簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 葉韋立
Yeh, Wei-Li
論文名稱： 鼓勵幼兒食用蔬菜的體驗式餐具設計
Experiential Tableware Design That Encourages Children to Eat Vegetables
指導教授： 周君瑞
Chou, Chun-Juei
學位類別： 碩士
Master
系所名稱： 規劃與設計學院 - 工業設計學系
Department of Industrial Design
論文出版年： 2021
畢業學年度： 109
語文別： 英文
論文頁數： 98
中文關鍵詞： 幼兒餐具設計 、遊戲化餐具 、幼兒用餐行為 、仕掛學 、使用者體驗方法
外文關鍵詞： Children's tableware design, Gamification tableware, Children's eating behavior, User engagement, Shikakeology
相關次數： 點閱：201  下載：15 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • 本研究的主題是「鼓勵幼兒食用蔬菜的體驗式餐具設計」，主旨為透過「互動性」、「回饋機制」作為引導幼兒用餐的驅動力，透過增加其用餐的愉悅感，進而強化幼兒用餐歷程的體驗，以提升整體用餐的自主性與意願度。
    因此，本研究將以行動研究法，觀察並蒐集2歲半至5歲幼兒用餐時的行為問題，另一方面，筆者也將訪談幼兒的父母親，針對數種幼兒用餐時的行為模式、教育幼兒用餐之方式以及挑選餐具的條件深入探討，以發掘照顧者與幼兒最迫切的需求，並作為設計洞見與設計範疇之參考，同時以使用者體驗方法與仕掛學輔以規劃體驗式餐具之核心活動與產品設計。
    本研究最終所提出之「體驗式餐具」，包含湯匙、互動式餐盤、餐墊以及蔬菜貼紙。透過幼兒與餐盤中的核心角色「熊熊」進行用餐競賽，以動畫互動、卡通化的音效等吸引幼兒對用餐的注意力，使其沈浸於用餐時的遊戲情境，藉由照顧者引導幼兒跟隨熊熊用餐，使其「一口接一口」地食用原先不敢或討厭的蔬菜為本研究的設計核心。據研究結果顯示，體驗式餐具不但成功地鼓勵幼兒勇敢嘗試食用原先討厭的蔬菜外，於維持用餐速度、自主性與意願度皆有明顯提升。

    The theme of this study is "experiential tableware design that encourages children to eat vegetables". The main purpose of this study is to enhance children's eating experience through "interactivity" and "visual feedback" as the driving force to guide children's eating and to enhance their eating experience by increasing their sense of enjoyment, to enhance their overall eating autonomy and willingness.
    This study was conducted to observe and collect the behavior problems of children aged 2 years to 5 years old during mealtime by action research method. On the other hand, the author will also interview parents of children to discuss several patterns of children's mealtime behaviors, ways of teaching children to eat, and conditions for selecting tableware, the most pressing needs of parents and children are identified and used as a reference for design insight and scope, and the core activities and product design of experiential tableware are planned with the help of user engagement and shikakeology.
    Experiential tableware proposed in this study consists of spoons, interactive plates, placemats, and vegetable stickers, through the meal competition between the children and the core character "Bear" on the dinner plate, the children's attention is attracted to the meal through animation interaction and cartoonish sound effects, the design to immerse the child in a playful mealtime situation, in which the caregiver guides the child to follow the bear's meal so that he or she eats the vegetables that he or she was afraid of or hated "one bite at a time".According to the results of the study, the experiential tableware not only encouraged the children to try the vegetables they hated but also significantly increased their speed, autonomy, and willingness to maintain their meals.

    摘要 i Abstract ii 謝誌 iii CONTENTS iv TABLE OF CONTENTS vii FIGURE OF CONTENTS ix CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Research background information 1 1.2 Motivation 2 1.3 Purpose 4 1.4 Limitations of the research 5 1.5 Research framework 7 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 8 2.1 Diet and physical and mental development of children 8 2.1.1 Cognitive development and behavior of children 8 2.1.2 Eating Behavior of Children 10 2.1.3 Conclusion 10 2.2 Mirror neurons and behavioral learning of children 11 2.2.1 Mirror neuron and imitation 11 2.2.2 Conclusion 11 2.3 Experience design 12 2.3.1 Definition experience 12 2.3.2 Product experience and emotional satisfaction 13 2.3.3 Examples of experiential design applied to children 15 2.3.4 Conclusion 15 2.4 Change human behavior with design 16 2.4.1 Change human behavior with tangible user interfaces (TUI) 17 2.4.2 Changing human behavior with fun-Shikakeology 19 2.4.3 Creating user pleasure with gamification 20 2.4.4 Conclusion 21 2.5 The specification and scope of children's products 21 2.5.1 Variations in hand grip and design applications for children 21 2.5.2 The use of appetite-stimulating colors in products for children 22 2.5.3 Conclusion 23 2.6 Research methods 23 2.6.1 Action research 23 2.6.2 Semistructured interview 24 2.6.3 User engagement 24 2.6.4 Conclusion 28 CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODS 29 3.1 Research processes 29 3.2 Research(design) steps 32 3.2.1 Theoretical basis of tableware design for children 32 3.2.1.1 Conclusion 35 3.2.2 Observe and analyze key problems of children's meals 36 3.2.2.1 Conclusion 38 3.2.3 Understand the needs of tableware from interviewing parents 39 3.2.3.1 Feedback from the interviews with the three parents 40 3.2.3.2 Conclusion 43 3.2.4 Determine the design direction and constraints 44 3.2.4.1 Samples of selected studies 44 3.2.4.2 Existing tableware feature analysis 45 3.2.4.3 Conclusion 46 3.2.5 Proposing the prototype of children’s tableware 46 3.2.5.1 Design 46 3.2.5.2 Iterative process of experimental tableware 53 3.2.5.3 Conclusion 56 CHAPTER 4 RESEARCH VERIFICATION 58 4.1 Research Assumptions 58 4.2 Test the degree to which the child's tableware can be used 59 4.2.1 Subjects 59 4.2.2 Experimental planning and process 59 4.2.3 Exploring the effect of tableware on children's diet 61 4.2.3.1 Results and analysis of subject B01 61 4.2.3.2 Results and analysis of subject B02 64 4.2.3.3 Results and analysis of subject B03 66 4.2.3.4 Results and analysis of subject B04 70 4.2.3.5 Results and analysis of subject B05 73 4.2.4 Testing the effectiveness of experiential tableware 76 4.3 Exploring the impact of experiential tableware on children's eating behaviors 80 4.3.1 Features of using experiential tableware 80 4.3.2 Classification of experiential behavior of children 81 4.3.3 Interactive rules and value analysis of experiential tableware 82 CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 85 5.1 Conclusions 85 5.2 Recommendations 86 REFERENCES 88 Appendix 1 Dietary behavior assessment form 93 Appendix 2 Sample of childcare tableware 94 Appendix 3 Consent form for photographing, recording and taping 97 Appendix 4 Outline of Interview 98

    Chinese
    1. 林薇 (1998)。幼兒飲食行為形成及影響因素。家政教育學報，1，42-58。
    2. 林佳蓉、陳瑤惠 (2001a)。影響學前兒童特殊飲食習慣養成之相關因素探討-以素食為例。公共衛生學報，28(1)，77-89。
    3. 張力山、 李淑貞、蘇聖文、王順治 (2014 )，老人養護機構無障礙環境設計準則探討，健康與建築雜誌。1(2)，9 -13。
    4. 盧瑩娣、陳俊宏 (2004)。餐盤色彩對食慾影響之研究。2004色彩學研討會論文集，43-55。
    5. 郭春在 (2006)。從幼兒身心發展觀點探討幼兒玩具設計要素之研究。應用藝術與設計學報，1， 53-62。
    6. 吳正仲(2012)。情感設計應用在減緩兒童診療焦慮與疼痛之研究。設計學報 (Journal of Design)，17(3)，69-93。
    7. 湯嘉明、陳俊宏 (2000)。色彩意象傳達容易引起食慾之研究-以彩色湯匙為例。2000色彩應用與色彩科學研討會論文集，176-184。
    8. 陳佑甄、金瑞芝(2010). 兒童隱藏情緒理解之研究。教育心理學報，42(2)，253-275。
    9. 鄧蔭萍(2012)。兒童情緒智力與社會行為之初探。兒童照顧與教育，2，1-21。
    10. 蘇建文、丁心平、許錦云(1990)。陌生情境中嬰兒行為及其依附類型研究初探。教育心理學報， 23，49-70。
    11. 甄曉蘭(1995)。合作行動研究 進行教育研究的另一種方式。國立嘉義師範學院學報，9-297。
    12. 陳惠邦(1998)。教育行動研究。台北：師大書苑，114-158。
    13. 林佳珍(2008)。宜蘭縣幼教師實施幼兒科學教學現況之調查研究。國立東華大學幼兒教育學系學位論文，1-122。
    14. 葉淑青(2014)。以探究食物顏色為主的科學活動對幼兒飲食習慣之影響。朝陽科技大學應用化學系學位論文，1-180。
    15. 胡幼慧(1996)。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例(頁177-132)。台北：巨流。
    16. 曾光華、饒怡雲(2015)。觀光與餐旅行銷：美學體驗、圖像學習(頁342-421)。新北市：前程。
    17. 周郁凱(2017)。遊戲化實戰全書。臺北市：城邦。
    18. 松村真宏(2018)。仕掛學:使人躍躍欲試、一舉兩得的好設計。遠流。

    Chinese Website
    1. 盧奕均、張惠婷(2014)。0至6歲兒童發展里程碑。兒童發展評估復健暨研究中心。取自http://taipei.tzuchi.com.tw/162/pdf/d/CR/%E7%99%BC%E5%B1%95%E6%AD%B7%E7%A8%8B.pdf
    2. 黃菁瑜 (2012)。一套能夠改善兒童在法庭訊問時提供資訊的品質與豐富度的半結構式訪談程序：研究成果回顧。取自 https://reurl.cc/Oqvpvg.
    3. 余曉玟 (2014)。The Fun Theory 玩樂改變生活習慣。2020年11月17日擷取自
    https://innoservice.org/2774/the-fun-theory-%E7%8E%A9%E6%A8%82%E6%94%B9%E8%AE%8A%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB%E7%BF%92%E6%85%A3%EF%BC%81/

    English
    1. Gesell,A.(1929).Maturation and infant behavior patten. Psychological Review,26,307-319.
    2. Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 27, 169-192.
    3. Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science, 198(4312), 75-78.
    4. Piaget,J.(1964):Cognitive Development in Children:Developmentand Learning.Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching,2,176-186.
    5. Khalid, H. M., & Helander, M. G. (2004). A framework for affective customer needs in product design.Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 5(1), 27-42.
    6. Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. The Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92-101.
    7. Green, W., & Jordan, P. (2002). Pleasure with products: Beyond usability .Taylor & Francis, 236-243.
    8. Norman, D. A. (2003). Measuring emotion. The Design Journal, 6(2), 1-4.
    9. Marotz, R. L., Cross, Z. M., & Rush, M. J.(2005). Health, Safety, and Nutrition for the Young Child (6th ed.). Clifton Park, NY：Thomson Delmar-Learning,432-441.
    10. Fisher, J, O., & Birch, L. L.(2001). Early experience with food and eating: implications for the development of eating disorder. In J. K, 23-39.
    11. Wetton, B. (2007). Robots: blood–A methodology. Kolding, Denmark: Kolding School of Design, 1(1), 14.
    12. Nakajima, K., Nakamura, K., Yonemitsu, S., Oikawa, D., Ito, A., Higashi, Y., ... & Tamura, T. (2001). Animal-shaped toys as therapeutic tools for patients with severe dementia.Conference Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society ,4, 3796-3798.
    13. Fernandez, E. (1986). A classification system of cognitive coping strategies for pain. Pain, 26(2),141-151.
    14. Kiche, M. T., & Almeida, F. D. (2009). Therapeutic toy: Strategy for pain management and tension relief during dressing change in children. Acta Paulista De Enfermagem, 22(2), 125-130.
    15. Case-Smith, J., Allen, A. S., & Pratt, P. N. (Eds.). (1996). Occupational therapy for children. , 67-98.
    16. Child, I. L., Hansen, J. A., & Hornbeck, F. W. (1968). Age and sex differences in children's color preferences. Child development, 237-247.
    17. Pine, B. J. II, & Gilmore, J. H. (1999). The Experience Economy- Work Is Theatre & Every Business a Stage. Boston, Massachusetts, USA: Harvard Business School Press.27-49.
    18. Elizabeth, B. N. S., & Dandavate, U. (1999). Design for experiencing: new tools. In First International Conference on Design and Emotion, TU Delft.
    19. Nack, F. (2003). Capturing experience: a matter of contextualising events. In Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGMM workshop on Experiential telepresence ,53-64.
    20. McLellan, H. (2000). Experience Design. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3(1), 59-69.
    21. Schmitt, B. (1999a). Experiential Marketing: A New Framework for Design and Communications. Design Management Journal, 10-16.
    22. Schmitt, B. H. (1999). Experiential marketing: How to get companies to sense, feel, think, act, and relate to your company and brands.244-249.
    23. Lanier Jr, C. D. (2008). Experiential marketing: Exploring the dimensions, characteristics, and logic of firm-driven experiences: The University of Nebraska-Lincoln.72-116.
    24. Freud, A. (1928). The theory of child analysis. Writings 1,162-175.
    25. Fisher, J, O., & Birch, L. L.(2001). Early experience with food and eating: implications for the development of eating disorder. In J. K., 23-39.
    26. Bruner, J. S.(1960).The Process of Education.Cambridge:Harvard University Press, 38-43.
    27. Chou, C. J. (2009). User engagement.providing additional interaction and meaning with products. Illinois Institute of Technology.
    28. Birch, L. L., Marlin, D. W., & Rotter, J. (1984). Eating as the" means" activity in a contingency: Effects on young children's food preference. Child development, 431-439.
    29. Fieldhouse, P. (1982). Nutrition and education of the schoolchild. In Nutrition Education and Modern Concepts of Food Assimilation ,40, 83-112.
    30. Stare, F. J. (1986). Nutrition education in America: From day one. World review of nutrition and dietetics.
    31. Rickard, K. A., Gallahue, D. L., Bewley, N., & Tridle, M. L. (1996). The play approach to learning: an alternative paradigm for healthy eating and active play. Pediatric Basics, 76, 2-4.
    32. Gustafsson, A., & Gyllenswärd, M. (2005). The power-aware cord: energy awareness through ambient information display. extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, 1423-1426.
    33. Ratti, C., Wang, Y., Ishii, H., Piper, B., & Frenchman, D. (2004). Tangible User Interfaces (TUIs): a novel paradigm for GIS. Transactions in GIS, 8(4), 407-421.
    34. Blackwell, A. F., Fitzmaurice, G., Holmquist, L. E., Ishii, H., & Ullmer, B. (2007). Tangible user interfaces in context and theory. extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems ,2817-2820.
    35. Ryokai, K., Marti, S., & Ishii, H. (2004). I/O brush: drawing with everyday objects as ink. Human factors in computing systems ,303-310.
    36. Ullmer, B., & Ishii, H. (2001). Human-Computer Interaction in the New Millennium, chapter Emerging Frameworks for Tangible User Interfaces.579-601.
    37. Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Esplin, P. W., & Horowitz, D. (2000). Assessing the value of structured protocols for forensic interviews of alleged child abuse victims. Child abuse & neglect, 24(6), 733-752.
    38. Kiche, M. T., & Almeida, F. D. A. (2009). Therapeutic toy: strategy for pain management and tension relief during dressing change in children. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, 22, 125-130.
    39. Pitchford, N. J., & Mullen, K. T. (2005). The role of perception, language, and preference in the developmental acquisition of basic color terms. Journal of experimental child psychology, 90(4), 275-302.
    40. Cohen, L. & Manion, L. (1989). Research Methods in Education. Routeledge and Kegan Paul: London. 325-400.

    Image Reference
    1. Propaganda(2020). sink plug. 2020/10/10 Retrieved from http://www.amazon.com/propaganda-Help-Drain-Stopper-Orange/dp/B0006VQUNY
    2. Edu-In(2011). Dinosaur-shaped tableware .2020/10/10 Retrieved from https://reurl.cc/Ezbjxm
    3. OMOSHIROI BLOCK (2020). the paper sculpture model sticky note .2020/10/07 Retrieved from https://www.omoshiroi-onlinestore.com/ja/omoshiroi-block-001
    4. YAHOO! (2020) . Fitness rings.2020/11/17 Retrieved from https://reurl.cc/OqgdND
    5. Multi-Touch Topography (2007).Sand Scape.2020/11/17 Retrieved from https://pruned.blogspot.com/2007/02/multi-touch-topography.html
    6. Donaldson(2019). Ring Fit Adventure review: Nintendo’s fitness RPG is one of the most pleasant surprises of the year.2020/11/17 Retrieved from https://www.vg247.com/2019/10/26/ring-fit-adventure-review/
    7. Wickes(2018). Fun Theory and the Extraordinary Power of Fun . 2020/11/17 Retrieved from https://www.familyadventureproject.org/fun-theory/

    下載圖示 校內：2023-10-12公開
    校外：2023-10-12公開
    QR CODE