本研究背景及目的主要是探討台灣傳產汽機車相關產業及光電產業，此二產業在21世紀競爭激烈的環境要如何生存？探討項目是以經營績效的前項變數、領導型態、組織文化，工作環境等構面相互關係。研究對象以台灣地區94年度車輛工業同業工會，相關汽機車中小企業及光電產業為研究母體。經由篩選出符合條件之廠商共63家為研究樣本，總計發放500份問卷，回收有299份，回收率達59.80 %，有效比率為94.65%。問卷調查回收後，以變異數分析、皮爾森相關、典型相關及迴歸分析、等統計方法分析此二種產業回收的資料。資料分析是以變異數分析，分析此二產業的差異性；皮爾森相關、典型相關，分析構面與構面因素之間的相關性；並以迴歸分析各構面與經營績效的相關性。經研究後，此二種產業在此領導型態、組織文化，工作環境四構面並無差異性。同時研究指出領導型態、組織文化及工作環境構面，確實會與企業經營績效有顯著的相關性，尤其是組織文化的影響程度較為顯著。

How do survival for the firms in Taiwan during the global market violent competition on 21 centry is very important. The main purpose of this research is to study the influence of business performance preceding composition. These include leadership style, organizational culture and working environment. The empirical study was focusing on vehicle related and optical industries in Taiwan. Total sampling size was 63 firms after evaluation and selected from these two different industries in Taiwan. After 500 questionnaire survey, it had been returned 299 questionnaires. And the return rate was about 59.8 %. The analysis methodology of statistical method which included factor analysis, reliability analysis, ANOVA, analysis of variance, Pearson correlation analysis and regression analysis. After the statistical analysis, there were two major finding. The first was no any varied in the leadership style, organizational culture, working environment and business performance of these vehicle related and optical industries in Taiwan. And the second was that leadership style, organizational culture and working environment with obviously correlation result with business performance. Especially the organizational culture is the main factor which can influence the business performance most.

一、 中文文獻
1. 尤克強、吳瓊治（民91）。組織文化與領導角色關係之研究：競值途徑的組織文化應用在東方領導角色之關係。品質月刊，38（1），32-35。
2. 王德順（民94）。企業管理。臺北市：五南，。
3. 司徒達賢（民91）。策略管理新論。臺北市：智勝出版社。
4. 白滌清、蘇美惠（民91）。高科技產業的技術移轉風險與研發及經營績效之研究。管理學報，19（3），565-584。
5. 朱侃如（民90）。傳統產業不轉型，就淘汰。商業週刊，703，76-80。
6. 吳佳煇（民92）。組織領導者如何影響組織文化的建立－以ING安泰人壽為例。中山管理評論，6（2）。
7. 吳統雄（民89）。電話調查：理論與方法，第二版。聯經出版社。
8. 吳萬益、林文寶（民91）。主管行為、特性組織、文化組織、學習方式與經營績效關係之研究。輔仁管理評論，9（1），71-94。
9. 李元墩、林育理、陳啟光（民90）。銀行業主管領導型態與部屬人格特質、組織承諾及其生產力關係模式之研究－LISREL分析方法之應用。人力資源管理學報，1（2），001-023。
10. 李明軒（民90）。傳統企業大翻身。天下雜誌，244， 94-136。
11. 林安樂（民89）。台灣傳統產業的困境與脫困。經濟前瞻-中華經濟研究院，68，71-85。
12. 林妙雀（民94）。企業之智慧資本與分享組織文化對組織管理績效影響之實證研究。管理評論，24（1），55-81。
13. 林昱君（民90）。台灣汽車以研發利基立足於兩岸。經濟前瞻-中華經濟研究院，84， 82-86。
14. 河野豐弘（民81）。改造企業文化。臺北市：遠流出版社。
15. 施坤壽、林清河、譚伯群（民89）。競爭因素、製造策略、顧客滿意及組織績效之整合分析。台大管理論叢，11（1），1-33。
16. 孫瑞霙（民90）。領導型態與領導績效之探討－學校與企業之比較研究。人力資源管理學報，1（3），107-130。
17. 馬維揚（民84）。我國高科技產業發展之績效評估─以科學工業園區為例。台北銀行月刊，26，29-41。
18. 許士軍（民79）。管理學。臺北市：東華書局。
19. 陳家聲、樊景立（民89）。我國國人工作生活品質經驗之研究。管理評論，19（1），31-79。
20. 陳銘薰、郭莉真（民93）。策略領導對組織績效之影響－以學習型組織為中介變數。企業管理學報，63，27-66。
21. 曾柔鶯（民88）。領導型態、企業文化與企業績效關係之研究－以企業倫理氣候為中介變項。台灣土地金融季刊，36（4）， 1-21。
22. 葉桂珍（民93）。科技人員之事業選擇與其攸關因素分析」一項實證。管理評論，23（2）， 1-28。
23. 鄭伯壎、郭建志（90）。 組織文化－員工層次分析 。初版，臺北市：遠流出版事業股份有限公司。
24. 羅家德、朱慶忠（民93）。人際網路結構因素對工作滿足之影響。中山管理評論，12（4），795-823。
25. 蘇國楨、陳榮德（民92）。服務業主管領導行為組織文化和領導效能之研究。人力資源管理學報，3（4），065-091。

二、 英文文獻
1. Adkins, B., & Caldwell, D. (2004). Firm or Subgroup Culture: Where Does Fitting in Matter Most. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25 (8), 969-978.
2. Ahmed, H. (1981). Quality of Work Life: A Need for Understand. Indian Management, 20(11), 29-33.
3. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond expectations. New York:Free Press.
4. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance beyond Expection. New York: Free Press.
5. Bass, B. M., & Stogdill (1990). Handbook of Leadership (3rd). New York: The Free Press.
6. Berson, Y., & Avolio, B. J. (2004). Transformational Leadership and the Dissemination of Organizational Goals: A Case Study of a Telecommunication Firm. Leadership Quarterly, 15 (5), 625-646.
7. Berson, Y., & Linton, J. D. (2005). An Examination of The Relationships Between Leadership Style, Quality, and Employee Satisfaction in R&D Versus Administrative Environments. R & D Management, 35 (1), 51-60.
8. Best, R. J. (2004). Market Based Managemnet(3rd). New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 32-37.
9. Brown, M. G., & Sveson, R.A. (1998). Measuring R&D Productivity. Resaearch Technology Management. Nov-Dec, 30-35.
10. Bruce, E. Winston., & Kathleen, Patterson. (2005). An Integrative Definition of Leadership, working paper.
11. Burns, J. H. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
12. Cabrera, A., Cabrera, E. F., & Barajas, S. (2001). The Key Role of Organizational Culture in A Multi-System View of Technology-Driven Chang. International Journal of Information Management, 21, 245-261.
13. Collins, J. (2001). Good to Great －Why Some Companies Make the Leap… and Others Don’t. Curtis Brown Ltd.
14. Cooke, R. A., & Roussearou, D. M. (1988). Group and organizational studies. Behavior Norms and Expecation: A Quantitiative Approach to The Assessment of Organization Culture, 13, 245-273.
15. De Vries, R. E., Roe, R. A., & Taillieu, T.C.B. (2002). Need for Leadership As a Moderator of The Relationships Between Leadership and Individual Outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 121-137.
16. Deal, T. E., & Kennedy, A. A. (1983). Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporation Life. M. A.: Addison-Wesley.
17. Debbie, Schachter.（2005）. Information outlook. l9(6) , 18-19.
18. Dirks, K. T. (2000). Trust in Leadership and Team Performance: Evidence from NCCA Basketbal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 1004-1012.
19. Downton.J.V. (1973). Rebel Leadership. New York : Free Press.
20. Dubrin, A. J. (2001). Leadership – Research Finding, Practices, and Skills. Third Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company Boston New York.
21. Ebert, R. J., & Griffin, R. W. (2000). Business Essentials. New Jersey: Prentice Hell.
22. Elzbieta, Sikorska. Simmons.,（2005）. Predictors of Organizational Commitment among Staff in Assisted Living. Academic Research Library , 45(2), 196
23. Ettorre, Barbara. (1999). What Constitues a Good Board? Management Review, 88(6), 7.
24. Greenberg, J., & Baron R. A. (2000). Behavior in Organization 7-th ed. Engledwood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice Hall Inc.
25. Hameri, A. P., (1996）. Technology Transfer between Basic Research and Industry. Technovation, 16(6), 51-57.
26. Hampton, M. (2003). Evaluating Employee Actions That Impact Guest Satisfaction. HAS International Worldwise Headquaters.
27. House, R. J. (1997). The Social Scientific Study of Leadership: Quo Vadis?. Journal of Management, 2(3), 445.
28. House, R., & Shamir, B. (1993). Toward the Integration of Transformational, Charismatic, and Visionary Theories. Leadership Theory and Research Perspectives and Directions, Academic Press, 577-594.
29. Igbaria, M., & Baroudi, J. J. (1993). A Short-Form Measure of Career Orientations: A Psychometric Evaluation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(2), 131-154.
30. Keith, D. Jones.（2005）. The Culture Quandary Creating an Organizational Fit. Workspan: Accounting & Tax Periodicals 48(10), 12.
31. Kotter, J. P. (1990). A Force for Change: How Leadership Differs from Management. New York: The Free Press.
32. Lee, T. S., & Tsai, H. J. (2005). The Effects of Business Operation Mode on Market Orientation, Learning Orientation and Innovativeness. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105 (3-4), 325-348.
33. Mitchell, M. A., & Yate, D. (2002). How to Use Your Organizational Culture as a Competitive Tool. Nonprofit World, Madison, 20(2), 33-34.
34. Porter, L. W., & Miles, R. E. (1974). Motivation and Management. in R. M. Steers and L. W. Porter (ed.). Motivation and Work Behavior, 20-23.
35. Robbins, S. P. (1990). Organizational Behavior: Concepts, Controversies, and Application. New York, Ist, edtion, Inc.
36. Robbins, S. P. (2001). Organizational Behavior. 9 th Edition. Englewood Cliffs, N. J. Prentice-Hall.
37. Samli, A. G. (1985). Technologytransfer: The General Model. Technology Transfer 1-15
38. Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational Culture and Leadership. 2nd.ed., San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers.
39. Seashore, S. E., & Taber, J. D. (1975). Job Satisfaction Indicators and Their Correlation. American Behavior Scientists, 18, 333-368.
40. Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of Leadership: A Survey of Literature. New York:Free Press.
41. Tsai, G. (2003). Documented Human Resource Policies Raise Worker Productivity Pricewaterhouse Coopers International Limited.
42. Tyler, T. R., & Degoey, P. (1996). Trust in Organizational Authorities: The Influence of Motive Attributions on Willingness to Accept Decisions, In R. M. Kramer and T. R. Tyler (eds). Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, Thousand Oaks, CA:Sag.
43. Visser, D. J., De- Coning, T. J., & Smit. E. M. (2005). The relationship between the characteristics of the transformational leader and the entrepreneur in South African SMEs, S.Afr.J.Bus.Manage. 36(3) 51.
44. Yeh, Q. J., & Lai, M. K. (2001). The Advancement Intention and Job Attitudes – A study on the Career Setting of High-tech Engineers in Taiwan. R&D Management, 31(1).
45. Yukl, Gary. A. (2001). Leadership in Organization-5thed. Pretice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.