| 研究生: |
李建暐 Li, Jian-Wei |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
以合成噴流致動器提升低雷諾數機翼之性能與飛行測試 Experimental Investigation and Flight Test of Synthetic Jet Actuator for Application in Enhancing the Aerodynamic Performance of Wings at Low Reynolds Numbers |
| 指導教授: |
蕭飛賓
Hsiao, Fei-Bin |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 航空太空工程學系 Department of Aeronautics & Astronautics |
| 論文出版年: | 2013 |
| 畢業學年度: | 101 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 100 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 合成噴流致動器 、低雷諾數 、無人飛行載具 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Synthetic Jet Actuator, Low Reynolds Number Aerodynamics, Small UAV |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:117 下載:6 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本論文主要在利用合成噴流致動器提升機翼在過度區間氣動力之性能。首先使用熱線測速儀量測合成噴流致動器在不同激擾頻率下所產生的出口速度,對基本的合成噴流致動器有基礎的瞭解。在共振頻率下,量測到的出口速度會相對大於在其他頻率下所產生的出口速度。接著將10個合成噴流致動器裝置在機翼上表面10%弦長的距離,並使用六分力平衡儀量得致動器在不同頻率下開起及關閉時的升力及阻力變化。分析升、阻力變化對於不同激擾頻率的效果。激擾頻率為200Hz下對低攻角所產生的升力變化最有效果。激擾頻率在300到500Hz區間對於高攻角產生的升力變化較有效果。
在風洞實驗驗證致動器的效果後,改裝黑面琵鷺-100無人飛機的左翼,裝置20個致動器在機翼上表面進行實際飛行測試。飛測結果顯示,在500Hz的激擾頻率下,左翼的升力增加,對無人飛機產生一個向右滾轉的力矩並耦合產生向右偏航的力矩。歸納風洞實驗與飛測的有效激擾頻率,都相當接近於機翼表面的剪切層擾動的基礎頻率。
This thesis experimentally studies the application of synthetic jet actuator (SJA) made of piezoelectric (PZ) material in enhancing the aerodynamic performance at low Reynolds numbers. First of all, the fundamental properties of the SJA are investigated by the hot-wire anemometer used to measure the exit velocities of the SJA with different excitation frequency on the PZ material. At the resonance frequency, the exit velocity of the SJA is highest than others. Next, the wind tunnel experiment is conducted to measure the force acting on the wind tunnel model of the NACA 633-018 with the SJA excitation at on and off conditions. To analyze the lift and drag difference with different excitation frequency, 200Hz excitation case is more effective at the low angle of attack and for 300Hz~500Hz excitation case is suitable the high angle of attack.
Finally, for active flow control application of the synthetic jet actuator is realized in the Spoonbill-100 UAV flight test. There are twenty pieces of actuators installed on the left side of the main wing. The flight test results indicate that the excitation frequency at 500Hz is the only effective frequency to enhance the lift. Therefore, the extra lift will generate the roll moment coupled with the yaw moment in real flight test. In comparison with the wind tunnel experiment and flight test, the effective excitation frequencies are very close to the fundamental frequency of the shear layer disturbances of the wing tested.
[1] J. Kiddy, P. Chen, and J. Niemczuk, “Active flow control using microelectro mechanical systems, 41st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference and Exhibit, AIAA-2000-1561, Atlanta, USA, 2000.
[2] “UIUC Airfoil Data Site,” http://www.ae.illinois.edu/m-selig/ads.html, 2010
[3] Althaus, D., “Recent Wind Tunnel Experiments at Low Reynolds Numbers,” Proceeding of the Conference on Aerodynamics at Low Reynolds Numbers, The Royal Aeronautic Society, Vol. 2, Paper 18, 15th-18th Oct. 1986.
[4] Teng, Y., “Aerodynamic Transition and Velocity Field Study of a Finite Wing in Low Reynolds Numbers”, Master Thesis, National Cheng Kung University, 2011.
[5] Lin, C.Y., and Hsiao, F.B., “Experimental Studies of Flow Separation over NACA633018 Wing with Synthetic Jet Control at Low Reynolds Numbers,” Journal of Mechanics, Vol. 29, pp.45-52, 2013
[6] Bendat, J. S., “Random Data Analysis and Measurement Procedures,” John Wiley &Sons, third edition, 2000.
[7] Chang, R.C., Hsiao, F.B. and Shyu, R.N., “Forcing Level Effects of Internal Acoustic Excitation on the Improvement of Airfoil Performance,” J. of Aircraft, Vol. 29, No. 5, Sep.-Oct. 1992, pp.823-829, 1992.
[8] Carmichael, B. H., “Low Reynolds Number Airfoil Number Survey,” NASA Contractor Report 165803, Vol. 1, November 1981.
[9] Jorgensen, F. E., “How to measure turbulence with hot-wire anemometers – a practical guide,” DANTEC DYNAMICS, 2002.
[10] Barlow, J.B., William, H.R. and Pope, A., “Low-speed Wind Tunnel Testing”, 3rded.New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1999.
[11] Chiang, B. H., “Experimental Study of Aerodynamic Transition on Roughness Wing at Low Reynolds Numbers,” the Thesis of Master Degree, National Chung Kung University, July 2010.
[12] Grundy, T. M., Keefe, G. P. and Lowson, M. V., “Effects of Acoustic Disturbances on Low Re Airfoil Flows,” Fixed and Flapping Wing Aerodynamics for Micro Air Vehicle Applications, AIAA, Inc, 2001, pp. 91-113.
[13] Harvey, W. D., “Low Reynolds Number Aerodynamic Research at NASA Langley Research Center,” The Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol. 2, Paper 19, October 1986.
[14] Horton, H. P., “A Semi-Empirical Theory for the Growth and Bursting of Laminar Separation Bubbles,” Aeronautical Research Council Current Papers, CP 1073, University of London, 1967.
[15] Hsiao, F. B., Chang, C. Y., Hsu, C. C. and Wang, D. B., “Experimental Study of Aerodynamic Performance for Finite Wing at Low Reynolds Numbers,” Journal of Chinese Society of Mechanical Engineers, Vol. 23, No. 6, 2002, pp. 517−524, 2002.
[16]Lin, J.C., “Review of research on low-profile vortex generators to control boundary-layer separation,” Progress in Aerospace Science, vol. 38, 2002, pp. 389-420, 2002
[17] Ahuja, K.K., Burrin, R.H., “Control of flow separation by sound,” AIAA Paper, 84–2298, 1984.
[18] Huang, L.S., Maestrello, L., Bryant, T.D., “Separation controlover an airfoil at high angles of attack by sound emanating from the surface,” AIAA Paper 87-1261, 1987.
[19] Hsiao, F.B., Liu, C.F. and Shyu, J.Y., “Control of Wall-Separated Flow by Internal Acoustic Excitation,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 28, No. 8, Aug. 1990, pp. 1440-1446, 1990.
[20] Jones, B. M., “An Experimental Study of the Stalling of Wings,” NACA Reports and Memoranda No. 1588, December 1933.
[21] Hsiao, F.B., Shyu, R.N. and Chang, R.C., “High-AOAAirfoil Stalling Performance Improvement by Internal Acoustic Excitation,” AIAA J., Vol. 32, No. 3, March 1994, pp. 655-657, 1994.
[22] Hsiao, F.B., Jih, J.J. and Shyu, R.N., “The Effect of Acoustics on Flow Passing a High-AOA Airfoil,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 199, No. 2, pp. 177-188, 1997.
[23] McMaster, J. H. and Henderson, M. L., “Low Speed Single Element Airfoil Synthesis,” Tech Soaring, Vol. 2, No.2, 1980, pp. 1−21.
[24] Mueller, T. J., “The Influence of Laminar Separation and Transition on Low Reynolds Number Airfoil Hysteresis,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 22, No. 9, pp. 763-770, September 1985.
[25] Pack L. G. and Seifert, A., “Periodic Excitation for Jet Vectoring and Enhanced Spreading,” Journal of Aircraft, vol.38, no. 3, pp.486-495, 2001.
[26] Smith, B. L, and Glezer, A., “Jet Vectoring using Synthetic Jets,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 458, pp.1-34, 2002.
[27] Jeon, J., Choi, J., Jeon,W. P., Choi, H., and Park, J., “Active Control of Flow over a Sphere for Drag Reduction at a Subcritical Reynolds Number,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 517, pp.113-129, 2004.
[28] Lee, C., Hong, G., Ha, Q. P., and Mallinson, S. G., “A Piezoelectrically Actuated Micro Synthetic Jet for Active Flow Control,” Sensors and Actuators: A, vol. 108, pp. 168-174, 2003.
[29] Hong, G., “Effectiveness of Micro Synthetic Jet Actuator Enhanced by Flow Instability in Controlling Laminar Separation Caused by Adverse Pressure Gradient,” Sensors and Actuators: A, vol. 132, pp.607-615, 2006.
[30] Wang, T., Gaddis, J. L., and Li, X., “Mist/steam heat transfer of multiple rows of impinging jets,” International Journal Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 48, pp.5179-5191, 2005.
[31] McCormick, B. W., “Aerodynamics, Aeronautics, and Flight Mechanics,” John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1979.
[32] Yarusevych, S., Sullivan, P. E. and Kawall, J. G., “On vortex shedding from an airfoil in low-Reynolds-flows,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 632, 2009, pp. 245-271, 2009.
[33] Ding, Y. R., “Development and flight test of autonomous formation flight capability for small UAV system,” Ph.D Thesis, National Cheng Kung University, 2012.