簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 何雅惠
Ho, Ya-Hui
論文名稱: 以模糊德爾菲法探討海域遊憩活動風險之研究
Study on Ocean Activity Safety using Fuzzy Delphi Method
指導教授: 董東璟
Doong, Dong-Jiing
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 水利及海洋工程學系
Department of Hydraulic & Ocean Engineering
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 83
中文關鍵詞: 模糊德爾菲法風險評估海域遊憩海岸管理
外文關鍵詞: Fuzzy Delphi method, Risk assessment, Coastal management, Qcean recreation
相關次數: 點閱:104下載:16
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 台灣海域遊憩活動發展日益蓬勃,以往多以禁止或限制的政策管理水域遊憩活動,近年改施以開放、鼓勵的政策,因此,風險的掌握有其必要性,事先知悉海域遊憩活動環境的風險有助於降低災害之發生,本研究針對海域遊憩活動進行風險評估研究。
    本研究藉由模糊德爾菲法建立與海域遊憩活動關聯之風險評估指標與因子,再藉由層級分析法分析各因子權重,計算各因子的相對重要性,並同時考慮危險度與脆弱度進行風險分析,分析因子中,除了納入海氣象水文特性與地文環境特性外,亦考慮了海岸地區的社會經濟、醫療與救災量能以及遊客行為等進行風險評估。
    本研究透過海氣象水文與地文觀測資料與數值模擬,以及專家問卷蒐集分析資料,研究結果顯示,對於海灘型態的海岸,共有10項危險度因子和12項脆弱度因子納入分析,危險度因子中權重最高者為「近岸海底坡度」,脆弱度因子中權重最高者為「安全救生設施」。
    本研究選擇台灣七處熱門遊憩海岸包含不同海岸型態進行風險評估分析,並比較有無考慮暴露度的風險等級,在遊憩活動上,暴露度可以遊客人數代表之,結果顯示,暴露度的納入對風險等級帶來顯著的影響。風險評估建議應定期更新,資料的齊全性高度影響了分析結果,是未來要有更正確評估應留意之事項。

    In the past, comprehensive policies had been strictly implemented on water recreation activities. However, as ocean recreation becomes more and more popular, the policies have become loosen in recent years; Therefore, it is necessary to gain a sufficient understanding of the potential risks. By acknowledging the risks of ocean recreational activities in advance, the occurrence of disaster could also be reduced. This study is concerned with the risk assessment on ocean recreational activities. Risk assessment indicators related to ocean recreational activities are established by the Fuzzy Delphi method. The weight of the indicators is analyzed by the AHP method, which is calculated for the relative importance of each factor. In addition to ocean meteorology and hydrological characteristics and ocean environment, the indicators have also taken social economy, medical response capacity for disaster, and tourist behavior of the coastal area into account for risk assessment.
    The results show that the beach type of risk assessment includes 10 hazard indicators and 12 vulnerability indicators. In this study, we select seven popular recreational coasts in Taiwan for risk assessment and compare their risks with and without the consideration of exposure index, as the exposure index can be represented by the number of tourists. In addition, it is necessary to be aware of the completeness of data to conduct a more accurate assessment, as the completeness of the dataset can cause a significant impact on the assessment result.

    摘要 i ABSTRACT ii 致謝 vi 目錄 vii 表目錄 ix 圖目錄 xii 第一章 緒論 1 1-1 研究背景 1 1-2 研究目的 3 1-3 文獻回顧 4 1-3-1 風險評估方法 4 1-3-2 海岸管理 8 1-4 研究架構 11 第二章 研究方法 12 2-1 海域遊憩安全之風險評估方法與架構 12 2-1-1 風險評估步驟 13 2-1-2 風險矩陣 14 2-2 風險辨識 16 2-2-1 危險度 16 2-2-2 脆弱度 18 2-3 風險評估指標選定 21 2-3-1 模糊德爾菲法(Fuzzy Delphi Method, FDM) 22 2-4 風險評估指標權重訂定 27 2-4-1 層級分析法(Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP) 27 2-4-2 層級分析法之評估尺度 28 2-4-3 AHP進行步驟與運算方法 29 第三章 研究資料 33 3-1 研究區域 33 3-2 研究區域基本資料蒐集 39 第四章 研究成果 42 4-1 模糊德菲法專家問卷調查結果分析 42 4-2 層級分析法專家問卷調查結果分析 46 4-3 風險分析 50 4-4 風險評估結果研析 59 4-4-1 研究區域分析 59 4-4-2 地域特性比較 66 4-4-3 納入暴露度比較 74 第五章 結論 76 5-1結論 76 5-2 建議 78 參考文獻 79

    [1] 鄧振源、曾國雄(1989),「層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(上) 」,中國統計學報,27(6),第5-22頁。
    [2] 陳昭宏(2001),亞太港埠競爭力與核心能力指標之研究,運輸學刊,13(1),第1-25頁。
    [3] 行政院研究發展考核委員會(2001),「海洋白皮書」,行政院研究發展考核委員會。
    [4] 鄭滄濱(2001),「軟體組織提升人員能力之成熟度模糊評估模式」,國立台灣科技大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
    [5] 葉晉嘉、翁興利、吳濟華 (2007),「德菲法與模糊德菲法之比較研究. 調查研究-方法與應用」,(21) ,第31-58頁。
    [6] 陳正男、陳元陽、于錫亮(2004),「臺灣地區海洋運動發展策略之研究: 以澎湖縣, 連江縣為例」,行政院體育委員會。
    [7] 行政院研究發展考核委員會(2006) ,「海洋政策白皮書」,行政院研究發展考核委員會。
    [8] 行政院勞工委員會(2009),「危害辨識及風險評估技術指引」,行政院勞工委員會。
    [9] 褚志鵬(2009),「層級分析法 (AHP) 理論與實作,才華有限實驗室 (2016). VR 來了」,(21),第 31-58頁。
    [10] 國立台灣大學(2010),「脆弱度及風險地圖分析方法之研究」,經濟部水利署研究報告。
    [11] 林雪美、朱明人、黃映慈(2011) ,「沙質海岸海灘劣化與復育策略:以宜蘭海岸為例」,地理研究第55期,第21–48頁。
    [12] 劉忠仁(2011),「建構澎湖海域遊憩場所安全性評鑑指標」,國立澎湖科技大學觀光休閒事業管理研究所碩士論文。
    [13] 蕭仁豪(2013),「海水浴場海灘安全性評估之研究」,弘光科技大學環境工程研究所碩士論文,台中。
    [14] 工業技術研究院(2014),「能源部門因應氣候變遷調適策略計畫」。
    [15] 李太立(2014),「旗山溪流域氣象災害風險評估」,國立中央大學土木工程學系碩士論文,桃園。
    [16] 莊子逸(2014),「整合模糊德爾菲法與模糊層級分析法評估淹水災害風險 -以宜蘭縣為例」,國立宜蘭大學土木工程學系碩士論文,宜蘭。
    [17] 張瓊文、蕭為元、張益城、謝奇良、李家齊(2016),「鐵公路系統氣候變遷脆弱度及風險地圖之研究」,運輸計劃季刊第四十五卷第四期,臺北,第251–276頁。
    [18] 劉書豪(2016),「屏東縣西部海域遊憩活動安全風險評估指標之建立」,國立高雄海洋科技大學海洋事務與管理碩士學位學程,碩士論文,高雄。
    [19] 葉純甄(2017),「台灣海岸侵蝕風險評估-以雲林、台東海岸為例」,國立臺灣海洋大學河海工程學系碩士論文,基隆。
    [20] 曹校章(2017),「臺灣地區海域休閒運動與觀光遊憩產業結構分析」,臺灣體育學術研究第62期,第67~98頁。
    [21] 黃書涵(2018),「環境變遷對永安漁港沿岸漁業之影響評估」,國立臺灣海洋大學環境生物與漁業科學學系碩士論文,基隆。
    [22] 海洋委員會(2019),「危險海域劃設原則之研究」,國立成功大學執行。
    [23] 劉子明、鄧澤宇(2019),「以IPCC風險定義探討氣候變遷下水資源風險評估與調適應用」,科技部行政法人國家災害防救科技中心研究報告。
    [24] 黃智偉(2020),「天然災害對港埠營運之衝擊與風險分析-以基隆港為例」,國立臺灣海洋大學河海工程學系碩士論文,基隆。
    [25] 海洋委員會( 2020),「國家海洋政策白皮書」,海洋委員會。
    [26] 謝天祥(2020),「都會區洪災風險分析-以典寶溪流域為例」,國立聯合大學土木與防災工程研究所碩士論文,苗栗。
    [27] 國家海洋研究院(2021),「全國海岸與釣點風險評估」,國家成功大學、國立中山大學、國立臺灣海洋大學執行。
    [28] Abraldes, J. A., & Pérez-Gómez, J. (2009). Assessment of risk factors for injuries on beaches. International journal of aquatic research and education, 3(3), 6.
    [29] Adopted, I. P. C. C. (2014). Climate change 2014 synthesis report. IPCC: Geneva, Szwitzerland.
    [30] Bain, H., Howard, N., & Saaty, T. L. (1971). Using the analysis of options technique to analyze a community conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 15(2), 133-144.
    [31] Botero, C. M., Pereira, C., Anfuso, G., Cervantes, O., Williams, A. T., Pranzini, E., & Silva, C. P. (2014). Recreational parameters as an assessment tool for beach quality. Journal of Coastal Research, (70 (10070)), 556-562.
    [32] Bush, D. M., Neal, W. J., Young, R. S., & Pilkey, O. H. (1999). Utilization of geoindicators for rapid assessment of coastal-hazard risk and mitigation. Ocean & Coastal Management, 42(8), 647-670.
    [33] Center, A. D. R. (2005). Total Disaster Risk Management. ADRC, Japan.
    [34] Cervantes, O., & Espejel, I. (2008). Design of an integrated evaluation index for recreational beaches. Ocean & Coastal Management, 51(5), 410-419.
    [35] Chen, C. L., & Teng, N. (2016). Management priorities and carrying capacity at a high-use beach from tourists’ perspectives: A way towards sustainable beach tourism. Ocean Policy, 74, 213-219.
    [36] Chen, J. G., Zhong, Y. Z., Chuang, L. Z. H., Koppe, B., & Chien, H. (2020). Risk management of coastal water safety for recreational activities: The case of Taoyuan coast. Applied geography, 117, 102173.
    [37] DHA, U. (1992). Internationally agreed glossary of basic terms related to disaster management. UNDHA (United Nations Department of Humanitarian Affairs), Geneva.
    [38] Ferrari, M., Carpi, L., Pepe, G., Mucerino, L., Schiaffino, C. F., Brignone, M., & Cevasco, A. (2019). A geomorphological and hydrodynamic approach for beach safety and sea bathing risk estimation. Science of The Total Environment, 671, 1214-1226.
    [39] Garvey, P. R., & Lansdowne, Z. F. (1998). Risk matrix: an approach for identifying, assessing, and ranking program risks. Air Force Journal of Logistics, 22(1), 18-21.
    [40] Hammer, W. (1972). Handbook of system and product safety (Vol. 3). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    [41] Hartman, A. (1981). Reaching consensus using the Delphi technique. Educational Leadership, 38(6), 495-97.
    [42] Chien, L. K., Hsu, C. H., Huang, W. P., & Wang, I. (2016, June). The study of designation of coastal protection zone and management in Taiwan. In The 26th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference. OnePetro.
    [43] Huang, W. P., Hsu, J. C., Chen, C. S., & Ye, C. J. (2018). The study of the coastal management criteria based on risk assessmeant: a case study on Yunlin Coast, Taiwan. Water, 10(8), 988.
    [44] IPCC, C. W. T. (2007). Climate change 2007: synthesis report (p. 104). Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.
    [45] Ishikawa, A., Amagasa, M., Shiga, T., Tomizawa, G., Tatsuta, R., & Mieno, H. (1993). The max-min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration. Fuzzy sets and systems, 55(3), 241-253.
    [46] Lee, G., Jun, K. S., & Chung, E. S. (2013). Integrated multi-criteria flood vulnerability approach using fuzzy TOPSIS and Delphi technique. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 13(5), 1293-1312.
    [47] Masselink, G., & Short, A. D. (1993). The effect of tide range on beach morphodynamics and morphology: a conceptual beach model. Journal of coastal research, 785-800.
    [48] Mucerino, L., Carpi, L., Schiaffino, C. F., Pranzini, E., Sessa, E., & Ferrari, M. (2021). Rip current hazard assessment on a sandy beach in Liguria, NW Mediterranean. Natural Hazards, 105(1), 137-156.
    [49] Murray, T. J., Pipino, L. L., & Van Gigch, J. P. (1985). A pilot study of fuzzy set modification of Delphi. Human Systems Management, 5(1), 76-80.
    [50] Rangel-Buitrago, N., Neal, W. J., & de Jonge, V. N. (2020). Risk assessment as tool for coastal erosion management. Ocean & Coastal Management, 186, 105099.
    [51] Saaty, T. L. (2003). Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary. European journal of operational research, 145(1), 85-91.
    [52] Short, A. D. (2006). Australian beach systems—nature and distribution. Journal of Coastal Research, 22(1), 11-27.
    [53] Short, A. D., & Hogan, C. L. (1994). Rip currents and beach hazards: their impact on public safety and implications for coastal management. Journal of Coastal Research, 197-209.
    [54] Suarez, P., & Linnerooth-Bayer, J. (2011). Insurance-related instruments for disaster risk reduction (2011 Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction).
    [55] Unies, N. (1980). Natural disasters and vulnerability analysis: report of expert group meeting, 9-12 July 1979. UNDRO.
    [56] UNISDR, T. (2004). Basic terms of disaster risk reduction. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR), Geneva.
    [57] Wang, G., Liu, Y., Wang, H., & Wang, X. (2014). A comprehensive risk analysis of coastal zones in China. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 140, 22-31.
    [58] World Health Organization. (2014). Global report on drowning: preventing a leading killer.
    [59] Yang, B., Lee, J., Hwang, J. S., Kweon, H. M., & Lee, J. L. (2014). Quantitative risk assessment for beach drowning management. Journal of Coastal Research, (72 (10072)), 117-121.
    [60] Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Information and control. Fuzzy sets, 8(3), 338-353.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE