| 研究生: |
孫然 RAN, SUN |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
改善東港溪水質之水資源運用策略探討 Allocation Strategies of Water Resources of Donggang River to Improve Water Quality |
| 指導教授: |
周乃昉
Chou, N.-F Frederick |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 水利及海洋工程學系 Department of Hydraulic & Ocean Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2018 |
| 畢業學年度: | 106 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 84 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 污染負荷 、水資源分配策略 、水質改善 、水量水質聯合調控 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Pollution loading, Allocation Strategies of Water Resources, water quality improvement, joint regulation and control of water quantity and quality |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:119 下載:5 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
東港溪位于台灣南部屏東縣,水量穩定充沛,下游港西抽水站爲鳳山水庫主要水源。但由於在其流域內畜養60萬餘頭猪隻,所排放之廢水導致東港溪整體水質不佳,下游河段皆屬中度到嚴重污染。
爲改善這一狀况,增加河川水體用途,過去已有不少關於東港溪水質改善之策略與計畫。在以往的東港溪水量水質分析中,受限于經費或時間等因素,多直接採用短期的1至2筆實測水質、水量資料做爲代表值進行分析。由於東港溪的氨氮負荷在年際和月際之間存在很大差異,直接採用單筆水質、水量實測值,或者少數幾筆實測水質、水量之平均值,做爲實際污染情况進行分析,雖有一定的參考性,但仍難以準確反映其實際污染情况的連續變化過程。
爲能掌握東港溪氨氮污染較爲長期連續的變化情况,本研究參考2008至2012年間5筆詳細實測之資料,利用2002至2013年間水利署的水量監測資料、環保署的水質監測資料,反向推估東港溪河段各支流的氨氮負荷量。再利用WRASIM模式和QUAL2K模式分別模擬地面水資源分配過程以及河道水質變化,從而探究不同的水資源分配策略對該溪水質的影響,從而評估不同水量運用策略對水質調控之影響,進而瞭解在水質條件下東港溪水量運用之可行性。
Donggang River is located in Pingtung County, which is in the south of Taiwan. The flow of Donggang River is abundant and stable. The Gong-xi pumping station at downstream is the main water source of Fengshan Reservoir. However, due to the wastewater of more than 600,000 pigs in their basins, the overall water quality of Donggang River is poor, and the water in the lower stream has been severely polluted.
There have been many strategies and plans for improving the water quality of Donggang River. For the restraint of research funding and time, one or two short-term measured records of water quality and water quantity were used as representative values for previous related analysis. Since the ammonia nitrogen loading of Donggang River varies greatly between the interannual. So a few measured data of water quality and water water quality in short-term could be used as a reference, but it is difficult to accurately demonstrate the continuous change process of its actual pollution.
This study estimated the ammonia nitrogen loading of each tributary of the Donggang River through five detailed measured data from 2008 to 2012, water quantity monitoring data from the Water Resources Agency, water quality monitoring data from the Environmental Protection Administration. The WRASIM model and the QUAL2K model are respectively used to simulate the allocation of water resources and the water quality changes of the river. To explore the impact of different Allocation Strategies of Water Resources on water quality of the river.
行政院環境保護署,2010年12月,「東港溪流域水質改善討及綜合規劃計畫」
行政院環境保護署,2011年,「環境影響評估河川水質評估模式技術規範」
行政院環保署環境水質監測資訊網https://wq.epa.gov.tw/Code/?Languages=tw
水利署地理資訊倉儲中心https://gic.wra.gov.tw/gic/Water/Space/WaterMain.aspx
經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所,2000年8月,「東港溪整治綱要計畫規劃水資源經理(含污染整治方案規劃)專題報告」
經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所,2008年10月,「東港溪水資源運用方案檢討及調查規劃」
經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所,2015年10月,「隘寮溪、林邊溪、士文溪即牡丹水庫水資源聯合運用規劃」
經濟部水利署南區水資源局,2011年12月,「東港溪公共給水水源開發之探討」
經濟部水利署第七河川局,2006年4月,「東港溪河系情勢調查計畫」
屏東縣政府,2008年8月,「東港溪整治綱要(修正計劃)規劃-水質改善」
屏東縣政府環境保護局,2010年,「東港溪流域河川水質改善及污染削减具體行動計畫」
王中根, 劉昌明,&黃友波.(2003).SWAT模式的原理,結構及應用研究.地理科學進展,22(1),79-861.
吳嘉文.(2010).網流模式配水成本之設定及檢核機制.成功大學水利及海洋工程學系博士學位論文,1-131.
游进军,王浩,&甘泓.(2006).水资源系统模拟模型研究进展.水科学进展,17(3),425-429.
張守平,魏傳江,王浩,侯麗娜,周翔南,&畢彥杰.(2014).流域/區域水量水質聯合配置研究Ⅰ:理論方法.水利學報,45(7),757-766.
張永勇,夏軍,陳軍鋒,&孟德娟.(2010).基于SWAT模式的閘壩水量水質優化調度模式研究.水力發電學報,29(5),159-164.
劉丙軍,陳曉宏,&江濤.(2009).基于水量水質雙控制的流域水資源分配模式.水科學進展,20(4),513-517.
趙琰鑫,陳岩,&吳悅穎等(2015).QUAL2K河流水質模擬模式理論方法與應用指南.氣象出版社
臺灣自來水公司,2014年8月,「鳳山水庫原水處理改善研究」
臺灣河川複育網http://trrn.wra.gov.tw/Default.aspx
Arnold, J. G., Williams, J. R., Srinivasan, R., King, K. W., & Griggs, R. H. (1994). SWAT: Soil and water assessment tool. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, TX, 494.
Avogadro, E., Minciardi, R., & Paolucci, M. (1997). A decisional procedure for water resources planning taking into account water quality constraints. European Journal of Operational Research, 102(2), 320-334.
Azevedo, L. G. T. D., Gates, T. K., Fontane, D. G., Labadie, J. W., & Porto, R. L. (2000). Integration of water quantity and quality in strategic river basin planning. Journal of water resources planning and management, 126(2), 85-97.
Karamouz, M., Kerachian, R., & Zahraie, B. (2004). Monthly water resources and irrigation planning: case study of conjunctive use of surface and groundwater resources. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 130(5), 391-402.
Loftis, B., Labadie, J. W., & Fontane, D. G. (1985). Optimal operation of a system of lakes for quality and quantity. in Computer Applications in Water Resources (pp. 693-702). ASCE.
Pingry, D. E., Shaftel, T. L., & Boles, K. E. (1991). Role for decision-support systems in water-delivery design. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 117(6), 629-644.
Whittemore, R. C., & Beebe, J. (2000). EPA's BASINS model: Good science or serendipitous modeling?. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 36(3), 493-499.
Willey, R. G., Smith, D. J., & Duke Jr, J. H. (1996). Modeling water-resource systems for water-quality management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 122(3), 171-179.