簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃耀緯
Huang, Yao-Wei
論文名稱: 停滯流場中濃度及拉伸率振盪對貧油預混 燃燒不穩定性之影響
THE EFFECTS OF OSCILLATORY EQUIVALENCE RATIO AND STRETCH ON LEAN PREMIXED COMBUSTION INSTABILITY IN SINGLE JET-WALL IMPINGEMENT
指導教授: 趙怡欽
Chao, Yei-Chin
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 工學院 - 航空太空工程學系
Department of Aeronautics & Astronautics
論文出版年: 2004
畢業學年度: 92
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 223
中文關鍵詞: 貧油預混燃燒貧油不穩定當量比與拉伸率振盪
外文關鍵詞: Lean premixed combustion, Lean blow out, Lean instability, Equivalence ratio and strain rate oscillation
相關次數: 點閱:106下載:5
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 摘 要
    論文題目(中文): 停滯流場中濃度及拉伸率振盪對貧油預混燃燒不穩定性之影響
    論文題目(英文): The Effects of Oscillatory Equivalence Ratio and Stretch on Lean Premixed Combustion Instability in Single Jet-Wall Impingement

    研 究 生: 黃耀緯
    指導教授: 趙怡欽

    本論文以實驗、數值模擬和理論分析的方式,來討論CH4/air 火焰在接近貧油可燃極限(lean flammable limit)時,火焰對於濃度和拉伸率擾動所產生之動態響應(dynamic response)。
    在噴流與壁面對沖之流場(jet-wall impingement)中,改變拉伸率方式有二:(1)以壁面振盪來改變流場之噴流區間(domain),(2)以聲波激擾混合流體(mixture),此兩個方式都可以造成流體於流場中之停滯時間(residence time)改變,因而改變了拉伸率。
    在濃度改變方面,吾人亦使用了聲波來激擾燃料流率 (註:不是混合流體),且使用熱線測速儀(hot-wire anemometer)來量測燃料出口速度之變化,將量測到的出口速度擾動乘上燃燒器出口面積,也就是燃料體積流率的擾動,此時吾人將此燃料體積流率的擾動與當時的空氣體積流率做計算,就可以算出當時的當量比(equivalence ratio)的變化了,並且以平行hot-wire測速儀來量測出口之濃度和速度之變化。主要的結果如下所示:
    在停滯流場中(single jet-wall impingement),區分了噴流區間和出口速度改變所引起之拉伸率變化,不同形式之拉伸對於火焰之暫態行為是有差異的。
    本研究中,找出了在接近熄滅拉伸率(extinction strain rate)時,濃度擾動之不穩定區域,當量比0.6可做為一不穩定區域之臨界值(critical number) ,吾人使用文獻中已知的laminar flame speed ( )與當量比( )之關係,推導出化學反應時間( )與當量比( )的關係,進一步找到critical number =0.6。當量比大於0.6時, 會有收斂(converge)的現象,且火焰對於濃度的擾動會穩定的存在。當量比小於0.6時, 會有發散(diverge)的現象,且火焰對於濃度的擾動有熄滅的現象(quench)。此結果符合物理和數學上的意義。 代表了因為濃度變化所得到的化學反應時間,當量比大於0.6時,”因為濃度變化所得到的化學反應時間”大於燃燒之化學反應時間( ),所以火焰仍然有充分的時間去完成燃燒反應。反之,當量比小於0.6時,”因為濃度變化所得到的化學反應時間”小於燃燒之化學反應時間( ),所以火焰沒有充分的時間去完成燃燒反應,所以當量比小於0.6時,任何的濃度擾動都將引起熄滅的現象(quench)。
    當濃度和拉伸率同時影響到火焰時,其兩者之初始條件(initial condition)互相作用於火焰時,會有不同的現象產生,換句話說,濃度和拉伸率的耦合(coupling)影響是很關鍵性的因素,特別是接近貧油可燃極限(lean flammable limit);一般來說,當濃度和拉伸率之變化頻率較低時,例如說 1 Hz,則火焰之燃燒行為會跟隨著外界擾動,且有較大之振盪幅度,因為火焰有較多的反應時間(response time)來對外界做出回應;另一方面,當濃度和拉伸率之變化頻率較高時,例如說 1000 Hz,則火焰之燃燒行為不會跟隨著外界擾動,且振盪幅度非常小,因為火焰並沒有較多的反應時間(response time)來對外界做出回應。
    根據能量方程式(energy equation)之無因次化分析,可以將溫度之變化區分為平均效應(mean-value effect)與擾動效應(perturbation effect),平均效應由濃度與拉伸率之比值所主導,濃度越大,溫度越高,反之,拉伸率越大,溫度越低。而擾動效應則與振動幅度、頻率及相位延遲有關,其中,隨著振動頻率增大,則擾動效應會減少。
    Relative number(相對於 之停滯時間與化學反應時間的比值)和熱釋放率對於外界激擾而產生的動態響應(dynamic response) 行為相近,其原因為當流體之停滯時間增加,火焰有足夠的時間完成化學反應,因此熱釋放率增加了;另一種可能是流場所需化學反應時間增加,此時流體之停滯時間卻無法相對增加,則火焰之熱釋放率便減少了。當只有濃度改變時,代表化學反應時間改變而停滯時間不變;當拉伸率改變時,化學反應時間與停滯時間則同時改變;此兩者時間之相對關係,主導了熱釋放率的行為,不穩定性取決於濃度及拉伸率之耦合效應,且其兩者之初始條件亦影響火焰行為之演化。
    本研究完成之燃燒極限資料以及不穩定現象之探討,將可作為貧油燃燒不穩定現象與吹熄極限(blow out limit)之豐富資料庫,藉由各種參數之分析並可提出貧油預混燃燒之極限預測。之後,更進一步地,對於將來貧油預混燃燒器(lean premixed combustor)之設計和不穩定性之主動控制(active control)將有很大的幫助。

    The Effects of Oscillatory Equivalence Ratio and Stretch on Lean Premixed Combustion Instability in Single Jet-Wall Impingement

    Student: Yao-Wei Huang
    Advisor: Yei-Chin Chao
    ABSTRACT
    In this work, the research of the dynamic response to the oscillatory equivalence ratio and strain rate near lean flammable limit is studied in the jet-wall impingement by experiments, numerical simulations and theoretical analysis.
    In the jet-wall impingement, the oscillatory strain rate can be induced by two manners. The first method is to make the domain between the wall and the burner exit oscillatory by the shaker connected to the wall. The second method is to make exit velocity of the mixture oscillatory by acoustic excitation. The flow residence time can also be changed by the both methods mentioned above.
    On the other hand, the acoustic excitation is also adopted to excite the fuel flow rate and hence the equivalence ratio is oscillatory. While the excitation is processed, the transition behavior and perturbations of the exit fuel velocity are measured by the hot-wire anemometer. The volume perturbations of fuel flow rate are estimated by the product of the exit area and the velocity perturbation of the fuel. And then, the oscillatory equivalence ratio is also estimated by the division of the perturbative fuel flow rate with the fixed air flow rate.
    The investigation of the relation between chemical reaction time, and equivalence, is done. Furthermore, when the oscillatory equivalence ratio is imposed on the combustion system near extinction strain rate, the critical number, =0.6 is obtained. While the equivalence ratio is above 0.60, the solution of is converged and the quench phenomena do not occur. While the equivalence ratio is below 0.60, the solution of is diverged and the flame quench occur. It is because the chemical reaction time is longer than the additional time obtained due to the decreasing equivalence ratio.
    According to the theoretical analysis in energy equation, we discriminate the mean-value effect of temperature variation to the perturbation effects. The mean-value effect is dominated by the ratio of the concentration and strain rate. The higher fuel concentration in lean condition, the higher flame temperature is. Similarly, the larger strain rate, the lower flame temperature is. On the other hand, the perturbation effect is dominated by the exciting frequency and amplitude. The effect of perturbation is decreased with the increasing oscillatory frequency. It is consistent with the results by experiments and numerical simulations.
    The initial conditions of the strain rate and equivalence ratio play a important role near lean flammable limit. The coupling effects of the oscillatory equivalence ratio and strain rate are also considered in this study. According to the theoretical analysis in energy equation, the term of perturbation effects is negative in the cases of oscillatory concentration and strain rate at the same time. When the condition is the positively initial slope of the oscillatory equivalence ratios and positively initial slope of the oscillatory strain rate, , quench phenomena occurs soon due to the oscillatory equivalence ratio in phase with the oscillatory strain rate (i.e., the perturbation is negative initially). When the conditions are at the cases of the and , the perturbation is positive initially. It is good for the flame to be survived and eventually, the quench occurs at the certain cyclic where the flame is opposed by the largest stretch and the lowest concentration.
    The relative number ( ) can be the parameter describing the combustion instability due to the similarity with the heat release rate. As the residence time (Tres) is increased, it is beneficial for flame to complete the chemical reaction and then the heat release rate can be increased. On the other situation, if the residence time (Tres) is not increased, while the chemical reaction time ( ) is increased, the heat release rate will be reduced. The oscillatory equivalence ratio only causes the oscillatory chemical reaction time. The oscillatory strain rate causes both the residence time and chemical reaction time oscillations. The coupling effects of equivalence ratio and strain rate oscillations will produce the competitions between the residence time and chemical reaction time during the combustions.
    Furthermore, such information accrued in this study may contribute to the future design of lean premixed combustor and active control.

    誌謝 vi 摘 要 vii 第一章 簡介 x 第二章 實驗設備及方法 xii 第三章 數值方法介紹 xiv 第四章 振盪之拉伸火焰 xv 第五章 實驗與數值模擬之結果 xvi 第六章 討論 xix 第七章 結語 xxi ABSTRACT xxii NOMENCLATURE xxv CONTENTS xxix LIST OF TABLES xxxiii LIST OF FIGURES xxxiv CHAPTER Ⅰ INTRODUCTION 1 1-1 Background 1 1-2 Investigation of Stretch Flat Flame 4 1-2.1 Steady Stretch 5 1-2.2 Unsteady Stretch 7 1-3 Investigation of Oscillation 8 1-3.1 Oscillation of Stagnation Plane 8 1-3.2 Reflection and Refraction of Acoustic Wave 10 1-4 Investigation of Instability 15 1-4.1 Sivashinsky Instability 15 1-4.2 Rayleigh Instability 17 1-4.3 The Influence of Heat Release Rate 20 1-5 Motivations and Objectives 23 CHAPTER II EXPERIMENTAL APPARATUS 25 2-1 Basic Setup 25 2-1.1 Burners and Fuel Systems 25 2-1.2 Wall Oscillation and Speaker Excitation System 26 2-1.3 Acoustic Measurement 26 2-1.4 Temperature Measurement 27 2-1.5 Image Capture Device 29 2-1.6 Ion Probe 29 2-1.7 Hot Wire 31 2-2 Quantitative Flow Visualization 34 2-2.1 Lasers 34 2-2. 2 Control Unit 34 2-2.3 Recording System 35 2-2.4 Rotating Disk Calibration 36 2-3 Experiment Design 37 CHAPTER III NUMERICAL METHOD 39 3-1Jet-Wall Impingement 39 3-1.1 Governing Equations 39 3-1.2 Boundary and Initial Conditions 43 3-2 Finite Difference Approximations 45 3-2.1 Spatial Discretizations 46 3-2.2 Temporal Discretizations 47 3-2.3 Temporal and Spatial Discretizations 48 3-3 Starting Estimates 49 3-4 Adaptation of Mesh Point 50 3-5 Time Stepping 52 3-6 Solution Procedure 53 CHAPTER Ⅳ THE OSCILLATORILY STRETCHED FLAME 55 4-1 Basis Structure of Flat Flame and Verification with References 55 4-2 Phase Delay of Oscillating Premixed Flame 56 4-3 Structural Response of Oscillating Premixed Flame 61 4-4 Detailed Pathway of NO Formation 63 4-5 Heat Release Rate and Pressure Fluctuations 67 4-6 Identifying Global Strain Sate 72 CHAPTER Ⅴ EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL RESULTS 75 5-1 Measuring Oscillatory Equivalence Ratio 76 5-3 Influences of Strain Rate 82 5-4 The Coupling Effects of Oscillatory Equivalence Ratio and Strain Rate 84 CHAPTER Ⅵ DISCUSSION 87 6-1 Dimensionless and Simplification of Energy Equation 88 6-2 The Effect of Unsteady Equivalence Ratio 90 6-3 The Effect of Unsteady Strain Rate 92 6-4 The Coupling Effects of Unsteady Strain Rate and Equivalence Ratio 97 6-4.1 Illustration of Physical Phenomena 101 6-5 Confirmation of Unstable Region 103 6-5.1 Verification with reference 104 6-5.2 Physical Analysis 107 6-6 Relative Number 108 CHAPTER Ⅶ CLOSURES 112 7-1 Conclusions 112 7-2 Future Work 115 APPENDIX 116 A1. Derivation of Global Strain Rate 116 A2 Simplification of Jet Flow to One Dimensional Flow 117 A3. Assumption of Unsteady One Dimensional Flow 119 REFERENCES 122 PUBLICATION LIST 220 VITA 222 著作權聲明 223 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 4-5.1 Data Set For Heat Release Rate Calculation 130 TABLE 6-6.1 Symbol Descriptions 131 TABLE 6-6.2 The Detailed Classification For Operating Conditions 132 LIST OF FIGURES Fig. 1-1.1 The lower NO formation in lean premixed combustion 134 Fig. 1-1.2 In well-stirred reactor, the effect of oscillatory (a) mass flow rate (b) equivalence ratio and (c) temperature on reaction rate in the lean premixed combustion 135 Fig. 1-2.1 Schematic of surface element S with velocity V and unit normal vector n in a flow field v 136 Fig. 1-2.2 Examples of the stretched flames 137 Fig. 1-2.3 Principle of counterflow methodology in determining : (a) velocity profile and definition of reference and (b) extrapolation of reference to yield 138 Fig.1-4.1a Thermo-acoustic feedback cyclic. 139 Fig.1-4.1b Thermo-acoustic feedback cyclic 139 Fig. 1-5.1a The Schematic of oscillatory jet-wall impingement. 140 Fig. 1-5.1b Mechanisms of Combustion Instability. 140 Fig. 2-1.1 Essentials of the experimental arrangements. 141 Fig. 2-1.2a The schematic diagram of ion probe 142 Fig. 2-1.2b The schematic of the ion measurement in single jet-wall impingement 142 Fig. 2-1.3 The distribution of temperature, heat release rate and ion concentration in flat flame (Lawton et al. 1969). 143 Fig. 2-1.4 a photograph of the single-type hot wire probe. 144 Fig. 2-1.4 b photograph of parallel hot wire probe for exit velocity and concentration measurements. 144 Fig. 2-2.1 Arrangements of lasers and optics of PIV device. 145 Fig. 2-2.2 The schematic plots of CCD control and laser trigger occasions. 146 Fig. 2-2.3(a) Rotating disk calibration of PIV device ( = 5 cyclic/second). 147 Fig. 2-2.3(b) Real velocity and velocity measured by PIV against the radius of location ( = 5 cyclic/second). 147 Fig. 2-3.1a The schematic of oscillatory strain rate induced by oscillatory domain in jet-wall impingement. 148 Fig. 2-3.1b The schematic of oscillatory strain rate induced by oscillatory exit flow rate (Fuel +Air) in jet-wall impingement. 148 Fig. 2-3.2a The schematic of oscillatory equivalence ratio induced by oscillatory fuel flow rate in jet-wall impingement. 149 Fig. 2-3.2b The signal fluctuations of exit velocity under the conditions by oscillatory equivalence ratio. 149 Fig.2-3.3 The schematic plot of oscillatory strain rate and equivalence rate. 150 Fig.2-3.4 The schematic plot of oscillatory strain rate and equivalence rate, induced at the same time by wall and speaker excitation respectively. 151 Fig.2-3.5 The schematic plot of oscillatory strain rate and equivalence rate, induced not at the same time by wall and speaker excitation respectively. 152 Fig. 4-1.1a The comparisons of the distributions of the temperature, velocity, OH and NO concentration are shown in the jet-wall impingement at the equivalence ratio, 0.8. 153 Fig. 4-1.1b The comparisons of the distributions of the temperature, velocity, OH and NO concentration are shown in the jet-wall impingement at the equivalence ratio, 0.6. 153 Fig. 4-1.1c The photograph of flat flame at different equivalence ratio in single jet-wall impingement. 154 Fig. 4-1.2a Verification of cyclic variation of flame location at frequency, f=51Hz, with A=0.1, where A is the amplitude fraction of domain between burner exit and wall in oscillatory wall case. 155 Fig. 4-1.2b Verification of cyclic variation of extinction strain rate, a=2650(1/s), for equivalence ratio, 0.8(CH4/air) by using cyclic variation of relative OH concentration, where B is the amplitude fraction of exit mean velocity. 155 Fig. 4-2.1 Temporal variation of Tmax and relative NO concentration at B=0.1 with f=10 and 100Hz, respectively. 156 Fig. 4-2.2 Dynamic response of flame thickness, relative NO concentration and Tmax vs. strain rate for oscillatory frequency f=10 and 100 Hz with B=0.1 156 Fig. 4-2.3 Dynamic response of flame thickness, relative NO concentration and Tmax vs. strain rate for B=0.1 and 0.3 at fixed oscillatory frequency f=10 Hz 157 Fig. 4-2.4 Temporal variation of Tmax and relative NO concentration at f=10 Hz with B=0.1 and 0.3, respectively. 157 Fig. 4-3.1 Comparison of cyclic variation of opposite strain (out-of-phase) for relative NO concentration and max flame temperature at frequency, f=10 Hz, with A=0.1 at equivalence ratio, 0.8(CH4/air) in oscillatory wall case, where A is the amplitude fraction of domain between burner exit and wall. 158 Fig. 4-3.2 Comparisons of oscillatory exit velocity and wall for the location of max flame temperature (normalized), d (d/L), and flame thickness (normalized), f (f/L), at frequency, freq=10 Hz, for equivalence ratio, 0.8(CH4/air) with A=B=0.1 where B and A are the amplitude fraction of exit mean velocity and domain between burner exit and wall respectively. 159 Fig. 4-3.3 Comparison of dynamic response of oscillatory exit velocity and wall for the max flame temperature at various frequency for equivalence ratio, 0.8(CH4/air) with A=B=0.1, where B and A are the amplitude fraction of mean velocity and domain between burner exit and wall respectively. 160 Fig. 4-3.4 Comparison of dynamic response of oscillatory exit velocity and wall for relative NO concentration at various frequency for equivalence ratio, 0.8(CH4/air) with A=B=0.1, where B and A are the amplitude fraction of mean velocity and domain between burner exit and wall respectively. 160 Fig. 4-4.1 At equivalence ratio, 0.8(CH4/air), the cyclic variations of oscillatory exit velocity and wall for the detailed NO pathway at various frequency with A=B=0.1, where B and A are the amplitude fraction of mean velocity and domain between burner exit and wall respectively. 161 Fig. 4-4.2 At equivalence ratio, 0.6(CH4/air), the cyclic variations of oscillatory exit velocity and wall for the detailed NO pathway at various frequency with A=B=0.1, where B and A are the amplitude fraction of mean velocity and domain between burner exit and wall respectively. 162 Fig. 4-4.3a At equivalence ratio, 0.8(CH4/air), the comparison of spatial variation of detailed NO pathway at strain rate 60.19(1/s), phase=90o, and 73.59(1/s), phase=270o, with frequency, f=10 Hz, and B=0.1 in the oscillatory exit velocity case. 163 Fig. 4-4.3b At equivalence ratio, 0.8(CH4/air), the comparison of spatial variation of detailed NO pathway at strain rate 60.8(1/s), phase=90o, and 74.3(1/s), phase=270o, with frequency, f=10 Hz, and A=0.1 in the oscillatory wall case. 163 Fig. 4-4.4a At equivalence ratio, 0.6(CH4/air), the comparison of spatial variation of detailed NO pathway at strain rate 18.0(1/s), phase=90o, and 22.0(1/s), phase=270o, with frequency, f=10 Hz, and B=0.1 in the oscillatory exit velocity case. 164 Fig. 4-4.4b At equivalence ratio, 0.6(CH4/air), the comparison of spatial variation of detailed NO pathway at strain rate 18.2(1/s), phase=90o, and 22.2(1/s), phase=270 o, with frequency, f=10 Hz, and A=0.1 in the oscillatory wall case. 164 Fig. 4-5.1 The profile of ion concentration and heat release rate 165 Fig. 4-5.2 The spectral density of ion probe signal without excitation at equivalence ratio, 0.6, 0.7 and 0.8(methane/ air). 166 Fig. 4-5.3a The spectral density of ion probe signal with oscillatory wall at 10 Hz of equivalence ratio, 0.6, 0.7 and 0.8(methane/ air). 167 Fig. 4-5.3b The spectral density of ion probe signal with oscillatory exit velocity at 10 Hz of equivalence ratio, 0.6, 0.7 and 0.8(methane/ air). 168 Fig. 4-5.4a The spectral density of ion probe signal with oscillatory wall at 20 Hz of equivalence ratio, 0.6, 0.7 and 0.8(methane/ air). 169 Fig. 4-5.4b The spectral density of ion probe signal with oscillatory exit velocity at 20 Hz of equivalence ratio, 0.6, 0.7 and 0.8(methane/ air). 170 Fig. 4-5.5a The spectral density of ion probe signal with oscillatory wall at 500 Hz of equivalence ratio, 0.6, 0.7 and 0.8(methane/ air). 171 Fig. 4-5.5b The spectral density of ion probe signal with oscillatory exit velocity at 500 Hz of equivalence ratio, 0.6, 0.7 and 0.8(methane/ air). 172 Fig. 4-5.6a The spectral density of ion probe signal with oscillatory wall at 1000 Hz of equivalence ratio, 0.6, 0.7 and 0.8(methane/ air). 173 Fig. 4-5.6b The spectral density of ion probe signal with oscillatory exit velocity at 1000 Hz of equivalence ratio, 0.6, 0.7 and 0.8(methane/ air). 174 Fig. 4-5.7a The comparisons of Pressure fluctuation incoming from burned and un-burned side at various frequency for equivalence ratio =0.8(CH4/air) with A=B=0.1, where B and A are the amplitude fraction of mean velocity and domain between burner exit and wall respectively 175 Fig. 4-5.7b The comparisons of Pressure fluctuation incoming from burned and un-burned side at various frequency for equivalence ratio =0.6(CH4/air) with A=B=0.1, where B and A are the amplitude fraction of mean velocity and domain between burner exit and wall respectively 175 Fig. 4-5.8 Comparisons of dynamic response of oscillatory exit velocity and wall for wall temperature at various frequency with A=B=0.1, where B and A are the amplitude fraction of mean velocity and domain between burner exit and wall respectively. 176 Fig 4-6.1a The velocity distribution in single jet-wall field. The domain (L) is 1.1cm and the exit velocity is 70 cm/sec at equivalence ratio, =0.8. 177 Fig 4-6.1b The velocity distribution in single jet-wall field. The domain (L) is 0.9 cm and the exit velocity is 70 cm/sec at equivalence ratio, =0.8. 177 Fig 4-6.2a The velocity distribution in single jet-wall field. The domain (L) is 1.0 cm and the exit velocity is 60 cm/sec at equivalence ratio, =0.8. 178 Fig 4-6.2a The velocity distribution in single jet-wall field. The domain (L) is 1.0 cm and the exit velocity is 75 cm/sec at equivalence ratio, =0.8. 178 Fig. 4-6.3a Relations between global strain rate (the ratio of exit velocity to domain between wall and burner exit) and strain rate (the velocity gradient before the zero strain) at equivalence ratio, =0.8, while the exit velocity is changed. 179 Fig. 4-6.3b Relations between global strain rate (the ratio of exit velocity to domain between wall and burner exit) and strain rate (the velocity gradient before the zero strain) at equivalence ratio, =0.8, while the domain is changed. 179 Fig. 4-6.4a Relations between global strain rate (the ratio of exit velocity to domain between wall and burner exit) and strain rate (the velocity gradient before the zero strain) at equivalence ratio, =0.6, while the exit velocity is changed. 180 Fig. 4-6.4b Relations between global strain rate (the ratio of exit velocity to domain between wall and burner exit) and strain rate (the velocity gradient before the zero strain) at equivalence ratio, =0.6, while the domain is changed. 180 Fig. 4-6.5 The comparisons of extinction strain rate at lean mixtures (methane/air) in stagnation field 181 Fig. 5-1.1a The calibration between methane exit velocity and signal output of hot wire. 182 Fig. 5-1.1b The velocity distribution of three flow rate of methane (i.e., 2565, 3802 and 4800 ml/min) at the burner exit 182 Fig. 5-1.2 The cycle variations of signal output of hot wire. The flow rate of methane are 2565, 3802 and 4800 ml/min with speaker excitation (55, 70 and 85 dB) at 10 Hz, respectively. 183 Fig. 5-1.3 The cycle variations of signal output of hot wire. The flow rate of methane are 2565, 3802 and 4800 ml/min with speaker excitation (55, 70 and 85 dB) at 10 Hz, respectively. 184 Fig. 5-1.4 Phase average of cycle variations of hot-wire signal at the phases of 90o, 180o, 270o and 360o, respectively. 185 Fig. 5-1.5a Calibration of the square anemometer (two parallel hot-wire probe) output as function (U*RHO)1/2 for both wires at different concentration. 186 Fig. 5-1.5b The square anemometer (two parallel hot-wire probe) output normalized by the concentration difference. 186 Fig. 5-1.6 The relation between equivalence ratio and mixture density of the CH4/air flow. 187 Fig. 5-1.7 The verification of oscillatory equivalence ratio and invariable exit velocity by two parallel hot-wire probe at the equivalence ratio with 10 Hz, 55dB excitation. 188 Fig. 5-1.8 The verification of oscillatory equivalence ratio and invariable exit velocity by two parallel hot- wire probe at the equivalence ratio with 1000 Hz, 85 dB excitation. 189 Fig. 5-2.1a The cycle variations of the relative heat release rate at the cases of initial slope of the oscillatory strain rate, (i.e., the strain rate is kept constant) and equivalence ratios, with 1, 10, 100 and 1000 Hz. The initial equivalence ratio and strain rate at time, t=0.0 are 0.52 and 25(1/s), respectively. 190 Fig. 5-2.1b The cycle variations of the relative heat release rate at the cases of initial slope of the oscillatory strain rate, (i.e., the strain rate is kept constant) and equivalence ratios, with 1, 10, 100 and 1000 Hz. The initial equivalence ratio and strain rate at time, t=0.0 are 0.52 and 25(1/s), respectively. 190 Fig. 5-2.2a The cycle variations of the relative heat release rate at the cases of initial slope of the oscillatory strain rate, (i.e., the strain rate is kept constant) and equivalence ratios, with 1, 10, 100 and 1000 Hz. The initial equivalence ratio and strain rate at time, t=0.0 are 0.55 and 110(1/s), respectively. 191 Fig. 5-2.2b The cycle variations of the relative heat release rate at the cases of initial slope of the oscillatory strain rate, (i.e., the strain rate is kept constant) and equivalence ratios, with 1, 10, 100 and 1000 Hz. The initial equivalence ratio and strain rate at time, t=0.0 are 0.55 and 110(1/s), respectively. 191 Fig. 5-2.3 The cycle variations of ion probe signal output at the cases of initial slope of the oscillatory strain rate, (i.e., the strain rate is kept constant) and equivalence ratios, with (a)1 Hz, (b)10 Hz, (c)100 Hz and (d)1000 Hz. The initial equivalence ratio and strain rate at time, t=0.0 are 0.55 and 110(1/s), respectively. 192 Fig. 5-2.4 The cycle variations of ion probe signal output at the cases of initial slope of the oscillatory strain rate, (i.e., the strain rate is kept constant) and equivalence ratios, with (a)1 Hz, (b)10 Hz, (c)100 Hz and (d)1000 Hz. The initial equivalence ratio and strain rate at time, t=0.0 are 0.55 and 110(1/s), respectively. 193 Fig. 5-2.5 The cycle variations of ion probe signal output at the cases of initial slope of the oscillatory strain rate, (i.e., the strain rate is kept constant) and equivalence ratios, with (a)1 Hz, (b)10 Hz, (c)100 Hz and (d)1000 Hz. The initial equivalence ratio and strain rate at time, t=0.0 are 0.6 and 300(1/s), respectively. 194 Fig. 5-2.6 The cycle variations of ion probe signal output at the cases of initial slope of the oscillatory strain rate, (i.e., the strain rate is kept constant) and equivalence ratios, with (a)1 Hz, (b)10 Hz, (c)100 Hz and (d)1000 Hz. The initial equivalence ratio and strain rate at time, t=0.0 are 0.6 and 300(1/s), respectively 195 Fig. 5-2.7a The cycle variations of the relative heat release rate at the cases of initial slope of the oscillatory strain rate, (i.e., the strain rate is kept constant) and equivalence ratios, with 1, 10, 100 and 1000 Hz. The initial equivalence ratio and strain rate at time, t=0.0 are 0.65 and 590(1/s), respectively. 196 Fig. 5-2.7b The cycle variations of the relative heat release rate at the cases of initial slope of the oscillatory strain rate, (i.e., the strain rate is kept constant) and equivalence ratios, with 1, 10, 100 and 1000 Hz. The initial equivalence ratio and strain rate at time, t=0.0 are 0.65 and 590(1/s), respectively. 196 Fig. 5-2.8 The cycle variations of ion probe signal output at the cases of initial slope of the oscillatory strain rate, (i.e., the strain rate is kept constant) and equivalence ratios, with (a)1 Hz, (b)10 Hz, (c)100 Hz and (d)1000 Hz. The initial equivalence ratio and strain rate at time, t=0.0 are 0.65 and 590(1/s), respectively. 197 Fig. 5-2.9 The cycle variations of ion probe signal output at the cases of initial slope of the oscillatory strain rate, (i.e., the strain rate is kept constant) and equivalence ratios, with (a)1 Hz, (b)10 Hz, (c)100 Hz and (d)1000 Hz. The initial equivalence ratio and strain rate at time, t=0.0 are 0.65 and 590(1/s), respectively. 198 Fig. 5-3.1 The cycle variations of the relative heat release rate with the cases of initial slope of the oscillatory equivalence ratios, and strain rate, with 1, 10, 100 and 1000 Hz. The initial equivalence ratio and strain rate at time, t=0.0 are 0.6 and 300(1/s), respectively. 199 Fig. 5-3.2 The cycle variations of ion probe signal output at the cases of initial slope of the oscillatory equivalence ratios, (i.e., the equivalence ratio is kept constant) and strain rate, with (a)1 Hz, (b)10 Hz, (c)100 Hz and (d)1000 Hz. The initial equivalence ratio and strain rate at time, t=0.0 are 0.60 and 300(1/s), respectively. 200 Fig. 5-3.3 The cycle variations of ion probe signal output at the cases of initial slope of the oscillatory equivalence ratios, (i.e., the equivalence ratio is kept constant) and strain rate, with (a)1 Hz, (b)10 Hz, (c)100 Hz and (d)1000 Hz. The initial equivalence ratio and strain rate at time, t=0.0 are 0.60 and 300(1/s), respectively. 201 Fig. 5-4.1 The cycle variations of the ion probe signal output with the cases of positively initial slope of the oscillatory equivalence ratios , and strain rate , with (a)1 Hz, (b)10 Hz, (c)100 Hz and (d)1000 Hz. The initial equivalence ratio and strain rate at time, t=0.0 are 0.6 and 300(1/s), respectively. 202 Fig. 5-4.2 The cycle variations of the ion probe signal output with the cases of initial slope of the oscillatory equivalence ratios, and strain rate, with (a)1 Hz, (b)10 Hz, (c)100 Hz and (d)1000 Hz. The initial equivalence ratio and strain rate at time, t=0.0 are 0.6 and 300(1/s), respectively. 203 Fig. 5-4.3a The cycle variations of the relative heat release rate with the cases of strain rate, , and initial slope of the oscillatory equivalence ratios, from to with oscillations at 1 Hz 204 Fig. 5-4.3b The cycle variations of the relative heat release rate with the cases of strain rate, and initial slope of the oscillatory equivalence ratios, from to with oscillations at 1 Hz 204 Fig. 5-4.4 The cycle variations of the relative heat release rate with the cases of slope of the oscillatory equivalence ratios, and strain rate, with 1, 10, 100 and 1000 Hz. 205 Fig. 5-4.5 The cycle variations of the ion probe signal output with the cases of initial slope of the oscillatory equivalence ratios, and strain rate, with (a)1 Hz, (b)10 Hz, (c)100 Hz and (d)1000 Hz. The initial equivalence ratio and strain rate at time, t=0.0 are 0.6 and 300(1/s), respectively. 206 Fig. 6-1.1 The schematic plot of the temperature gradient in lean condition. 207 Fig. 6-4.1 The cyclic response of the flame thickness and location to the opposed excitation at 1 and 1000 Hz. The initial slope of oscillatory strain rate and equivalence ratio are and , respectively. 208 Fig. 6-5.1a The dependence of normalized chemical reaction time on equivalence ratio. 209 Fig. 6-5.1b The dependence of normalized slope, in figure 6-5.1 on the equivalence ratio. 209 Fig. 6-5.2 The dependence of normalized chemical reaction time and slope, on equivalence ratio near extinction strain rate. 210 Fig. 6-5.3a The relations between thermal diffusivity and equivalence ratio at lean condition in methane/air mixture. 211 Fig. 6-5.3b The relations between laminar flame speed and equivalence ratio by Law (1989) and Lawn et al. (2004). 211 Fig. 6-5.4 The difference between the value of zero and RHS of equation (6-5.11) at various equivalence ratios. The solutions of equation (6-5.11) are near 1.0 and 0.6. 212 Fig. 6-6.1a The cyclic variations of the relative number at the cases of initial slope of the oscillatory strain rate, (i.e., the strain rate is kept constant) and equivalence ratios, with 1, 10, 100 and 1000 Hz. The initial equivalence ratio and strain rate at time, t=0.0 are 0.52 and 25(1/s), respectively. 213 Fig. 6-6.1b The cyclic variations of the relative number at the cases of initial slope of the oscillatory strain rate, (i.e., the strain rate is kept constant) and equivalence ratios, with 1, 10, 100 and 1000 Hz. The initial equivalence ratio and strain rate at time, t=0.0 are 0.52 and 25(1/s), respectively. 213 Fig. 6-6.2a The cyclic variations of the relative number at the cases of initial slope of the oscillatory strain rate, (i.e., the strain rate is kept constant) and equivalence ratios, with 1, 10, 100 and 1000 Hz. The initial equivalence ratio and strain rate at time, t=0.0 are 0.55 and 110(1/s), respectively. 214 Fig. 6-6.2b The cyclic variations of the relative number at the cases of initial slope of the oscillatory strain rate, (i.e., the strain rate is kept constant) and equivalence ratios, with 1, 10, 100 and 1000 Hz. The initial equivalence ratio and strain rate at time, t=0.0 are 0.55 and 110(1/s), respectively. 214 Fig. 6-6.3a The cyclic variations of the relative number at the cases of initial slope of the oscillatory strain rate, (i.e., the strain rate is kept constant) and equivalence ratios, with 1, 10, 100 and 1000 Hz. The initial equivalence ratio and strain rate at time, t=0.0 are 0.65 and 590(1/s), respectively. 215 Fig. 6-6.3b The cyclic variations of the relative number at the cases of initial slope of the oscillatory strain rate, (i.e., the strain rate is kept constant) and equivalence ratios, with 1, 10, 100 and 1000 Hz. The initial equivalence ratio and strain rate at time, t=0.0 are 0.65 and 590(1/s), respectively. 215 Fig. 6-6.4 The cyclic variations of the relative number with the cases of initial slope of the oscillatory equivalence ratios, and strain rate, with 1, 10, 100 and 1000 Hz. The initial equivalence ratio and strain rate at time, t=0.0 are 0.6 and 300(1/s), respectively. 216 Fig. 6-6.5a The cyclic variations of the relative number with the cases of strain rate, , and initial slope of the oscillatory equivalence ratios, from to with oscillations at 1 Hz 217 Fig. 6-6.5b The cyclic variations of the relative number with the cases of strain rate, and initial slope of the oscillatory equivalence ratios, from to with oscillations at 1 Hz 217 Fig. 6-6.6 The cyclic variations of the relative number with the cases of slope of the oscillatory equivalence ratios, and strain rate, with 1, 10, 100 and 1000 Hz. 218 Fig. 6-6.7 Schematic diagram of the stable regime for oscillatory strain rate and equivalence ratio at lean condition 219

    Blevins, L.G., and Gore, J.P., (1999) “Computed Structure of Low Strain Rate Partially Premixed CH4/Air Counter Flames: Implications for NO formation,” Combustion and Flame, 116:546-566.
    Bowman, C. T., Hanson, R. K., Davidson, D. F., Gardiner, Jr, W. C., Lissianski, V., Smith, G. P., Golden, D. A., Frenklach, M., and Goldenberg, M., (1995) http://www.me.berkeley.edu/gri_mech/.
    Chu, B. T., (1953) “On the Generation of Pressure Waves at a Plane Flame Front,” Proceeding of the Combustion Institute, vol. 4, pp. 603-612.
    Chu, B. T., (1958) “Nonlinear Interactions in a Viscous, Heat Conducting Compressible Gas,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 3, pp. 494 -514.
    Coltrin, M. E, Kee, R. J. and Evans, G. H., (1991) “SPIN: A Fortran Program for Modeling One-Dimensional Rotating-Disk/Stagnation-Flow Chemical Vapor Deposition Reactors,” Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND91-8003.
    Comte-Bellot, G., (1976) “Hot-Wire Anemometry” Ann. Rev. Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 8, pp. 209.
    Darabiha, N., (1992) “The Role of Kinetic versus Thermal Feedback in Nonpremixed Ignition of Hydrogen versus Heated Air,” Combustion Science and Technology, Vol. 94, pp. 57-85.
    De Zilwa, S. R. N., Uhm, J. H., and Whitelaw, J. H. (2000) “Combustion Oscillations Close to the Lean Flammability Limit,” Combustion Science and Technology, Vol. 160, pp. 223-258.
    Dixon-Lewis, G., David, T. and Gaskell, P. H. (1984)” Calculation of the Structure and Extinction Limit of a Methane-Air Counterflow Diffusion Flame in the Forward Stagnation Region of a Porous Cylinder,” Proceeding of the Combustion Institute, vol. 20, pp. 1893-1904.
    Dowling, A. P., (1999) “A Kinetic Model of a Ducted Flame,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 394, pp. 51-72.
    Drake, M. C. and Blint, R. J., (1991) “Relative Importance of Nitric Oxide Formation Mechanisms in Laminar Opposed-Flow Diffusion Flames,” Combustion and Flame, 83: 185-203.
    Drazin, P. G. and Reid, W. H., (1981) “Hydrodynamic Stability,”
    Egolfopoulos, F. N., (1994) “Dynamics and Structure of Unsteady, Strained, Laminar Premixed Flames,” Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, vol. 25, 1365-1373.
    Egolfopoulos, F. N., Zhang, H. and Zhang, Z., (1997) “Wall Effects on the Propagation and Extinction of Steady, Strained, Laminar Premixed Flames,” Combustion and Flame 109:237-252.
    Emiris, I and Whitelaw, J. H. (2003) “Control of Combustion Oscillations,” Combustion Science and Technology, Vol. 175, pp. 157-184.
    Fleifel, M., Annaswamy, A. M., Ghoniem, A. F. and Ghoniem, Z. A., (1996) “Response of a Laminar Premixed Flame to Flame Oscillations: A Kinematic Model and Thermo-acoustic Instability Results,” Combustion and Flame 106:487-510.
    Ghoniem, A. F., Soteriou, M. C. and Knio, O. M., (1992) “Unsteady Stretch in Turbulent Flow,” Proceeding of the Combustion Institute, vol. 24, pp. 223-230
    Glassman, I., “Combustion” Third edition, Academic Press.
    Haworth, D. C., Drake, M. C., Pope, S. B. and Blint, R. J., (1988) “Reduced Kinetic Mechanisms for Counterflow Methane-Air Diffusion Flames,” Proceeding of the Combustion Institute, vol. 22, pp. 589-597.
    Hirasawa, T., Ueda, T., Matsuo, A. and Mizomoto, M., (2000) “Response of Flame Displacement Speeds to Oscillatory Stretch in Wall-Stagnating Flow,” Combustion and Flame, 121:312-322.
    Ikeda, H., Libby, P. A., and Williams, F. A., 1993, “Catalytic Combustion of Hydrogen-Air Mixtures in Stagnation Flows,” Combustion and Flame, Vol. 93, pp.138 -148.
    Ikeda, H., Sata, J., and Williams, F. A., 1995, “Surfaces Kinetics for Catalytic Combustion of Hydrogen-Air Mixtures on Platinum at Atmosphere Pressure in Stagnation Flows,” Surface Science, Vol. 326, pp.11-26.
    Im, H.G., Law, C.K., Kim, J.S. and Williams, F.A., (1995) “Response of Counter-flow Diffusion Flames to Oscillating Strain Rates,” Combustion and Flame, 100: 21-30.
    Im, H.G., Bechtold, J.K. and Law, C.K., (1996) “Response of Counterflow Premixed Flames to Oscillating Strain Rates,” Combustion and Flame, 105: 358-372.
    Keyes, D. E. and Smooke, M. D., (1987) “Flame Sheet Starting Estimates for Counterflow Diffusion Flame Problems,“ Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 73, pp. 267-288.
    Krebs, W., Flohr, P., Prade, B. and Hoffmann, S., (2002) “Thermo-acoustic Stability Chart for High-Intensity Gas Turbine Combustion Systems,” Combustion Science and Technology, Vol. 174, pp. 99-128.
    Law, C. K., Ishizuka, S. and Mizomoto, M., (1981) “Lean-Limit Extinction of Propane/Air Mixtures in the Stagnation-Point Flow,” Proceeding of the Combustion Institute, vol. 18, pp. 1991- 1998.
    Law, C. K., Wu, C. K., Zhu, D.L. and Yu, G., (1986) ”Laminar Flame Speeds of Hydrocarbon + Air Mixtures with Hydrogen Addition,” Combustion and Flame, 63: 339-347.
    Law, C. K., Sohrab, S. H., and Ye, Z. Y., (1986) “Theory of Interactive Combustion of Counterflow Premixed Flames,” Combustion Science and Technology, Vol. 45, pp. 27-47.
    Law, C. K., Zhu, D.L. and Yu, G., (1988a) “Propagation and Extinction of Stretched Premixed Flames,” Proceeding of the Combustion Institute, vol. 21, pp. 1419-1426.
    Law, C.K., Zhu, D.L and Yu, G., (1988b)” Propagation and Extinction of Stretched Premixed Flames,” Proceeding of the Combustion Institute, vol. 21 pp. 1419-1426.
    Law, C. K., (1989) “Dynamics of Stretched Flames,” Proceeding of the Combustion Institute, vol. 22, pp. 1381-1402.
    Law, C. K., and Sung, C. J., (2000) “Structural Sensitivity, Response, and Extinction of Diffusion and Premixed Flames in Oscillating Counterflow,” Combustion and Flame, 123:375-388.
    Lawn, C. J. and Polifke, W. (2004) “A Model for the Thermoacoustic Response of A Premixed Swirl Burner, Part Ⅱ: The Flame Response” Combustion Science and Technology, Vol. 176, pp.1359-1390.
    Lawton, J. and Weinberg, F. J., (1969) Electrical Aspects of Combustion, Clarendon Press Oxford.
    Ledder, G and Kapila, A. K., (1991) “The Response of Premixed Flames to Pressure Perturbations,” Combustion Science and Technology, Vol. 76: 21-44.
    Lieuwen, T. and Zinn, B. T., (1998a) “Application of Boundary Element Methods in Modeling Multidimensional flame-acoustic interaction,” ASME Paper 98-GT-269.
    Lieuwen, T and Zinn, B. T., (1998b) “The Role of Equivalence Ratio Oscillations in Driving Combustion Instabilities in Low NOx Gas Turbines,” Proceeding of the Combustion Institute, vol. 27, pp. 1809-1816.
    Lieuwen, T., Neumeier, Y., Zinn, B.T., (1999a) ”A Mechanism of Combustion Instability in Lean, Premixed Gas Turbine Combustors,” Combustion Science and Technology, Vol. 135, pp. 1-6.
    Lieuwen, T., (1999b) “Investigation of Combustion Instability Mechanisms in Premixed Gas Turbines,” Ph. D thesis
    Manton, J., Von Elbe, G. and Lewis, B., (1952) “Non-Isotropic Propagation of Combustion Waves in Explosive Gas Mixture and the Development of Cellular Flames,” Journal of Chemical and. Physic, vol. 20, pp. 153-160.
    Marble, F. E. and Candel, S. M., (1978) “An Analytical Study of the Non-Steady Behavior of Large Combustors,” Proceeding of the Combustion Institute, vol. 17, pp. 761-769.
    Markkstein, G. H., (1951) “Experimental and Theoretical Studies of Flame front Instability Phenomena in Combustion Waves,” Journal of Aeronautic Science, vol. 3, pp. 18-25.
    Markkstein, G. H., (1952) “Instability Phenomena in Combustion Waves,” Combustion Science and Technology, Vol. 4, pp. 43-59.
    Markkstein, G. H. and Schwartz, D., (1956) “Non-Steady Flame Propagation,” Combustion Science and Technology, Vol. 8, pp. 143-159.
    Mongia, R., Dibble, R. and Lovett, J., “Spontaneous Oscillations in Lean Premixed Combustion,” ASME Paper# 98-GT-3043.
    Peracchio, A. A. and Proscia, W. M., (1998) “Nonlinear Heat Release Acoustic Model for Thermo-Acoustic Instability in Lean Premixed Combustors,” ASME Paper 98-GT-269.
    Pierce, A. D., (1991) Acoustics: An Introduction to Its Physical Principles and Applications, Society of America.
    Poinsot, T. and Candel, S. M., (1998) “A Nonlinear Model for Ducted Flame Combustion Instabilities,” Combustion Science and Technology, Vol. 61, pp. 121-153.
    Poppe, C., Sivasegram, S. and Whitelaw, J. H., (1998) “Control of NOx Emissions in Confined Flames by Oscillations,” Combustion and Flame, 113: 13-26.
    Rayleigh, L., (1878) “The explanation of certain acoustical phenomena,” Royal Institution Proceedings, vol. 8, pp. 536-542.
    Ravikrishna, R. V., Cooper, Clayton S. and Laurendeau, Normand M., (1999) “Comparison of Saturated and Linear Laser-Induced Fluorescence Measurements of Nitric Oxide in Counterflow Diffusion Flames,” Combustion and Flame117:810-820.
    Ravikrishna, R. V. and Laurendeau, N. M., (2000) “Laser-Induced Fluorescence Measurements and Modeling of Nitric Oxide in Methane-Air and Ethane-Air Counterflow Diffusion Flames,” Combustion and Flame120:372-382.
    Ren, J. Y., Qin, W., Egolfpoulous, F. N. and Tsotsis, T.T., (2001). “Strain-Rare Effects on Hydrogen-Enhanced Lean Premixed Combustion,” Combustion and Flame, 124: 717-720.
    Rober J, K., James A, M. and Gregory H, E. (1988)”A Computional Model of the Structure of Strain, Opposed Flow, Premixed Methane-Air Flames,” Proceeding of the Combustion Institute, vol. 22, pp. 1479-1494.
    Sardi, Katerina., Taylor, A. M. K. P. and Whitelaw, J. H., (2000) “Extinction of Turbulent Counterflow Flames under Periodic Strain,” Combustion and Flame, 120: 265-284.
    Sivashinsky, G. I., (1977) ”Diffusion-Thermal Theory of Cellular Flames,” Combustion Science and Technology, Vol. 15, pp.137-146.
    Stahl, G., and Warnatz, J., (1991) “A Front Tracking Method for the Motion of Premixed Flames,” Combustion and Flame, 106: 487-510.
    Strahle, W. C., (1971) “On Combustion Generated Noise,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 49, pp 399-414.
    Strahle, W. C., (1973) “Refraction, Convection and Diffusion Flame Effects in Combustion Generated Noise,” Proceeding of the Combustion Institute, vol. 14 pp. 527-535.
    Sung, C. J. and Law, C. K., (2000) “Structural Sensitivity, Response, and Extinction of Diffusion and Premixed Flames in Oscillating Counterflow,” Combustion and Flame123:375-388.
    Thomsen, D. Douglas, Kuligowski, F. Frank and Laurendeau, Normand M., (1999) “Modeling of NO formation in Premixed, High-Pressure Methane Flames,” Combustion and Flame119:307-318.
    Tien, J. H. and Matalon, M., (1991) “A Compilation of Experimental Data on Laminar Burning Velocities,” Combustion and Flame, 84: 238-248.
    Vagelopoulos, C.M., Egolfopoulos, F.N. and Law, C.K., (1994) “Further Considerations on the Determination of Laminar Flame Speeds with the Counter-flow Twin Flame Technique,” Proceeding of the Combustion Institute, vol. 25 pp. 1341-1347.
    Vlachos, D. G., Schmidt, L. D. and Aris, R., (1993) “Ignition and Extinction of Flames Near Surfaces: Combustion of H2 in Air,” Combustion and Flame 95:313-335.
    Warnatz, J., Mass, U. and Dibble, R. W. (1996) “Combustion: Physical and Chemical Fundamentals, Modelling and Simulation, Experiments, Pollutant Formation”, Springer.
    Way, J. and Libby, P. A., (1970) “Hot-Wire for Measuring Velocity and Concentration in Helium-Air Mixtures,” AIAA Journal, Vol.8, pp. 976-978.
    Way, J. and Libby, P. A., (1971) “Application of Hot-Wire for Anemometry and Digital Techniques to Measurements in a Turbulent Helium Jet,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 9, pp. 1567-1573.
    Westbrook, C.K. and Dryer, F.L., (1981) “Simplified Reaction Mechanisms for the Oxidation of Hydrocarbon Fuel in Flames,” Combustion Science and Technology, vol. 27, pp. 31-43.
    Wu, C.K. and Law, C.K., (1985) “On the Determination of Laminar Flame Speeds from Stretched Flames,” Proceeding of the Combustion Institute, vol. 20, pp. 1941-1949.
    Yahagi, Y., Ueda, T. and Mizmoto, M., (1992) “Extinction Mechanism of Lean Methane/Air Turbulent Premixed Flame In A Stagnation Point Flow,” Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, vol. 24, pp. 537-542.
    Yang, V. and Culick, F. E. C., (1983) “Linear Theory of Pressure Oscillations in Liquid-Fueled Ramjet Engines,” AIAA Paper 83-0574.
    Yu, G.., Law, C.K. and Wu, C.K., (1986) “Laminar Flame Speeds of Hydrocarbon + Air Mixtures with Hydrogen Addition,” Combustion and Flame, 63: 339- 347.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:2004-09-17公開
    QR CODE