area Augmentation System Ground Facility. Washington, D.C., FAA-E- 2937A, April 17, 2002.
[19] "FAA LAAS Ground Facility Functions," in Unpublished Manuscript, Vol. 2.4: LAAS KTA Group, September 9, 1998.
[20] Xie, G., Pullen, S., Luo, M., Normark, P.L., Akos, D., Lee, J., Enge, P., Pervan, J., “Integrity Design and Updated Test Results for the Stanford LAAS Integrity Monitor Testbed,” Proceedings of the ION 57th Annual Meeting, Albuquerque NM., pp. 681-693, June 11-13, 2001.
[21] Pullen, S., Luo, M., Pervan, B., Chang, F.C., “Ephemeris Protection Level Equations and Monitor Algorithms for GBAS,” Proceedings of ION GPS. Salt Lake City, UT., pp. 1738-1749., September 11-14, 2001.
[22] Worracharoen, P., Novel and Robust GBAS Integrity Concepts for Safe Aircraft Approach Using GPS and Galileo, Department of Space Science Thesis, Lulea University of Technology, 2008.
[23] "Specification: Performance Type One Local Area Augmentation System Ground Facility," U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C., FAA-E-2937A, April 17, 2002.
[24] Lee, J., GPS-Based Aircraft Landing Systems with Enhanced Performance: Beyond Accuracy, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University, 2005.
[25] Google Map, http://maps.google.com.tw/