簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃聖諭
Huang, Sheng-Yu
論文名稱: 會計師審計工作經驗對於審計品質及審計公費之影響
The Impact of Audit Partner Experience on Audit Quality and Audit Fees
指導教授: 林囿成
Lin, Yu-Chen
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 會計學系
Department of Accountancy
論文出版年: 2019
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 34
中文關鍵詞: PCAOBRule3211Form A會計師審計經驗審計品質審計公費
外文關鍵詞: PCAOB, rule3211, Form AP, partner disclosure, audit experience, audit quality, audit fees
相關次數: 點閱:67下載:5
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本文探討會計師的整體審計經驗是否與審計品質及審計公費相關。美國證券交易委員會(Securities Exchange Commission, SEC) 於2016年5月9日發佈了Rule 3211,要求註冊會計師事務所在發佈每份查核報告後應出具Form AP揭露會計師姓名。過去有其他國家文獻探討類似的規定,然而其結果並不一致。Cahan and Sun (2015)的研究使用了會計師接觸審計工作的年數來代理會計師審計經驗,然而美國與中國的審計市場存在很大的差異,因此本研究改用美國會計師樣本。研究發現當個別會計師資訊揭露後,經驗對審計品質沒有顯著關係,審計公費則發現顯著正關係。再者,本研究將樣本劃分成四大及非四大會計師事務所,發現經驗對審計公費的影響在非四大事務所較顯著。合理的解釋為四大會計師事務所的審計品質控制機制較非四大事務所謹慎且完備。整體而言,我們的結論越富有經驗之會計師收取之公費較高。

    This paper explores whether the overall audit experience of partner relates to audit quality and audit fees. The U.S. Securities Exchange Commission (here after SEC) released Rule 3211 on May 9, 2016, they require registered audit firms to issue Form AP to disclose the name of the partner after they issue each audit report. Prior research using audit partner disclosure information from other country find the mix results. Cahan and Sun (2015) use years that partner engaged in audit-related work to proxy audit experience in China but there is great difference between audit market in China and the U.S. This study uses U.S. partner sample and find that when the partner's name information discloses, the experience has a positive relationship with the audit fees but we find no significant relationship in audit quality. Next, the sample is separate into Big4 audit firms and non-Big4 audit firms. This study finds the relationship between experience and audit fees is more significant in non-Big4 firms. The different quality control mechanism between Big4 and non-Big4 might be the reason. Overall, our conclusions support the policy of Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (here after PCAOB), the disclose of Form AP will reduce the information asymmetry and make the audit market more transparent.

    I. Introduction 1 II. Literature Review 3 III. Sample Collections and Models 10 IV. Research Results 14 V. Conclusion 28 VI. Reference 30

    Abdolmohammadi, M. and A. Wright. 1987. An examination of the effects of experience and task complexity and audit judgments. The Accounting Review 62: 1-13.
    Armstrong, C., M. Barth, A. Jagolinzer and E. Riedl. 2010. Market reaction to the adoption of IFRS in Europe. The Accounting Review 85 (1): 31-61.
    Becker, C., M. DeFond, J. Jiambalvo and K. Subramanyam. 1998. The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research 15(1): 1-24.
    Burke, J., R. Hoitash and U. Hoitash. 2018. Audit Partner Identification and Characteristics: Evidence from US Form AP Filings. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory.
    Bonner, S. and B. Lewis. 1990. Determinants of auditor expertise. Journal of Accounting Research 28: 1-20.
    Bedard, J. and K. Johnstone. 2010. Audit partner tenure and audit planning and pricing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 29(2): 45-70.
    Blay, A., M. Notbohm, C. Schelleman, and A. Valencia. 2014. Audit quality effects of an individual audit engagement partner signature mandate. International Journal of Auditing 18(3): 172-192.
    Chung, H. and S. Kallapur. 2003. Client importance, nonaudit services, and abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review 78(4): 931-955.
    Chen, S., S. Sun, and D. Wu. 2010. Client importance, institutional improvements, and audit quality in China: An office and individual auditor level analysis. The Accounting Review 85(1): 127-158.
    Carey, P. and R. Simnett. 2006. Audit partner tenure and audit quality. The Accounting Review 81(3): 653-676.
    Choi, J. H., Kim, J. B., Qiu, A. A. and Zang, Y. (2012). Geographic proximity between auditor and client: How does it impact audit quality? Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 31(2): 43-72.
    Cahan, S. and W. Zhang. 2006. After Enron: Auditor conservatism and ex-Andersen。clients. The Accounting Review 81(1): 49-82.
    Chen, C., C. Lin, and C. Lin. 2008. Audit partner tenure, audit firm tenure, and discretionary accruals: Does long auditor tenure impair earnings quality? Contemporary Accounting Research 25(2): 415-445.
    Cahan, S. and J. Sun. 2015. The effect of audit experience on audit fees and audit quality. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 30(1): 78-100.
    Church, B., S. Davis, and S. McCraken. 2008. The auditor’s reporting model: A literature overview and research synthesis. Accounting Horizons 22 (1): 69-90.
    Carcello, J. and C. Li. 2013. Costs and benefits of requiring an engagement partner signature: Recent experience in the United Kingdom. The Accounting Review 88(5): 1511-1546.
    Cameran, M., D. Campa and J. Francis. 2017. How important is partner variation in explaining audit quality. Working paper, Bocconi University, International University of Monaco, and University of Missouri. http://dx. doi. org/10.2139/ssrn. 2744620.
    DeFond, M. and J. Francis. 2005. Audit research after Sarbanes-oxley. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 24(s-1): 5-30.
    DeAngelo, L. 1981. Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3(3): 183-199.
    Das, S. and H. Zhang. 2003. Rounding-up in reported EPS, behavioral thresholds, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 35(1): 31-50.
    Dunn, K. and B. Mayhew. 2004. Audit firm industry specialization and client disclosure quality. Review of Accounting Studies, 9(1), 35-58.
    Davis, J. 1996. Experience and auditors' selection of relevant information for preliminary control risk assessments. Auditing 15(1): 16.
    Davidson, R. and D. Neu. 1993. A note on the association between audit firm size and audit quality. Contemporary Accounting Research 9(2): 479-488.
    Estes, R. and D. Reames. 1988. Effects of personal characteristics on materiality decisions: A multivariate analysis. Accounting and Business Research 18(72): 291-296.
    Francis, J. and D. Stokes. 1986. Audit prices, product differentiation, and scale economies: Further evidence from the Australian market. Journal of Accounting Research: 383-393.
    Francis, J. 2004. What do we know about audit quality? The British Accounting Review 36(4): 345-368.
    Francis, J. and M. Yu. 2009. Big 4 office size and audit quality. The Accounting Review, 84(5), 1521-1552.
    Fellner, G. and B. Maciejovsky. 2007. Risk attitude and market behavior: Evidence from experimental asset markets. Journal of Economic Psychology 28(3): 338-350.
    Gul, F., D. Wu and Z. Yang. 2013. Do individual auditors affect audit quality? Evidence from archival data. The Accounting Review 88(6): 1993-2023.
    Gul, F. A., B. Srinidhi and A. Ng. 2011. Does board gender diversity improve the informativeness of stock prices? Journal of Accounting and Economics 51(3): 314-338.
    Geiger, M. and D. Rama. 2006. Audit firm size and going-concern reporting accuracy. Accounting horizons 20(1): 1-17.
    Hambrick, D. and P. Mason. 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review 9(2): 193-206.
    Kaplan, S. E., E. O'Donnell and B. Arel. 2008. The influence of auditor experience on the persuasiveness of information provided by management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 27(1): 67-83.
    Knapp, C. M. Knapp. 2001. The effects of experience and explicit fraud risk assessment in detecting fraud with analytical procedures. Accounting, Organizations and Society 26(1): 25-37.
    Kothari, S., A. Leone and C. Wasley. 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39(1): 163-197.
    Libby, R. 1979. Bankers' and auditors' perceptions of the message communicated by the audit report. Journal of Accounting Research: 99-122.
    McEvoy, G. and W. Cascio. 1985. Strategies for reducing employee turnover: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 70(2): 342.
    C. Moeckel. 1990. The effect of experience on auditors' memory errors. Journal of Accounting Research 28(2): 368-387.
    Manry, D., T. Mock and J. Turner. 2008. Does increased audit partner tenure reduce audit quality? Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 23(4): 553-572.
    Myers, J., L. Myers and T. Omer. 2003. Exploring the term of the auditor-client relationship and the quality of earnings: A case for mandatory auditor rotation? The Accounting Review 78(3): 779-799.
    Nelson, M. and H. Tan. 2005. Judgment and decision-making research in auditing: A task, person, and interpersonal interaction perspective. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 24(s-1): 41-71.
    Owhoso, V., W. Messier, Jr, and J. Lynch, Jr. 2002. Error detection by. industry‐specialized teams during sequential audit review. Journal of Accounting Research 40(3): 883-900.
    Palmrose, Z.1986. The effect of nonaudit services on the pricing of audit services: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting Research: 405-411.
    Ruiz-Barbadillo, E., N. Gómez-Aguilar, and N. Carrera. 2009. Does mandatory audit firm rotation enhance auditor independence? Evidence from Spain. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 28(1): 113-135.
    Schipper, K. 1989. Earnings management. Accounting horizons 3(4): 91.
    Williams, C. and L. Livingstone. 1994. Another look at the relationship between performance and voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal 37(2): 269-298.

    下載圖示 校內:2024-06-19公開
    校外:2024-06-19公開
    QR CODE